07.01.2013 Views

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> – <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 300 ENV R CS 002 C - A9003099<br />

8.7.2 Consultation with Zonal <strong>and</strong> Wereda Authorities<br />

Consultation was conducted with the Dawro zone council, Gena Bossa <strong>and</strong> Loma wereda of the Dawro zone<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kindo Koyisha wereda of the Wolayita zone administration council on the issues related to the impacts<br />

of the project on the historic walls.<br />

Local officials expressed their fear regarding the flooding of the walls. However, after consultation <strong>and</strong> a<br />

joint field visit to some of these sites it was confirmed that only a relatively small portion of the wall will be<br />

flooded.<br />

Therefore, from the consultation process the following were proposed:<br />

• Both Ijajo kella of Wolayita <strong>and</strong> the Halala Kella of Dawro should be registered immediately as<br />

cultural heritage;<br />

• Full documentation works should be carried out on the very high-risk sites before the sites will be<br />

flooded;<br />

• Further information should be collected <strong>and</strong> detailed study should be conducted to enrich the<br />

information regarding the impact of the project on both historical walls;<br />

• For those portions of the wall which will not be submerged by the reservoir, the administration of<br />

Dawro <strong>and</strong> Wolayita Zone <strong>and</strong> its responsible offices should protect the wall of Halala <strong>and</strong> Jiao from<br />

manmade <strong>and</strong> natural hazards (animal, human <strong>and</strong> developmental).<br />

8.8 Consultation with NGOs <strong>and</strong> Other Organisations<br />

Currently Farm Africa, Ethiopian Pastoralist Area Research <strong>and</strong> Development Association (EPARDA),<br />

Catholic Church <strong>and</strong> Refuge Trust are those Non Governmental Organization’s which are actively involved<br />

in the social <strong>and</strong> development activities within the community in the Lower Omo area.<br />

These organizations are engaged in the activities of various socio-economic development sectors like the<br />

health, education, water supply, livestock disease, conflict resolution, food security, natural resource <strong>and</strong><br />

agriculture.<br />

According to them, the implementation of <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> project will have an impact for the community residing<br />

along the lower Omo River on crop production, fish <strong>and</strong> livestock grazing. Therefore, development of small<br />

scale irrigation, forage development, demonstration plots for crop <strong>and</strong> forage, <strong>and</strong> fish marketing are some of<br />

the activities that will mitigate these impacts. During implementation of these measures, adopting such<br />

activities which are currently practiced by other organization has a paramount importance <strong>and</strong> helps to<br />

implement the interventions effectively.<br />

8.9 Public Disclosure<br />

It should be emphasized from the out set that the <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> hydroelectric project involves a multitude of<br />

stakeholders ranging from project affected persons <strong>and</strong> communities to the project developer, regional <strong>and</strong><br />

federal governments through to financiers, environmentalists NGOs, etc. Needless to argue that<br />

infrastructure projects such as <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> usually attract the attention of various stakeholders <strong>and</strong> hence are<br />

often prone to criticism. This is especially true in today’s highly globalized world. It is not the type <strong>and</strong> the<br />

number of criticisms made to an infrastructure project that is important. Rather, more important is the way<br />

how such criticisms, both constructive or otherwise, are h<strong>and</strong>led or entertained <strong>and</strong> taken care of.<br />

CESI SpA - Mid-Day International Consulting Engineers Page 254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!