Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />
knowledge skills required <strong>of</strong> UA operators operating in the NAS; this minimum standard may differ for<br />
given classes <strong>of</strong> UA. UA operators 3 will be expected to conform to these requirements.<br />
Another issue that arises is when civilian pilots, such as those working for an aircraft manufacturer<br />
building UA for the military, need to fly their company's product during the performance <strong>of</strong> a military<br />
contract, such as for test, production delivery, and acceptance (DD Form 250) flights. The Defense<br />
Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for such activities leading up to the<br />
acceptance <strong>of</strong> aircraft by the government, has established a policy letter (DCMA Instruction 8210.1, dated<br />
13 November 2002) requiring all contractor UA operators to hold a current FAA Private or Commercial<br />
Pilot and Instrument rating to fly outside <strong>of</strong> restricted or warning areas. This policy has already been<br />
waived in certain conditions when the operator training and currency requirements have been found<br />
adequate for the operation. Qualification standards for non-military UA operators and maintainers will<br />
eventually need an FAA rating that reflects the type <strong>of</strong> aircraft they are operating.<br />
SEE AND AVOID PRINCIPLE<br />
A key requirement for routine access to the NAS is UA compliance with 14 CFR 91.113, “Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way<br />
Rules: Except Water Operations.” This is the Section that contains the phrase “see and avoid,” and is the<br />
primary restriction to normal operations <strong>of</strong> UA. The intent <strong>of</strong> “see and avoid” is for pilots to use their<br />
sensors (eyes) and other tools to find and maintain situational awareness <strong>of</strong> other traffic and to yield the<br />
right-<strong>of</strong>- way, in accordance with the rules, when there is a traffic conflict. Since the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />
regulation is to avoid mid-air collisions, this should be the focus <strong>of</strong> technological efforts to address the<br />
issue as it relates to UA rather than trying to mimic and/or duplicate human vision. In June 2003,<br />
USAF’s Air Combat Command (ACC) sponsored a joint working group to establish and quantify a S&A<br />
system capability for submission to the FAA; their White Paper, See and Avoid Requirement for<br />
Remotely Operated <strong>Aircraft</strong>, was released in June 2004.<br />
Relying simply on human vision results in mid-airs accounting for an average <strong>of</strong> 0.8 percent <strong>of</strong> all<br />
mishaps and 2.4 percent <strong>of</strong> all aviation fatalities incurred annually (based on the 3-year average from<br />
1998 to 2000). 4 Meaningful S&A performance must alert the UA operator to local air traffic at ranges<br />
sufficient for reaction time and avoidance actions by safe margins. Furthermore, UA operations BLOS<br />
may require an automated S&A system due to potential communications latencies or failures.<br />
The FAA does not provide a quantitative definition <strong>of</strong> S&A, largely due to the number <strong>of</strong> combinations <strong>of</strong><br />
pilot vision, collision vectors, sky background, and aircraft paint schemes involved in seeing oncoming<br />
traffic. Having a sufficient field <strong>of</strong> regard (FOR) for a UA S&A system, however, is fundamental to<br />
meeting the goal <strong>of</strong> assured air traffic separation. The FAA does provide a cockpit field <strong>of</strong> regard<br />
recommendation in its Advisory Circular 25.773-1, but the purpose <strong>of</strong> AC 25.773-1 does not specifically<br />
mention S&A.<br />
Although an elusive issue, one fact is apparent. The challenge with the S&A issue is based on a<br />
capability constraint, not a regulatory one. Given the discussions in this and other analyses, a possible<br />
definition for S&A systems emerges: S&A is the onboard, self-contained ability to<br />
� Detect traffic that may be a conflict<br />
� Evaluate flight paths<br />
� Determine traffic right-<strong>of</strong>-way<br />
� Maneuver well clear according to the rules in Part 91.113, or<br />
3<br />
NOTE: UA operators may, or may not, be "rated pilots." For this Airspace Integration Plan, "operator" is the<br />
generic term to describe the individual with the appropriate training and Service certification for the type <strong>of</strong> UA<br />
being operated, and as such, is responsible for the air vehicle's operations and safety.<br />
4<br />
National Transportation Safety Board aviation statistics.<br />
APPENDIX F – AIRSPACE<br />
Page F-7