03.01.2013 Views

October 6, 2011 - RTCA

October 6, 2011 - RTCA

October 6, 2011 - RTCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Special Committee 147<br />

1<br />

<strong>RTCA</strong> Paper No. 010-12 /SC147-769<br />

November 29, <strong>2011</strong><br />

MINIMUM OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR TRAFFIC ALERT<br />

AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS AIRBORNE EQUIPMENT<br />

The 73 rd meeting of SC-147 was held on <strong>October</strong> 6, <strong>2011</strong>, at <strong>RTCA</strong> in Washington, DC. In<br />

accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Mr. Roger Sultan, Federal Aviation<br />

Administration (FAA) was the Designated Federal Representative for this meeting.<br />

Bob Buley Co-Chairman, Aircraft Data Fusion<br />

J. Stuart Searight Co-Chairman, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA<br />

Technical Center)<br />

Dan Tillotson Secretary, ARINC<br />

Hal Moses <strong>RTCA</strong><br />

[Attachment 1 – Meeting Attendance]<br />

Agenda Item 1. Opening Plenary Session<br />

Co-Chairman Bob Buley welcomed the participants to the 73 rd meeting of Special Committee<br />

147. Ken Carpenter noted that this was a joint meeting with EUROCAE Working Group 75 and<br />

as Chairman of Working Group 75, he welcomed the participants to the 22 nd meeting of that<br />

Working Group.<br />

Co-Chairman Buley requested that everyone sign in and invited the meeting participants to<br />

introduce themselves. The list of meeting participants is provided in Attachment 1.<br />

Bob reviewed the planned agenda with the committee and outlined his planned schedule for the<br />

meeting. The previously-distributed agenda was accepted with no amendments. He noted that<br />

both working groups met at <strong>RTCA</strong> on 4 and 5 <strong>October</strong>.<br />

Hal Moses provided an overview of the capabilities of the new <strong>RTCA</strong> facilities and discussed<br />

administrative and emergency procedures for the new location.<br />

Bob requested that meeting participants provide any comments on the minutes of the 72 nd<br />

meeting. The minutes of the 72 nd meeting were approved as submitted.<br />

Agenda Item 2. EUROCAE Working Group (WG)-75 Status Update<br />

Ken Carpenter provided the committee with an update on current WG-75 activities. WG-75 has<br />

met twice since the last SC-147 meeting. The next meeting of WG-75 is planned for 25-26<br />

January <strong>2011</strong> in Cologne, Germany.<br />

Ken noted that new Terms of Reference have been proposed to the EUROCAE Council to<br />

include the following tasks and deliverables. This proposal has not yet been accepted.


1. Update Existing MOPS for TCAS II<br />

2. Prepare MOPS for TCAS Hybrid Surveillance<br />

3. Develop MOPS for Autoflight/TCAS Coupling<br />

4. Develop guidance for traffic displays that support collision avoidance for aircraft not<br />

carrying TCAS II<br />

5. Define proposals to support the development of future collision avoidance systems<br />

Ken noted that Working Group 75 had no plans to change the core TCAS II MOPS other than in<br />

unison with SC-147, and that MOPS for TCAS II and Hybrid Surveillance are expected to be<br />

identical to the <strong>RTCA</strong> MOPS.<br />

The primary focus of the initial work on developing MOPS for the Autoflight/TCAS Coupling<br />

will be in the areas of automatic guidance on RAs and altitude capture adaptation to reduce<br />

occurrence of RAs. It is expected that a new subgroup will be established to complete this work<br />

to ensure that appropriate expertise in autoflight systems is included in the work. Analyses have<br />

shown that the collision risk will be reduced by a factor of two and the RA rate reduced by over<br />

50% in European airspace with the implementation of the autoflight/TCAS coupling. Ken<br />

expressed the desire from Working Group 75 to have the development of these MOPS be done in<br />

concert with <strong>RTCA</strong>.<br />

The SC-147 Co-Chairs outlined the process needed to have the efforts on MOPS development to<br />

become a joint effort. Bob Buley expressed his desire that the appropriate expertise from SC-147<br />

be involved in any joint work, regardless of which <strong>RTCA</strong> Special Committee eventually is tasked<br />

with working with Working Group 75.<br />

Working Group 75 has also been working on the compatibility of TCAS with ground safety nets<br />

and the display of RA information to controllers. The Requirements Working Group (RWG)<br />

spent some time during their meeting this week discussing the display of RA information to<br />

controllers.<br />

Ken introduced two presentations on the topic display of RA information to controllers:<br />

