02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TACTICAL INTERCEPTS 353<br />

<strong>and</strong> closing speed are changing continuously during this procedure.<br />

Another danger is presented by the conversion turn itself, which is a long,<br />

blind turn in close proximity to the target. The pilot is exposing the<br />

interceptor's belly to the whole world <strong>and</strong> daring someone to shoot. If there<br />

are other undetected bogeys in the area, the fighter pilot may never complete<br />

this intercept. It is usually good practice in any event to pause for a<br />

belly-check about halfway through the conversion turn. Generally stern<br />

conversions are not recommended in an unknown environment.<br />

Although fighter speed is not critical to the conduct of a FQ intercept, an<br />

interceptor speed advantage over the target is highly desirable for the stern<br />

conversion. In general, the greater the interceptor's speed advantage, the<br />

more room there is for error in the conversion process. At co-speed, or with<br />

an interceptor speed disadvantage, timing <strong>and</strong> geometry must be nearly<br />

perfect or the fighter pilot is likely to complete the conversion too far<br />

behind the target for a successful attack.<br />

Another drawback of the stern-conversion technique is the interceptor's<br />

vulnerability to chaff while it is in the target's beam region. It is<br />

difficult for most radars to discriminate between chaff <strong>and</strong> the real target<br />

when they are viewed from the target's flank, since closing velocity is so<br />

nearly identical. This situation often results in the interceptor pilot losing<br />

contact with the target at a critical time or completing an intercept on the<br />

chaff. Doppler-type radars are also susceptible to losing track of targets<br />

with beam aspects.<br />

The FQ <strong>and</strong> stern-conversion intercepts comprise the basics of almost<br />

all tactical intercepts. The tactics presented in the remainder of this<br />

chapter apply these fundamentals to multiple-fighter scenarios. Although<br />

the examples depicted here usually show two fighters opposing two<br />

bogeys, each aircraft of either formation can be considered to be an element<br />

of any desired number, <strong>and</strong> the tactics can be applied to an encounter of<br />

essentially any size.<br />

Today it is even more important to dominate the . . . highly sophisticated<br />

weapon systems, perhaps even more important than being a good pilot; to<br />

make the best use of this system.<br />

Lt. General Adolph Gall<strong>and</strong>, Luftwaffe<br />

Single-Side Offset<br />

Description<br />

The single-side offset places all interceptors on one side of the target<br />

formation, <strong>and</strong> the fighter leader performs either a FQ intercept or a stern<br />

conversion, as shown in Figure 10-4.<br />

In this example the fighter section detects the bogey formation roughly<br />

head-on, <strong>and</strong> the leader offsets to the north beginning at time "I," possibly<br />

to take advantage of prevailing environmental conditions. Ideally the first<br />

pilot with radar contact becomes the tactical leader throughout the intercept.<br />

The wingman, initially located on the south side, dives below the<br />

leader to increase speed, <strong>and</strong> then crosses the leader's flight path to emerge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!