A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

elmertowns.com
from elmertowns.com More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

With the compromising Levite and Micah’s gods, the Danites themselves settled in northern Palestine. They attacked and destroyed the isolated community of Laish and rebuilt the city, calling it Dan. The Levite and, false gods were established as part of the worship at the tabernacle, which remained in Shiloh. Another Levite also strayed from his calling and took to himself a concubine. But the concubine became involved with other men and eventually left the Levite to return to her father’s house in Bethlehem in Judah. It was four months before the Levite made the trip to Bethlehem to reclaim his concubine (19:2). As the Levite traveled home with his concubine, he found himself unable to find housing in the city of Gibeah. He decided to spend the night in the streets, but met an old man from his home region who was at the time living in Gibeah and offered to house the Levite and his concubine for the night. Later that evening, certain men of the city came to the house intending to engage in homosexual acts with the Levite. In an effort to discourage the men from their intended actions, the host offered to let the men abuse his daughter and the Levite’s concubine. “So the man took his concubine and brought her out to them. And they knew her and abused her all the night until morning; and when the day began to break, they let her go” (v. 25). As the Levite prepared to continue his journey home the next day, he found his abused concubine lying dead on the doorstep. He placed her body on his donkey and returned home. There he severed her body into twelve pieces and sent the pieces to the different regions of Israel. The severed body of the abused concubine angered the nation, “and the congregation gathered together as one man before the Lord at Mizpah” (20:1). From there they attacked the tribe of Benjamin. The battle virtually devastated the tribe: with some 25,000 Benjaminites dying in that day. The 600 men of the tribe who escaped hid out at the rock of Rimmon for four months. Later, the men of Israel realized the civil war had virtually resulted in the extinction of one of the tribes of Israel, but not before they had made a vow not to give their daughters to the men of that tribe in marriage. When they repented of their actions against the tribe of Benjamin, they proposed two plans by which the men who had survived the battle and escaped would secure wives. First, because the amen of Jabesh Gilead had failed to join Israel in the battle, they were attacked and destroyed. The only residents of the city who were preserved were some 400 young virgins who were then offered to the men of Benjamin as wives. That action only provided wives for every two out of three men who had survived the battle. To secure another 200 wives, the men of Benjamin were encouraged and permitted to kidnap “the daughters of Shiloh” that left the city during a certain feast of the Lord, which was held annually in Shiloh. This second plan provided the rest of the needed wives for the tribe of Benjamin.

The degenerate lifestyles and actions of the Levites in the Age of the Judges reached their utter depths of degradation in the persons of Hophni and Phinehas, the sons of Eli and the priests of the Lord in Shiloh. Their father may have had great ambitions for his sons when he named them as they were born, but they failed in every way to live up to expectations. The name Hophni means “strong, “ and Phinehas was probably named after the third high priest of Israel, who was a personification of righteousness. But the sons of Eli were weak and wicked, so much so they earned the reputation of being “sons of Belial” (1 Sam. 2:12). Though God had made provision for the priests to remove a portion of some offerings for themselves as it boiled, the sons of Eli bullied worshipers into giving them raw meat they could later roast rather than the boiled beef (vv. 13-17). This was a practice apparently learned from their father by the lesson of example. In addition to their abuse of the offering, they were also involved immorally “with the women who assembled at the door of the tabernacle of meeting” (v. 22). An unnamed prophet warned Eli that he kicked “at My sacrifice and My offering which I have commanded in My habitation, and honor your sons more than Me, to make yourselves fat with the best of all the offerings of Israel My, people” (v. 29). Apparently, Eli complained about burning up good meat in sacrifice to God. He kept it, as did his sons, and God made reference to their overweight condition. Then God announced Eli’s life would be cut off and his sons killed in their youth. The sin of Hophni and Phinehas was rebuked by their father and an unnamed prophet of God, but still there was no repentance on their part. “They did not know the Lord” (v. 12) and brought disgrace on the holy things of God. It was this attitude on their part that led to the loss of the very glory of God from Israel and resulted in their own deaths on the battlefield. They must have felt God would give them a victory over their enemies no matter how they profaned His holy name. They did not realize the judgment of God on the people of Israel and the family of Eli. “And when they joined battle, Israel was defeated by the Philistines, who killed about four thousand men of the army in the field” (4:2). The military defeat against the Philistines caused people to begin asking an important question. “Why has the Lord defeated us today before the Philistines?” (v. 3) It was obvious to all observers that the loss was an evidence of the displeasure of God. It was an important question that needed to be asked, but they were asking the wrong people. It was widely known that Samuel was the one God was communicating with, but it was Hophni and Phinehas who still held the office of the priesthood and the elders of the nation who wielded the political clout. Between them they were able to ask the right question, but could only arrive at the wrong answer. “Let us bring the ark of the covenant of the Lord from Shiloh to us, that when it comes among us it may save us from the hand of our enemies” (v. 3). It was customary in those days when a nation went into battle to take their gods into battle with them. Perhaps as they had fought the Philistines, some of the Israelites had gotten close enough to the camp to see the Philistine god Dagon in a prominent place. Israel did not have an idol it could carry into battle, but the Ark of the Covenant was perhaps the most sacred portable article that was prominent in their worship of God. And so rather than trusting God for victory over the Philistines, they chose to place their confidence in a box they could see and carry from Shiloh to the battle. Though Eli himself was concerned with the decision to remove the ark from the tabernacle, Hophni and Phinehas could see no problem with the plan. Eli’s indecision and passive nature again allowed his sons to make a tragic mistake. Their religion had become little more than ritual and a convenient setting for their other less noble interests. Still, they knew the religion of Israel had some meaning to many people in the land. Carrying the ark to the