� Yvonne Graner clarified DFS's motivation to perform significant research on this topic<br />

following the Überlingen accident and an associated safety recommendation. She<br />

outlined the DFS program for evaluating the use of this information, and the enabling<br />

technology.<br />

� Stan Drozdowski started by placing the display of RA information in the broader context<br />

of Compatibility of Safety Nets. He provided an overview of ATS facilities where Mode<br />

S RA downlink is already being used to display RA information to controllers although<br />

there are no ICAO provisions for the operation of RA downlink. He concluded by<br />

advocating a more holistic approach to further TCAS evolution.<br />

Agenda Item 3. TCAS Program Office Activities<br />

Neal Suchy provided an overview of the work being performed by the TCAS Program Office to<br />

define potential next generation collision avoidance system. Work is also underway to<br />

investigate the display of RA information to controllers. At the present time, the Program Office<br />

does not support the display of information to controllers.<br />

Agenda Item 3.a Monitoring Efforts/TRAMS/TOPA<br />

2


Wes Olson provided an overview of data collected and analyzed as part of the TCAS Operational<br />

Assessment Program (TOPA). He noted that a majority of the data are being collected from<br />

Mode S radars across the United States. There are 21 sites now operational and there are<br />

currently over 150,000 RAs in the TOPA database. There has been little change in the findings<br />

from the data since his report at the last SC-147 meeting.<br />

Wes presented an overview of studies and analyses that have been completed on pilot response to<br />

RAs; TCAS performance in level off encounters (with both 500 and 1000 ft separation from the<br />

intruder); and RAs issued where an intruder could not be identified in the radar surveillance data.<br />

Agenda Item 3.b Future Collision Avoidance System (CAS) Development Efforts<br />

Neal Suchy provided an overview of the work being performed by the TCAS Program Office to<br />

define potential next generation collision avoidance system. The Program Office’s efforts are<br />

focused on three primary work packages.<br />

1. Improve current surveillance performance to minimize TCAS utilization of the<br />

1030/1090 MHz spectrum.<br />

2. Develop threat logic that will be compatible with expected/planned changes in airspace<br />

structure and operations. This threat logic is focused for use on aircraft that currently use<br />

TCAS II systems.<br />

3. Define surveillance requirements and concepts that will allow TCAS to use different<br />

surveillance sources and use improved tracking algorithms.<br />

Additional research is being conducted to evaluate requirements and concepts that could provide<br />

a collision avoidance capability for other classes of airspace users.<br />

Work is underway to conduct initial flight testing of the new threat logic in the 2013 time frame.<br />

Agenda Item 4 AVS and Other FAA Activities<br />

Agenda Item 4.a Certification and Flight Standard Activities<br />

Roger Sultan provided an update on the TCAS-related activities that Flight Standards have been<br />

working on since the last Plenary meeting.<br />

The Flight Standards’ Outreach efforts have resulted in meetings and discussions with NetJets<br />

and Boeing’s Training organization. The next efforts for the Outreach program are to conduct<br />

briefings at NBAA Regional Forums and with ALPA.<br />

A SAFO has been developed for Part 135 and Part 91k operators related to TCAS training and<br />

guidance. This is in final review and is expected to be released shortly.<br />

Flight Standards is also working on developing TCAS training material and has supported<br />

verification of the implementation of the autopilot and flight director automated response systems<br />

on the A350.<br />

Roger introduced Wayne Gallo to the Committee. Wayne is a new member of the Flight<br />

Standards Organization and will be representing Flight Standards in future SC-147 meetings.<br />

