04.01.2013 Views

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two Approaches <strong>for</strong> Providing Adaptive Support <strong>for</strong><br />

Discussion in an <strong>Ill</strong>-<strong>Defined</strong> Domain<br />

Erin Walker, Amy Ogan, Vincent Aleven, Chris Jones<br />

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA<br />

aeo@andrew.cmu.edu, erinwalk@andrew.cmu.edu, aleven@cs.cmu.edu,<br />

cjones@andrew.cmu.edu<br />

Abstract. <strong>Intelligent</strong> tutoring systems have increased student learning in many<br />

domains with well-structured tasks such as math and science. As these successes<br />

may be applicable to ill-defined domains, is important to investigate how<br />

to apply tutoring paradigms <strong>for</strong> tasks that are ill-defined. We focus on the domain<br />

of intercultural competence, where asynchronous online discussion is a<br />

typical instructional task. We explore two methods of assessing student contributions<br />

and delivering feedback: an adaptive support system that provides individual<br />

feedback, and a peer moderator from the class supported by adaptive assistance.<br />

We report on our initial experience in two pilots of these systems,<br />

where we found promise that students may benefit from each approach.<br />

1 Introduction<br />

<strong>Intelligent</strong> tutoring systems (ITS) have been shown to be effective at increasing<br />

student learning in domains with well-structured tasks, where criteria <strong>for</strong> correctness<br />

are relatively easy to quantify. As researchers move towards domains with ill-defined<br />

tasks, however, it is important to identify how to apply tutoring paradigms in these<br />

new domains. Whereas most ITS (see [1] <strong>for</strong> review) provide correctness feedback on<br />

student solutions, similar definitive feedback is difficult to give in ill-defined tasks.<br />

Also, classroom methods <strong>for</strong> teaching these domains, such as discussion with peers or<br />

Socratic dialogue, are not congruent with a typical tutoring system interface [2]. Intercultural<br />

competence, the ability to consider and understand events in a <strong>for</strong>eign culture<br />

in terms of cultural differences, is one such ill-defined domain. In displaying<br />

intercultural competence, students are asked to demonstrate that they have mastered<br />

various savoirs, such as the ability to explain cultural behavior (see [3] <strong>for</strong> a detailed<br />

discussion of the domain]. However, solutions in this domain may depend on an interpretation<br />

of events or language. For example, a student asked to evaluate immigration<br />

issues in France could draw on historical, journalistic or experiential knowledge<br />

from various perspectives to <strong>for</strong>mulate a valid response. While there may be rules<br />

that describe cultural norms or behavior, they tend to have many exceptions depending<br />

on the circumstances or on individual traits of the actors in a situation. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

in learning intercultural competence there is often an emphasis on the critical analysis<br />

of cultural events.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!