A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

elmertowns.com
from elmertowns.com More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

of action in that city, it was he who lost his life. “Thus God repaid the wickedness of Abimelech, which he had done to his father by killing his seventy sons. And all the evil of the men of Shechem God returned on their own heads, and on them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal” (Jud. 9:56-57). THIRTY RUTH: The Romance of Redemption (Ruth 1:1-4:22) About the time Gideon was hiding in the winepress to escape the dangers of a Midianite invasion, a small village to the south was caught up in the midst of a severe famine. This famine may have been the natural consequence of the successive invasions of the Midianites during the harvest seasons, or simply the result of a prolonged drought. Some Bible commentators suggest the combination of these two factors resulted in its severity. Like the other dozen famines recorded in Scripture, this famine also appears to have been a physical manifestation of the judgment of God. The account of this famine is recorded in the opening verse of the Book of Ruth, originally appended to the Book of Judges. Yet unlike the Book of Judges, Ruth is an account of what was going right in Israel. It records people praying and seeing answers to their prayers without the cycle of oppression so common in the Book of Judges. Yet it is obvious from several contextual hints in the two books that these event occurred simultaneously. Ruth begins with the expression, “Now it came to pass, in the days of.” A form of this expression occurs five times in the Old Testament and always denotes impending trouble, followed by internal disorders and outward oppressions. The crisis age referred to in this context is simply described as “when the judges ruled” (Jud. 1:1). This was an era of apostasy and anarchy (cf. 2:10-13; 21:25). Though some Jewish commentators tend to identify the Boaz of this book with the otherwise unknown judge Ibzan of Bethlehem (12:8-10), the genealogy of the last chapter linking Ruth and Boaz to David suggests an earlier context; i.e., during the rule of Gideon. This would also account for the dramatic change in conditions during the decade in which the first chapter of the book is set. But the Book of Ruth is more than a history of a family in Bethlehem. It is a love story of how a poor but virtuous widow finds her rest and fulfillment through a marriage to one of the wealthiest and most honorable men of the city. But it is also more than a love story. It is an account of faith in which a number of prayers are offered to God and without exception answered to the benefit of the one praying. But it also more than an account of faith. It is the story of how a Moabite girl, who was an alien from the commonwealth of Israel and by law under the curse of Moab, found redemption in the village of Bethlehem and was accepted into the society of the people of God. And in all this, it is a picture of every believer’s relationship to God. It is the romance of redemption, a picture of what faith can and does accomplish in the life of every believer.

LOVE’S RESOLVE (Ruth 1:1-22) The book begins with the record of a lot of decisions, but two stand as primary to the entire plot of the book. First there was the bad decision of Elimelech to leave Bethlehem and move to Moab. In contrast, there is the good decision of Ruth to leave Moab and move to Bethlehem. In understanding the decision-making process involved, we can learn much about how to make decisions and live with their consequences. The setting of the beginning and much of this book is in the village of Bethlehem in Judah. Bethlehem is located on a narrow ridge about six miles south of Jerusalem. The area is surrounded by terraced slopes suitable for the cultivation of vineyards and orchards of olives and figs. In the fields beyond the terraces, wheat and barley have always been the principal crops grown. On the hillsides beyond the fields, flocks and herds were kept. Though the village was originally known as Ephrathah, it was not long before people began calling it Bethlehem which literally means “house of bread.” The first decision made in this book was a bad decision with tragic consequences. A man named Elimelech which means “my God is King” decided to leave his home in Bethlehem to travel to Moab. The Bible describes this family as “Ephrathites of Bethlehem, Judah” (Ruth 1:2) suggesting they were an old and established family in the village. By today’s terminology, they were “blue bloods.” Their decision to leave was probably not an easy decision to make, but that did not prevent them from making the wrong decision. There are several hints as to how Elimelech made his bad decision. First though it was Elimelech’s decision to go to Moab, it was probably made with his wife’s consent. Some commentators have even suggested she may have been the driving force behind the decision (cf. w. 20-21). If this is an accurate conclusion, the opening verses of Ruth portray a man being constantly nagged by his wife to take a course of action he knows to be wrong. But the fault in making this bad decision was not exclusively that of Naomi. As Elimelech considered the situation, he soon began developing his own little compromises by which he could justify his decision to go to Moab. First, he would only go “to sojourn” (v. 1). The Hebrew word gur refers to a status as resident aliens. In his original decision to move to Moab, it was never his determination to remain. Second, he would only go to “the country of Moab” (v. 1) literally “the fields of Moab.” The Hebrew word used in this context seeks to draw a distinction between the fields belonging to the nation Moab and the actual land of Moab which I would have included the cities. Perhaps he thought he could avoid the contamination of Moab by avoiding; the cities. It was the same kind of erroneous logic Lot, the father of Moab, had once used to justify moving toward Sodom. But if Elimelech was going to leave Bethlehem, why would he choose to go to Moab? The Moabites were descendants of an incestuous relationship between Lot and his oldest daughter (Gen. 19:29-38). As a people, they had often opposed Israel by refusing them water and

