Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />
TABLE 2.7-1. CLASSES OF WORLDWIDE MILITARY RECONNAISSANCE UAS.<br />
Tactical Specialized Endurance<br />
Country Over-the-Hill Close Range Maritime Penetrating Medium Rng Long Rng<br />
United States Dragon Eye Hunter Pioneer J-UCAS Predator Global Hawk<br />
FPASS, Raven Shadow Fire Scout<br />
France Tracker Crecerelle<br />
CL-289 Eagle 1<br />
MCMM<br />
Neuron MALE<br />
Germany Luna Brevel Seamos CL-289 Eurohawk<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
Phoenix<br />
Hermes 180<br />
J-UCAS Hermes 450<br />
Italy<br />
Mirach 26<br />
Mirach 150 Predator<br />
Falco<br />
Neuron<br />
Israel Scout/Searcher Hermes 450<br />
Heron<br />
Russia<br />
Shmel/Yak-61 VR-3 Reys<br />
VR-2 Strizh<br />
<strong>Systems</strong> not yet fielded are italicized.<br />
2.7.2 Export Policy<br />
The sale <strong>of</strong> U.S.-manufactured UAS to foreign militaries <strong>of</strong>fers the triple advantages <strong>of</strong> 1) supporting the<br />
U.S. industrial base for UAS, 2) potentially lowering the unit costs <strong>of</strong> UAS to the Services, and 3)<br />
ensuring interoperability by equipping allied forces with mutually compatible systems. Balanced against<br />
these advantages, however, are two areas <strong>of</strong> concern. The first concern is the potential for transfer <strong>of</strong><br />
critical technology. This is mitigated by export license reviews and establishment <strong>of</strong> UAS<br />
disclosure/reliability policy guidance. The second concern is that an UA capable <strong>of</strong> carrying a given<br />
weight <strong>of</strong> reconnaissance sensors and data links on a round trip could be modified to carry an equal<br />
weight <strong>of</strong> advanced weapons twice that distance on a one-way mission. As the range, accuracy, and<br />
payload capacity <strong>of</strong> UA have overtaken those <strong>of</strong> cruise missiles and some ballistic missiles, controlling<br />
their proliferation has become a concern. UA fall under the terms <strong>of</strong> the Missile Technology Control<br />
Regime (MTCR), an informal and voluntary political agreement among 33 countries to control the<br />
proliferation <strong>of</strong> unmanned rocket and aerodynamic systems capable <strong>of</strong> delivering weapons <strong>of</strong> mass<br />
destruction (see Table 2.7-2). MTCR makes no distinction in terms <strong>of</strong> payload (weaponized vs. nonweaponized).<br />
Predator, Predator B, and Global Hawk fall under Category I definitions (vehicles capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> carrying 500 kg <strong>of</strong> payload to a range <strong>of</strong> 300 km) <strong>of</strong> the MTCR and therefore are subject to a strong<br />
presumption <strong>of</strong> denial for export under the existing agreement. The U.S. Defense and State Departments<br />
drafted an updated interim policy to the MTCR in late 2001 to allow UA (including J-UCAS) exports to<br />
selected countries on a case-by-case basis. The policy was used effectively to facilitate the sale <strong>of</strong> a nonweaponized<br />
Predator system to Italy in 2001.<br />
SECTION 2 - CURRENT UA PROGRAMS<br />
Page 39