children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...

children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ... children out of school in america - University of Tennessee Digital ...

diglib.lib.utk.edu
from diglib.lib.utk.edu More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

over again for four or five years. u8a In Montgomery, Alabama, classes for educable mentally retarded children in junior high were offered for the first time in 1972-73. It was not until 1973-74 that the first senior high school special education classes were instituted. Holyoke has only one class for emotionally disturbed children ages 10 through 12. It is located at Highland Elementary School and serves only that district's more affluent population. Quality. Many purportedly educational programs for handicapped children are in fact custodial and/ or recreational. In Floyd County, one former mental retardation worker said that the County's classes for educable retarded children were "purely babysitting. The teachers are primarily trying to keep the kids busy." He characterized the two classes for trainable retarded children in the County as "pretty good" to "terrible."89 In Somerville, a Neighborhood Youth Corps worker referred to the special classes in one school as a "dumping ground for slow learners" and alleged that children stay in the program three or four years, learning the same things over and over with no options open to them. 40 Many of the school districts we surveyed said they provided home instruction (often referred to as the Homebound Program) for students who are either physically handicapped or so emotionally disturbed that they could not attend regular classes. Many of the children who actually received these services had only short-term illnesses. These temporarily disabled children often filled the workloads of the few available home teachers. Students with longterm handicaps which kept them permanently out of school received fewer home services. When given, home instruction was, on the average, an hour per day, two or three times a week. Students who depend on this form of instruction for their continuing education are not only deprived of participation in significant educational activities such as science laboratories but also may suffer from limited or no contact with other children. They also must 8a Interview with a school official, Somerville, Massachusetts, who asked to remain anonymoCs. 89 Interview with a person in Floyd County, Kentucky who asked to remain anonymous. 40 Interview with Jean Luce. Neighborhood Youth Corps (Out-of- chool). Somerville. Massachusetts, 1112/73. 100 go to school a much longer period of time to earn enough credits to qualify for high school graduation. Contributing to their poor quality is the inferior status most special education programs occupy in the eyes of too many school officials, teachers, parents and children. The principal of Portland High School sees a role for a new vocational school to train the EMR students for "simple maintenance work, sweeping floors."4l In Springfield, the itinerant learning disabilities program is often restricted to those schools where there is available space or a free room or alcove or closet. Since the schools where Puerto Rican children are concentrated are extremely overcrowded, there are no itinerant learning disabilities teachers there. School officials complained most about a lack of trained personnel for special education classes. One school official we interviewed said he phased out two classes for emotionally disturbed children at the end of 1972-73 because "we can't find teachers who can handle these kids. I walked into one of those classes one day and Twas so discouraged ... if anyone from the public had seen it. ..."42 In Georgia, 40 percent of the teachers for EMR classes are not fully certified to teach such classes. 48 Many Sumter County, South Carolina officials said that hardly any colleges or universities have training programs for special education. "The legislature keeps expanding the requirements."" Lack of trained personnel is a main problem restricting expansion of special education programs. This complaint was echoed it] the District of Columbia where one official said many children in need of special education were not being served because of the limited number of good qualified special education teachers.4 S Mont- 4t Interview with Walter Hansen, Principal, Portland High School, 10/25/73. 42 Interview with an official. Portland, Maine, who asked to remain anonymous. 48 This figure was confirmed by the Director of the Division of Special Education in Georgia in an interview with a CDF staff member, August 1974. 44 Interview with Dr. Hugb Stoddard, Superintendent, of Schools, R. E. Davis, Direclor of Special Services, and W. T. Lavender, Assistant Title I Coordinator, Sumter County No.2, South Carolina, 1121/74. 45 Interview with Julian West, Assistant to the Assistant Superintendent, Washington, D.C., 5/23/74. 4(' Interview with Martha White, Special Education Coordinator, Montgomery, Alabama, 11\0/74 and 1/1\/74.