LOVE’S RESOLVE<br />

(Ruth 1:1-22)<br />

<strong>The</strong> book begins with the record of a lot of decisions, but two stand as primary to the<br />

entire plot of the book. First there was the bad decision of Elimelech to leave Bethlehem and<br />

move to Moab. In contrast, there is the good decision of Ruth to leave Moab and move to<br />

Bethlehem. In understanding the decision-making process involved, we can learn much about<br />

how to make decisions and live with their consequences.<br />

<strong>The</strong> setting of the beginning and much of this book is in the village of Bethlehem in<br />

Judah. Bethlehem is located on a narrow ridge about six miles south of Jerusalem. <strong>The</strong> area is<br />

surrounded by terraced slopes suitable for the cultivation of vineyards and orchards of olives and<br />

figs. In the fields beyond the terraces, wheat and barley have always been the principal crops<br />

grown. On the hillsides beyond the fields, flocks and herds were kept. Though the village was<br />

originally known as Ephrathah, it was not long before people began calling it Bethlehem which<br />

literally means “house of bread.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> first decision made in this book was a bad decision with tragic consequences. A man<br />

named Elimelech which means “my God is King” decided to leave his home in Bethlehem to<br />

travel to Moab. <strong>The</strong> Bible describes this family as “Ephrathites of Bethlehem, Judah” (Ruth 1:2)<br />

suggesting they were an old and established family in the village. By today’s terminology, they<br />

were “blue bloods.” <strong>The</strong>ir decision to leave was probably not an easy decision to make, but that<br />

did not prevent them from making the wrong decision. <strong>The</strong>re are several hints as to how<br />

Elimelech made his bad decision.<br />

First though it was Elimelech’s decision to go to Moab, it was probably made with his<br />

wife’s consent. Some commentators have even suggested she may have been the driving force<br />

behind the decision (cf. w. 20-21). If this is an accurate conclusion, the opening verses of Ruth<br />

portray a man being constantly nagged by his wife to take a course of action he knows to be<br />

wrong.<br />

But the fault in making this bad decision was not exclusively that of Naomi. As<br />

Elimelech considered the situation, he soon began developing his own little compromises by<br />

which he could justify his decision to go to Moab. First, he would only go “to sojourn” (v. 1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hebrew word gur refers to a status as resident aliens. In his original decision to move to<br />

Moab, it was never his determination to remain.<br />

Second, he would only go to “the country of Moab” (v. 1) literally “the fields of Moab.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hebrew word used in this context seeks to draw a distinction between the fields belonging to<br />

the nation Moab and the actual land of Moab which I would have included the cities. Perhaps he<br />

thought he could avoid the contamination of Moab by avoiding; the cities. It was the same kind<br />

of erroneous logic Lot, the father of Moab, had once used to justify moving toward Sodom.<br />

But if Elimelech was going to leave Bethlehem, why would he choose to go to Moab?<br />

<strong>The</strong> Moabites were descendants of an incestuous relationship between Lot and his oldest<br />

daughter (Gen. 19:29-38). As a people, they had often opposed Israel by refusing them water and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!