A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

elmertowns.com
from elmertowns.com More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

Kingdom of Israel. The political turmoil in the north during this era of stability in Judah had a marked effect on the people of God in both kingdoms. God’s dealings with His people during these years were consistent with His unchanging nature. As Judah experienced revival and drew closer to God, He blessed that kingdom. But as apostate Israel followed its wandering kings and continued to stray from God, they moved closer to the inevitable judgment of the Lord for their sin. THE WANDERING KINGS OF ISRAEL Nadab (1 Kings 15:25-28) (910-909 B.C.) Nadab, the second king in the north, did not assume the throne until the second year of Asa’s reign in Jerusalem. When he did become king, his reign lasted only two years. They were years marked by his evil character. “And he did evil in the sight of the Lord, and walked in the way of his father, and in his sin by which he made Israel sin” (1 Kings 15:26). So great was the sin of Jeroboam and his son Nadab that they succeeded in provoking “the Lord God of Israel to anger” (v. 30). In light of the consistent teaching of Scripture concerning the long-suffering nature of God, the provocation of God by the house of Jeroboam suggests something of the severity of its evil behavior. That being the case, it is not surprising that Nadab had enemies even within his own nation. Neither is it surprising that those who opposed this second king of the northern tribes did so violently. While Nadab and his army were laying siege to the Philistine city of Gibbethon, a soldier from the tribe of Issachar named Baasha saw and seized an opportunity to rid Israel of an evil king and insure for himself a position in the nation. “Baasha killed him in the third year of Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his place” (v. 28). Though there is no suggestion in the biblical text that Baasha acted in this coup at the specific directive of God, the action was the means by which an earlier promise of judgment on the house of Jeroboam was fulfilled. But a precedent was set. Many of the northern kings would be assassinated and each family reign would be shortlived. In the south, the bloodline of David would continue on the throne and the nation generally respected the monarchy. Baasha (15:28-16:7) (909-886 B.C.) If northern Israel was relieved to escape the oppressive rule of evil King Nadab, their sense of relief was short-lived. As is often the case in political revolutions, the cure proved worse than the disease. The character of Baasha, new king of Israel, was consistent with that of the previous two. “He did evil in the sight of the Lord, and walked in the way of Jeroboam, and in his sin by which he had made Israel sin” (15:34). It was not long before God would again intervene in the affairs of the Northern Kingdom and send His prophet with a message for the one who sat on the throne. “Then the word of the Lord came to Jehu the son of Hanani” (16:1). When God needed a prophet He could trust to faithfully communicate His word to Baasha, the Prophet Jehu (not to be confused with the later King Jehu) was the man He chose. The message was severe. Baasha had been the instrument of judgment on the house of Jeroboam, but was himself guilty of the same sins. As the prophet spoke the message of the Lord in his hearing, Baasha learned his family was to be placed under the same curse as the former dynasty. “Surely I will take away the posterity of Baasha and the posterity of his house, and I will make your house like the house of Jeroboam the son of Nebat” (v. 3). Baasha reigned as king in Israel for twenty-four years, but they were years

in which Israel continued to drift farther from God. On the death of Baasha, his son Elah assumed the throne of Israel. Elah (w. 10-20) (886-885 B.C.) The fourth king of Israel proved to be the last monarch of Israel’s second dynasty in less than fifty years. Elah reigned only two years as king before he was assassinated in a coup led by one of his own military leaders, Zimri. Zimri was the commander over half of the chariots in Israel’s army. While the rest of the army was engaged in a military conflict at the Philistine city of Gibbethon, Zimri took the throne. Elah had drunk heavily at a party hosted by his steward Arza. Zimri found the drunk king and killed him in the home of Arza; then systematically killed the other descendants of Baasha. So thorough was Zimri in his purge that “he did not leave him one male, neither of his kinsmen nor of his friends” (v. 11). Again a prophecy delivered by one of God’s prophets had been fulfilled in the political life of Israel, and Israel had a new king. Zimri (w. 1020) (885 B.C.) But the new king had what amounts to one of the shortest reigns in history-one week. When word reached the people fighting at Gibbethon of Zimri’s coup, they appointed their own king, Omri, who led the army to Tirzah and laid that city under siege. As Zimri recognized he was king of a people in revolt against their king, he chose not to fight. “And it happened, when Zimri saw that the city was taken, that he went into the citadel of the king’s house and burned the king’s house down upon himself with fire, and died” (v. 18). Now the apostate nation Israel witnessed the suicide of its leader. Tibni (vv. 21-22) (885-880 B.C.) Though the nation was agreed they did not want Zimri reigning over them, they were not as agreed when it came to the question of who should be king in his place. Confusion reigned. Many of the people were willing to follow Omri, who had led the army into battle against Zimri, but a significant portion of the nation chose rather to follow Tibni, the son of Ginath, and made him their king. As a result, the northern tribes found themselves with two kings, each with his own following among the tribes. Little is known about Tibni, contender for the throne. His name means “intelligent,” and this may suggest something concerning his character. It appears that Omri had a clear majority support both among the army and people at large; yet a comparison of the few verses referring to this period in the history of Israel suggests the civil war between Tibni and Omri lasted about four years. That Tibni could have survived as a contender that long against one as popular as Omri suggests Tibni may have been a brilliant military strategist. “But the people who followed Omri prevailed over the people who followed Tibni the son of Ginath. So Tibni died and Omri reigned” (v. 22). Omri (vv. 21-22) (885-874 B.C.) In the thirty-first year of the reign of Asa in the south, Israel’s sixth king of that period took the throne of the reunited nation of ten tribes in the north. With the accession of Omri to the throne of Israel, the third dynasty of the Northern Kingdom began. For a period of time, Israel in the north was to experience a period of political stability, but the general character of that dynasty meant Israel, in her period of political stability, was still wandering spiritually from her