<strong>The</strong> degenerate lifestyles and actions of the Levites in the Age of the Judges reached their<br />

utter depths of degradation in the persons of Hophni and Phinehas, the sons of Eli and the priests<br />

of the Lord in Shiloh. <strong>The</strong>ir father may have had great ambitions for his sons when he named<br />

them as they were born, but they failed in every way to live up to expectations. <strong>The</strong> name<br />

Hophni means “strong, “ and Phinehas was probably named after the third high priest of Israel,<br />

who was a personification of righteousness. But the sons of Eli were weak and wicked, so much<br />

so they earned the reputation of being “sons of Belial” (1 Sam. 2:12). Though God had made<br />

provision for the priests to remove a portion of some offerings for themselves as it boiled, the<br />

sons of Eli bullied worshipers into giving them raw meat they could later roast rather than the<br />

boiled beef (vv. 13-17). This was a practice apparently learned from their father by the lesson of<br />

example. In addition to their abuse of the offering, they were also involved immorally “with the<br />

women who assembled at the door of the tabernacle of meeting” (v. 22).<br />

An unnamed prophet warned Eli that he kicked “at My sacrifice and My offering which I<br />

have commanded in My habitation, and honor your sons more than Me, to make yourselves fat<br />

with the best of all the offerings of Israel My, people” (v. 29). Apparently, Eli complained about<br />

burning up good meat in sacrifice to God. He kept it, as did his sons, and God made reference to<br />

their overweight condition. <strong>The</strong>n God announced Eli’s life would be cut off and his sons killed in<br />

their youth. <strong>The</strong> sin of Hophni and Phinehas was rebuked by their father and an unnamed<br />

prophet of God, but still there was no repentance on their part. “<strong>The</strong>y did not know the Lord” (v.<br />

12) and brought disgrace on the holy things of God. It was this attitude on their part that led to<br />

the loss of the very glory of God from Israel and resulted in their own deaths on the battlefield.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y must have felt God would give them a victory over their enemies no matter how<br />

they profaned His holy name. <strong>The</strong>y did not realize the judgment of God on the people of Israel<br />

and the family of Eli. “And when they joined battle, Israel was defeated by the Philistines, who<br />

killed about four thousand men of the army in the field” (4:2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> military defeat against the Philistines caused people to begin asking an important<br />

question. “Why has the Lord defeated us today before the Philistines?” (v. 3) It was obvious to<br />

all observers that the loss was an evidence of the displeasure of God. It was an important<br />

question that needed to be asked, but they were asking the wrong people. It was widely known<br />

that Samuel was the one God was communicating with, but it was Hophni and Phinehas who still<br />

held the office of the priesthood and the elders of the nation who wielded the political clout.<br />

Between them they were able to ask the right question, but could only arrive at the wrong<br />

answer. “Let us bring the ark of the covenant of the Lord from Shiloh to us, that when it comes<br />

among us it may save us from the hand of our enemies” (v. 3).<br />

It was customary in those days when a nation went into battle to take their gods into<br />

battle with them. Perhaps as they had fought the Philistines, some of the Israelites had gotten<br />

close enough to the camp to see the Philistine god Dagon in a prominent place. Israel did not<br />

have an idol it could carry into battle, but the Ark of the Covenant was perhaps the most sacred<br />

portable article that was prominent in their worship of God. And so rather than trusting God for<br />

victory over the Philistines, they chose to place their confidence in a box they could see and<br />

carry from Shiloh to the battle.<br />

Though Eli himself was concerned with the decision to remove the ark from the<br />

tabernacle, Hophni and Phinehas could see no problem with the plan. Eli’s indecision and<br />

passive nature again allowed his sons to make a tragic mistake. <strong>The</strong>ir religion had become little<br />

more than ritual and a convenient setting for their other less noble interests. Still, they knew the<br />

religion of Israel had some meaning to many people in the land. Carrying the ark to the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!