02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268 DIVISION TACTICS<br />

design began to stress aircraft speed <strong>and</strong> heavy armament <strong>and</strong> armor <strong>and</strong> to<br />

neglect maneuverability <strong>and</strong> cockpit field of view.<br />

With no war, we forgot about building airplanes we could see out of.<br />

Colonel Erich "Bubi" Hartmann, GAP<br />

The fighter formation almost universally accepted during this period<br />

was the three-plane vee, or "vie," with the aircraft positioned almost<br />

wingtip-to-wingtip for concentration of firepower. This formation (see<br />

Figure 7-1) allowed the leader to maneuver fairly well <strong>and</strong> to fly through<br />

clouds with little chance of losing his wingmen. He was able to hit quickly<br />

to limit exposure to bomber defensive fire, <strong>and</strong> all fighters could fire at<br />

once at the same target for maximum concentration of destructive power.<br />

The vie had some drawbacks, however: only one bomber could be<br />

targeted at a time, <strong>and</strong> the close formation allowed defensive fire to be<br />

concentrated on all fighters simultaneously. The leader was also the only<br />

one likely to have a good shot, since the wingmen had to be more concerned<br />

with not running into somebody than with aiming their guns.<br />

Firing range for the wingmen was also increased, since they had to cease<br />

fire when the leader reached minimum range <strong>and</strong> broke off his attack.<br />

Several of these vies could operate together <strong>and</strong> coordinate their attacks<br />

to bring additional targets under fire <strong>and</strong> to spread the defensive fire. These<br />

additional vies also offered each other some visual mutual support, since<br />

the defensive effectiveness of individual divisions was very limited because<br />

of formation requirements. One favorite arrangement of vies on<br />

patrol was for several vies to form a larger vie spaced at wider intervals<br />

than the individual elements. This was a fairly effective formation for<br />

visual cross-cover, but it was difficult to maneuver, so the elements often<br />

dropped into trail on each other when substantial maneuvering was required.<br />

This arrangement still offered good defensive coverage for all<br />

elements except "Tail-end Charlie."<br />

This, then, was the thinking of most of the air powers of the world in the<br />

1920s <strong>and</strong> 1930s. Some were able to test this doctrine during conflicts in<br />

the late 1930s, notably the Spanish Civil War <strong>and</strong> the Sino-Japanese War.<br />

These conflicts revealed that the relative superiority of bombers over<br />

fighters of the period was greatly exaggerated. Whenever bombers were<br />

met by determined fighter resistance, the bombers nearly always suffered<br />

Figure 7-1. The Vic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!