Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ... Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
UAS ROADMAP 2005 recognized today as the prime attribute of an UA when compared to manned aircraft, and endurance is determined largely by the efficiency of the powerplant, propulsion is, with processors, one of the two key UA technologies. Two key propulsion metrics are specific fuel consumption (SFC) for efficiency and specific power (SP) for performance. AFRL’s Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE) program aims to achieve a 10 percent decrease in SFC by 2015, while improving thrust-to-weight (T/W) by 50 percent and lowering engine production and maintenance costs. Reciprocating engines for aircraft generally produce 1 hp per pound of engine weight (746 watts/lb), and today’s fuel cells are approaching this same level, while lithium-ion batteries have about half this SP (See Figure 4.3-1). Fuel cells in particular are expected to show rapid advancement over the coming decade due their increasing use in hybrid automobiles. Heavy fuel engine (HFE) technology has advanced over the last few decades to the point where replacement with internal combustion engines on tactical UA is now practicable. However, further HFE development investment needs to be made to make their use on small UA practicable. Additional investment also needs to be made in turbine technology for a J-UCAS class engine with a high thrust to weight ratio and low SFC. Specific power trends in propulsion and power technology are forecast in Figure 4.3-1 and Table 4.3-1. Recommended Investment Strategy: Focus DoD research on developing diesel reformaters for fuel cell use, enhanced engine durability and time between overhaul, improved specific fuel consumption for enhanced endurance, and alternative propulsive power sources like fuel cells, photovoltaic, and nuclear propulsion systems. 4.3.4 Reliability Aircraft reliability and cost are closely coupled, and unmanned aircraft are widely expected to cost less than their manned counterparts, creating a potential conflict in customer expectations. The expected benefit of lower unit prices may be negated by higher attrition rates due to poorer system reliability. The impact of reliability on UA affordability, availability, and acceptance is described in detail in Appendix H. Figure 4.3-2 illustrates how the mishap rates of larger UA compare to that of representative manned aircraft (F-16 and U-2) after similar numbers of flying hours have been accumulated. Since UA fleets are generally smaller than manned fleets, they have accumulated flying hours at lower rates resulting in slower progress down this curve. As an example, the MQ-1 Predator fleet just reached the 100,000-hour mark in October, 2004, 10 years and 3 months after its first flight, whereas the F-16 reached this same mark in one quarter of that time and the 800,000-hour mark in that same time. However, the Figure shows that the mishap rates of the recent, larger UA track closely with that of the F-16 fleet at a comparable point in its career. Recommended Investment Strategy: See “Recommendations” in Appendix H Page 53
UAS ROADMAP 2005 Turbine Engine Efficiency, % (Solar Cells Only) Hypersonics Scramjets Turboelectric Machinery Rechargeable Batteries 28 25 20 15 10 5 0 Specific Power, hp/lb 30 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 NiCd Specific power of gas turbines equals 4 to 10, depending on airspeed Alkaline Alkaline FC VRLA Rotax 914 Motto Guzzi GM NiMH Space Shuttle Solar Cells (Efficiency Only) Silicon Cell Limit Internal Combustion Engines Batteries 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 GM Li-Poly Li-ion GM GM GM FIGURE 4.3-1. MASS SPECIFIC POWER TRENDS. Fuel Cells TABLE 4.3-1. PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY FORECAST. Turbofan, turboprop, Integrated High Performance Turbine Engine Technology (IHPTET) Now 2010 2015 AF Single Engine Scramjet Demo, Mach 4-7, X-43C Multi-engine, Mach 5-7 Integrated Drive Generator on Accessory Drive, Integrated Power Unit – F- 22 Lead Acid, NiCd, in wide use, Lithium Ion under development –(B-2 battery – 1st example) Photovoltaics Silicon based single crystal cells in rigid arrays Fuel Cells Prototypes demonstrated in ground-based assets. Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE-1) Robust Scramjet: broader operating envelope and reusable applications (e.g. turbine-based combined cycles) No AMAD, Electric Propulsive Engine Controls, Vehicle Drag Reduction/Range Extension Lithium Ion batteries in wide use (100-150 WH/kg) Flexible thin films Multi-junction devices – Germanium, Gallium based Production PEM/SO fuel cells available for UA Begin UA integration Page 54 VAATE-II Note: VAATE ends in 2017 Hypersonic cruise missiles could be in use w/in operational commands. Prototype high Mach (8-10) air vehicles possible Enabling electrical power for airborne directed energy weaponry Solid State Lithium batteries initial use (300-400 WH/kg) Concentrator cells and modules technologies (lens, reflectors) Fuel cells size/weight reductions Fuel flexible reformers
- Page 16 and 17: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.0 CURRENT UAS Th
- Page 18 and 19: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.2 RQ-2B Pionee
- Page 20 and 21: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.4 RQ-5A/MQ-5B
- Page 22 and 23: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.6 RQ-8A/B Fire
- Page 24 and 25: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.8 Joint Unmann
- Page 26 and 27: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.10 I-Gnat-ER U
- Page 28 and 29: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.13 Extended Ra
- Page 30 and 31: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.2.3 Cormorant Us
- Page 32 and 33: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.2.7 Eagle Eye Us
- Page 34 and 35: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.2 Maverick Use
- Page 36 and 37: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.4 XPV-2 Mako U
- Page 38 and 39: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.6 Onyx Autonom
- Page 40 and 41: UAS ROADMAP 2005 FQM-151 Pointer Ba
