Unilateral Administrative Order - Muskego Sanitary Landfill ...
Unilateral Administrative Order - Muskego Sanitary Landfill ...
Unilateral Administrative Order - Muskego Sanitary Landfill ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
yiNiiriieiii^^<br />
: REGIONS<br />
77 WESt JACKSON BOULEVARD<br />
CHICAGO, II.. 606044590<br />
IJEC 0 9<br />
RE: <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> Super fund Site,<br />
<strong>Unilateral</strong> <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong><br />
Remedial Design/Remedial Action<br />
Dear Sir or Hada:ni::<br />
(J5)<br />
11355"<br />
REPLY TOTHIE; ATTENTION Of:<br />
Enclosed please find a <strong>Unilateral</strong> <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong> issued by<br />
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Section 106 of the<br />
Comprehensive Environmental Response , Compensation and Liabi 1 ity<br />
Act of 1980,, aia amended by the Superfund Amendments and<br />
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (CERCLA) , 42 U.S. c. § 9601, et :sec|;.<br />
Please note that the <strong>Order</strong> allows an opportunity for a conference<br />
if requested within ten (10) calendar days after issuance o:l: the<br />
<strong>Order</strong>; and specifies a date and location for the conference.<br />
If you have any questions regarding the Girder, feel free to<br />
contact Thomas Krueger, Assistant Regional Counsel, at. (312) 886-<br />
0562 or Bill Haubold, Remedial Project Manager,, at (312) 353-<br />
6261.<br />
Sincerely yours,<br />
, William E. Huno,<br />
Waste Management D ivls i<br />
Enclosure<br />
cc :: Mark Giesf eldt<br />
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources<br />
Is/
cc: Sue Mencohi<br />
Deborah Garber<br />
Tom Xruegei<br />
Tom Marks<br />
Susan Pastor, Public Affairs<br />
Sheila Huff, Department of Interior<br />
Tony Audia (5MF8-14)
ywiiEOjEiniwiis<br />
February 17, 1993<br />
If HI.. Lima S, Seglin<br />
Senior Environmental Counsel<br />
Waste Management,, Inc. „<br />
300::i ButtiEirfield Road<br />
Oak Brook, II. 60521<br />
REGION !ii<br />
77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD<br />
CHICAGO,, I'L 80604-3590<br />
Ra: Muskeqo <strong>Landfill</strong><br />
Adiiitinistrative <strong>Order</strong> V-W-92-C173<br />
Dear Ms,. Seglin:<br />
This letter is in response to your January 20,, 1993 letter<br />
regarding deed restrict ions for the Anaiuut: facility property, It<br />
is U.S. EPA's view that the AnamaK: facility property is', at least<br />
partially, a part of the <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> site,, Figure<br />
i-2 of the ReigDueidial DeiEiiign/Renedial Action Work: Plan sh,o«s<br />
portions of the Old, Non-"Contigiiousr and Soiuitlleaet Fill Areas<br />
extiuiiding onto the forhmer Anaiiax: facility property., U.S., EPA<br />
therefore believes that the fEttateiDiient in your letter that this<br />
property is not part of the lldUskego site is mistaken,<br />
Your letter also indicates that a deed restriction was recorded<br />
in the office of the Waukeeha County Register of Deeds on January<br />
11:1,, 1993.. However,, your letter does not discuss wn,at steps Waste<br />
Management of Wisconsin,, Inc. (WIPlfl) has taken to comiply with,<br />
paragraph 32 of the Adiiinistrative <strong>Order</strong>„ wihich required mmi to<br />
record a copy of the <strong>Order</strong> within !:i days of the effective date of<br />
the <strong>Order</strong> (iDeceniLber 29,, 1992;), Please provide me details<br />
