05.01.2013 Views

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

– 0,6093) and extremely significant in the last two years (R = 0,4539 – 0,4058) (Table<br />

3.)<br />

Table 3. Regressi<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s between spring wheat yield and petroleum<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (1996-2002)<br />

Nr. Anul Ecuaţia Coeficient de Semnificaţie<br />

crt.<br />

corelaţie<br />

1 1996 Y = - 1,4818 X + 18,271 R = 0,8723 oo<br />

2 1997 Y = - 1,2357 X + 19,696 R = 0,8906 oo<br />

3 1998 Y = - 0,4377 X + 7,9734 R = 0,7833 oo<br />

4 1999 Y = - 0,4169 X + 7,7041 R = 0,7531 oo<br />

5 2000 Y = - 0,1430 X + 3,9634 R = 0,6093 oo<br />

6 2001 Y = - 0,0885 X + 5,6811 R = 0,4539 o<br />

7 2002 Y = - 0,3566 X + 10,0100 R = 0,4058 o<br />

The relative producti<strong>on</strong> losses for spring wheat range between 24,3 % for 1 %<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> to 74,7 % for 10 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>. These losses are bigger than the <strong>on</strong>es<br />

registered during the previous year in millet. This is because wheat is less tolerant to<br />

polluti<strong>on</strong> than millet.<br />

The evoluti<strong>on</strong> of relative yield losses in spring wheat from the last seven years of<br />

observati<strong>on</strong> has a rising tendency, described in polynomial equati<strong>on</strong>s of the 2 nd degree,<br />

extremely significant for high c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s (5 and 10 %), significant for 3 % and with<br />

no importance for a 1 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of petroleum. (Figure 4.)<br />

The average values of relative yield losses decrease annually and reach about 10 –<br />

15 % for the small 1-3 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s, 25 % for the 5 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> and 37 % for<br />

the maximum 10 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>. The average yield differences in spring wheat from<br />

the last seven years of research in spring wheat polluti<strong>on</strong> are of 1,1 q/ha for a 1 %<br />

polluti<strong>on</strong> – significant statistically, 3,3 q/ha for 3 %, 5,0 q/ha at 5 % and 6,3 % for 10 %,<br />

the last two are very significant. (Table 4.)<br />

The interacti<strong>on</strong> (petroleum c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>) x years does not have any statistical<br />

value for the variant polluted under c<strong>on</strong>trol with 1 %, and is significant for the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 3 % and extremely significant for the 5 % and 10 % c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> in<br />

the first 20 cm of the soil profile.<br />

If we analyse the annual yield losses evoluti<strong>on</strong> from the period in which spring<br />

wheat was cultivated we notice that in the variant polluted with 1 % petroleum, the yield<br />

losses are extremely significant statistically in 1996, significant in 1997 – 1999, <strong>on</strong>ly be<br />

become insignificant in the last three years of the research.<br />

In the variant with a 10 % polluti<strong>on</strong>, the yield in the last year is not significant<br />

statistically, is significant in the ninth year, distinctively significant in the eighth year,<br />

and very significant in the first seven years.<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!