05.01.2013 Views

Dialogue Editing

Dialogue Editing

Dialogue Editing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

How We Got Where We Are 7<br />

It was clear to all that a method of showing sound and picture was of<br />

great commercial interest. In the late 1880s, Edison and his associate, W.K.L.<br />

Dickson, linked the Edison cylinder phonograph with a larger tube that was<br />

slotted much like the Zoetrope. It wasn’t elegant, but it did produce synchronized<br />

images and sound. 3 Georges Demeny, in 1891, claimed to produce a<br />

synchronous sound system, but like so many assertions in this time of riotous<br />

invention, this proved unfounded. There were many other attempts to add<br />

sound to the ever more popular moving picture, but at least three impediments<br />

came between a successful marriage of sound and picture: reliable<br />

synchronization, amplifi cation, and the fact that silent pictures were so effective<br />

and popular.<br />

Early Attempts at Sound in Movies<br />

Many early sound movies were merely prerecorded playback tracks to which<br />

“silent” actors mimed. By the 1920s, when commercial talkies were a real<br />

possibility, sound playback was usually from a phonograph synchronized to<br />

the fi lm projector via belts, pulleys, and cogs. The most successful interlocked<br />

phonograph/projector system was the Vitaphone, made by Western Electric<br />

and Bell Laboratories. But this double-system playback failed completely in<br />

the event of a fi lm break or a skip in the record. The projectionist had no<br />

choice but to return to the beginning of the reel. Eugene Augustin Lauste<br />

patented a form of optical fi lm soundtrack in 1910, but it would be another<br />

20 years before optical recording was adopted for fi lm sound. 4<br />

Amplifi cation of disk or cylinder recordings posed a hurdle, since early phonographs<br />

played their sounds acoustically rather than through amplifi cation—hardly<br />

appropriate for large halls. The German Tri-Ergon sound-on-fi lm<br />

system, later improved on by American Lee De Forest, enabled a sound reader<br />

to convert variations in the optical track into a signal that could be amplifi ed<br />

by valve amplifi ers newly improved by the Marconi company and others.<br />

This was the beginning of a standard for sound reproduction that would last<br />

more than 50 years—optical sound printed directly onto the fi lmprint.<br />

But there was one more hurdle to clear in order to bring sound movies out<br />

of the “gee whiz” ghetto and into commercial success. Simply stated, silent<br />

pictures worked. By the mid-1920s silent fi lms had established a language<br />

and an audience and were rightly considered both entertainment for the<br />

3 Mark Ulano. “Moving Pictures That Talk, Part 2: The Movies Are Born a Child of the<br />

Phonograph” (http://www.fi lmsound.org/ulano/index.html).<br />

4 David A. Cook. A History of Narrative Film (New York: Norton, 1981, pp. 241–44).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!