children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...

children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ... children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...

diglib.lib.utk.edu
from diglib.lib.utk.edu More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

abuse laws of the state. However, the child should remain in the regular educational program until such time as his behavior becomes unreasonably disruptive, or endangers his own life or that of other children, at which time appropriate procedures may be initiated. Adequate administrative and judicial appeal mechanisms should be established for both school and parent to resolve assessment and placement disagreements. The Difficulty of bnplementing Quality Programs for Special Needs Children In Regular Public School Classes No matter how worthy the goal, old attitudes die slowly, new procedures upset bureaucracies, and new and improved programs require more money. Much more than court decrees and laws will be needed to ensure that the thousands upon thousands of children with special needs get the educational parity they deserve. Enforcement of existing court decrees and state statutes is a first step. Developing good tests and using the procedu.res we have outlined is another. But changing attitudes toward special needs children and preparing teachers and their peers to deal with them are prerequisite steps if the problems we have found are to be remedied. Many people oppose integration of special needs children into regular schools and classrooms. Already pressed administrators who are constantly battling scarce financial resources, limited personnel, inadequate facilities, teacher resistance, and parental fears, may not be receptive to taking on still more children with even greater problems and demands. For example, the principal of one of the junior high schools in Portland, Maine feels the new special education law in Maine will "hurt the public schools. It's just that we don't have the facility. We need a special school for mentally retarded kids. Integration is fine theoretically. But imagine those people in your class and the teachers spending all their time with them. "99 Teacher resistance to demands to integrate special needs children is likely to be particularly acute. 114 They already feel overworked and fear they will receive little help. They are also reluctant to face children whose needs they have not been prepared to understand. One official summed up a pervasive feeling we got in many districts: "There has been a significant effort to mainstream the kids but teachers do not want to be bothered with having the special education kids in their classes. "100 Nothing is more important than understanding and working with teachers. In-service training and adequate support personnel must be provided. Most importantly, teachers should be made to understand more about the kinds of children that are capable of functioning in a regular school setting, and offered the appropriate forum for voicing fears and requesting help. They must be provided adequate supports to meet these children's needs. Parents may resist integration of special needs children. Sometimes parents of special needs children believe special placement, even separate schools, may result in more and better education for their children. They tend to be protective and to assume "special" means "better." It is interesting that their children often do not share their views. Informal discussions with a group of handicapped children and their parents at a special school in Massachusetts showed parents liked "special" schools but the children were more willing, even eager, to go through the rough and tumble of regular school instead of being sequestered and stigmatized. Parents of children who do not have special needs often do not encourage mixing the two in classes. They fear educational quality overall will diminish. They do not want to see school dollars stretched even thinner for children whose needs may be greater and costlier and, in their view, for whom educational benefits are less evident. And they fear exposure of their child to others with problems. Unfortunately, people who do not have special needs children often hold a stereotyped, monolithic image of such children. They recall the most profoundly mentally retarded children or those with severe physical de- 09 Interview with Dan Murphy, Principal, Lincoln Junior High School, Portland, Maine, 10/24/73. 100 Interview with James Ingram, Head Counselor, West High School, Davenport, Iowa, 11/8/73.