3


Agenda Item 4.b ASIAS/CAST/CAS Steering Committee<br />

There were no discussions under this agenda item.<br />

Agenda Item 5. Working Group Status Reports<br />

Agenda Item 5.a Requirements Working Group (RWG)<br />

Andy Zeitlin provided a summary of the RWG’s work since the last Plenary meeting. The main<br />

focus is preparing a report on future collision avoidance systems and work on that report has been<br />

completed. Andy’s report provided an overview of the contents and recommendations from the<br />

report. The report identifies both near-term and long-term improvements that could be<br />

incorporated into the collision avoidance logic.<br />

The contents of the report were reviewed this week by the RWG and the RWG is in agreement<br />

with the current version of the report. Following the completion of a few editorial cleanup<br />

changes, the report will be ready for distribution to the Committee for review and comment.<br />

To support the delivery of the report to the Program Management Committee (PMC) in<br />

December <strong>2011</strong>, the following distribution and review schedule was agreed to during the<br />

meeting.<br />

Initial Distribution <strong>October</strong> 19, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Comments Due Back to Andy November 7, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Telecon/Webex to Review Comments November 9, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Deliver to PMC November 30, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Agenda Item 5.b Surveillance Working Group (SWG)<br />

Ruy Brandao provided a status report on the SWG’s work. Since the last SC-147 meeting, work<br />

has continued to develop and evaluate means of reducing the TCAS utilization of the 1090 MHz<br />

frequency. A simulation model that was previously developed was updated to incorporate all six<br />

specific change proposals and testing was done with all of the various proposals. Simulations<br />

show that Changes to DO-300 would result in 1090 MHz utilization reduction of 60% to 85%<br />

when all simulated TCAS II equipped aircraft have these changes implemented. Additional<br />

change proposals have been defined which would further reduce the contributions of on-ground<br />

TCAS to 1090 MHz utilization. Evaluation of the benefits of these changes is expected to be<br />

complete by the end of the year. Safety studies do not show any degradation in risk ratio when<br />

these changes are implemented.<br />

The SWG recommended that the Terms of Reference be amended to allow incorporation of these<br />

changes in the MOPS. The SWG will continue work on the change proposals under the<br />

assumption that the Terms of Reference will be updated. This may result in changes to DO-<br />

185B, DO-300, or both.<br />

The SWG also proposed allowing TAs to be issued based solely on ADS B data (for hybrid<br />

surveillance equipped aircraft) if the intruder was not already being interrogated and then<br />

switching to active interrogations immediately after the TA was issued. The Committee agreed<br />

with this proposal.<br />

4


The SWG also sought the Committee’s input on a change proposal to limit, in surveillance, the<br />

tracking of aircraft within 3000 feet above the airport surface when TCAS is operated while the<br />

own aircraft is on the ground. There were no objections to this proposal and no concerns were<br />

expressed with such an implementation.<br />

The Co-Chairs agreed to caucus on how to handle proposing these change proposals to the PMC.<br />

The Co-Chairs will distribute the results of their discussions, along with their recommendations,<br />

to the Committee in the same time frame that the RWG report is distributed.<br />

Agenda Item 6 Consideration of Final Proposed Changes to SC-147 Terms of Reference<br />

There were no specific discussions conducted under this agenda item.<br />

Agenda Item 7 Other Business<br />

Agenda Item 7.a Traffic Situational Awareness with Alerts (TSAA) Status<br />

Dave Gray presented an overview of the of the SC-186 work to develop requirements and<br />

standards for TSAA. The Committee provided comments and feedback on the concept of TSAA<br />

and its operational use with the intent of ensuring that TSAA did not degrade the performance<br />

and safety provided by TCAS II.<br />

Agenda Item 8 Action Items<br />

There were no discussions under this agenda item.<br />

Agenda Item 9 Closing Session<br />

Agenda Item 9.a. Date and Time of Next Meeting<br />

All presentations from this meeting are available on the <strong>RTCA</strong>/SC-147 website or from <strong>RTCA</strong><br />

upon request.<br />

The next meeting of the Committee will be scheduled following the <strong>RTCA</strong> PMC meeting<br />

scheduled for December. The Co-Chairs will schedule this meeting once further guidance on the<br />