• gomery, Alabama did not set up learning disabilities classes until recently. There is a good selection of teachers for programs for the mentally retarded, but learning disability teachers are scarcer than "hen's teeth. "46 Misclassification For children with special needs to be in poor programs is educationally unsound; for them to be in the wrong programs is harmful and cruel. Children with one problem who are put in classes geared for a different problem may not learn, may fall further behind and experience great frustration. Those who are "normal" like B.J. and his New Bedford friends described in Chapter I, who have been misdiagnosed or misplaced for racially discriminatory or for other reasons, suffer grave doubts about their own abilities and may lose all motivation to go to school at all. The damage to their intellectual and emotional development may be great. As Judge J. Skelly Wright wrote in his decision in Hobson v. Hansen about students who had been misclassified: The unfortunate students, treated as if they were subnormal, come to accept the fact that they are subnormal.4 7 Despite these foreseeable harmful consequences, misclassification in schools is rife. The most striking data we turned up point to racial discrimination in the classification process. But we also discovered three other major causes of error in placing children in special education. First, assessment techniques are inadequate. They often cannot pinpoint the cause of symptoms. They are costly and facilities and trained personnel may be in short supply. Less expensive, standardized tests are crude measures of overall performance and may be biased against culturally or linguistically different children. Second, children are often placed on the basis of subjective evaluation. Special education classes may be misused by classroom teachers to remove children who are disruptive, who do not have a handicap, and who will not benefit from special educational 47 269 F.Supp. 401, 484 (D.D.C. 1967), af}'d. ell ballc sub 110m. Smuck v. Hobson, 408 F.2d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1969). instruction. If a teachei: does not deliberately banish trouble-makers to special education classes, he or she may evaluate such students subjectively and decide they belong there because of their behavior. Whether willful or unwitting, misclassification commonly occurs. Third, many financial aid programs provide additional funds for serving children with special needs. The incentive of increased revenues sometimes tempts school and other officials to be careless about identification, labeling and segregation of students into special education classes. Rather than seeking children with unmet needs who may be difficult to find, the temptation to label those at hand is appealing. Each of these problems in the classification of children is abetted by the virtual monopoly school officials exercise in making these critical decisions. Even more than the suspension process which we discuss in Chapter 5, classification procedures, or the lack of them, are hidden from public and parental view. Racial Discrimination in Classification -Janice, 16, is in the 10th grade in Macon, Georgia. She has been suspended several times for refusing to be placed in a special education class. The root of this problem extends back to September 1972 when Janice says she was told by her white advisor that she should be placed in special math and English classes because of her "attitude." Janice refused on grounds that these classes are for "dumb people." Since September, she has been suspended on an average of once every three months for refusing to be placed in these classes. However, she has continued to return to school in her regular classes and maintains a C average. Janice feels she needs tutoring in math and English but does not need to be placed in a special education class. If she is forced into such a class, she will drop out. She would be ostracized by her friends who would tease her about being in a class with a "bunch of dummies. Teachers in these classes don't teach, they just try to keep the dummies quiet." The threat of being placed in this class has caused Janice to "study harder in order to show the white folks that she is not dumb." Thus far, 101

•<br />

gomery, Alabama did not set up learn<strong>in</strong>g disabilities<br />

classes until recently. There is a good selection <strong>of</strong><br />

teachers for programs for the mentally retarded, but<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g disability teachers are scarcer than "hen's<br />

teeth. "46<br />

Misclassification<br />

For <strong>children</strong> with special needs to be <strong>in</strong> poor programs<br />

is educationally unsound; for them to be <strong>in</strong><br />

the wrong programs is harmful and cruel. Children<br />

with one problem who are put <strong>in</strong> classes geared for<br />

a different problem may not learn, may fall further<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d and experience great frustration. Those who<br />

are "normal" like B.J. and his New Bedford friends<br />

described <strong>in</strong> Chapter I, who have been misdiagnosed<br />

or misplaced for racially discrim<strong>in</strong>atory or for other<br />

reasons, suffer grave doubts ab<strong>out</strong> their own abilities<br />

and may lose all motivation to go to <strong>school</strong> at<br />

all. The damage to their <strong>in</strong>tellectual and emotional<br />

development may be great. As Judge J. Skelly<br />

Wright wrote <strong>in</strong> his decision <strong>in</strong> Hobson v. Hansen<br />

ab<strong>out</strong> students who had been misclassified:<br />

The unfortunate students, treated as if they were<br />

subnormal, come to accept the fact that they are<br />

subnormal.4 7<br />

Despite these foreseeable harmful consequences,<br />

misclassification <strong>in</strong> <strong>school</strong>s is rife. The most strik<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data we turned up po<strong>in</strong>t to racial discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong><br />

the classification process. But we also discovered<br />

three other major causes <strong>of</strong> error <strong>in</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>children</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> special education.<br />

