children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...
children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ... children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...
community leaders concerned with education. 5 While our data should not be extrapolated to the nation as a whole, we are confident that the children we identified as out of school are typical of the kinds of children out of school nationally. We are equally confident that the school policies and practices which we uncovered and which cause children to be out of school fairly represent ways in which school systems operate. In the 30 areas we surveyed we found 5.4 percent of all children'6 to 17 years old out of school for at least 45 days, one-quarter of the school year. 19.6 percent of the 16 and 17 year olds we found were out of school. 6 As with Census data, however, the overall average understates the severity of the problem for certain groups of children in specific places. -In Portland, Maine's Rivertol) Housing Project, children 6 to 17 from the predominantly white and poor population were out of school at a rate twice our survey average, 10.8 percent. -In a Census tract in Holyoke, Massachusetts, with a heavy concentration of Puerto Ricans, 6.7 percent of Puerto Rican children 7 to 15 and 37.5 percent of Puerto Rican children 16 to 17 were out of school. -In a New Bedford, Massachussetts Census tract, 60.0 percent of all 16 and 17 year olds and 72.7 percent of Portuguese youths that age were out of school. 5 Appendix A explains the methodology of our survey and includes a copy of our questionnaire; Appendix C lists the names and titles of officials interviewed and others who provided assistance and information. Appendix 0 lists state school officials' responses to our request for inforrna:ion on cbildren out of school. Most school officials were cooperative and helpful and we greatly appreciate their aid. A few would not talk to us at aU. The Superintendents of Hancock County and Bibb County, Georgia repeatedly refused to be interviewed. The Superintendent of Autauga County, Alabama did permit an interview, but would not permit otber scbool employees to be interviewed. 6 Compulsory attendance laws in 48 states require attendance for 7-15 year olds, but states vary as to the ages children must start scbool and when they may leave. Our judgment is that children should be expected to stay in school until they have acquired requisite literacy skills and credentials, wbich generally takes children to age 17 and beyond. Therefore, in our analysis of Census data, we used the 7-15 age grouping to allow for comparability within the compulsory attendance framework, and the 7-17 age grouping as well. Our own COP survey reflects our further judgment that 6 year olds should be in school as well, and data is therefore summarized for 6 to 17 year olds. -In a virtually all black Census tract in Washington, D.C., 20.8 percent of 16 and 17 year olds were out of school. Characteristics of Children Out of School Census data helped us begin to draw a picture of the children most likely to be out of school. Children are out of school all over America and come from every racial and income group. But low income children and those from unemployed households are disproportionately nonenrolled. Children from families with less education are out of school more than children whose families have more education. Minority children are out of school more than white children. And rural children are nonenrolled more than urban children. The Census asked no questions about why these children are out of school, what their problems are, how their parents tried to deal with them, and what are the school policies and practices that these children and their families have to encounter. These are the questions we sought to answer in our survey. We found that if a child is not White, or is white but not middle class, does not speak English, is poor, 3
- Page 1: CHILDREN OUT OF SCHOOL IN AMERICA A
- Page 4 and 5: Copyright If.> October 1974 by the
- Page 7 and 8: People Who Worked Oft This Report .
- Page 9: Portland, Maine CDF staff Cambridge
- Page 12: Foreword Introduction Chapter 1 Cha
- Page 16 and 17: CHAPTER 1 Table I CHAPTER 2 Table I
- Page 23 and 24: districts in Alabama, Georgia, Sout
- Page 25 and 26: critics do not contest the importan
- Page 27 and 28: warm while they are there. Ad hoc h
- Page 29 and 30: Postscript: On Child Advocacy Those
- Page 31 and 32: Ask them to prove that they are not
- Page 33: school rather than leave or to info
- Page 36 and 37: or told "we'll notify you when chil
- Page 39 and 40: patience to teach him." When a thir
- Page 41 and 42: officials said it was too late in t
- Page 43: school. That's where I should be. T
- Page 46 and 47: Philippe, 12 When Philippe, his thr
- Page 48 and 49: Massachusetts Department of Youth S
- Page 51 and 52: This chapter presents our analysis
- Page 53 and 54: Table II Children Not EnroUed 1 Asa
- Page 55 and 56: Proportion of Children in Rural Are
- Page 58 and 59: Children who live with only one par
- Page 61 and 62: CDF Survey of Children Out of Schoo
- Page 63 and 64: tive issues and sometimes about dif
- Page 66: .j>. 00 Table IX Children Out of Sc
community leaders concerned with education. 5<br />
While our data should not be extrapolated to the<br />
nation as a whole, we are confident that the <strong>children</strong><br />
we identified as <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> are typical <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>ds<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> nationally. We are equally<br />
confident that the <strong>school</strong> policies and practices which<br />
we uncovered and which cause <strong>children</strong> to be <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>school</strong> fairly represent ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>school</strong> systems<br />
