MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vol. 18, 4/2010 MoraVian geographical reports<br />
grassland and 297 ha orchards. About 42% <strong>of</strong> the land<br />
is designated as a protected area. A part <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
is designated as a Protected Landscape Area (Ždárské<br />
vrchy Hills); a part <strong>of</strong> the area is designated as<br />
a drinking water protected zone (Vír reservoir dam).<br />
Soils in the case study area are heterogeneous. Three<br />
main soil types were found in the catchments (Source:<br />
Soil map <strong>of</strong> the Czech Republic, characterization<br />
according to FAO Soil Classification). The first one,<br />
which covers about 54% can be mostly found on slopes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the catchment area and is classified as Dystric<br />
Cambisol with sandy loam and loamy sand topsoil<br />
(Fig. 3). The bedrock is weathered and fractured.<br />
The second and the third soil types are classified<br />
as Eutric Cambisol and Dystric Planosol and cover<br />
approximately 13% and 8% <strong>of</strong> the case study area,<br />
respectively. The prevailing parent rock consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> weathered paragneiss and erosion products,<br />
phyllites, shales, greywackes, granites and their<br />
erosion products.<br />
Main threats to soil in the case study area are<br />
represented by soil erosion caused by water, soil<br />
compaction, loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter and to a limited<br />
extent also by diffuse soil contamination.<br />
Data on soil and farming practices were collected from<br />
the questionnaires by a soil protection expert and<br />
tabulated as output. Farmers in the case study region<br />
were interviewed (semi-structured interviews) as to<br />
adopted policies and farming practices. Interviews<br />
were conducted also by soil conservation expert.<br />
Farms were visited and all interviews were performed<br />
face-to-face.<br />
Soil degradation<br />
problem<br />
In the following, the outline <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire and<br />
the questions contained are described. The survey<br />
consisted <strong>of</strong> the following parts:<br />
• General part (contact information),<br />
• Related soil characteristics and farming practices,<br />
• Assessment <strong>of</strong> soil conservation measures and<br />
farming practices in dependence on crop products,<br />
• Effects <strong>of</strong> soil conservation measures on the soil<br />
threats.<br />
3. Results and discussion<br />
The main soil degradation problem (Tab. 1) in the<br />
case study area is water soil erosion due to large plots<br />
predominantly used as arable land, hilly landscape or<br />
steep slopes in highlands; intensive farming practices,<br />
and frequent extreme hydrological events. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
soil lost by erosion comes from the cropland.<br />
Soil compaction occurs due to intensive conventional<br />
farming on arable land (using heavy machinery)<br />
especially in the lower part <strong>of</strong> the case study area<br />
(around Brno City – farms 7 and 8). The loss <strong>of</strong> soil<br />
organic matter results from the continual soil erosion<br />
process. Main causes <strong>of</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter<br />
are conventional farming practices without applying<br />
manure and other organic matter. It is also linked<br />
with the decreasing water retention capacity <strong>of</strong> soils,<br />
which in turn is caused by compaction and land<br />
conversion. The loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter leads to the<br />
decreasing natural crop productivity <strong>of</strong> soils and to<br />
decreases yields.<br />
Farmers’ perception <strong>of</strong> the severity <strong>of</strong> soil degradation<br />
problems in their area is presented in Tab. 1. There was<br />
no difference between the opinion <strong>of</strong> farmers about the<br />
Severity on the farms<br />
farm 1 farm 2 farm 3 farm 4 farm 5 farm 6 farm 7 farm 8<br />
Soil erosion (water) 3 3 2 3 3 2 4 4<br />
Soil erosion (wind) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> organic matter 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3<br />
Carbon balance 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3<br />
Diffuse contamination 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 3<br />
Compaction 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 3<br />
Acidification 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2<br />
Retention capacity 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 4<br />
Off-site damages 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 4<br />
Tab. 1: Estimation <strong>of</strong> the severity <strong>of</strong> soil degradation problems on various farms<br />
Source: own assessment, interviews<br />
Note: The numbers indicate the severity <strong>of</strong> soil degradation problems at farms examined by means <strong>of</strong> questionnaire 2 with<br />
the classification ranging from 5 (severe) to 0 (no problem). The rating was made through interviewing different farms.<br />
5