Committee’s proposals and recommendations is received from the PMC.<br />

Certified as a true and accurate summary of the meeting.<br />

Co-Chairmen<br />

-S- -S-<br />

Mr. Robert Buley Mr. Stuart Searight<br />

Aircraft Data Fusion FAA<br />

5


Attachment 1<br />

Meeting Attendance for SC-147 Plenary on <strong>October</strong> 6, <strong>2011</strong><br />

Name Organization E-mail<br />

Thierry Arino Egis Avia thierry.arino@egis.fr<br />

Christian Aveneau DSNA aveneau@cena.fr<br />

Larry Bachman Regulus Group LLC lbachman@regulus-group.com<br />

Ben Bakker EUROCONTROL ben.bakker@eurocontrol.int<br />

John Banzhaf USAF john.banzhaf.ctr@hanscom.af.mil<br />

Carl Bayh BAE Systems raymond.bayh@baesystems.com<br />

Walter Bender JHU/APL walter.r.bender@jhuapl.edu<br />

Ruy Brandao Honeywell International ruyjr.brandao@honeywell.com<br />

Robert Buley Aircraft Data Fusion bobbuley@aircraftdf.com<br />

Joslin Carino FAA joslin.carino@faa.gov<br />

Ken Carpenter QinetiQ ken@kencarpenter.co.uk<br />

Michael Castle Aurora Sciences LLC mcastle@aurorasciences.com<br />

Mark Cato Air Line Pilots Association catom@alpa.org<br />

Kathryn Ciaramella FAA kathryn.cairamella@faa.gov<br />

Robert Clarke Alion Science and Technology rclarke@alionscience.com<br />

Jonathan Dahlgren Honeywell jonathan.dahlgren@honeywell.com<br />

Stanislaw Drozdowski EUROCONTROL stanislaw.drozdowski@eurocontrol.int<br />

Ann Drumm MIT Lincoln Laboratory drum@ll.mit.edu<br />

Tomas Elder MIT Lincoln Laboratory tomas.elder@ll.mit.edu<br />

John Fisher FAA john.d.fisher@faa.gov<br />

Gaston Formisano Rockwell Collins cgformis@rockwellcollins.com<br />

Wayne Gallo FAA wayne.gallo@faa.gov<br />

Edward Glowacki Titan Corporation edward.ctr.glowacki@faa.gov<br />

Jose Goday ARINC jgoday@arinc.com<br />

Yvonne Graner DFS yvonne.graner@dfs.de<br />

David Gray FAA david.e.gray@faa.gov<br />

Carl Jezierski FAA carl.jezierski@faa.gov<br />

Jessica Holland MIT Lincoln Laboratory jessica.holland@ll.mit.edu<br />

Al Mattox ARINC amattox@arinc.com<br />

Ralph Mintel FAA ralph.mintel@faa.gov<br />

Matt Modderno FAA Matt.modderno@faa.gov<br />

Harold Moses <strong>RTCA</strong> hmoses@rtca.org<br />

Wesley Olson MIT Lincoln Laboratory wes.olson@ll.mit.edu<br />

Thomas Pagano FAA thomas.pagano@faa.gov<br />

Adam Panken MIT Lincoln Laboratory adam.panken@ll.mit.edu<br />

Chuck Rose MIT Lincoln Laboratory c.rose@ll.mit.edu<br />

Stacey Rowlan L-3 Communications stacey.rowlan@L-3com.com<br />

Stuart Searight FAA Technical Center stuart.searight@faa.gov<br />

Joshua Silbermann The Johns Hopkins University joshua.silberman@jhuapl.edu<br />

Charles Sloane FAA charles.sloane@faa.gov<br />

David Spencer MIT Lincoln Laboratory dspencer@ll.mit.edu<br />

Neal Suchy FAA neal.suchy@faa.gov<br />

Roger Sultan FAA roger.sultan@faa.gov<br />

William Thedford U.S. Air Force aacas-llc@comcast.net<br />

Dan Tillotson ARINC dtillots@arinc.com<br />

6


Name Organization E-mail<br />

Thomas Troast Regulas Group tetroast@regulas-group.com<br />

Jessie Turner Boeing jessie.turner@boeing.com<br />

Ethan Walters Aurora Sciences ewalters@aurorasciences.com<br />

Andrew Zeitlin MITRE Corporation/CAASD azeitlin@mitre.org<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!