02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350 TACTICAL INTERCEPTS<br />

desired altitude separation at intercept. Target altitude should also be<br />

monitored throughout the intercept to detect any changes.<br />

Advantages <strong>and</strong> Disadvantages<br />

The FQ intercept is useful for establishing an initial attack direction for<br />

the existing environmental conditions (coming out of the sun, etc.), or for<br />

some other purpose. Many all-aspect missiles (notably all-aspect heat<br />

seekers) have better capability from FQ firing positions than from directly<br />

head-on. Some target aspect during an intercept can also increase the range<br />

of a probable VID, since a profile view of the target is larger <strong>and</strong> usually<br />

more recognizable than a strictly head-on view.<br />

Increasing or decreasing TAA does take time, however, allowing the<br />

bogey to gain further penetration toward its target. In addition, the method<br />

described does not ensure any particular target range once the desired<br />

aspect has been achieved; therefore the final approach course may be<br />

established well inside maximum weapons-firing range, <strong>and</strong> displacement<br />

might be insufficient for a stern-conversion option. This drawback can be<br />

alleviated by controlling displacement <strong>and</strong> aspect concurrently, a technique<br />

that is discussed in the next example. The FQ intercept is also<br />

relatively easy for the bogey to counter. In this example, for instance, the<br />

bogey could make a substantial turn (jink) away from the interceptor<br />

between times "I" <strong>and</strong> "2," generating so much displacement that the<br />

fighter pilot would be hard-pressed even to complete the intercept, much<br />

less to control the target aspect. The bogey could later turn back on course<br />

<strong>and</strong> possibly complete an "end run" around the interceptor, which may be<br />

thrown well back in trail of the target, out of range. Early detection of a<br />

target jink can be difficult for the interceptor between times "I" <strong>and</strong> "2,"<br />

depending on the sophistication of its weapons system <strong>and</strong> GCI capability.<br />

Once the target is on collision bearing, jinks are more easily detected as a<br />

simple drift rate <strong>and</strong> a change in closure.<br />

If the restriction of a specified target aspect is removed,the dangers of a<br />

target jink can be alleviated by turning the interceptor immediately to<br />

collision heading at time "I" <strong>and</strong> accepting whatever aspect is initially<br />

available. This method also minimizes bogey penetration <strong>and</strong> time to<br />

intercept.<br />

Stern Conversion<br />

Description<br />

The stern-conversion intercept "converts" an initial FQ setup into a final<br />

rear-hemisphere position for the interceptor. Figure 10-3 depicts an example<br />

of a stern conversion.<br />

The initial setup at time "I" is the same as in the previous example.<br />

This time, however;the interceptor intends a stern conversion. To accomplish<br />

this conversion requires a certain amount of displacement from the<br />

bogey's flight path, an amount dependent on how hard the interceptor pilot<br />

wants to turn during the final conversion <strong>and</strong> his true airspeed (i.e., the<br />

interceptor's turn radius). The conversion is often planned so that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!