Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ... Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
UAS ROADMAP 2005 over present computers. Ultimately, quantum computing may replace traditional computing based on ones and zeros with using nuclear magnetic resonance to encode the spin of atoms. Speed (MIPS) Speed (MIPS) 1012 1012 109 109 106 106 103 103 1 10-3 10-3 10 1012 1012 109 109 106 106 103 103 1 10-3 10-3 10-6 10-6 -6 ENIAC iBM 7090 IBM 360/65 IBM 1620 Mainframes Intel 4004 Cray Red Storm Cray CS6400 Pentium Intel 80286 Sun SS1 Pentium 4 Personal Computers 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2030 Optical Fiber Video Channel Audio Channel FIGURE 4.1-1. TREND IN PROCESSOR SPEED. 1985 PC Book CD IBM Deep Blue Lizard 1995 PC Monkey Human Mouse Library of Congress 10-6 10-3 1 103106 109 1012 10-6 10-3 1 103106 109 1012 Memory (Megabytes) Cray Red Storm FIGURE 4.1-2. RELATIONSHIP OF PROCESSOR SPEED AND MEMORY. Recommended Investment Strategy: Rely on commercial markets (personal and commercial computers) to drive processor technology. Focus DoD research on radiation–tolerant integrated circuit components and algorithms. 4.2 COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES The principal issue of communications technologies is flexibility, adaptability, and cognitive Page 49
UAS ROADMAP 2005 controllability of the bandwidth, frequency, and information/data (e.g. differentiated services, separate routing of data based on priority, latency, etc) flows. This means that the systems will be net-centric and that network services like C2, data management and flow control, etc., will have to be integrated into the systems and concepts of operations. In-flight entertainment and finance-based systems will not handle these issues well for military applications. The personal information services providers might provide technology paths forward, but major portions of the government will need to invest in the net-centric solutions required by the U.S. Government. One way of addressing bandwidth and spectrum constraints is by re-using certain communications paths in new ways (e.g. tactical radios used as orderwires for directional links, tightly coupled RF backup links for free space optics (lasercomm), etc.). Communications technologies might be repartitioned to address apertures, RF Front ends, software defined modems/bandwidth efficient waveforms, multiple signals in space, crossbanding, digital interfaces, new communications approaches (e.g. free space optics), and hybrid approaches. 4.2.1 4.2.2 Data Links Airborne data link rates and processor speeds are in a race to enable future UA capabilities. Today, and for the near-term, the paradigm is to relay virtually all airborne data to the ground and process it there for interpretation and decision-making. Eventually, onboard processing power will outstrip data link capabilities and allow UA to relay the results of their data to the ground for decision making. At that point, the requirement for data link rates in certain applications, particularly imagery collection, should drop significantly. Meanwhile, data compression will remain relevant as long as band-limited communications exist, but it is unlikely compression algorithms alone will solve the near term throughput requirements of advanced sensors. A technology that intentionally discards information is not the preferred technique. For now, compression is a concession to inadequate bandwidth. In the case of radio frequency (RF) data links, limited spectrum and the requirement to minimize airborne system size, weight, and power (SWAP) have been strong contributors for limiting data rates. Rates up to 10 Gbps (40 times currently fielded capabilities) are considered possible at current bandwidths by using more bandwidth-efficient modulation methods. At gigahertz frequencies however, RF use becomes increasingly constrained by frequency congestion. This is especially true for the 1-8 GHz range which covers L, S, and C bands. Currently fielded digital data links provide an efficiency varying between 0.92 and 1.5 bps/Hz, where the theoretical maximum is 1.92. Airborne optical data links, or lasercom, will potentially offer data rates two to five orders of magnitude greater than those of the best future RF systems. However, lasercom data rates have held steady for two decades because their key technical challenge was adequate pointing, acquisition, and tracking (PAT) technology to ensure the laser link was both acquired and maintained. Although mature RF systems are viewed as lower risk, and therefore attract investment dollars more easily, Missile Defense Agency funding in the 1990s allowed a series of increasingly complex demonstrations at Gbps rates. The small apertures (3 to 5 inches) and widespread availability of low power semiconductor lasers explains why lasercom systems typically weigh 30 to 50 percent that of comparable RF systems and consume less power. The smaller apertures also provide for lower signatures, greater security, and provide more jam resistance. Although lasercom could surpass RF in terms of airborne data transfer rate, RF will continue to dominate at the lower altitudes for some time into the future because of its better all-weather capability. Thus, both RF and optical technology development should continue to progress out to 2025. Network-Centric Communications There are several areas of networking technology development that should be identified as critical to the migration path of UAS and their ability to provide network services, whether they be transit networking or stub networking platforms. Highflying UAS, such as the Global Hawk or Predator, have the ability to Page 50
