Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment - Gibe III
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> – <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> 300 ENV R CS 002 C - A9003099<br />
The absorption areas at dam axis are identified by means of a blue colour range scale; colour grey has been<br />
used where no absorption has been recorded. Representative Lugeon units at the stage are added for each<br />
step or sequence with same value. The absorption areas at the dam axis are classified into two main zones. A<br />
first upper one located immediately below the Omo river rising through the left abutment. A lower second<br />
one lies below 450m a.s.l. Both of them, detected with the same shape upstream or downstream, show a high<br />
water absorption. It can be concluded that the permeability of the sound bedrock behaving as dam<br />
foundation, below an upper layer with a low/moderate absorption, is practically nil.<br />
The Confined Aquifer<br />
During the geognostic campaign at dam site, a confined artesian aquifer has been reached between 90 <strong>and</strong><br />
110 m below the riverbed, whose elevation is 678 m a.s.l. Following the course of the Omo river from<br />
upstream, the roof of the aquifer seems slightly rising, from the pre-cofferdam site (576m a.s.l.) to<br />
downstream reaching the dam toe between 585 <strong>and</strong> 598m a.s.l. The aquifer still lowers before the dam axis<br />
dropping down between 541 <strong>and</strong> 544m a.s.l. Downstream of the dam axis the level of the aquifer rises again<br />
reaching 565m a.s.l. The measured water discharges in the boreholes are very modest giving no evidence of<br />
relevant groundwater circulation, if compared to the Omo river flows.<br />
5.1.5.3 Reservoir Seepage risk assessment<br />
Further to document [300 GEO R SP 002 A - Reservoir Seepage Risk Analysis]:<br />
• no receptive basins at an altitude lower than the reservoir bottom have been located within a distance<br />
of at least 100 Km from the reservoir itself; elevations below 670 m a.s.l. are recorded only<br />
downstream of the dam. The Main Ethiopian Rift east of the <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> reservoir lies at elevations<br />
higher than the reservoir as well. Therefore, seepage from the <strong>Gibe</strong> <strong>III</strong> reservoir towards nearby<br />
catchments can be excluded.<br />
• the structural lineament study led to recognize two main lineament sets directed N20°E (parallel to<br />
the MER) <strong>and</strong> N120°E, <strong>and</strong> subordinate ones with directions N50°E, N70°E, N135°E, N160°E, N-S<br />
<strong>and</strong> E-W. Single lineaments have a length in the order of 1.000 to 4.000 m, whereas major composite<br />
structures have an observable persistence in the order of 30-40 Km. The structural pattern observed<br />
in the study area (no large scale interconnection) allows to exclude the risk that significant<br />
infiltration of water from the reservoir may occur along fault zones. A preferential filtration direction<br />
can be inferred parallel to the N20°E set, i.e. to the main river course, further limiting the possibility<br />
of consistent water loss away from the reservoir area.<br />
• the supposed seepage from the reservoir towards the banks (saturation of the banks) doesn’t<br />
influence negatively the filling time being the filtered volume as much as 11% of the total reservoir<br />
volume. The filling time of the reservoir ranges between 12 <strong>and</strong> 16 months, i.e. 1 to 2 months longer<br />
than the result obtained without considering seepage into the banks.<br />
5.1.6 Soils<br />
The alteration of the geologic basement in the area has led to the appearance of different types of soils, that<br />
can be classified in the following groups.<br />
To a first general soil group belong Eutric Nitosols, Ortic <strong>and</strong> Chromic Luvisols <strong>and</strong> Orthic Acrisols<br />
(according to the FAO classification), all these soils have a significant clay Bt level of dark reddish brown<br />
CESI SpA - Mid-Day International Consulting Engineers Page 91