05.01.2013 Views

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

Joint International Conference on Long-term Experiments ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

proves that the highest yield can be achieved by 75 % water supply <strong>on</strong> calcareous<br />

chernozem and marshy meadow soil and by 50 % water supply level <strong>on</strong> brown forest<br />

soil. It can also be stated that the effect of nitrogen fertilizati<strong>on</strong> was not modified by the<br />

different water supply. The positive effect of nitrogen treatments was detectable in the<br />

dry matter producti<strong>on</strong> of plants at each cuts (significant at P = 0.1 % level).<br />

The nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent of plants is the highest (2.81 %) <strong>on</strong> marshy meadow soil<br />

(P = 0.1 %), while <strong>on</strong> brown forest soil and calcareous chernozem the nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />

of ryegrass was lower, 1.34 % and 1.91 %, respectively (Table 4). The tendency is in<br />

accordance with the original total nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tents of the experiment soils (Table 1).<br />

The higher water supply decreased the nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent of plants in almost every<br />

treatment and soil combinati<strong>on</strong> (P = 1.0 % or 5.0 %).<br />

In the mean of the experiment, the amount of nitrogen extracted per pot reduced with<br />

time (1st cut: 87.7; 2 nd cut 42.8 and 3 rd cut: 37.2 mg N per pot). The total amount of<br />

nitrogen extracted by the three cuts is also c<strong>on</strong>siderable with 167.7 mg per pot. The<br />

decrease in the amount of nitrogen extracted can be explained by the gradually<br />

decreasing yield.<br />

Table 4: Nitrogen c<strong>on</strong>tent (%) of the ryegrass 1 st cut<br />

W.c. (%) Soil site N supply (mg kg -1 ) (A)<br />

(C) (B) 0 40 80 Average<br />

Pallag 1.13 1.27 1.83 1.41<br />

50 Látókép 1.38 2.00 2.52 1.97<br />

Dombos 1.85 2.90 3.72 2.83<br />

Average 1.45 2.06 2.69 2.07<br />

Pallag 1.00 1.27 1.52 1.27<br />

75 Látókép 1.35 1.78 2.45 1.86<br />

Dombos 2.10 2.75 3.55 2.80<br />

Average 1.48 1.93 2.51 1.98<br />

Pallag 1.06 1.27 1.67 1.34<br />

Average Látókép 1.36 1.89 2.49 1.91<br />

Dombos 1.97 2.83 3.64 2.81<br />

Average 1.47 2.00 2.60 2.02<br />

Table of variance<br />

Factor FG MQ F SD 5%<br />

A 2 7.72 291.5 *** 0.09<br />

B 2 13.27 501.0 *** 0.09<br />

A*B 4 0.56 21.1 *** 0.16<br />

C 1 0.15 5.71 * 0.08<br />

A*C 2 0.08 2.85 + 0.13<br />

B*C 2 0.02 0.82 0.13<br />

A*B*C 4 0.05 1.99 0.23<br />

Error 51 0.03<br />

*** Significant at P=0.1 % level; * Significant at P=5.0 % level<br />

+ Significant at P=10.0 % level<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!