Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />
flight. Figure 4.0-2 depicts where example UA stand in comparison to their ten levels <strong>of</strong> autonomy.<br />
Autonomous Control Levels<br />
Fully Autonomous Swarms<br />
Group Strategic Goals<br />
Distributed Control<br />
Group Tactical Goals<br />
Group Tactical Replan<br />
Group Coordination<br />
Onboard Route Replan<br />
Adapt to Failures & Flight Conditions<br />
Real Time Health/Diagnosis<br />
Remotely Guided<br />
1955<br />
10<br />
4.1 PROCESSOR TECHNOLOGIES<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
Global Hawk, Shadow,<br />
ER/MP, and Fire Scout<br />
2 Predator<br />
1<br />
Pioneer<br />
UCAR Goal<br />
J-UCAS Goal<br />
1965 1975 1985 1995 <strong>2005</strong> 2015 2025<br />
FIGURE 4.0-2. TREND IN UA AUTONOMY.<br />
Although today's processors allow UA to fly entire missions with little or no human intervention, if the<br />
ultimate goal is to replace a pilot with a mechanical facsimile <strong>of</strong> equal or superior thinking speed,<br />
memory capacity, and responses (algorithms) gained from training and experience, then processors <strong>of</strong><br />
human-like speed, memory, and situational adaptability are necessary. Human capabilities are generally<br />
agreed to equate to 100 million million-instructions-per-second (MIPS) in speed and 100 million<br />
megabytes (MB) in memory. In the 1980s, AFRL attempted to develop a robotic adjunct to a fighter pilot<br />
under the Pilot's Associate program, but the available processor technology proved insufficient.<br />
Figures 4.1-1 and 4.1-2 illustrate the progress in processor technology toward human levels <strong>of</strong><br />
performance that has occurred and that are likely to be seen in the coming 25 years. Both show that<br />
today's supercomputers' are within a factor <strong>of</strong> 10 <strong>of</strong> achieving human equivalence in speed and capacity<br />
and could achieve human parity by the 2015 timeframe. The cost <strong>of</strong> a supercomputer is however<br />
uncompetitive with that <strong>of</strong> a trained human, but by <strong>2030</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> a 100 million MIP processor should<br />
approach $10,000. As for inculcating a fighter pilot's training and experience into a robot brain, the<br />
equivalent <strong>of</strong> Top Gun school for tomorrow's J-UCAS will consist <strong>of</strong> a post-flight download in seconds.<br />
Today's silicon-based semiconductor processors will be limited to features about 0.1 micron in size, the<br />
so-called "point one limit," by current manufacturing techniques based on ultraviolet lithography. Once<br />
the limits <strong>of</strong> silicon semiconductors are reached, presumably in the 2015-2020 period, what are the<br />
alternatives for developing more advanced processors? Just as computers have evolved from using<br />
vacuum tubes to transistors to integrated circuits <strong>of</strong> semiconductors over the past 60 years, future ones<br />
may progressively use optical, biochemical, quantum interference switching (QIS), and molecular<br />
("moletronics") processors, or some combination <strong>of</strong> them, to achieve ever faster speeds and larger<br />
memories. QIS <strong>of</strong>fers a thousandfold increase in speed and moletronics a potential billionfold increase<br />
Page 48