formities to argue against all children with special needs being placed in regular classes. The fact is, however, that the great majority of children with special needs are those who could profit from schooling and become self-sufficient. A host of children have mild physical disabilities, such as nearsightedness, deafness, or physical handicaps which in no way affect their intellectual and social development. Parents, teachers and adrr.inistrators need to be educated to differentiate among special needs children and to learn what is appropriate, helpful or harmful in each case. Individual assessment is essential, as is a range of program options that would allow children to be integrated according to their needs and abilities. 'ol Resistance to integration of programs for special needs children into regular school programs may also come from some of those who perceive a stake in separate facilities and programs and who fear that their power base will be undercut with integration. Some advocate associations for handicapped children prefer to maintain separate funding because of the small resource pie within which they must compete against other special needs groups and general school expenditures. They therefore foster labeling and segregation. Cohesive pressure among special needs groups is therefore rendered more difficult. All these attitudes must be reanalyzed from the point of view of children who, after all, should be the focus of those concerned. Children in regular classes should learn to accept children who have different kinds of problems. Handicapped children should not be isolated. Segregated programs usually lack leverage on central school resources, and they make it more likely that children (1) will be dumped aside; (2) will have their handicap emphasized rather than the similarities all children have in common; (3) will be stigmatized; (4) will receive little definable educational benefit; and (5) will have greater difficulty adjusting to a larger society in which they must live. A teacher at the Baxter State School for the Deaf which is located on an island in Casco Bay near Portland, Maine, commented: "The island is beautiful, its great for nature walks and the like, but completely unrealistic. Kids live here for 12 years and never deal with the hearing world. Many of them do get job placements after. But they only live for eight hours with hearing people and then withdraw."102 The evidence of educational benefit to children from separate special classes is unimpressive. For children with profound problems - autistic children or those whose IQ is below 25 - separate and special programs may have substantial benefits. But "research concerning classes for children with more ambiguous handicaps - the educable mentally retarded, mildly emotionally disturbed and perceptually handicapped - reach quite different conclusions. Those programs do not tangibly benefit their students, whose equally handicapped counterparts placed in regular school classes perform at least as well and without apparent detriment to their normal classmates."103 Important steps are now being taken in several states that bear careful scrutiny. Massachusetts, for example, has recently passed a new Special Education law which is a model of flexibility and sensitivity to labels. Its passage is an example of effective outside advocacy combined with responsive state legislative and executive officials. This coalition's strength will determine bow effectively the law is implemented. We hope other states will follow Massachusetts' lead. Those interested in receiving more information on this state law and its progress should write to: David Liederman, Director State Office for Children 120 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116 or to: Larry Brown, Director Massachusetts Advocacy Center Two Park Square - 7th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02116. ---- 101 For example, special education officials of the Public Schools of the District of Columbia, in September, 1972, devised a "Comprehensive Plan for Special Education" for ten levels of programming for children with special problems ranging from regular classroom placement with supportive educational services to tuition grants to private school to institutionalization. 102 Interview with a teacher, Baxter School for the Deaf, Portland. Maine who asked to remain anonymous. l03 David Kirp, "Student Classification, Public Policy, and the Courts," Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 44, No.1, February, 1974, p. 19. 115

abuse laws <strong>of</strong> the state. However, the child should<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the regular educational program until<br />

such time as his behavior becomes unreasonably<br />

disruptive, or endangers his own life or that <strong>of</strong><br />

other <strong>children</strong>, at which time appropriate procedures<br />

may be <strong>in</strong>itiated. Adequate adm<strong>in</strong>istrative<br />

and judicial appeal mechanisms should be established<br />

for both <strong>school</strong> and parent to resolve assessment<br />

and placement disagreements.<br />

The Difficulty <strong>of</strong> bnplement<strong>in</strong>g Quality<br />

Programs for Special Needs Children<br />

In Regular Public School Classes<br />

No matter how worthy the goal, old attitudes die<br />

slowly, new procedures upset bureaucracies, and new<br />

and improved programs require more money. Much<br />

more than court decrees and laws will be needed to<br />

ensure that the thousands upon thousands <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong><br />

with special needs get the educational parity<br />

they deserve. Enforcement <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g court decrees<br />

and state statutes is a first step. Develop<strong>in</strong>g good<br />

tests and us<strong>in</strong>g the procedu.res we have <strong>out</strong>l<strong>in</strong>ed is<br />

another. But chang<strong>in</strong>g attitudes toward special needs<br />

<strong>children</strong> and prepar<strong>in</strong>g teachers and their peers to<br />

deal with them are prerequisite steps if the problems<br />

we have found are to be remedied.<br />

Many people oppose <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> special needs<br />

