05.01.2013 Views

LOUDSPEAKERS: Does the Totem Mani-2 still rate as one of the ...

LOUDSPEAKERS: Does the Totem Mani-2 still rate as one of the ...

LOUDSPEAKERS: Does the Totem Mani-2 still rate as one of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Feedback<br />

highlighting <strong>the</strong>ir tremendous imaging,<br />

dynamics and musicality.<br />

Tom Norton, <strong>of</strong> Stereophile and<br />

Ultimate AV fame, had a totally different<br />

opinion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RC-70 than your team.<br />

In his review Mr. Norton is quoted <strong>as</strong><br />

saying, “<strong>the</strong> RC-70 had superb overall<br />

tonal balance” and that <strong>the</strong> “top end <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> RC-70 is <strong>as</strong> open, airy and <strong>as</strong> detailed<br />

<strong>as</strong> you could wish for.” Mr. Norton’s<br />

comments regarding soundstage reproduction<br />

and midrange accuracy are also<br />

different from what you found. He said,<br />

“<strong>the</strong> RC-70’s sounded nei<strong>the</strong>r ‘in your<br />

face’ forward nor recessed, and produced<br />

a detailed, well-focused soundstage…<br />

Voices were…beautifully served by<br />

<strong>the</strong> RC-70, with soaring female voices<br />

and male vocals that were rich and full<br />

bodied.”<br />

We are not sure if your opinions<br />

were bi<strong>as</strong>ed due to your experience and<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old Reference Connoisseur<br />

model, or if you were looking<br />

for something else from <strong>the</strong>se speakers.<br />

Your comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original Reference<br />

Connoisseur to today's RC-70 is<br />

like comparing a 20-year-old muscle car<br />

with today's muscle car. They are very<br />

different in every sense, and making<br />

a direct comparison is like comparing<br />

apples and oranges. While both may<br />

be good or excellent cars, <strong>the</strong>y do things<br />

very differently, and this must be taken<br />

into consideration.<br />

Today’s Reference Connoisseur<br />

product had more challenging standards<br />

to meet. Twenty years ago it w<strong>as</strong> only<br />

about <strong>the</strong> sound. Efficiency, dynamics,<br />

low distortion and power handling were<br />

less <strong>of</strong> a concern. Today, our speakers are<br />

used in a number <strong>of</strong> different configurations,<br />

from state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> art two channel<br />

systems to high-powered multichannel<br />

systems. The Reference Connoisseur<br />

Series must have <strong>the</strong> efficiency to be<br />

driven with modest-powered amplifiers,<br />

plus must have <strong>the</strong> dynamic range and<br />

power handling to handle <strong>the</strong> demands<br />

<strong>of</strong> movie soundtracks. A three-year<br />

development program w<strong>as</strong> necessary to<br />

redesign every comp<strong>one</strong>nt in order to<br />

meet <strong>the</strong>se standards. The new tweeter,<br />

midrange and wo<strong>of</strong>ers for <strong>the</strong> Reference<br />

Connoisseur Series are ground-breaking<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir ability to perform to <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

musical standards, while providing<br />

ultra low distortion with high power<br />

handling.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> us here feel <strong>the</strong> new RC-70<br />

surp<strong>as</strong>ses <strong>the</strong> performance parameters<br />

that were established by <strong>the</strong> original<br />

Reference Connoisseur. The RC-70 <strong>still</strong><br />

h<strong>as</strong> <strong>the</strong> captivating, immersive sound <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> original, but h<strong>as</strong> improvements in<br />

almost every area.<br />

In your review you mention that <strong>the</strong><br />

frequency response curve “is amazingly<br />

flat, <strong>one</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best we have ever me<strong>as</strong>ured.”<br />

Then you suggest that comes at<br />

a cost: ph<strong>as</strong>e accuracy. Flat frequency<br />

response <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> speaker system is made<br />

up <strong>of</strong> both magnitude and ph<strong>as</strong>e relationships<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual drivers.<br />

Since you mention <strong>the</strong> RC-70 h<strong>as</strong> flat<br />

frequency response, it would suggest<br />

that <strong>the</strong> ph<strong>as</strong>e relationship between <strong>the</strong><br />

individual drivers is also correct.<br />

Also, ano<strong>the</strong>r point is <strong>the</strong> placement<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> microph<strong>one</strong> in trying to<br />

recreate <strong>the</strong> square wave that you were<br />

me<strong>as</strong>uring. In a two-way speaker, <strong>the</strong><br />

microph<strong>one</strong> distance can be at a shorter<br />

distance and <strong>still</strong> deliver a somewhat<br />

meaningful me<strong>as</strong>urement. With a multisource<br />

speaker system like <strong>the</strong> RC-70,<br />

a small microph<strong>one</strong> distance from <strong>the</strong><br />

speaker would result in a meaningless<br />

test, with me<strong>as</strong>urements that do not<br />

reflect what <strong>the</strong> speaker is truly recreating.<br />

The only way to perform accu<strong>rate</strong><br />

acoustical me<strong>as</strong>urements, especially with<br />

multi-driver speakers, is a microph<strong>one</strong><br />

distance <strong>of</strong> at le<strong>as</strong>t 2 metres. As you<br />

probably know, such a microph<strong>one</strong><br />

Interactive features<br />

ULTRA HIGH FIDELITY Magazine<br />

This free issue works just like <strong>the</strong> full (paid) electronic version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> magazine.<br />

