07.01.2013 Views

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> – <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 300 ENV R CS 002 C - A9003099<br />

Conclusions<br />

Main results of the hydrological elaborations are summarized here below:<br />

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> Dam Site<br />

Peak<br />

Discharge<br />

Time of Peak TP Total Runoff Volume<br />

[m 3 /s] [hr] [Mm 3 ]<br />

10000yr 10606 240 12193<br />

PMF 18661 240 19741<br />

The whole flood events lasts about 30 days with a lag time of about 4 days.<br />

Comparison of the results with other studies confirms the consistency of the estimates.<br />

Table 5.27 illustrates the comparison with the results of preceding extreme flood studies for basins within the<br />

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> catchment, achieved adopting the same procedure illustrated in this report.<br />

10000yr<br />

PMF<br />

Dam/River Site +<br />

Reference<br />

Table 5.27: Comparison with Other Hydrologic Studies<br />

Catchment<br />

Area [km 2 ]<br />

Peak<br />

Discharge<br />

[m 3 /s]<br />

Specific Peak<br />

[m 3 /s/ km 2 ]<br />

Gojeb Shebe [12] 3614 1770 0.490 3.80<br />

Gojeb OM19 [12] 5136 2250 0.438 3.83<br />

Halele [15] 6126 2420 0.395 3.79<br />

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> 34159 10606 0.310 4.30<br />

Gojeb Shebe [12] 3614 2050 0.567 3.95<br />

GojebOM19[12] 5136 2590 0.504 3.97<br />

Halele [15] 6126 5760 0.940 4.68<br />

<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> 34159 18661 0.546 5.01<br />

Francou-<br />

Rodier’s<br />

Coefficient [-]<br />

The highest values of the Francou-Rodier’s coefficient 17 at <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> dam site prove the precautionary<br />

approach of the analysis.<br />

It’s easy to notice in the table above that specific peak values for the 10000 yr analysis well follow a<br />

decreasing trend as the catchment extension increases.<br />

On the contrary, Gojeb PMF data seem to reject this tendency. The PMF peak for OM19 assessed in the<br />

present study equals 3486 m3/s being about one third higher of the value in Table 5.27.<br />

This discrepancy in the PMF calculation does not surprise if three factors are considered:<br />

1. the adoption in the Gojeb Study of a constant ARF of 0.54 inevitably involves an underestimate of<br />

the areal PMP for longer storm duration such as 15 days (critical duration for <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> Basin);<br />

2. a larger record including more intense precipitation was made available for the latest studies (Halele<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong>);<br />

17<br />

Francou J., Rodier J. A., “Essai de classification des crues maximales observees dans le monde”, Cah. ORSTOM, ser.<br />

Hydrol., vol. IV, n. 3, 1967<br />

CESI SpA - Mid-Day International Consulting Engineers Page 119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!