05.01.2013 Views

The war as seen by an archaeologist. Reconstruction of barbarian ...

The war as seen by an archaeologist. Reconstruction of barbarian ...

The war as seen by an archaeologist. Reconstruction of barbarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110<br />

Fig. 2: Shield boss from N<strong>as</strong>ławice with traces <strong>of</strong> deformation<br />

(KONTNY 2001a: Fig 2).<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ged in time, yet it never fell below 50%, <strong>an</strong>d sometimes<br />

reached (A 2 ) or even exceeded (B 2b ) 90% 14 .<br />

Diagram 1 does not, however, distinguish between the<br />

burials with single shafted weapon heads <strong>an</strong>d those with their<br />

greater number. For that re<strong>as</strong>on I decided to study also other<br />

<strong>as</strong>pects <strong>of</strong> this problem. First I put together the burials with<br />

more th<strong>an</strong> a single shafted weapon head (ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong>of</strong> frequency<br />

me<strong>as</strong>ured in the same way <strong>as</strong> above) - Diagram 2. It yielded<br />

the following picture: burials with several shafted weapon<br />

heads c<strong>an</strong> be found <strong>as</strong> early <strong>as</strong> in ph<strong>as</strong>e A 1 , yet their number<br />

is very small. <strong>The</strong> ph<strong>as</strong>es which follow m<strong>an</strong>ifest a tendency<br />

to<strong>war</strong>ds incre<strong>as</strong>e, reaching a culmination in ph<strong>as</strong>e B 2b (more<br />

th<strong>an</strong> 70 % burials with weapons had several heads). <strong>The</strong>n there<br />

w<strong>as</strong> a gradual decline <strong>of</strong> import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> this category <strong>of</strong> grave<br />

goods, which completely disappeared in ph<strong>as</strong>es C 2 -D 15 .<br />

Bartosz Kontny<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

%<br />

65,5<br />

87,1<br />

81,2 77,5 83,1<br />

91,6<br />

76,4 68,8<br />

51,4<br />

A1 A2 A3 B1 B1a B2b B2/C1 late C2-D<br />

stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> ph<strong>as</strong>e<br />

C1a-C1b<br />

Diagram 1: Frequency <strong>of</strong> weapon graves furnished with<br />

weapon head(s) in the Przeworsk Culture<br />

%<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

20,8 26,5<br />

52,3<br />

70,9<br />

43,4<br />

24,7<br />

3,4 3,2<br />

0<br />

A1 A2 A3 B1 B1a B2b B2/C1 late C2-D<br />

stage<br />

<strong>of</strong> ph<strong>as</strong>e<br />

C1a-C1b<br />

Diagram 2: Frequency <strong>of</strong> weapon graves furnished<br />

with th<strong>an</strong> one shafted weapon head in the<br />

Przeworsk Culture<br />

<strong>The</strong> appear<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> more th<strong>an</strong> two heads <strong>of</strong> shafted weapons<br />

in burials h<strong>as</strong> been remarked upon in literature <strong>an</strong>d this<br />

phenomenon w<strong>as</strong> mainly linked with ph<strong>as</strong>e B 2b 16 . In this<br />

connection it seemed worth while to study the import<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

<strong>of</strong> this phenomenon. A histogram (Diagram 3) presenting<br />

the numbers <strong>of</strong> grave <strong>as</strong>semblages containing several heads<br />

w<strong>as</strong> made. Two vari<strong>an</strong>ts: two shafted weapon heads, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

more th<strong>an</strong> two shafted weapon heads were taken into consideration.<br />

<strong>The</strong> diagram indicates that burials with more th<strong>an</strong><br />

two shafted weapon heads were very rare <strong>an</strong>d those with two<br />

heads were predomin<strong>an</strong>t 17 .<br />

It is worth reviewing how the frequency <strong>of</strong> barbed heads<br />

looks against that background (these heads were included<br />

in Diagram 2). It is known that they appeared in the Rom<strong>an</strong><br />

Period until ph<strong>as</strong>e C 1a 18 , <strong>an</strong>d were considered to be the<br />

most numerous in ph<strong>as</strong>es B 1 <strong>an</strong>d B 2a 19 . <strong>The</strong> data (frequen-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!