academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
academica of cicero. - 912 Freedom Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Project Gutenberg eBook <strong>of</strong> ...<br />
account be led into a mistake for our rule will prevent us from making any positive assertion<br />
about the eggs." Adsentiri: for the passive use <strong>of</strong> this verb cf. 39. Par est: so Dav. for per, which<br />
most MSS. have. The older edd. and Orelli have potest, with one MS. Quasi: the em. <strong>of</strong> Madv.<br />
for the quam si <strong>of</strong> the MSS. Transversum digitum: cf. 116. Ne confundam omnia: cf. 53, 110.<br />
Natura tolletur: this <strong>of</strong> course the sceptics would deny. They refused to discuss the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
things in themselves, and kept to phenomena. Intersit: i.e. inter visa. In animos: Orelli with one<br />
MS. reads animis; if the MSS. are correct the assertion <strong>of</strong> Krebs and Allgayer (Antibarbarus, ed.<br />
4) "imprimere wird klas sisch verbunden in aliqua re, nicht in aliquam rem," will require<br />
modification. Species et quasdam formas: e?d? ?a? ?e??, quasdam marks the fact that formas is<br />
a trans. I have met with no other passage where any such doctrine is assigned to a sceptic. As it<br />
stands in the text the doctrine is absurd, for surely it must always be easier to distinguish between<br />
two genera than between two individuals. If the non before vos were removed a better sense<br />
would be given. It has <strong>of</strong>ten been inserted by copyists when sed, tamen, or some such word,<br />
comes in the following clause, as in the famous passage <strong>of</strong> Cic Ad Quintum Fratrem, II. 11,<br />
discussed by Munro, Lucr. p. 313, ed. 3.<br />
§59. Illud vero perabsurdum: note the omission <strong>of</strong> est, which <strong>of</strong>ten takes place after the emphatic<br />
pronoun. Impediamini: cf. n. on 33. A veris: if visis be supplied the statement corresponds<br />
tolerably with the Academic belief, if rebus be meant, it is wide <strong>of</strong> the mark. Id est ... retentio:<br />
supposed to be a gloss by Man., Lamb., see however nn. on I. 6, 8. Constitit: from consto, not<br />
from consisto cf. 63 qui tibi constares. Si vera sunt: cf. 67, 78, 112, 148. The nonnulli are Philo<br />
and Metrodorus, see 78. Tollendus est adsensus: i.e. even that qualified assent which the<br />
Academics gave to probable phenomena. Adprobare: this word is ambiguous, meaning either<br />
qualified or unqualified assent. Cf. n. on 104. Id est peccaturum: "which is equivalent to sinning,"<br />
cf. I. 42. Iam nimium etiam: note iam and etiam in the same clause.<br />
§60. Pro omnibus: note omnibus for omnibus rebus. Ista mysteria: Aug. Contra Ac. III. 37, 38<br />
speaks <strong>of</strong> various doctrines, which were servata et pro mysteriis custodita by the New<br />
Academics. The notion that the Academic scepticism was merely external and polemically used,<br />
while they had an esoteric dogmatic doctrine, must have originated in the reactionary period <strong>of</strong><br />
Metrodorus (<strong>of</strong> Stratonice), Philo, and Antiochus, and may perhaps from a passage <strong>of</strong> Augustine,<br />
C. Ac. III. 41 (whose authority must have been Cicero), be attributed to the first <strong>of</strong> the three (cf.<br />
Zeller 534, n.). The idea is ridiculed by Petrus Valentia (Orelli's reprint, p. 279), and all<br />
succeeding inquirers. Auctoritate: cf. 8, 9. Utroque: this neuter, referring to two fem. nouns, is<br />
noticeable, see exx. in Madv. Gram. 214 c.<br />
§61. Amicissimum: "because you are my dear friend". Commoveris: a military term, cf. De Div.<br />
II. 26 and Forc., also Introd. p. 53. Sequere: either this is future, as in 109, or sequeris, the<br />
constant form in Cic. <strong>of</strong> the pres., must be read. Approbatione omni: the word omni is emphatic,<br />
and includes both qualified and unqualified assent, cf. 59. Orbat sensibus: cf. 74, and D.F. I. 64,<br />
where Madv. is wrong in reproving Torquatus for using the phrase sensus tolli, on the ground that<br />
the Academics swept away not sensus but iudicium sensuum Cimmeriis. Goer. qu. Plin. N.H. III.<br />
5, Sil. Ital. XII. 131, Festus, s.v. Cimmerii, to show that the town or village <strong>of</strong> Cimmerium lay<br />
close to Bauli, and probably induced this mention <strong>of</strong> the legendary people. Deus aliquis: so the<br />
best edd. without comment, although they write deus aliqui in 19. It is difficult to distinguish<br />
between aliquis and aliqui, nescio quis and nescio qui, si quis and si qui (for the latter see n. on<br />
81). As aliquis is substantival, aliqui adjectival, aliquis must not be written with impersonal<br />
nouns like terror (T.D. IV. 35, V. 62), dolor (T.D. I. 82, Ad Fam. VII. 1, 1), casus (De Off. III. 33).<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> personal nouns the best edd. vary, e.g. deus aliqui (T.D. I. 23, IV. 35), deus aliquis<br />
(Lael. 87, Ad Fam. XIV. 7, 1), anularius aliqui (86 <strong>of</strong> this book), magistratus aliquis (In Verr. IV.<br />
146). With a proper name belonging to a real person aliquis ought to be written (Myrmecides in<br />
120, see my n.). Dispiciendum: not despiciendum, cf. M.D.F. II. 97, IV. 64, also De Div. II. 81,<br />
verum dispicere. Iis vinculis, etc. this may throw light on fragm. 15 <strong>of</strong> the Acad. Post., which see.<br />
§62. Motum animorum: n. on 34. Actio rerum: here actio is a pure verbal noun like p?a???, cf.<br />
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14970/14970-h/14970-h.htm[1/5/2010 10:31:57 AM]