A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns
A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns
A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Though Isaac left the city, he did not go very far away. He again pitched a tent, but<br />
initially there is no evidence of an altar. He dug wells, a necessity of life in a nomadic camp, but<br />
the names of his wells reveal the poverty of his spiritual life.<br />
As the first well was completed, it was claimed by the herdsmen of Gerar and named<br />
Esek, which means “contention” (Gen. 26:20). A struggle was waged over the second well which<br />
Isaac dug also, and that well was named Sitnah, meaning “hatred” (v. 21). Though the wells were<br />
named in the context of conflict with the Philistines, they might also have described Isaac’s own<br />
spiritual conflict. He was trying to have the best of both worlds. He was once again living in<br />
tents, a symbol of the faith of the patriarchs, but he was still “dwelling” (v. 17) rather than<br />
“sojourning.” He had chosen to dwell in the Valley of Gerar where he could count on the defense<br />
of the city, rather than depending on the Lord to be his defense. Those who try to satisfy two<br />
worlds are torn apart inside with the contention that results from the enmity between the carnal<br />
and spiritual mind.<br />
<strong>The</strong> digging of a third well apparently coincided with a change in Isaac. <strong>The</strong> well was<br />
named Rehoboth, meaning “enlargement,” because there was no struggle associated with this<br />
well (v. 22). <strong>The</strong> naming of this well includes Isaac’s first mention of the Lord since he began<br />
dwelling in Gerar. Also it is followed by his decision to return to the Promised Land, where he<br />
built an altar to the Lord. It was there that the Lord also appeared to Isaac to encourage him again<br />
with the promise of His presence and continued blessing. And it was there that Isaac stopped<br />
“dwelling” and “pitched his tent.” Finally, Isaac was leaving Gerar, the halting place. <strong>The</strong><br />
journey was not only physical; it was a refreshing spiritual experience.<br />
When Isaac had completed his separation from the world, he found the world was coming<br />
to him. Abimelech traveled to his camp with a friend named Ahuzzath and the chief captain of<br />
his army, Phicol. <strong>The</strong> Hebrew word mere’ehu translated “friends” (v. 26) was also the title of the<br />
counselor to a political leader. <strong>The</strong> visit to Isaac was apparently an official “state visit” in which<br />
Abimelech sought to establish a treaty with Isaac. Understandably, he was accompanied by his<br />
chief military and political advisors.<br />
According to their testimony, the leaders of Gerar attributed the success of Isaac to the<br />
blessing of Jehovah. This does not mean they necessarily had adopted the worship of Jehovah<br />
themselves or even had a clear understanding of who Jehovah was. <strong>The</strong>y probably used the term<br />
loosely to refer to the “god” of the camp of Isaac much as an unsaved person might make an<br />
occasional positive reference to “the good Lord” in an effort to demonstrate his respect for a<br />
Christian friend’s personal religious beliefs. <strong>The</strong> Philistines were willing to believe the gods of<br />
other tribes would bless those tribes as their own gods would bless them.<br />
Isaac agreed to some sort of treaty before he sent them away the next morning. It was<br />
later that day that water was struck by those digging a well. Isaac named it Shebah, meaning<br />
“oath or commitment.” It was now known as Beersheba, the southern limit of the Promised<br />
Land. It was a reminder of his agreement with the leaders of Gerar, but it was more than that. It<br />
was also a reminder of his greater commitment to the Lord.<br />
Still, all was not well in the household of Isaac. His failures as a father bore fruit in the<br />
rebellion of a son. Just as Isaac had married Rebekah at age forty, so his favored son Esau married.<br />
But Esau’s choice of a wife was Judith, the daughter of a Hittite. Separation was supposed<br />
to characterize all members of the household of faith and that vow of separation was clearly<br />
violated by Esau in the taking of Judith as his wife. <strong>The</strong> Scriptures reveal something of the<br />
tremendous family tension which must have surrounded this rebellious act in the record of the<br />
“grief of mind” experienced by both Isaac and Rebekah (v. 35). But it was only the beginning of