02.01.2013 Views

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

Fighter Combat - Tactics and Maneuvering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 ONE-VERSUS-ONE MANEUVERING, SIMILAR AIRCRAFT<br />

techniques is chosen, a missile should be launched at the first opportunity,<br />

even if separation is marginal. Such a shot could be successful, but even if<br />

it is not, the target's defensive maneuver usually places it in a very<br />

vulnerable position for a follow-up gun shot.<br />

Dissimilar Weapons<br />

So far in this chapter it has been assumed that the opposing fighters have<br />

identical weapons. Although this is a very likely situation with similar<br />

aircraft, it does not always hold true. Supply problems, ordnance expenditure,<br />

or weapons system malfunction, for instance, quite conceivably<br />

could result in dissimilar weapon capabilities. In this section the more<br />

common weapons mixes are investigated.<br />

Guns versus Rear-Quarter Missiles<br />

Since the gun is a close-range weapon <strong>and</strong> the missile generally a longerrange<br />

weapon, it is to the advantage of the pilot of the guns-only fighter to<br />

remain as close to his missile-equipped opponent as possible. The angles<br />

tactics outlined in the guns-only section serve this purpose better than the<br />

energy methods described there. Since gun snapshot parameters are usually<br />

easier to satisfy than those of the RQ missile, the guns-only fighter<br />

may have some advantage in this scenario. The missile-equipped fighter,<br />

however, will have the better chance of safely disengaging from defensive<br />

situations. The gunfighter may have a more difficult time with separation,<br />

unless it disengages from a position of advantage.<br />

For defensive purposes, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, the pilot of the missile fighter<br />

would like to maintain his speed <strong>and</strong> separation from the gunfighter.<br />

Energy tactics are ideal for this purpose. The pilot of the missile fighter<br />

therefore should attempt to deplete his opponent's energy, <strong>and</strong> then he<br />

should initiate a zoom maneuver to gain advantage.<br />

In the case where the missile fighter is also gun equipped, its pilot<br />

should still employ energy tactics because of the added measure of safety<br />

inherent in greater speed, more separation from the opponent's weapon,<br />

<strong>and</strong> better disengagement opportunities. The gun, however, should be his<br />

primary weapon, since its parameters are easier to satisfy. The missile then<br />

becomes the means of preventing the opponent's escape.<br />

Guns versus All-Aspect Missiles<br />

Again in this scenario, the gunfighter pilot would like to stay close to his<br />

missile-equipped opponent to deny him min-range separation. Angles<br />

tactics <strong>and</strong> nose-to-nose maneuvers should be used exclusively for this<br />

purpose. If the missile-equipped fighter reverses at the pass to set up a<br />

nose-to-tail situation as depicted in Figure 3-11, the gunfighter pilot must<br />

make a rapid decision. His choices are to extend <strong>and</strong> disengage, continue in<br />

the nose-to-tail maneuver, or reverse to reinitiate a nose-to-nose condition.<br />

The best choice depends primarily on when the bogey reverses <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the capabilities of its weapons system in the maneuvering environment.<br />

The disengagement option is usually available if the pass occurs with high<br />

TCA <strong>and</strong> the gunfighter has good speed. By turning only far enough to keep

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!