04.01.2013 Views

The Active Labour Market Policy Reform – The Second Wave

The Active Labour Market Policy Reform – The Second Wave

The Active Labour Market Policy Reform – The Second Wave

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

May 13-14, 2004<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

government has reacted with a comprehensive cross-governmental Age Programme (also<br />

subject to a Peer Review in 2000 1 and 2003 2 ).<br />

<strong>The</strong> labour market reforms are taking place in an overall context of reform in Finland. <strong>The</strong><br />

Finnish welfare state is undergoing a restructuring process, e.g. new ways of providing<br />

services jointly with the municipalities, the PES and the SII (??) have been established with<br />

the aim of achieving better co-operation and synergies. <strong>The</strong>re has been a shift in the<br />

steering mechanisms used in the public sector for governance and a move away from the<br />

‘management by objectives’ model of the 1980s and 1990s towards more heterogeneous<br />

models. <strong>The</strong>se include quality award elements, balanced scorecard approaches,<br />

benchmarking, and knowledge management.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Finnish <strong>Labour</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> System<br />

Finnish labour market policy is based on a broad range of services mainly focusing on jobbroking<br />

services, training measures and subsidised employment programmes. It also<br />

provides a large amount of information on vacancies, education and training, and careers.<br />

<strong>Labour</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Reform</strong>s in the 1990s<br />

During the recession at the beginning of the 1990s, labour market policy took on a rather<br />

reactive role. As demand in the open labour market collapsed, active labour market policy<br />

programmes were stepped up to provide unemployed people with new qualifications and<br />

keep them job-ready. While these programmes helped interrupt individual periods of<br />

unemployment, they also had the effect of encouraging people to wait for activation rather<br />

than actively searching for a job themselves and thus actually prolonging the real period of<br />

unemployment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first wave of the reforms, known as ‘activation and individual employment services’, was introduced<br />

in 1998. <strong>The</strong> main pillars of the reforms were:<br />

1) improved and more individual employment services,<br />

2) activation of the passive labour market support benefit for job-creation,<br />

3) reform of active programmes,<br />

4) reform of recruitment services and<br />

5) definition of the rights and obligations of the unemployed job-seekers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> employment services themselves were also reformed and their job-search remit increased.<br />

This involved skill-mapping to increase compatibility between vacancies and job-seekers and the<br />

introduction of large scale short-term job-search programmes for the unemployed, with the aim of<br />

reducing periods of unemployment. Efforts were also made to prevent exclusion from the labour<br />

market by reforming both the service process and the flat-rate unemployment benefit known as<br />

‘labour market support’.<br />

1 <strong>The</strong> National Programme for Ageing Workers (follow up), January 2003: http://www.peerreviewemployment.org/en/finland03/FIN03.htm;<br />

2<br />

<strong>The</strong> National Programme for Ageing Workers, October 2000: http://www.peerreviewemployment.org/en/finoct00.htm.<br />

Peer Review <strong>The</strong> <strong>Active</strong> <strong>Labour</strong> <strong>Market</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>Reform</strong> <strong>–</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Second</strong> <strong>Wave</strong><br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!