07.01.2013 Views

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> – <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 300 ENV R CS 002 C - A9003099<br />

• Undesirable effect of the project; <strong>and</strong><br />

• Measures for mitigating the adverse effects.<br />

The points raised in the discussion are depicted below.<br />

Benefit:<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing about the benefit that the project would provide to the community is not more than skin-deep<br />

although they are well aware of its disadvantages.<br />

Disadvantages:<br />

• As the reservoir is going to claim vast tracts of l<strong>and</strong>, the community not only loses farm l<strong>and</strong>, but<br />

also it will have very limited access to forest resources like wood for house constructions <strong>and</strong> grass<br />

for thatch roofs; including energy sources;<br />

• Beekeeping will be impeded by the decimation of forests <strong>and</strong> resulting in the loss of income to the<br />

households;<br />

• Loss of grazing l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> browsing areas for domestic animals will take place; as well as the loss of<br />

l<strong>and</strong> with salty soils, locally known as bole, where livestock very much prefer licking; <strong>and</strong><br />

• It will be no more possible to harvest root crops that are found naturally <strong>and</strong> vital sources of food in<br />

times of drought <strong>and</strong> distress.<br />

Measures for offsetting the losses:<br />

• FGD participants finally appealed to appropriate Government units to have exhaustively identify all<br />

those farmers who are going to be displaced <strong>and</strong> then compensate them with a means that<br />

commensurate their losses.<br />

Place/Venue of the FG: In the Compound of Kebele Office Date: 10/03/08<br />

Wereda: Soro FGD composition: Small scale livestock producers<br />

Kebele Gebaba Lange, Bureye Lange <strong>and</strong><br />

Ombo Lange<br />

Number of participants: 28<br />

The FGDs were composed of farmers who predominantly engage in livestock <strong>and</strong> topics of discussions have<br />

mainly revolved around three key areas.<br />

• The benefit they believe that would result from the project;<br />

• Adverse effects due to the project <strong>and</strong>;<br />

• Solutions to be considered by the government.<br />

Outcomes of the discussions are summarised below.<br />

Expected benefit of the project:<br />

• The FGD participants believe that the project is of immense benefit to the country as well as to the<br />

local communities.<br />

Adverse effect of the project:<br />

• Usually livestock producers are constrained by shortages of grazing l<strong>and</strong>. In the face of such<br />

situation, for about nine months, they leave for other places hankering after grazing l<strong>and</strong>s. They<br />

often travel to various weredas across vast expanse of l<strong>and</strong> to the extent of crossing <strong>Gibe</strong> River to the<br />

CESI SpA - Mid-Day International Consulting Engineers Page 309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!