- Page 42 and 43: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.4.2 Micro Air Ve
- Page 44 and 45: UAS ROADMAP 2005 launched and contr
- Page 46 and 47: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.5.2 Tethered Aer
- Page 48 and 49: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.5.6 High Altitud
- Page 50 and 51: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.6 UAS PROGRAMMAT
- Page 52 and 53: UAS ROADMAP 2005 TABLE 2.7-1. CLASS
- Page 54 and 55: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3.0 REQUIREMENTS R
- Page 56 and 57: UAS ROADMAP 2005 TABLE 3.3-1. COMBA
- Page 58 and 59: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3.5 INTEROPERABILI
- Page 60 and 61: UAS ROADMAP 2005 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES U
- Page 62 and 63: UAS ROADMAP 2005 over present compu
- Page 64 and 65: UAS ROADMAP 2005 provide coverage t
- Page 68 and 69: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Class A or B Misha
- Page 70 and 71: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Weight, Lb 100,000
- Page 72 and 73: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Panchromatic Calen
- Page 74 and 75: UAS ROADMAP 2005 4.4.2 Communicatio
- Page 76 and 77: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.0 OPERATIONS 5.1
- Page 78 and 79: UAS ROADMAP 2005 labs have been inv
- Page 80 and 81: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.3 OPERATIONS 5.3
- Page 82 and 83: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.3.3 battlespace
- Page 84 and 85: UAS ROADMAP 2005 6.0 ROADMAP This S
- Page 86 and 87: UAS ROADMAP 2005 range/endurance ai
- Page 88 and 89: UAS ROADMAP 2005 level below that a
- Page 90 and 91: UAS ROADMAP 2005 � Unmanned syste
- Page 92 and 93: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Appendices
- Page 94 and 95: UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX A: MISSIO
- Page 96 and 97: UAS ROADMAP 2005 be treated more li
- Page 98 and 99: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3. The integration
- Page 100 and 101: UAS ROADMAP 2005 of expendables. In
- Page 102 and 103: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Range Transporter
- Page 104 and 105: UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX B: SENSOR
- Page 106 and 107: UAS ROADMAP 2005 film can. Primary
- Page 108 and 109: UAS ROADMAP 2005 mature, and integr
- Page 110 and 111: UAS ROADMAP 2005 should be encourag
- Page 112 and 113: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Contractors have p
- Page 114 and 115: UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX C: COMMUN
UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />
recognized today as the prime attribute <strong>of</strong> an UA when compared to manned aircraft, and endurance is<br />
determined largely by the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the powerplant, propulsion is, with processors, one <strong>of</strong> the two key<br />
UA technologies.<br />
Two key propulsion metrics are specific fuel consumption (SFC) for efficiency and specific power (SP)<br />
for performance. AFRL’s Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE) program aims to<br />
achieve a 10 percent decrease in SFC by 2015, while improving thrust-to-weight (T/W) by 50 percent and<br />
lowering engine production and maintenance costs. Reciprocating engines for aircraft generally produce<br />
1 hp per pound <strong>of</strong> engine weight (746 watts/lb), and today’s fuel cells are approaching this same level,<br />
while lithium-ion batteries have about half this SP (See Figure 4.3-1). Fuel cells in particular are<br />
expected to show rapid advancement over the coming decade due their increasing use in hybrid<br />
automobiles. Heavy fuel engine (HFE) technology has advanced over the last few decades to the point<br />
where replacement with internal combustion engines on tactical UA is now practicable. However, further<br />
HFE development investment needs to be made to make their use on small UA practicable. Additional<br />
investment also needs to be made in turbine technology for a J-UCAS class engine with a high thrust to<br />
weight ratio and low SFC. Specific power trends in propulsion and power technology are forecast in<br />
Figure 4.3-1 and Table 4.3-1.<br />
Recommended Investment Strategy: Focus DoD research on developing diesel reformaters for fuel cell<br />
use, enhanced engine durability and time between overhaul, improved specific fuel consumption for<br />
enhanced endurance, and alternative propulsive power sources like fuel cells, photovoltaic, and nuclear<br />
propulsion systems.<br />
4.3.4 Reliability<br />
<strong>Aircraft</strong> reliability and cost are closely coupled, and unmanned aircraft are widely expected to cost less<br />
than their manned counterparts, creating a potential conflict in customer expectations. The expected<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> lower unit prices may be negated by higher attrition rates due to poorer system reliability. The<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> reliability on UA affordability, availability, and acceptance is described in detail in Appendix<br />
H. Figure 4.3-2 illustrates how the mishap rates <strong>of</strong> larger UA compare to that <strong>of</strong> representative manned<br />
aircraft (F-16 and U-2) after similar numbers <strong>of</strong> flying hours have been accumulated. Since UA fleets are<br />
generally smaller than manned fleets, they have accumulated flying hours at lower rates resulting in<br />
slower progress down this curve. As an example, the MQ-1 Predator fleet just reached the 100,000-hour<br />
mark in October, 2004, 10 years and 3 months after its first flight, whereas the F-16 reached this same<br />
mark in one quarter <strong>of</strong> that time and the 800,000-hour mark in that same time. However, the Figure<br />
shows that the mishap rates <strong>of</strong> the recent, larger UA track closely with that <strong>of</strong> the F-16 fleet at a<br />
comparable point in its career.<br />
Recommended Investment Strategy: See “Recommendations” in Appendix H<br />
Page 53