language and literature european landmarks of identity

The state administration didn’t miss the comments and analysis of Caragiale.
He divided it into two camps: the power and the opposition, both incapable of resisting
to the popular uprising, made up by the "plebs, customers, university students and
schoolchildren from schools, often led by university teachers"
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, accesat în 13.06.2011) and must be changed every three years
"devoted to the good habits."
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, 13.06.2011). The political struggle was given noisy, with the
support of political clients, students and high school students. The truth of Caragiale is
also our truth, considering that the same thing continues to happen today, "one customer
leaves, another comes; the hungry ones pass at the table, the satisfied to penance. And
that it always and again, at every three years, and sometimes even more often."
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, 13.06.2011) Caragiale is current and real, still exists today in
the same form. Caragiale's writing postulates especially an ironical position for
characters and times. Caragiale's realism could be named ironic realism. Caragiale
figured a world with the sadness of contesting its imperfections, with obvious concern
for language and behavior, always being an author located at equidistance between
serious and hilarious. (Fanache, 1984: 186)
To present a people with a common character, he named all his countrymen
"The Romanian", referring to Romania, which was "the tip and favor homeland", where
no one trusted in justice, because although it had authority, it had not, however,
prestige. Caragiale's criticism came also on the territory of education: "The Romanian
school, instead of being a mean of education and culture of the people and of the
supervision classes, it becomes a drain of first desires between citizens, of cheap
arriving, of relieving duties, of enhancing rights and privileges."
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, accesat în 13.06.2011) To the extent that justice was available
anytime for the ruling party, so the "culture" came from the schools that have become
factories of diploma for "a plethora of semi-cultered, with no characters, no humanity,
true knights of intellectual industry, who need immediately honors as many without any
merits and great gain without much trouble."
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, 13.06.2011)
Administration and oligarchy was the one ruling the Romanian country, and in
order to get to rule it took "more courage, lack of any scruples, renunciation of personal
dignity, of family honor, even infamy, if needed, and a little luck - and the brilliant
career is ready"
http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4%
83'n_toamn%C4%83, 13.06.2011). Caragiale justified his claim every time, by showing
a good knowledge of Romanian realities. Oligarchic were considered also the political
parties, associated with some "gangs" with historical claims, with "no respect for law,
without compassion for humanity, without fear of God."
(http://ro.wikisource.org/wiki/1907_din_prim%C4%83var%C4%83_p%C3%A2n%C4
%83'n_toamn%C4%83, 13.06.2011) The article was divided into three chapters.
Chapter I ended with the pray of the writer that the sacrifice be as less painful for
people, sacrifice he admitted, because without sacrifices can not exist history and
heroism, and after all, he said that had found the solution to solve people's requests, and