MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
MORAVIAN GEOGRAPHICAL REPORTS - Institute of Geonics ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Vol. 18, 4/2010 MoraVian geographical reports<br />
Fig. 9: Stable plots (1782 – 2003)<br />
SW. These areas represent the best preserved forest<br />
ecosystems, which belong to the Slovak Paradise<br />
National Park (SW) and the Volovske vrchy Hills<br />
(SE). The basin’s bottom was mainly used as arable<br />
land in the studied period. The total unchanged land<br />
use area (mostly forest and arable land) covers 33% <strong>of</strong><br />
the territory (Tab. 2). Due to the low spatial accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> historical maps (1782 and 1822), the results<br />
might be biased (for example, grasslands' areas were<br />
considerably overestimated in 1782).<br />
4.3 Absolute land use change intensity<br />
Table 3 shows a total sum <strong>of</strong> changes, which have<br />
occurred in the territory, their area and percentage.<br />
The largest area belongs to unchanged land use forms,<br />
followed by the areas with lesser intensity changes<br />
(1 – 2 or 3 – 4). Fig. 10 (see cover p. 3) documents the<br />
areas that experienced the most intense changes,<br />
which are located at the perimeter <strong>of</strong> the basin,<br />
mostly in the N and NW sections. They are obvious<br />
in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Levoča. These areas mostly refer to<br />
the shift between arable land and forest. Areas with<br />
a smaller total sum <strong>of</strong> land use changes are located in<br />
the middle <strong>of</strong> the basin where arable land has changed<br />
to grassland. Exceptions to these trends are localities<br />
between Spišská Nová Ves and Levoča and in the<br />
southeast <strong>of</strong> the village <strong>of</strong> Spišský Štvrtok, which lay<br />
on a hilly landscape where the change was between<br />
forest, grassland and arable land.<br />
4.4 Relative intensity <strong>of</strong> land use change<br />
Table 4 presents trends <strong>of</strong> the land use change and<br />
its percentage. The largest part <strong>of</strong> the studied region<br />
(67.1%) has experienced either no change or its land<br />
use has returned to the original form during the studied<br />
period. In the changed areas, extensification (18.2%)<br />
slightly prevails over intensification (14.7%). The most<br />
preserved or returned areas are located in the SE and<br />
Land-use forms built-up area Grassland Arable land Forest SUM Ratio [%]<br />
Area in [ha] 178.70 43.40 10,528.71 7,835.34 18,586.15 33.3<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> polygons 30 63 731 295 1,119<br />
Area <strong>of</strong> the largest [ha] 67.24 5.61 1,067.83 2,573.47<br />
Tab. 2: Stable land use forms areas in 1782 – 2003<br />
17