6th September 2012 - The Bush Telegraph Weekly
6th September 2012 - The Bush Telegraph Weekly
6th September 2012 - The Bush Telegraph Weekly
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COUNCIL ELECTION <strong>2012</strong><br />
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE RESIDENTS OF HORNSBY SHIRE<br />
Before you vote on 8th <strong>September</strong> to elect a Mayor & Councillors to Hornsby<br />
Council, consider these issues and the questions that candidates should answer.<br />
Hornsby Quarry:<br />
Hornsby Shire rate-payers have paid tens of millions of dollars compensation to CSR for the empty quarry.<br />
Hornsby Council now proposes to fill the quarry, which could take up to 20 years of heavy truck movements<br />
at 10 minute intervals every week day, turning Hornsby & the surrounding residential roads into an industrial<br />
quagmire.<br />
If (re)elected, to council, will you properly investigate & present other viable alternatives, such as the<br />
“stable-lake” option for community input?<br />
Hornsby Shire Housing Strategy:<br />
Hornsby Council has vigorously pursued, against residents’ wishes, 5 storey high-rise precincts in inappropriate<br />
locations such as neighbourhood villages, bushfire prone areas & areas of limited escape in the event of a<br />
catastrophe, i.e. a bushfire.<br />
If (re)elected will you actively seek to prevent such precincts from being developed as high rise?<br />
Section 94 funds Developer Contributions:<br />
$6.3 million of compulsory developer contributions for public facilities (S94 funds) were spent by the council<br />
on a little used Equestrian centre in Galston.<br />
If (re) elected how will you treat the allocation Section 94 funds to maximise the benefit for the<br />
majority of rate-payers of Hornsby Shire?<br />
Councillors representing their community:<br />
<strong>The</strong> present council has a record of not listening to their constituents and not properly addressing the<br />
concerns of residents of the shire, as highlighted above.<br />
If (re)elected, how would you propose to ensure that the council and councillors truly represent the<br />
wishes of their community?<br />
Council’s agenda:<br />
Hornsby Council has inconvenienced & angered the shire’s residents with issues such as the closure of<br />
Hornsby pool, the demolition of the CWA building, the dilapidated state of the Hornsby pedestrian overhead<br />
bridge, the Brooklyn pump-out saga and many others.<br />
If (re)elected will you seek to ensure that the council’s policies and actions are more responsive<br />
to the wishes of the community?<br />
Council Rates & Councillors’ salaries:<br />
Hornsby shire rates: $1,138 p.a.* but Ku-ring-gai shire rates: $697 p.a.* Not withstanding this, Hornsby<br />
councillors have recently awarded themselves pay increases to the maximum allowable amount.<br />
*Based on block of land valued at $500,000<br />
If (re)elected to council how do you propose to reduce our unacceptably high rates?<br />
Don’t forget that we get to exercise our democratic right only once every 4 years!<br />
Motherhood statements are not enough; Councillors need to know that they will<br />
be held accountable throughout their term!<br />
<strong>The</strong> question for you is, on the basis of candidates’ answers, Is it time for change??<br />
John Lambeth, on behalf of North Of Hornsby Residents Action Group, Non-political, Non-aligned.<br />
(northofhornsbyresidentsactiongroup@hotmail.com)