Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> – <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 300 ENV R CS 002 C - A9003099<br />
stream) locations of the river for the animals that move, provided a satisfactory protection is made by the<br />
regional government or the project. These sites can be a sanctuary for the animals that tend to occupy<br />
them.<br />
2) Although minor, it is inevitable that the flooding will disturb <strong>and</strong> deprive the few wildlife inhabiting the<br />
area <strong>and</strong> their existing habitat <strong>and</strong> they will be pushed to the proposed buffer area. Hence, animals<br />
(especially the browsing animals) search for a new suitable habitat for feed source, shelter, breeding, egg<br />
laying <strong>and</strong> hatching sites. This may make the wildlife vulnerable to poachers, when they leave their usual<br />
dwelling <strong>and</strong> hiding sites.<br />
3) Not all the valley l<strong>and</strong> is topographically uniform; therefore the inundation at some sites may also cause<br />
fragmentation of habitat <strong>and</strong> disrupt the movement of some animals.<br />
4) It is mentioned already that the steep cliffs of the gorge <strong>and</strong> the riverine forest along the river are<br />
important for several groups of birds such as herons <strong>and</strong> egrets, king fishers, barbets, chats <strong>and</strong> thrushes,<br />
wood peckers, pigeons, shrikes, warblers <strong>and</strong> flycatchers, etc. As the reservoir level increases some of<br />
their existing habitats will be flooded. However, because of the availability of wide areas in the River<br />
Basin (upstream <strong>and</strong> downstream of this project site) in which these birds are found, it is unlikely that<br />
the project will significantly affect the survivorship <strong>and</strong> well-being of these species.<br />
5) As reported by settlers at Soro wereda specifically at Gortancho <strong>and</strong> Asawincho kebeles there were lions<br />
which have been turned to man-eating which extensive search have been made by experts from the<br />
Department of wildlife of ministry of Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Rural Development. Although the experts have<br />
found none, they speculated the existence of four such lions. This was later found to be true, <strong>and</strong> as a<br />
protection measure it was possible to hunt two of the lion legally (Kahsay <strong>and</strong> Chere 2007). Furthermore<br />
these authors have indicated that hunting was permitted only to get rid of these lions otherwise no<br />
hunting is allowed in the area.<br />
Although the local communities from the kebeles located close to the reservoir have expressed their concern<br />
that the incidents of wild animals’ attack on humans <strong>and</strong> domestic animals may increase due to flooding their<br />
habitat there is no risk to human <strong>and</strong> wildlife conflict in the area. This is because during the survey it was<br />
observed that due to a very high risk of malaria <strong>and</strong> trypanosomiasis humans <strong>and</strong> livestock do not inhabit the<br />
area close to the future reservoir. However, a wildlife emergency response team has been proposed to deal<br />
with any such unforeseen risks.<br />
The following mitigation measures are recommended to offset these adverse impacts posed by the project:<br />
• Establish Buffer Zone: During our survey we were able to observe that because of the risk of<br />
Malaria <strong>and</strong> Trypanosomiasis humans <strong>and</strong> livestock do not inhabit most of the hill-slope of terraces<br />
<strong>III</strong> <strong>and</strong> IV (altitude below 1,300 m a.s.l). Therefore, it is recommended to establish a buffer zone on<br />
an estimated 50,000 ha of l<strong>and</strong> in the area between altitudes 900 <strong>and</strong> 1,100 m a.s.l (See Figure 7.1)<br />
<strong>and</strong> EEPCO to initiate a discussion with the Regional Governments to secure a protection zone status<br />
to the buffer zone. The buffer area will serve as a refuge for the wildlife to move to the area<br />
downstream or upstream of the reservoir. It will also support the bio-diversity conservation <strong>and</strong><br />
enhance the biological value of the area. Given time there will be the reestablishment of the riparian<br />
zone on the edges of the reservoir from the woodl<strong>and</strong> vegetation at the initial stage since the species<br />
composition of the woodl<strong>and</strong> vegetation <strong>and</strong> riparian vegetation are more or less similar except<br />
differences in size. As the reservoir water level increases relatively slowly, wildlife (animals) that<br />
will be affected will have time to adapt themselves to the new habitat <strong>and</strong> move to the dry place.<br />
CESI SpA - Mid-Day International Consulting Engineers Page 205