- Page 12 and 13: UAS ROADMAP 2005 ID Identification
- Page 14 and 15: UAS ROADMAP 2005 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
- Page 16 and 17: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.0 CURRENT UAS Th
- Page 18 and 19: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.2 RQ-2B Pionee
- Page 20 and 21: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.4 RQ-5A/MQ-5B
- Page 22 and 23: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.6 RQ-8A/B Fire
- Page 24 and 25: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.8 Joint Unmann
- Page 26 and 27: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.10 I-Gnat-ER U
- Page 28 and 29: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.1.13 Extended Ra
- Page 30 and 31: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.2.3 Cormorant Us
- Page 32 and 33: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.2.7 Eagle Eye Us
- Page 34 and 35: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.2 Maverick Use
- Page 36 and 37: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.4 XPV-2 Mako U
- Page 38 and 39: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.3.6 Onyx Autonom
- Page 40 and 41: UAS ROADMAP 2005 FQM-151 Pointer Ba
- Page 42 and 43: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.4.2 Micro Air Ve
- Page 44 and 45: UAS ROADMAP 2005 launched and contr
- Page 46 and 47: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.5.2 Tethered Aer
- Page 48 and 49: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.5.6 High Altitud
- Page 50 and 51: UAS ROADMAP 2005 2.6 UAS PROGRAMMAT
- Page 52 and 53: UAS ROADMAP 2005 TABLE 2.7-1. CLASS
- Page 54 and 55: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3.0 REQUIREMENTS R
- Page 56 and 57: UAS ROADMAP 2005 TABLE 3.3-1. COMBA
- Page 58 and 59: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3.5 INTEROPERABILI
- Page 60 and 61: UAS ROADMAP 2005 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES U
- Page 64 and 65: UAS ROADMAP 2005 provide coverage t
- Page 66 and 67: UAS ROADMAP 2005 recognized today a
- Page 68 and 69: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Class A or B Misha
- Page 70 and 71: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Weight, Lb 100,000
- Page 72 and 73: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Panchromatic Calen
- Page 74 and 75: UAS ROADMAP 2005 4.4.2 Communicatio
- Page 76 and 77: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.0 OPERATIONS 5.1
- Page 78 and 79: UAS ROADMAP 2005 labs have been inv
- Page 80 and 81: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.3 OPERATIONS 5.3
- Page 82 and 83: UAS ROADMAP 2005 5.3.3 battlespace
- Page 84 and 85: UAS ROADMAP 2005 6.0 ROADMAP This S
- Page 86 and 87: UAS ROADMAP 2005 range/endurance ai
- Page 88 and 89: UAS ROADMAP 2005 level below that a
- Page 90 and 91: UAS ROADMAP 2005 � Unmanned syste
- Page 92 and 93: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Appendices
- Page 94 and 95: UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX A: MISSIO
- Page 96 and 97: UAS ROADMAP 2005 be treated more li
- Page 98 and 99: UAS ROADMAP 2005 3. The integration
- Page 100 and 101: UAS ROADMAP 2005 of expendables. In
- Page 102 and 103: UAS ROADMAP 2005 Range Transporter
- Page 104 and 105: UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX B: SENSOR
- Page 106 and 107: UAS ROADMAP 2005 film can. Primary
- Page 108 and 109: UAS ROADMAP 2005 mature, and integr
- Page 110 and 111: UAS ROADMAP 2005 should be encourag
UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />
over present computers. Ultimately, quantum computing may replace traditional computing based on<br />
ones and zeros with using nuclear magnetic resonance to encode the spin <strong>of</strong> atoms.<br />
Speed (MIPS)<br />
Speed (MIPS)<br />
1012 1012 109 109 106 106 103 103 1<br />
10-3 10-3 10<br />
1012 1012 109 109 106 106 103 103 1<br />
10-3 10-3 10-6 10-6 -6 ENIAC<br />
iBM 7090<br />
IBM 360/65<br />
IBM 1620<br />
Mainframes<br />
Intel 4004<br />
Cray Red Storm<br />
Cray CS6400<br />
Pentium<br />
Intel 80286<br />
Sun SS1<br />
Pentium 4<br />
Personal Computers<br />
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 <strong>2030</strong><br />
Optical Fiber<br />
Video Channel<br />
Audio Channel<br />
FIGURE 4.1-1. TREND IN PROCESSOR SPEED.<br />
1985 PC<br />
Book CD<br />
IBM Deep Blue<br />
Lizard<br />
1995 PC<br />
Monkey Human<br />
Mouse<br />
Library <strong>of</strong> Congress<br />
10-6 10-3 1 103106 109 1012 10-6 10-3 1 103106 109 1012 Memory (Megabytes)<br />
Cray Red Storm<br />
FIGURE 4.1-2. RELATIONSHIP OF PROCESSOR SPEED AND MEMORY.<br />
Recommended Investment Strategy: Rely on commercial markets (personal and commercial<br />
computers) to drive processor technology. Focus DoD research on radiation–tolerant integrated circuit<br />
components and algorithms.<br />
4.2 COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES<br />
The principal issue <strong>of</strong> communications technologies is flexibility, adaptability, and cognitive<br />
Page 49