First, assessment techniques are <strong>in</strong>adequate. They<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten cannot p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t the cause <strong>of</strong> symptoms. They<br />

are costly and facilities and tra<strong>in</strong>ed personnel may<br />

be <strong>in</strong> short supply. Less expensive, standardized<br />

tests are crude measures <strong>of</strong> overall performance and<br />

may be biased aga<strong>in</strong>st culturally or l<strong>in</strong>guistically different<br />

<strong>children</strong>.<br />

Second, <strong>children</strong> are <strong>of</strong>ten placed on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

subjective evaluation. Special education classes may<br />

be misused by classroom teachers to remove <strong>children</strong><br />

who are disruptive, who do not have a handicap,<br />

and who will not benefit from special educational<br />

47 269 F.Supp. 401, 484 (D.D.C. 1967), af}'d. ell ballc<br />

sub 110m. Smuck v. Hobson, 408 F.2d 175 (D.C. Cir.<br />

1969).<br />

<strong>in</strong>struction. If a teachei: does not deliberately banish<br />

trouble-makers to special education classes, he or<br />

she may evaluate such students subjectively and<br />

decide they belong there because <strong>of</strong> their behavior.<br />

Whether willful or unwitt<strong>in</strong>g, misclassification commonly<br />

occurs.<br />

Third, many f<strong>in</strong>ancial aid programs provide additional<br />

funds for serv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>children</strong> with special needs.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>centive <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased revenues sometimes<br />

tempts <strong>school</strong> and other <strong>of</strong>ficials to be careless ab<strong>out</strong><br />

identification, label<strong>in</strong>g and segregation <strong>of</strong> students<br />

<strong>in</strong>to special education classes. Rather than seek<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>children</strong> with unmet needs who may be difficult to<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d, the temptation to label those at hand is appeal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these problems <strong>in</strong> the classification <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>children</strong> is abetted by the virtual monopoly <strong>school</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials exercise <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g these critical decisions.<br />

Even more than the suspension process which we<br />

discuss <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5, classification procedures, or<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> them, are hidden from public and parental<br />

view.<br />

Racial Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> Classification<br />

-Janice, 16, is <strong>in</strong> the 10th grade <strong>in</strong> Macon, Georgia.<br />

She has been suspended several times for refus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to be placed <strong>in</strong> a special education class. The<br />

root <strong>of</strong> this problem extends back to September<br />

1972 when Janice says she was told by her white<br />

advisor that she should be placed <strong>in</strong> special math<br />

and English classes because <strong>of</strong> her "attitude."<br />

Janice refused on grounds that these classes are<br />

for "dumb people." S<strong>in</strong>ce September, she has been<br />

suspended on an average <strong>of</strong> once every three<br />

months for refus<strong>in</strong>g to be placed <strong>in</strong> these classes.<br />

However, she has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to return to <strong>school</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> her regular classes and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s a C average.<br />

Janice feels she needs tutor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> math and English<br />

but does not need to be placed <strong>in</strong> a special<br />

education class. If she is forced <strong>in</strong>to such a class,<br />

she will drop <strong>out</strong>. She would be ostracized by<br />

her friends who would tease her ab<strong>out</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a<br />

class with a "bunch <strong>of</strong> dummies. Teachers <strong>in</strong><br />

these classes don't teach, they just try to keep the<br />

dummies quiet."<br />

The threat <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g placed <strong>in</strong> this class has<br />

caused Janice to "study harder <strong>in</strong> order to show<br />

the white folks that she is not dumb." Thus far,<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!