operate.<br />
In the 30 areas we surveyed we found 5.4 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> all <strong>children</strong>'6 to 17 years old <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> for at<br />
least 45 days, one-quarter <strong>of</strong> the <strong>school</strong> year. 19.6<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the 16 and 17 year olds we found were<br />
<strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>. 6 As with Census data, however, the<br />
overall average understates the severity <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />
for certa<strong>in</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong> specific places.<br />
-In Portland, Ma<strong>in</strong>e's Rivertol) Hous<strong>in</strong>g Project,<br />
<strong>children</strong> 6 to 17 from the predom<strong>in</strong>antly white<br />
and poor population were <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> at a<br />
rate twice our survey average, 10.8 percent.<br />
-In a Census tract <strong>in</strong> Holyoke, Massachusetts,<br />
with a heavy concentration <strong>of</strong> Puerto Ricans,<br />
6.7 percent <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rican <strong>children</strong> 7 to 15<br />
and 37.5 percent <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rican <strong>children</strong> 16<br />
to 17 were <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>.<br />
-In a New Bedford, Massachussetts Census<br />
tract, 60.0 percent <strong>of</strong> all 16 and 17 year olds<br />
and 72.7 percent <strong>of</strong> Portuguese y<strong>out</strong>hs that age<br />
were <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>.<br />
5 Appendix A expla<strong>in</strong>s the methodology <strong>of</strong> our survey and<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes a copy <strong>of</strong> our questionnaire; Appendix C lists the<br />
names and titles <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>in</strong>terviewed and others who<br />
provided assistance and <strong>in</strong>formation. Appendix 0 lists state<br />
<strong>school</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials' responses to our request for <strong>in</strong>forrna:ion on<br />
cbildren <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>. Most <strong>school</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficials were cooperative<br />
and helpful and we greatly appreciate their aid. A<br />
few would not talk to us at aU. The Super<strong>in</strong>tendents <strong>of</strong><br />
Hancock County and Bibb County, Georgia repeatedly refused<br />
to be <strong>in</strong>terviewed. The Super<strong>in</strong>tendent <strong>of</strong> Autauga<br />
County, Alabama did permit an <strong>in</strong>terview, but would not<br />
permit otber scbool employees to be <strong>in</strong>terviewed.<br />
6 Compulsory attendance laws <strong>in</strong> 48 states require attendance<br />
for 7-15 year olds, but states vary as to the ages <strong>children</strong><br />
must start scbool and when they may leave. Our judgment<br />
is that <strong>children</strong> should be expected to stay <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong> until<br />
they have acquired requisite literacy skills and credentials,<br />
wbich generally takes <strong>children</strong> to age 17 and beyond.<br />
Therefore, <strong>in</strong> our analysis <strong>of</strong> Census data, we used the 7-15<br />
age group<strong>in</strong>g to allow for comparability with<strong>in</strong> the compulsory<br />
attendance framework, and the 7-17 age group<strong>in</strong>g as<br />
well. Our own COP survey reflects our further judgment<br />
that 6 year olds should be <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong> as well, and data is<br />
therefore summarized for 6 to 17 year olds.<br />
-In a virtually all black Census tract <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton,<br />
D.C., 20.8 percent <strong>of</strong> 16 and 17 year<br />
olds were <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>.<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Children Out <strong>of</strong> School<br />
Census data helped us beg<strong>in</strong> to draw a picture <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>children</strong> most likely to be <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>. Children<br />
are <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> all over America and come<br />
from every racial and <strong>in</strong>come group. But low <strong>in</strong>come<br />
<strong>children</strong> and those from unemployed households<br />
are disproportionately nonenrolled. Children<br />
from families with less education are <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong><br />
more than <strong>children</strong> whose families have more education.<br />
M<strong>in</strong>ority <strong>children</strong> are <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong> more than<br />
white <strong>children</strong>. And rural <strong>children</strong> are nonenrolled<br />
more than urban <strong>children</strong>.<br />
The Census asked no questions ab<strong>out</strong> why these<br />
<strong>children</strong> are <strong>out</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>school</strong>, what their problems<br />
are, how their parents tried to deal with them, and<br />
what are the <strong>school</strong> policies and practices that these<br />
<strong>children</strong> and their families have to encounter. These<br />
are the questions we sought to answer <strong>in</strong> our survey.<br />
We found that if a child is not White, or is white<br />
but not middle class, does not speak English, is poor,<br />
3