<strong>children</strong> <strong>in</strong>to regular <strong>school</strong>s and classrooms. Already<br />

pressed adm<strong>in</strong>istrators who are constantly battl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scarce f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources, limited personnel,<br />

<strong>in</strong>adequate facilities, teacher resistance, and parental<br />

fears, may not be receptive to tak<strong>in</strong>g on still more<br />

<strong>children</strong> with even greater problems and demands.<br />

For example, the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the junior high<br />

<strong>school</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Portland, Ma<strong>in</strong>e feels the new special<br />

education law <strong>in</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong>e will "hurt the public<br />

<strong>school</strong>s. It's just that we don't have the facility.<br />

We need a special <strong>school</strong> for mentally retarded kids.<br />

Integration is f<strong>in</strong>e theoretically. But imag<strong>in</strong>e those<br />

people <strong>in</strong> your class and the teachers spend<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

their time with them. "99<br />

Teacher resistance to demands to <strong>in</strong>tegrate special<br />

needs <strong>children</strong> is likely to be particularly acute.<br />

114<br />

They already feel overworked and fear they will<br />

receive little help. They are also reluctant to face<br />

<strong>children</strong> whose needs they have not been prepared<br />

to understand. One <strong>of</strong>ficial summed up a pervasive<br />

feel<strong>in</strong>g we got <strong>in</strong> many districts:<br />

"There has been a significant effort to ma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

the kids but teachers do not want to be bothered<br />

with hav<strong>in</strong>g the special education kids <strong>in</strong> their<br />

classes. "100<br />

Noth<strong>in</strong>g is more important than understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and work<strong>in</strong>g with teachers. In-service tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and<br />

adequate support personnel must be provided. Most<br />

importantly, teachers should be made to understand<br />

more ab<strong>out</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> that are capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a regular <strong>school</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

the appropriate forum for voic<strong>in</strong>g fears and<br />

request<strong>in</strong>g help. They must be provided adequate<br />

supports to meet these <strong>children</strong>'s needs.<br />

Parents may resist <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> special needs<br />

<strong>children</strong>. Sometimes parents <strong>of</strong> special needs <strong>children</strong><br />

believe special placement, even separate<br />

<strong>school</strong>s, may result <strong>in</strong> more and better education for<br />

their <strong>children</strong>. They tend to be protective and to<br />

assume "special" means "better." It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that their <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten do not share their views.<br />

Informal discussions with a group <strong>of</strong> handicapped<br />

<strong>children</strong> and their parents at a special <strong>school</strong> <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts<br />

showed parents liked "special" <strong>school</strong>s<br />

but the <strong>children</strong> were more will<strong>in</strong>g, even eager, to<br />

go through the rough and tumble <strong>of</strong> regular <strong>school</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g sequestered and stigmatized.<br />

Parents <strong>of</strong> <strong>children</strong> who do not have special needs<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten do not encourage mix<strong>in</strong>g the two <strong>in</strong> classes.<br />

They fear educational quality overall will dim<strong>in</strong>ish.<br />

They do not want to see <strong>school</strong> dollars stretched<br />

even th<strong>in</strong>ner for <strong>children</strong> whose needs may be greater<br />

and costlier and, <strong>in</strong> their view, for whom educational<br />

benefits are less evident. And they fear exposure <strong>of</strong><br />

their child to others with problems. Unfortunately,<br />

people who do not have special needs <strong>children</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

hold a stereotyped, monolithic image <strong>of</strong> such <strong>children</strong>.<br />

They recall the most pr<strong>of</strong>oundly mentally retarded<br />

<strong>children</strong> or those with severe physical de-<br />

09 Interview with Dan Murphy, Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal, L<strong>in</strong>coln Junior<br />

High School, Portland, Ma<strong>in</strong>e, 10/24/73.<br />

100 Interview with James Ingram, Head Counselor, West<br />

High School, Davenport, Iowa, 11/8/73.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!