Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse
Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse
Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“Those anime students”: Foreign language <strong>literacy</strong> <strong>development</strong> through Japanese popular culture<br />
I conducted an interview study in 2003 with<br />
three anime fans, Emily, Ted, and Sean. This article<br />
looks at their multiliteracies and the sociocultural<br />
context of foreign language <strong>literacy</strong> <strong>development</strong>.<br />
Although these “anime students” were college-level<br />
J<strong>FL</strong> learners at South University (pseudonym),<br />
they mostly talked about their experiences with<br />
anime in their adolescence. Building on previous<br />
studies of anime and popular culture (<strong>Fukunaga</strong>,<br />
2000; Napier, 2001), I will discuss the findings<br />
from my data, connecting them to sociocultural<br />
perspectives of language learning (Gee, 2002) and<br />
to the studies of new literacies and multiliteracies<br />
(Collins & Blot, 2003; New London Group, 1996).<br />
<strong>Anime</strong> in the framework of<br />
multiliteracies<br />
In contrast to the singular <strong>literacy</strong>, multiliteracies<br />
and new literacies are wider concepts that include<br />
texts, language, situated meaning, technology,<br />
popular culture, power, identity, and critical<br />
stance (Collins & Blot, 2003; Gee, 1996). New<br />
forms of communication such as those spawned<br />
by the Internet have become vital information<br />
sources for U.S. anime fans (<strong>Fukunaga</strong>, 2000).<br />
However, individual students have different relationships<br />
with anime and its community. Two of<br />
Gee’s (2002) concepts are useful for understanding<br />
these theories in relation to anime: shapeshifting<br />
portfolio people and affinity groups. My<br />
interviews with J<strong>FL</strong> learners provided some examples<br />
relevant to these concepts.<br />
Shape-shifting portfolio people<br />
Gee’s (2002) concept provides a useful framework<br />
to understand anime as a product of multiliteracies.<br />
Gee described millennials, who were born between<br />
1982 and 1998, as youth who shape<br />
themselves according to “class-based customized<br />
standardization” (italics in original) to become<br />
“shape-shifting portfolio people” (Gee, pp.<br />
62–63). The word portfolio does not necessarily<br />
mean a collection of documents; rather, it is used<br />
as a metaphor for the invisible skills needed for<br />
success. Gee used the expression to describe youth<br />
who collect skills in order to access a variety of resources<br />
and to be successful in capitalist society.<br />
These youth continue to revise their portfolios<br />
with new experiences in order to make themselves<br />
available for different tasks in different times. In<br />
the New Capitalism, “the capitalism of our current<br />
technologically driven, knowledge-based<br />
global economy” (Gee, 2001, p. 100), class is defined<br />
not only by the amount of money one has<br />
but also by the nature of one’s experiences, skills,<br />
and achievements. For example, millennials “customize<br />
themselves” (Gee, 2002, p. 63) to gain entrance<br />
to elite schools.<br />
Young, Dillon, and Moje (2002) criticized<br />
Gee’s description of shape-shifting portfolio millennials<br />
for being “too generalized and too global”<br />
(p. 129). One of the examples that Young et al. described<br />
is of a middle class youth who resisted being<br />
labeled as a “successful candidate” so he did<br />
not shape-shift his portfolio. <strong>Anime</strong> students’<br />
goals are not transferable to mainstream success<br />
either. For anime students, gaining Japanese linguistic<br />
and cultural knowledge is one way to build<br />
their portfolios by exploring authentic Japanese<br />
popular culture. What happens once these anime<br />
students lose their interest in Japanese popular<br />
culture? Will they shape-shift their portfolio according<br />
to “shifting” goals? I explore these questions<br />
in later sections. While there is a need to be<br />
cautious about overgeneralization, the idea of a<br />
“shape-shifting portfolio” remains a helpful description<br />
of anime students’ <strong>literacy</strong> activities.<br />
Affinity group<br />
Knowledge of Japanese language is one way for<br />
anime fans to shape-shift their portfolios.<br />
Computer skills and access to the Internet also<br />
add to anime fans’ portfolios in the anime community.<br />
Gee’s concept of the “affinity group”<br />
(2002) is a form of portfolio building that incorporates<br />
sociocultural aspects of students’ <strong>literacy</strong><br />
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY 50:3 NOVEMBER <strong>2006</strong> 207