Kingdom of Israel. <strong>The</strong> political turmoil in the north during this era of stability in Judah had a<br />

marked effect on the people of God in both kingdoms. God’s dealings with His people during<br />

these years were consistent with His unchanging nature. As Judah experienced revival and drew<br />

closer to God, He blessed that kingdom. But as apostate Israel followed its wandering kings and<br />

continued to stray from God, they moved closer to the inevitable judgment of the Lord for their<br />

sin.<br />

THE WANDERING KINGS OF ISRAEL<br />

Nadab (1 Kings 15:25-28) (910-909 B.C.)<br />

Nadab, the second king in the north, did not assume the throne until the second year of<br />

Asa’s reign in Jerusalem. When he did become king, his reign lasted only two years. <strong>The</strong>y were<br />

years marked by his evil character. “And he did evil in the sight of the Lord, and walked in the<br />

way of his father, and in his sin by which he made Israel sin” (1 Kings 15:26). So great was the<br />

sin of Jeroboam and his son Nadab that they succeeded in provoking “the Lord God of Israel to<br />

anger” (v. 30). In light of the consistent teaching of Scripture concerning the long-suffering<br />

nature of God, the provocation of God by the house of Jeroboam suggests something of the<br />

severity of its evil behavior.<br />

That being the case, it is not surprising that Nadab had enemies even within his own<br />

nation. Neither is it surprising that those who opposed this second king of the northern tribes did<br />

so violently. While Nadab and his army were laying siege to the Philistine city of Gibbethon, a<br />

soldier from the tribe of Issachar named Baasha saw and seized an opportunity to rid Israel of an<br />

evil king and insure for himself a position in the nation. “Baasha killed him in the third year of<br />

Asa king of Judah, and reigned in his place” (v. 28). Though there is no suggestion in the biblical<br />

text that Baasha acted in this coup at the specific directive of God, the action was the means by<br />

which an earlier promise of judgment on the house of Jeroboam was fulfilled. But a precedent<br />

was set. Many of the northern kings would be assassinated and each family reign would be shortlived.<br />

In the south, the bloodline of David would continue on the throne and the nation generally<br />

respected the monarchy.<br />

Baasha (15:28-16:7) (909-886 B.C.)<br />

If northern Israel was relieved to escape the oppressive rule of evil King Nadab, their<br />

sense of relief was short-lived. As is often the case in political revolutions, the cure proved worse<br />

than the disease. <strong>The</strong> character of Baasha, new king of Israel, was consistent with that of the<br />

previous two. “He did evil in the sight of the Lord, and walked in the way of Jeroboam, and in<br />

his sin by which he had made Israel sin” (15:34). It was not long before God would again<br />

intervene in the affairs of the Northern Kingdom and send His prophet with a message for the<br />

one who sat on the throne.<br />

“<strong>The</strong>n the word of the Lord came to Jehu the son of Hanani” (16:1). When God needed a<br />

prophet He could trust to faithfully communicate His word to Baasha, the Prophet Jehu (not to be<br />

confused with the later King Jehu) was the man He chose. <strong>The</strong> message was severe. Baasha had<br />

been the instrument of judgment on the house of Jeroboam, but was himself guilty of the same<br />

sins. As the prophet spoke the message of the Lord in his hearing, Baasha learned his family was<br />

to be placed under the same curse as the former dynasty. “Surely I will take away the posterity of<br />

Baasha and the posterity of his house, and I will make your house like the house of Jeroboam the<br />

son of Nebat” (v. 3). Baasha reigned as king in Israel for twenty-four years, but they were years

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!