06.01.2013 Views

Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse

Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse

Fukunaga 2006 FL literacy development using Anime ... - Oncourse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“Those anime students”: Foreign language <strong>literacy</strong> <strong>development</strong> through Japanese popular culture<br />

I conducted an interview study in 2003 with<br />

three anime fans, Emily, Ted, and Sean. This article<br />

looks at their multiliteracies and the sociocultural<br />

context of foreign language <strong>literacy</strong> <strong>development</strong>.<br />

Although these “anime students” were college-level<br />

J<strong>FL</strong> learners at South University (pseudonym),<br />

they mostly talked about their experiences with<br />

anime in their adolescence. Building on previous<br />

studies of anime and popular culture (<strong>Fukunaga</strong>,<br />

2000; Napier, 2001), I will discuss the findings<br />

from my data, connecting them to sociocultural<br />

perspectives of language learning (Gee, 2002) and<br />

to the studies of new literacies and multiliteracies<br />

(Collins & Blot, 2003; New London Group, 1996).<br />

<strong>Anime</strong> in the framework of<br />

multiliteracies<br />

In contrast to the singular <strong>literacy</strong>, multiliteracies<br />

and new literacies are wider concepts that include<br />

texts, language, situated meaning, technology,<br />

popular culture, power, identity, and critical<br />

stance (Collins & Blot, 2003; Gee, 1996). New<br />

forms of communication such as those spawned<br />

by the Internet have become vital information<br />

sources for U.S. anime fans (<strong>Fukunaga</strong>, 2000).<br />

However, individual students have different relationships<br />

with anime and its community. Two of<br />

Gee’s (2002) concepts are useful for understanding<br />

these theories in relation to anime: shapeshifting<br />

portfolio people and affinity groups. My<br />

interviews with J<strong>FL</strong> learners provided some examples<br />

relevant to these concepts.<br />

Shape-shifting portfolio people<br />

Gee’s (2002) concept provides a useful framework<br />

to understand anime as a product of multiliteracies.<br />

Gee described millennials, who were born between<br />

1982 and 1998, as youth who shape<br />

themselves according to “class-based customized<br />

standardization” (italics in original) to become<br />

“shape-shifting portfolio people” (Gee, pp.<br />

62–63). The word portfolio does not necessarily<br />

mean a collection of documents; rather, it is used<br />

as a metaphor for the invisible skills needed for<br />

success. Gee used the expression to describe youth<br />

who collect skills in order to access a variety of resources<br />

and to be successful in capitalist society.<br />

These youth continue to revise their portfolios<br />

with new experiences in order to make themselves<br />

available for different tasks in different times. In<br />

the New Capitalism, “the capitalism of our current<br />

technologically driven, knowledge-based<br />

global economy” (Gee, 2001, p. 100), class is defined<br />

not only by the amount of money one has<br />

but also by the nature of one’s experiences, skills,<br />

and achievements. For example, millennials “customize<br />

themselves” (Gee, 2002, p. 63) to gain entrance<br />

to elite schools.<br />

Young, Dillon, and Moje (2002) criticized<br />

Gee’s description of shape-shifting portfolio millennials<br />

for being “too generalized and too global”<br />

(p. 129). One of the examples that Young et al. described<br />

is of a middle class youth who resisted being<br />

labeled as a “successful candidate” so he did<br />

not shape-shift his portfolio. <strong>Anime</strong> students’<br />

goals are not transferable to mainstream success<br />

either. For anime students, gaining Japanese linguistic<br />

and cultural knowledge is one way to build<br />

their portfolios by exploring authentic Japanese<br />

popular culture. What happens once these anime<br />

students lose their interest in Japanese popular<br />

culture? Will they shape-shift their portfolio according<br />

to “shifting” goals? I explore these questions<br />

in later sections. While there is a need to be<br />

cautious about overgeneralization, the idea of a<br />

“shape-shifting portfolio” remains a helpful description<br />

of anime students’ <strong>literacy</strong> activities.<br />

Affinity group<br />

Knowledge of Japanese language is one way for<br />

anime fans to shape-shift their portfolios.<br />

Computer skills and access to the Internet also<br />

add to anime fans’ portfolios in the anime community.<br />

Gee’s concept of the “affinity group”<br />

(2002) is a form of portfolio building that incorporates<br />

sociocultural aspects of students’ <strong>literacy</strong><br />

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY 50:3 NOVEMBER <strong>2006</strong> 207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!