05.01.2013 Views

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Though Isaac left the city, he did not go very far away. He again pitched a tent, but<br />

initially there is no evidence of an altar. He dug wells, a necessity of life in a nomadic camp, but<br />

the names of his wells reveal the poverty of his spiritual life.<br />

As the first well was completed, it was claimed by the herdsmen of Gerar and named<br />

Esek, which means “contention” (Gen. 26:20). A struggle was waged over the second well which<br />

Isaac dug also, and that well was named Sitnah, meaning “hatred” (v. 21). Though the wells were<br />

named in the context of conflict with the Philistines, they might also have described Isaac’s own<br />

spiritual conflict. He was trying to have the best of both worlds. He was once again living in<br />

tents, a symbol of the faith of the patriarchs, but he was still “dwelling” (v. 17) rather than<br />

“sojourning.” He had chosen to dwell in the Valley of Gerar where he could count on the defense<br />

of the city, rather than depending on the Lord to be his defense. Those who try to satisfy two<br />

worlds are torn apart inside with the contention that results from the enmity between the carnal<br />

and spiritual mind.<br />

<strong>The</strong> digging of a third well apparently coincided with a change in Isaac. <strong>The</strong> well was<br />

named Rehoboth, meaning “enlargement,” because there was no struggle associated with this<br />

well (v. 22). <strong>The</strong> naming of this well includes Isaac’s first mention of the Lord since he began<br />

dwelling in Gerar. Also it is followed by his decision to return to the Promised Land, where he<br />

built an altar to the Lord. It was there that the Lord also appeared to Isaac to encourage him again<br />

with the promise of His presence and continued blessing. And it was there that Isaac stopped<br />

“dwelling” and “pitched his tent.” Finally, Isaac was leaving Gerar, the halting place. <strong>The</strong><br />

journey was not only physical; it was a refreshing spiritual experience.<br />

When Isaac had completed his separation from the world, he found the world was coming<br />

to him. Abimelech traveled to his camp with a friend named Ahuzzath and the chief captain of<br />

his army, Phicol. <strong>The</strong> Hebrew word mere’ehu translated “friends” (v. 26) was also the title of the<br />

counselor to a political leader. <strong>The</strong> visit to Isaac was apparently an official “state visit” in which<br />

Abimelech sought to establish a treaty with Isaac. Understandably, he was accompanied by his<br />

chief military and political advisors.<br />

According to their testimony, the leaders of Gerar attributed the success of Isaac to the<br />

blessing of Jehovah. This does not mean they necessarily had adopted the worship of Jehovah<br />

themselves or even had a clear understanding of who Jehovah was. <strong>The</strong>y probably used the term<br />

loosely to refer to the “god” of the camp of Isaac much as an unsaved person might make an<br />

occasional positive reference to “the good Lord” in an effort to demonstrate his respect for a<br />

Christian friend’s personal religious beliefs. <strong>The</strong> Philistines were willing to believe the gods of<br />

other tribes would bless those tribes as their own gods would bless them.<br />

Isaac agreed to some sort of treaty before he sent them away the next morning. It was<br />

later that day that water was struck by those digging a well. Isaac named it Shebah, meaning<br />

“oath or commitment.” It was now known as Beersheba, the southern limit of the Promised<br />

Land. It was a reminder of his agreement with the leaders of Gerar, but it was more than that. It<br />

was also a reminder of his greater commitment to the Lord.<br />

Still, all was not well in the household of Isaac. His failures as a father bore fruit in the<br />

rebellion of a son. Just as Isaac had married Rebekah at age forty, so his favored son Esau married.<br />

But Esau’s choice of a wife was Judith, the daughter of a Hittite. Separation was supposed<br />

to characterize all members of the household of faith and that vow of separation was clearly<br />

violated by Esau in the taking of Judith as his wife. <strong>The</strong> Scriptures reveal something of the<br />

tremendous family tension which must have surrounded this rebellious act in the record of the<br />

“grief of mind” experienced by both Isaac and Rebekah (v. 35). But it was only the beginning of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!