Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...

UAS ROADMAP 2005
FIGURE F-2: U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT AND UA CLASS A MISHAP RATES (LIFETIME), 1986-2003.
..............................................................................................................................................F-3
FIGURE F-3. UA AND AIRSPACE CLASSES OF THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM........................F-4
FIGURE H-1. U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT AND UA CLASS A MISHAP RATES (LIFETIME), 1986 –
2004..................................................................................................................................... H-3
FIGURE H-2. AVERAGE SOURCES OF SYSTEM FAILURES FOR U.S. MILITARY UA FLEET................
(BASED ON 194,000 HRS)............................................................................................................ H-5
FIGURE H-3. AVERAGE SOURCES OF SYSTEM FAILURES FOR IAI UA FLEET (BASED ON 100,000
HRS). .................................................................................................................................... H-5
FIGURE I-1. UA ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS IN SUPPORT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. ..................I-2
FIGURE J-1. JRP FUNDING HISTORY. ........................................................................................... J-1
FIGURE J-2. JRP MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE............................................................................... J-2
FIGURE J-3: JRP STRATEGY AND EVOLVING ROBOTICS REQUIREMENTS..................................... J-7
FIGURE J-4: ROBOTIC EVOLUTION. .............................................................................................. J-7
TABLE 2.6-1. SUMMARY STATUS OF RECENT UAS....................................................................... 37
TABLE 2.6-2. FY06 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET REQUEST FOR UAS RDT&E AND PROCUREMENT
($M)*. ................................................................................................................................... 38
TABLE 2.6-3. FY06 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET FOR UAS OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ($M)*. .. 38
TABLE 2.7-1. CLASSES OF WORLDWIDE MILITARY RECONNAISSANCE UAS. ............................... 39
TABLE 2.7-2. MTCR MEMBER INTEREST IN UAS......................................................................... 40
TABLE 3.1-1. HISTORICALLY VALIDATED UAS ROLES................................................................. 41
TABLE 3.2-1. IPL PRIORITIES FOR UAS-RELATED APPLICATIONS BY COCOM. .......................... 42
TABLE 3.2-2. UAS-RELATED IPL ITEMS BY JOINT FUNCTIONAL CATEGORY. .............................. 42
TABLE 3.3-1. COMBATANT COMMANDER/SERVICE UAS MISSION PRIORITIZATION MATRIX—
2004....................................................................................................................................... 43
TABLE 3.4-1. UAS MISSION AREAS.............................................................................................. 44
TABLE 4.3-1. PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY FORECAST................................................ 54
TABLE 4.3-2. UAS AND UA COSTS AND WEIGHTS. ...................................................................... 56
TABLE 5.3-1. CURRENT UAS INVENTORY. ................................................................................... 67
TABLE 6.1-1. EXAMPLE CAPABILITY METRICS. ............................................................................ 71
TABLE C-1. WNW FEATURES................................................................................................... C-11
TABLE C-2. KEY SOURCES FOR COMMUNICATIONS STANDARDS.............................................. C-19
TABLE D-1. FUTURE FUNDING OF DOD. ................................................................................... D-11
TABLE F-1. ALIGNMENT OF UA CATEGORIES WITH FAA REGULATIONS.....................................F-5
TABLE H-1. SUMMARY OF UA RELIABILITY FINDINGS............................................................... H-3
TABLE H-2: SUMMARY OF UA FAILURE MODE FINDINGS .......................................................... H-4
TABLE H-3. TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE UA RELIABILITY......................................................... H-8
TABLE I-1. DHS/BTS CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO UA. ....................................I-1
TABLE I-2. PAST AND PLANNED DHS-SPONSORED UA DEMONSTRATIONS..................................I-2
TABLE K-1. SURVIVABILITY CLASSIFICATION LETHAL THREAT MATRIX................................... K-5
TABLE K-2. SURVIVABILITY CLASSIFICATION NON-LETHAL THREAT MATRIX. ......................... K-5
TABLE K-3. SURVIVABILITY DESIGN FEATURES BY SURVIVABILITY CLASSIFICATION. .............. K-5
TABLE OF CONTENTS – Page v