Click on a heading in <strong>the</strong> table <strong>of</strong> contents, and you'll be whisked right to <strong>the</strong><br />

article itself. Same thing with <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> advertisers on page 79. And if you<br />

click on most ads in this issue, if you're connected to <strong>the</strong> Internet you’ll find<br />

yourself on <strong>the</strong> company’s Web site.<br />

distance requires <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> an anechoic<br />

chamber, which negates <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong><br />

room boundaries when <strong>the</strong> microph<strong>one</strong><br />

is placed at greater distances from <strong>the</strong><br />

speaker.<br />

We are <strong>still</strong> not certain why you<br />

were not able to get good results from<br />

<strong>the</strong> RC-70, even though <strong>the</strong> response<br />

curve suggests <strong>the</strong> speaker should be<br />

excellent. Maybe <strong>the</strong> room you placed<br />

<strong>the</strong> speaker in w<strong>as</strong> too small for such a<br />

full range speaker system? We do know<br />

that <strong>the</strong> RC-70 is definitely suited to<br />

larger rooms than <strong>the</strong> previous Reference<br />

Connoisseur model, <strong>as</strong> it h<strong>as</strong> more<br />

extended response and output.<br />

As you can tell, we are very disappointed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> t<strong>one</strong> <strong>of</strong> your review<br />

and by some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> comments, which<br />

we feel, are unfounded. We think <strong>the</strong><br />

Energy brand and its loyal customer b<strong>as</strong>e<br />

deserved better.<br />

Scott Goodman<br />

Energy Speakers Brand Manager<br />

SCARBOROUGH, ON<br />

Kudos and, better, bravo for a singular<br />

and superlative publication. I quite<br />

eagerly digested my very first issue ever<br />

<strong>of</strong> UHF about a week ago. I am <strong>still</strong> in a<br />

very ple<strong>as</strong>ant state <strong>of</strong> shock!<br />

Having quite regularly sampled both<br />

The Absolute Sound and Stereophile for<br />

about four decades, my mind set w<strong>as</strong><br />

entirely unprepared for UHF’s unique<br />

raison d’être. Your guiding ethos, ethics<br />

and modus operandi are so simple in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir fundamental elegance. To allude<br />

to Carly Simon’s lyrics celebrating <strong>the</strong><br />

now mythic procreative capacity <strong>of</strong> 007<br />

is simply incorrect. Not only “Nobody<br />

<strong>Does</strong> it Better” — double negative<br />

intended — but no o<strong>the</strong>r publication does<br />

it!<br />

Bob Reinach<br />

POULSBO, WA<br />

Just noticed a spelling mistake on <strong>the</strong><br />

cover <strong>of</strong> UHF No. 75… “redicovery.”<br />

Since most <strong>of</strong> your subscribers are probably<br />

a little more educated than most,<br />

I expect you’ll probably be getting a<br />

deluge <strong>of</strong> e-mails.<br />

Still love <strong>the</strong> magazine though.<br />

Jeff Malloch<br />

ELORA, ON<br />

Somehow <strong>one</strong> never thinks <strong>of</strong> running<br />

spellcheck on a cover. Too obvious, right?<br />

I read <strong>the</strong> comment about <strong>the</strong> “open<br />

source” turntable in UHF No. 74. Your<br />

writer said that this w<strong>as</strong> not <strong>the</strong> way hi-fi<br />

equipment is designed.<br />

Yet <strong>one</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> top billed turntables<br />

around, <strong>the</strong> Teres , w<strong>as</strong> designed just this<br />

way. Interested people got toge<strong>the</strong>r on<br />

a newsgroup and delibe<strong>rate</strong>d, and this<br />

led to a small run <strong>of</strong> parts and <strong>the</strong>n a<br />

commercial endeavor, and some pretty<br />

over-<strong>the</strong>-top variations, not to mention<br />

<strong>the</strong> Redpoint brand. You can check out<br />

<strong>the</strong> process here: http://www.teresaudio.<br />

com/project/index.html.<br />

Dominic<br />

MONTRÉAL, QC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!