Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ... Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030 - Federation of ...

06.01.2013 Views

UAS ROADMAP 2005 APPENDIX D: TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Turbine UA are rapidly being developed for eventual integration into the Army, Naval and Air Force fleets. Today’s battlefield contains aircraft that have two classes of turbine engines: 1) man-rated for manned platforms and 2) expendables for cruise missiles. UA service has brought about a third limited-life class, which must support the unique role of UA. The current development of systems, such as Global Hawk and J-UCAS, which occupy ISR, SEAD and deep strike missions, have shown that existing “off-theshelf” propulsion systems are placed under such heavy demands that mission capability and operational utility can be severely limited. Future UA will address combat scenarios and are projected to require even greater demands for better fuel consumption, thrust, power extraction, cost, low signature and distortion tolerance. � Integrated High Performance Turbine Engine Technology (IHPTET) program. The IHPTET program is a joint service, NASA, DARPA and industry initiative that began in 1988. It is a three-phase program with goals of doubling propulsion capability by 2005. IHPTET is also the cornerstone of U.S. military turbine engine technology development. One of the three IHPTET classes of engines is the Joint Expendable Turbine Engine Concept (JETEC) program. This joint Air Force/Navy effort, will demonstrate several key UA-applicable technologies including advanced aerodynamics, lubeless bearings, high-temp low cost hot Sections, and low-cost manufacturing techniques. Using data from laboratory research, trade studies, and existing systems, the payoffs/tradeoffs for each of the critical technologies will be analyzed in terms of engine performance, cost, and storability. (See Figure D-1 and Figure D-2.) FIGURE D-1. PERFORMANCE PAYOFF OF A NOTIONAL COMBAT UA UTILIZING TECHNOLOGIES FROM THE JETEC PHASE III GOALS. Reducing production and development costs may be the most critical effort for UA engine designers. These reductions can be achieved through various means such as advancements in manufacturing APPENDIX D – TECHNOLOGIES Page D-1

UAS ROADMAP 2005 techniques, unique component designs, and multi-use applicability. Advanced manufacturing techniques can greatly reduce tooling cost and fabrication time. For example, resin-transfer molding for outer mold casing components can reduce production cost up to 40% over conventional lay-up techniques. JETEC is pursuing this and several other fabrication concepts including gang milling, high-speed milling, bonded castings, bonded disks, metal-injected moldings and inertial welding. Unique component designs must be pursued to allow UA engines to provide a high level of sophistication while minimizing cost. Since part count is a major determinant of production cost, design features such as drum turbo-machinery, slinger combustors, threaded casings, and integral blisks can reduce part count by an order of magnitude. Low cost seals such as brush and finger designs have shown great promise for replacing large, expensive labyrinth-type seals. FIGURE D-2. JETEC COST GOAL IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING SYSTEMS. Development costs can inhibit a buyer from pursing a new engine design. This leaves only off-the-shelf systems that typically have less than optimal performance and/or cost for UA. These penalties can come in the form of increased maintenance, decreased range or speed, increased production costs, or decreased low observable (LO). To counter this and minimize development costs, industry must examine multi-use concepts where a common-core can be incorporated into UA and commercial propulsion systems such as general aviation, business jet, and helicopter gas generators. The payoffs are enormous for both communities – decreased cost to the military and increased technology for the civilian sector. � Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE). As currently planned, the DoD/NASA/DOE VAATE initiative is ramping up over the next several years, and will follow and build upon the IHPTET effort. Unlike IHPTET, which focused heavily on performance, VAATE will build upon the technology advances of IHPTET, and concentrate on improving aviation, marine and even ground-power turbine engine affordability, which proponents define as capability divided by cost. VAATE's affordability orientation will look at technologies cutting engine development, production and maintenance costs. The balance of the VAATE affordability improvements will come from performance capabilities--technologies associated with boosting thrust and cutting weight and APPENDIX D – TECHNOLOGIES Page D-2

UAS ROADMAP <strong>2005</strong><br />

techniques, unique component designs, and multi-use applicability. Advanced manufacturing techniques<br />

can greatly reduce tooling cost and fabrication time. For example, resin-transfer molding for outer mold<br />

casing components can reduce production cost up to 40% over conventional lay-up techniques. JETEC is<br />

pursuing this and several other fabrication concepts including gang milling, high-speed milling, bonded<br />

castings, bonded disks, metal-injected moldings and inertial welding.<br />

Unique component designs must be pursued to allow UA engines to provide a high level <strong>of</strong> sophistication<br />

while minimizing cost. Since part count is a major determinant <strong>of</strong> production cost, design features such<br />

as drum turbo-machinery, slinger combustors, threaded casings, and integral blisks can reduce part count<br />

by an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude. Low cost seals such as brush and finger designs have shown great promise for<br />

replacing large, expensive labyrinth-type seals.<br />

FIGURE D-2. JETEC COST GOAL IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING SYSTEMS.<br />

Development costs can inhibit a buyer from pursing a new engine design. This leaves only <strong>of</strong>f-the-shelf<br />

systems that typically have less than optimal performance and/or cost for UA. These penalties can come<br />

in the form <strong>of</strong> increased maintenance, decreased range or speed, increased production costs, or decreased<br />

low observable (LO). To counter this and minimize development costs, industry must examine multi-use<br />

concepts where a common-core can be incorporated into UA and commercial propulsion systems such as<br />

general aviation, business jet, and helicopter gas generators. The pay<strong>of</strong>fs are enormous for both<br />

communities – decreased cost to the military and increased technology for the civilian sector.<br />

� Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE). As currently planned, the<br />

DoD/NASA/DOE VAATE initiative is ramping up over the next several years, and will follow and<br />

build upon the IHPTET effort. Unlike IHPTET, which focused heavily on performance, VAATE will<br />

build upon the technology advances <strong>of</strong> IHPTET, and concentrate on improving aviation, marine and<br />

even ground-power turbine engine affordability, which proponents define as capability divided by<br />

cost. VAATE's affordability orientation will look at technologies cutting engine development,<br />

production and maintenance costs. The balance <strong>of</strong> the VAATE affordability improvements will come<br />

from performance capabilities--technologies associated with boosting thrust and cutting weight and<br />

APPENDIX D – TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Page D-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!