HERMANN HESSE AND THE DIALECTICS OF TIME Salvatore C. P. ...

HERMANN HESSE AND THE DIALECTICS OF TIME Salvatore C. P. ... HERMANN HESSE AND THE DIALECTICS OF TIME Salvatore C. P. ...

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
05.01.2013 Views

aber leben, weiterleben, hinwegkommen, sich verwandeln, die Einheit der Seele preisgeben, und dennoch in der Verwandlung sich bewahren, ein Mensch bleiben, nicht zum gedachtnislosen Tier herabsinken. Es ist das Grundthema der >Elektra

exceptions (see the myth of Pygmalion), Ovid's characters undergo a coercive process of metamorphosis (e.g. Arachne, Daphne), although sometimes the transformations of Ovid's characters appear as a compensation for an unfavourable fate Tiresias receives his power of prophecy from Jove after an angry Juno condemns him to blindness. 34 Both Ziolkowski and Gallagher agree on the term 'degradation' to describe Gregor Samsa's transformation, while they regard Piktor's metamorphoses as an example of 'ascension'. 35 As opposed to Gregor Samsa and most characters in Ovid's Metamorphoses, Piktor actively pursues his transformations, and metamorphosis appears as the process that allows one to manipulate reality and play with time in order to partially deflect the latter's course. Another important trait of Piktors' metamorphoses is that Hesse, like Ovid, portrays the actual process of transformation, while Kafka begins his story when Gregor has already turned into a beetle. In other words, the 'narrative' side of Gregor's metamorphosis is absent from Kafka's account. Ziolkowski and Gallagher also lay great emphasis on the fact that Gregor's and Piktor's metamorphoses are 'metonymic' their names are unrelated to the shapes they turn into whilst Ovid's transformations are, in most cases, announced by the characters' names. [Hesse's] tale shares with Kafka's Die Verwandlung the common element that the metamorphoses are both metonymic in that they have no semiotic connection with the names of the protagonists. (Gallagher, 302) Although Ziolkowski's and Gallagher's standpoint rings true, it is my contention that, on deeper inspection, Tiktors Verwandlungen' is not a clear case of metonymic metamorphosis. Both Ziolkowski and Gallagher support their thesis with the fact that Piktor is 'an obvious pseudonym for Hesse himself as "the painter"' (Ziolkowski 2005, 85). As there is no apparent connection between Hesse as a painter and Piktor's transformations, they conclude it is a case of metonymic metamorphosis. However, if we consider Piktor as an incarnation of Hesse's ideal of 'the artist', who is able to transform himself at will and reshape the objects of the real world, the name Tiktor' 34 In this respect, Rilke's portrayal of Daphne's metamorphosis in Die Sonette an Orpheus (see Zweiter Teil, XII, 46) retains the same negative connotations as in Ovid. 35 See Ziolkowski (2005, 87) and Gallagher (302). 126

exceptions (see the myth of Pygmalion), Ovid's characters undergo a coercive<br />

process of metamorphosis (e.g. Arachne, Daphne), although sometimes the<br />

transformations of Ovid's characters appear as a compensation for an unfavourable<br />

fate Tiresias receives his power of prophecy from Jove after an angry Juno<br />

condemns him to blindness. 34 Both Ziolkowski and Gallagher agree on the term<br />

'degradation' to describe Gregor Samsa's transformation, while they regard Piktor's<br />

metamorphoses as an example of 'ascension'. 35 As opposed to Gregor Samsa and<br />

most characters in Ovid's Metamorphoses, Piktor actively pursues his<br />

transformations, and metamorphosis appears as the process that allows one to<br />

manipulate reality and play with time in order to partially deflect the latter's course.<br />

Another important trait of Piktors' metamorphoses is that Hesse, like Ovid, portrays<br />

the actual process of transformation, while Kafka begins his story when Gregor has<br />

already turned into a beetle. In other words, the 'narrative' side of Gregor's<br />

metamorphosis is absent from Kafka's account. Ziolkowski and Gallagher also lay<br />

great emphasis on the fact that Gregor's and Piktor's metamorphoses are<br />

'metonymic' their names are unrelated to the shapes they turn into whilst Ovid's<br />

transformations are, in most cases, announced by the characters' names.<br />

[Hesse's] tale shares with Kafka's Die Verwandlung the common element that<br />

the metamorphoses are both metonymic in that they have no semiotic<br />

connection with the names of the protagonists. (Gallagher, 302)<br />

Although Ziolkowski's and Gallagher's standpoint rings true, it is my contention<br />

that, on deeper inspection, Tiktors Verwandlungen' is not a clear case of metonymic<br />

metamorphosis. Both Ziolkowski and Gallagher support their thesis with the fact<br />

that Piktor is 'an obvious pseudonym for Hesse himself as "the painter"' (Ziolkowski<br />

2005, 85). As there is no apparent connection between Hesse as a painter and Piktor's<br />

transformations, they conclude it is a case of metonymic metamorphosis. However, if<br />

we consider Piktor as an incarnation of Hesse's ideal of 'the artist', who is able to<br />

transform himself at will and reshape the objects of the real world, the name Tiktor'<br />

34 In this respect, Rilke's portrayal of Daphne's metamorphosis in Die Sonette an Orpheus (see Zweiter Teil,<br />

XII, 46) retains the same negative connotations as in Ovid.<br />

35 See Ziolkowski (2005, 87) and Gallagher (302).<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!