05.01.2013 Views

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EFFECT OF VARIOUS CROP PRODUCTION FACTORS ON THE YIELD<br />

AND YIELD STABILITY OF MAIZE IN A LONG-TERM EXPERIMENT<br />

Zoltán Berzsenyi – Dang Quoc Lap<br />

Agricultural Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Mart<strong>on</strong>vásár<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In a l<strong>on</strong>g-<strong>term</strong> experiment set up in 1960 <strong>on</strong> a medium heavy loamy soil, the effect of<br />

five crop producti<strong>on</strong> factors in increasing maize yields was studied in seven treatment<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong>s. The factors studied were soil cultivati<strong>on</strong>, fertilisati<strong>on</strong>, plant density,<br />

variety and weed c<strong>on</strong>trol. All the factors had a minimum and an optimum level. Yield<br />

data recorded over 42 years were evaluated using analysis of variance and stability<br />

analysis. The highest yield (8.59 t ha –1 ) was obtained when all the producti<strong>on</strong> factors<br />

were optimum and lowest (2.09 t ha –1 ) when these factors were at a minimum. When<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e factor was at a minimum and all the other factors were optimum the following<br />

yields were obtained (t ha –1 ): soil tillage: 8.32, fertilisati<strong>on</strong>: 5.21, genotype: 4.98, plant<br />

density: 6.31, weed c<strong>on</strong>trol: 7.01.The crop producti<strong>on</strong> factors c<strong>on</strong>tributed to the increase<br />

in maize yield in the following ratios (%): fertilisati<strong>on</strong> 30.6, variety 32.6, plant density<br />

20.2, weed c<strong>on</strong>trol 14.2, soil cultivati<strong>on</strong> 2.4. The highest value of CV%, expressing the<br />

deviati<strong>on</strong> of the yield averages, was obtained when all the producti<strong>on</strong> factors were at the<br />

minimum level (45.7%) and when weed c<strong>on</strong>trol or fertilisati<strong>on</strong> were at a minimum<br />

(36.6% and 34.8%, respectively), while the lowest value was recorded when all the<br />

factors were optimum (19.5%). The significant treatment × year interacti<strong>on</strong> could be<br />

attributed principally to treatments in which weed c<strong>on</strong>trol, fertilisati<strong>on</strong>, genotype or all<br />

the factors were at a minimum. The regressi<strong>on</strong> coefficient of linear regressi<strong>on</strong> analysis<br />

provided a satisfactory characterisati<strong>on</strong> of the stability of the treatments in different<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ments, while the distance between the straight lines expressed the yield<br />

differences between the treatment pairs. The AMMI (Additive Main Effect and<br />

Multiplicative Interacti<strong>on</strong>) model proved to be a valuable approach for understanding<br />

agr<strong>on</strong>omic treatment x envir<strong>on</strong>ment interacti<strong>on</strong>s and assessing yield stability.<br />

Key words: l<strong>on</strong>g-<strong>term</strong> experiment, maize, producti<strong>on</strong> factors, stability analysis, AMMI<br />

model<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

L<strong>on</strong>g-<strong>term</strong> experiments are often c<strong>on</strong>ducted to compare the l<strong>on</strong>g-<strong>term</strong> effects (e.g.,<br />

sustainability) of various treatments <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e or more resp<strong>on</strong>se variables. Measurements<br />

made <strong>on</strong> the plots are generally taken each year in the case of crop yield and other plant<br />

measurements. These data are ultimately subjected to some kind of statistical analysis,<br />

often with the goal of understanding something about the potential for different<br />

cumulative effects of treatments over time. As a result, the time x treatment interacti<strong>on</strong><br />

becomes the focus of an analysis.<br />

It is generally accepted that measurements made in field experiments may be<br />

influenced by unc<strong>on</strong>trollable envir<strong>on</strong>mental factors. Aside from random variati<strong>on</strong> there<br />

is also a predictable element, the l<strong>on</strong>g-<strong>term</strong> average of yield in the experiment. The<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!