A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns
A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns
of action in that city, it was he who lost his life. “Thus God repaid the wickedness of Abimelech, which he had done to his father by killing his seventy sons. And all the evil of the men of Shechem God returned on their own heads, and on them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal” (Jud. 9:56-57). THIRTY RUTH: The Romance of Redemption (Ruth 1:1-4:22) About the time Gideon was hiding in the winepress to escape the dangers of a Midianite invasion, a small village to the south was caught up in the midst of a severe famine. This famine may have been the natural consequence of the successive invasions of the Midianites during the harvest seasons, or simply the result of a prolonged drought. Some Bible commentators suggest the combination of these two factors resulted in its severity. Like the other dozen famines recorded in Scripture, this famine also appears to have been a physical manifestation of the judgment of God. The account of this famine is recorded in the opening verse of the Book of Ruth, originally appended to the Book of Judges. Yet unlike the Book of Judges, Ruth is an account of what was going right in Israel. It records people praying and seeing answers to their prayers without the cycle of oppression so common in the Book of Judges. Yet it is obvious from several contextual hints in the two books that these event occurred simultaneously. Ruth begins with the expression, “Now it came to pass, in the days of.” A form of this expression occurs five times in the Old Testament and always denotes impending trouble, followed by internal disorders and outward oppressions. The crisis age referred to in this context is simply described as “when the judges ruled” (Jud. 1:1). This was an era of apostasy and anarchy (cf. 2:10-13; 21:25). Though some Jewish commentators tend to identify the Boaz of this book with the otherwise unknown judge Ibzan of Bethlehem (12:8-10), the genealogy of the last chapter linking Ruth and Boaz to David suggests an earlier context; i.e., during the rule of Gideon. This would also account for the dramatic change in conditions during the decade in which the first chapter of the book is set. But the Book of Ruth is more than a history of a family in Bethlehem. It is a love story of how a poor but virtuous widow finds her rest and fulfillment through a marriage to one of the wealthiest and most honorable men of the city. But it is also more than a love story. It is an account of faith in which a number of prayers are offered to God and without exception answered to the benefit of the one praying. But it also more than an account of faith. It is the story of how a Moabite girl, who was an alien from the commonwealth of Israel and by law under the curse of Moab, found redemption in the village of Bethlehem and was accepted into the society of the people of God. And in all this, it is a picture of every believer’s relationship to God. It is the romance of redemption, a picture of what faith can and does accomplish in the life of every believer.
LOVE’S RESOLVE (Ruth 1:1-22) The book begins with the record of a lot of decisions, but two stand as primary to the entire plot of the book. First there was the bad decision of Elimelech to leave Bethlehem and move to Moab. In contrast, there is the good decision of Ruth to leave Moab and move to Bethlehem. In understanding the decision-making process involved, we can learn much about how to make decisions and live with their consequences. The setting of the beginning and much of this book is in the village of Bethlehem in Judah. Bethlehem is located on a narrow ridge about six miles south of Jerusalem. The area is surrounded by terraced slopes suitable for the cultivation of vineyards and orchards of olives and figs. In the fields beyond the terraces, wheat and barley have always been the principal crops grown. On the hillsides beyond the fields, flocks and herds were kept. Though the village was originally known as Ephrathah, it was not long before people began calling it Bethlehem which literally means “house of bread.” The first decision made in this book was a bad decision with tragic consequences. A man named Elimelech which means “my God is King” decided to leave his home in Bethlehem to travel to Moab. The Bible describes this family as “Ephrathites of Bethlehem, Judah” (Ruth 1:2) suggesting they were an old and established family in the village. By today’s terminology, they were “blue bloods.” Their decision to leave was probably not an easy decision to make, but that did not prevent them from making the wrong decision. There are several hints as to how Elimelech made his bad decision. First though it was Elimelech’s decision to go to Moab, it was probably made with his wife’s consent. Some commentators have even suggested she may have been the driving force behind the decision (cf. w. 20-21). If this is an accurate conclusion, the opening verses of Ruth portray a man being constantly nagged by his wife to take a course of action he knows to be wrong. But the fault in making this bad decision was not exclusively that of Naomi. As Elimelech considered the situation, he soon began developing his own little compromises by which he could justify his decision to go to Moab. First, he would only go “to sojourn” (v. 1). The Hebrew word gur refers to a status as resident aliens. In his original decision to move to Moab, it was never his determination to remain. Second, he would only go to “the country of Moab” (v. 1) literally “the fields of Moab.” The Hebrew word used in this context seeks to draw a distinction between the fields belonging to the nation Moab and the actual land of Moab which I would have included the cities. Perhaps he thought he could avoid the contamination of Moab by avoiding; the cities. It was the same kind of erroneous logic Lot, the father of Moab, had once used to justify moving toward Sodom. But if Elimelech was going to leave Bethlehem, why would he choose to go to Moab? The Moabites were descendants of an incestuous relationship between Lot and his oldest daughter (Gen. 19:29-38). As a people, they had often opposed Israel by refusing them water and
- Page 102 and 103: JOSEPH AS A SLAVE IN EGYPT (Gen. 39
- Page 104 and 105: plenty, God continued to bless Jose
- Page 106 and 107: Some critics have disputed the reli
- Page 108 and 109: high, and a man who had a vital rel
- Page 110 and 111: scarring and mutilation may be caus
- Page 112 and 113: God, Eliphaz was instructed, “Tak
- Page 114 and 115: First, Jochebed wove a basket out o
- Page 116 and 117: were a phenomenon which challenged
- Page 118 and 119: oasis Marah which means “bitter
- Page 120 and 121: The giving of the Law to Israel cam
- Page 122 and 123: While Moses and Joshua ascended the
- Page 124 and 125: A second area of interest in the Bo
- Page 126 and 127: ecause of the same kind of unbelief
- Page 128 and 129: Israel. “And the earth opened its
- Page 130 and 131: contains a chapter which the rabbis
- Page 132 and 133: Learning about a sustained confiden
- Page 134 and 135: Christ, John the Baptist chose seve
- Page 136 and 137: described as a savior meeting the S
- Page 138 and 139: JOSHUA: From Victory to Victory (Jo
- Page 140 and 141: THE NORTHERN CAMPAIGN (Josh. 11:1-1
- Page 142 and 143: TWENTY-EIGHT JUDGES: Othniel, Ehud,
- Page 144 and 145: attlefield or in spiritual realms.
