A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns A Journey Through The Old Testament - Elmer Towns

elmertowns.com
from elmertowns.com More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

Christ whom Paul calls “the last Adam” (1 Cor. 15:45). In this sense Adam is “a type of Him who was to come” (Rom. 5:14). Every evil influence that Adam passed on to humanity, Christ overcame for the race. Because of Adam’s transgression, everyone is born with a sin nature, but Christ offers a new nature to those who experience His salvation (2 Cor. 5:17). Everyone will die because of Adam, but Christ’s death is a substitute for sin and through the Cross, the repentant sinner receives new life. Jesus claimed, “That they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly” (John 10:10). While the race is “condemned already” (3:18) because of Adam’s sin, “there is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1). Jesus came as the last Adam to lead a new race of those who were born again into His kingdom (John 1:13; 3:3). Writing to the Romans, the Apostle Paul outlined a comparison between Adam and Christ and their respective “races.” ROMANS 5:12-21 Adam Christ Sin entered Grace entered Offense transferred Free gift offered Condemnation Justification Death reigns Righteousness reigns Disobedience Obedience Makes men sinners Makes men righteous Sin abounds Grace abounds Death Eternal Life THREE CAIN: A Depressing Story of Failure (Genesis 4:1-5:32) No one can imagine the awe that surrounded the conception and birth of the first child in history. Adam and Eve knew they were to “replenish” the earth, but they had never been through the experience surrounding childbirth. They had no parents to guide them during pregnancy, and there is no record of God giving them instructions in the intricacies of bringing forth life. Most scholars think the innate knowledge given to our first parents at Creation included wisdom for bringing a child to maturity. As we relate to the dreams of joy that surround a new baby today, what about our first parents? They were looking for a “seed” (Gen. 3:15) that would defeat the tempter and deliver them. They probably did not understand the long-range nature of prophecy, so they probably expected their first child to be their redeemer. The first child born to human parents carried great expectations. Adam and Eve had lost their paradise, and no doubt they told their child of their experience. He should have learned by their mistake. God is quick to judge, but full of mercy. The first child, Cain, should have sought to walk with God, as did his parents; but he did not.

One of the unfortunate results of Adam’s sin was that it changed the nature of man, and that changed nature was evident in his first child. Sin became not only a part of human experience; it also became a governing factor in human nature. Due in part to the different physical conditions governing the pre-Flood world, men lived long lives, each person living almost a thousand years. But they were long evil years for the most part. The first man born into this world rejected God, murdered his brother, and established an evil society. Ultimately the world became so wicked that God destroyed all but a single family by means of a Flood. If history revolves around the lives of men and their influence, this early era of world history revolved around the influence of Cain. Remembered primarily as a man of great sin, he became the father of a civilization which is also today remembered chiefly for its wickedness. Many years later some of the final books of the New Testament described a sinful society and “the way of Cain” (Jude 11) and “Cain who was of the wicked one” (1 John 3:12). THE WAY OF CAIN (Gen. 4:1-7) The life of Cain is in many senses an irony. Here is a man who could have been remembered as a great man of God, but chose rather to follow his own selfish way. In this sense, he is an example of the truth of the proverb: “There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death” (Prov. 14:12; 16:25). His name means “acquisition” and he was so named by his mother because of her belief that she had received the promised seed, “a man even Jehovah” (Gen. 4:1, literal translation). Some commentators believe that Eve’s later naming of Abel (the name could mean “breath” or “vanity”) suggests a sense of disappointment on her part because Cain as a child was not living up to her expectations as “the God-Man.” In the early life of Cain there were a number of positive “firsts” by which he would probably have been remembered had it not been for the murder of Abel. The first recorded offering to the Lord was by Cain (v. 3). Further, though God probably provided a sacrifice for sin in the Garden for Adam, the first recorded example of a sacrifice for sin was God’s command to Cain (v. 7). Most Christians do not realize that the Scriptures record the Lord speaking more with Cain than with any other man in the pre-Flood world. Yet none of these positive influences were of any benefit to Cain who was committed to being his own selfish authority in life. The tragedy of Cain is the tragedy of a man who lives his own life his own way. He brought an offering to God, but he did it his way (Jude 11). His brother Abel also brought an offering, but he did it by faith (Heb. 11:4). Cain’s offering was “an offering of the fruit of the ground” (Gen. 4:3) whereas “Abel also brought of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat” (v. 4). Abel’s offering was accepted; Cain’s was not. Several reasons have been suggested as to why Cain’s offering was rejected. It is widely believed that the difference between these offerings is a difference of blood. Those who hold this view, point out Abel offered a blood sacrifice and it is the shedding of blood that is a propitiation to reconcile man to God. While this may be the case, others note that God made allowances for a non-blood offering in the grain offering (Lev. 2:1-16) and suggest the difference between Cain and Abel was one of attitude. That the Scriptures describe Abel as choosing the first and finest in his flock may imply Cain did not. Cain’s attitude may have been, “Anything will do for God.” This conclusion is contrary to the biblical prohibition of offering to God defective sacrifices. A third view argues the difference was in the object of worship. While all agree Abel was a worshiper of Jehovah, some interpreters believe Cain’s offering and later murder of Abel was a part of the worship of pagan deity; in which case Cain’s example may have been the precedent on which other human-sacrifice cults later developed. The result of Cain’s unacceptable sacrifice was evidenced in his reaction when God rejected him. Rather than repenting of his self-centeredness and responding positively to God, Cain got angry to the extent that it soon became evident in his physical appearance. Even though Cain was mad at God, God did not

