04.01.2013 Views

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains - Philippe ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Two Approaches <strong>for</strong> Providing Adaptive Support 6<br />

support scenario, after students created a post on the discussion board, they submitted<br />

it to the system. The support system ran the analysis module to determine where the<br />

post fell along each of the three dimensions. It then followed the decision tree in Figure<br />

1 to determine which type of feedback to provide. The system randomly selected<br />

one feedback message from three with alternate wordings that were associated with<br />

the location of the post in the tree. To develop these feedback strings, we interviewed<br />

an expert to determine what experts focused on in writing feedback to posts. The system<br />

then added several correct facts related to the categorization of the post topics<br />

from a collection of facts about the issues presented in the video. If the post was offtopic,<br />

the system simply suggested several facts from a variety of different relevant<br />

topics. This feedback was presented to the student (see Figure 2), who was required<br />

to make at least one modification to the post be<strong>for</strong>e being allowed to submit the final<br />

version to the discussion board. Once the post was submitted, it appeared on the discussion<br />

board and was available <strong>for</strong> the rest of the group to read.<br />

In the moderator support scenario, the system used the moderator ratings to navigate<br />

through the model hierarchy and identify which feedback type is appropriate.<br />

The moderator was then presented with a feedback template to help in constructing<br />

appropriate feedback. The template was again developed by consulting an expert and<br />

consisted of both praise <strong>for</strong> the positive elements of the post and constructive criticism<br />

<strong>for</strong> the negative elements of the post. The system also suggested three facts<br />

about the culture that the moderator might want to incorporate into his or her post,<br />

using the same algorithm as the individual adaptive support. Moderators were then<br />

encouraged to fill the template in with specific details from the post they were replying<br />

to, and use the additional facts that were provided. They then submitted their<br />

feedback as a post to the discussion <strong>for</strong>um.<br />

Figure 3. Feedback examples <strong>for</strong> the moderator and individual support (translated)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!