- Page 146 and 147: DEBORAH AND BARAK AND THE DEFEAT OF
- Page 148 and 149: Lord is with us” (v. 13), suggest
- Page 150 and 151: GIDEON: THE READY CRUSADER (Jud. 7:
- Page 154 and 155: ead during their Exodus from Egypt
- Page 156 and 157: LOVE’S REQUEST (Ruth 3:1-18) Naom
- Page 158 and 159: worshipers. Because of the importan
- Page 160 and 161: paternity could not always be estab
- Page 162 and 163: Jephthah’s problems were not over
- Page 164 and 165: THE WIFE OF MANOAH (Jud. 13:1-25) (
- Page 166 and 167: decaying carcass of the lion as a h
- Page 168 and 169: Delilah sought to learn the secret
- Page 170 and 171: With the compromising Levite and Mi
- Page 172 and 173: attlefront would raise the spirits
- Page 174 and 175: “Then she made a vow and said, `O
- Page 176 and 177: the voice again, he was to remain w
- Page 178 and 179: territory, to Beth Shemesh, then He
- Page 180 and 181: when they would cry out to God beca
- Page 182 and 183: finding the lost asses; however, hi
- Page 184 and 185: a battle and the ensuing loss of li
- Page 186 and 187: Philistines disarmed the nation so
- Page 188 and 189: to mourn until God intervened and s
- Page 190 and 191: valley of Elah. “I defy the armie
- Page 192 and 193: Saul began to view David as a perso
- Page 194 and 195: Samuel were staying, he too began p
- Page 196 and 197: dead. Every legitimate means of dis
- Page 198 and 199: On the death of Saul, David was the
- Page 200 and 201: elieved Joab could be trusted. He p
LOVE’S RESOLVE<br />
(Ruth 1:1-22)<br />
<strong>The</strong> book begins with the record of a lot of decisions, but two stand as primary to the<br />
entire plot of the book. First there was the bad decision of Elimelech to leave Bethlehem and<br />
move to Moab. In contrast, there is the good decision of Ruth to leave Moab and move to<br />
Bethlehem. In understanding the decision-making process involved, we can learn much about<br />
how to make decisions and live with their consequences.<br />
<strong>The</strong> setting of the beginning and much of this book is in the village of Bethlehem in<br />
Judah. Bethlehem is located on a narrow ridge about six miles south of Jerusalem. <strong>The</strong> area is<br />
surrounded by terraced slopes suitable for the cultivation of vineyards and orchards of olives and<br />
figs. In the fields beyond the terraces, wheat and barley have always been the principal crops<br />
grown. On the hillsides beyond the fields, flocks and herds were kept. Though the village was<br />
originally known as Ephrathah, it was not long before people began calling it Bethlehem which<br />
literally means “house of bread.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> first decision made in this book was a bad decision with tragic consequences. A man<br />
named Elimelech which means “my God is King” decided to leave his home in Bethlehem to<br />
travel to Moab. <strong>The</strong> Bible describes this family as “Ephrathites of Bethlehem, Judah” (Ruth 1:2)<br />
suggesting they were an old and established family in the village. By today’s terminology, they<br />
were “blue bloods.” <strong>The</strong>ir decision to leave was probably not an easy decision to make, but that<br />
did not prevent them from making the wrong decision. <strong>The</strong>re are several hints as to how<br />
Elimelech made his bad decision.<br />
First though it was Elimelech’s decision to go to Moab, it was probably made with his<br />
wife’s consent. Some commentators have even suggested she may have been the driving force<br />
behind the decision (cf. w. 20-21). If this is an accurate conclusion, the opening verses of Ruth<br />
portray a man being constantly nagged by his wife to take a course of action he knows to be<br />
wrong.<br />
But the fault in making this bad decision was not exclusively that of Naomi. As<br />
Elimelech considered the situation, he soon began developing his own little compromises by<br />
which he could justify his decision to go to Moab. First, he would only go “to sojourn” (v. 1).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Hebrew word gur refers to a status as resident aliens. In his original decision to move to<br />
Moab, it was never his determination to remain.<br />
Second, he would only go to “the country of Moab” (v. 1) literally “the fields of Moab.”<br />
<strong>The</strong> Hebrew word used in this context seeks to draw a distinction between the fields belonging to<br />
the nation Moab and the actual land of Moab which I would have included the cities. Perhaps he<br />
thought he could avoid the contamination of Moab by avoiding; the cities. It was the same kind<br />
of erroneous logic Lot, the father of Moab, had once used to justify moving toward Sodom.<br />
But if Elimelech was going to leave Bethlehem, why would he choose to go to Moab?<br />
<strong>The</strong> Moabites were descendants of an incestuous relationship between Lot and his oldest<br />
daughter (Gen. 19:29-38). As a people, they had often opposed Israel by refusing them water and