One of the unfortunate results of Adam’s sin was that it changed the nature of man, and that changed<br />

nature was evident in his first child. Sin became not only a part of human experience; it also became a<br />

governing factor in human nature. Due in part to the different physical conditions governing the pre-Flood<br />

world, men lived long lives, each person living almost a thousand years. But they were long evil years for<br />

the most part. <strong>The</strong> first man born into this world rejected God, murdered his brother, and established an evil<br />

society. Ultimately the world became so wicked that God destroyed all but a single family by means of a<br />

Flood.<br />

If history revolves around the lives of men and their influence, this early era of world history<br />

revolved around the influence of Cain. Remembered primarily as a man of great sin, he became the father of<br />

a civilization which is also today remembered chiefly for its wickedness. Many years later some of the final<br />

books of the New <strong>Testament</strong> described a sinful society and “the way of Cain” (Jude 11) and “Cain who was<br />

of the wicked one” (1 John 3:12).<br />

THE WAY OF CAIN (Gen. 4:1-7)<br />

<strong>The</strong> life of Cain is in many senses an irony. Here is a man who could have been remembered as a<br />

great man of God, but chose rather to follow his own selfish way. In this sense, he is an example of the truth<br />

of the proverb: “<strong>The</strong>re is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death” (Prov. 14:12;<br />

16:25). His name means “acquisition” and he was so named by his mother because of her belief that she had<br />

received the promised seed, “a man even Jehovah” (Gen. 4:1, literal translation). Some commentators<br />

believe that Eve’s later naming of Abel (the name could mean “breath” or “vanity”) suggests a sense of<br />

disappointment on her part because Cain as a child was not living up to her expectations as “the God-Man.”<br />

In the early life of Cain there were a number of positive “firsts” by which he would probably have<br />

been remembered had it not been for the murder of Abel. <strong>The</strong> first recorded offering to the Lord was by<br />

Cain (v. 3). Further, though God probably provided a sacrifice for sin in the Garden for Adam, the first<br />

recorded example of a sacrifice for sin was God’s command to Cain (v. 7). Most Christians do not realize that<br />

the Scriptures record the Lord speaking more with Cain than with any other man in the pre-Flood world. Yet<br />

none of these positive influences were of any benefit to Cain who was committed to being his own selfish<br />

authority in life.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tragedy of Cain is the tragedy of a man who lives his own life his own way. He brought an<br />

offering to God, but he did it his way (Jude 11). His brother Abel also brought an offering, but he did it by faith<br />

(Heb. 11:4). Cain’s offering was “an offering of the fruit of the ground” (Gen. 4:3) whereas “Abel also brought<br />

of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat” (v. 4). Abel’s offering was accepted; Cain’s was not.<br />

Several reasons have been suggested as to why Cain’s offering was rejected. It is widely believed that<br />

the difference between these offerings is a difference of blood. Those who hold this view, point out Abel<br />

offered a blood sacrifice and it is the shedding of blood that is a propitiation to reconcile man to God. While<br />

this may be the case, others note that God made allowances for a non-blood offering in the grain offering (Lev.<br />

2:1-16) and suggest the difference between Cain and Abel was one of attitude. That the Scriptures describe<br />

Abel as choosing the first and finest in his flock may imply Cain did not. Cain’s attitude may have been,<br />

“Anything will do for God.” This conclusion is contrary to the biblical prohibition of offering to God defective<br />

sacrifices. A third view argues the difference was in the object of worship. While all agree Abel was a worshiper<br />

of Jehovah, some interpreters believe Cain’s offering and later murder of Abel was a part of the worship<br />

of pagan deity; in which case Cain’s example may have been the precedent on which other human-sacrifice<br />

cults later developed.<br />

<strong>The</strong> result of Cain’s unacceptable sacrifice was evidenced in his reaction when God rejected him.<br />

Rather than repenting of his self-centeredness and responding positively to God, Cain got angry to the extent<br />

that it soon became evident in his physical appearance. Even though Cain was mad at God, God did not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!