concerning WMWI' s cocmpliance with, this XHEiiquirenient as qiuickly as<br />
possible.,<br />
If you have any questions,, please contact xne at (31.2) 353-6261.<br />
Sincerely,,<br />
William J., Haubold<br />
Ruedial Project Manager<br />
Attacliiiient
cc:: Ton Krueger/ OIRC<br />
Gairy Edeistein/ WDNR<br />
Hike Prattlce/ MWI<br />
Dee Brncfoh/
IN mi<br />
iiiiii<br />
' I i<br />
{Hi!!<br />
iiiiii<br />
Miii<br />
IS<br />
ll<br />
rsOrs-COi<br />
FILL<br />
DRUM<br />
MOb<br />
PHASE<br />
SEDIMEN<br />
BASIN<br />
MOD 3 PHASE I<br />
LANDFiLL<br />
STONE RIDGE RECYCLING<br />
AND DISPOSAL FACILITY<br />
WASTE MAr-AGE-sEr-T OF WISCONSIN, INC,<br />
-pROPERTt<br />
iFORjstR sHasssX ==rjD£r-:NG CO.<br />
PROPERTY' | i<br />
CARL V-AUER<br />
PROPERTY<br />
^ -"" 1 ' 2 > : ?•-.. 'a ."o' lii i<br />
]<br />
LEGE30<br />
SCALE: i'MOO'<br />
CQ~TOUR<br />
_ ROAD<br />
.--; PAVED ROAD<br />
.— APPROXIMATE PROPERTY LiNE<br />
•—— APPROXIMATE L:M:TS OF RtriJSE<br />
^ ArrROXissaTE LOCA7:0« Or<br />
LEACHATE COLLECTiQ-- PQ-S-TS<br />
*_ LEACHATE HEAD WELL LOCATiOri<br />
i GROUNDWATER OBSERVATiON WELL AND<br />
P:£20M£TR:C LOCATiOrs<br />
HOT-S<br />
=- GAS EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION<br />
1. gASE MAR WAS PROVIDED Bt WASTE<br />
MANAGEMENT Of KiSCGNSiri. JrsC.<br />
AND :S A~ AERIAL SURVEY PERFORMED<br />
§Y ilBQ-METRiC fN&SNEfRSNO,<br />
INC., SHEBOYGAN, WJSCONSJN. DATE<br />
Or FLiGHT NOV. 2?, :3S2.<br />
2. TOPOGRAPHY :5 BASED ON U.5.G.5. DATUss<br />
3. CONTOUR INTERVAL iS TWO FEET,<br />
s, GRIG BASED GN WiSCQNSIri STATE<br />
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,<br />
5. PROPERTY LiNES. LIMITS OF REFUSE.<br />
WELL LOCATIONS AND LEACHATE<br />
COLLECTION POINTS OBTAINED FROM<br />
inrORMATiuN PROviDED ON WAR2YN<br />
PLAN SHEET HO. D? OF REMEDIAL<br />
:wVESTiGATiQ«/FEASIB-L.TY STUDY,<br />
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL.<br />
1-2<br />
EXiSTiNG S-TE CGNDit-ONS<br />
•e.
UNILATEl<br />
ATTACHMENT 1<br />
flNISTRATiyEORDER
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY<br />
Region V<br />
In The Matter Of: )<br />
<strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> Landfi11<br />
Source Control Operable Unit<br />
Muskeqo, Wisconsin<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
Respondents listed in Attachment: 4<br />
Proceeding Under Section 106 (a) of the<br />
)<br />
)<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
Docket, tyo.<br />
v.W- v* r~T"77<br />
!l " " i(l Comprehensive Environmental Response,<br />
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980,<br />
as amended (42 U.S.C. 9606(a))<br />
)<br />
)<br />
)<br />
" •'• ' J<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER<br />
FOR REMEDIAL, DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
I. INTRODUCTION AND JURISDICTION 1<br />
II. FINDINGS OF FACT 2<br />
III. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DETERMINATIONS 18<br />
IV. NOTICE TO THE STATE 19<br />
V. ORDER 19<br />
VI. DEFINITIONS 20<br />
VII. NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY 22<br />
VIII. PARTIES BOUND 22<br />
IX. WORK TO BE PERFORMED 24<br />
X. FAILURE TO ATTAIN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 30<br />
XI. EPA PERIODIC REVIEW 31<br />
XII. MODIFICATIONS TO WORK 31<br />
XIII . ENDANGERMENT AMD EMERGENCY RESPONSE 32<br />
XIV. EPA REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS 33<br />
XV. PROGRESS REPORTS 34<br />
XVI. QUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLING AND DATA ANALYSIS 34<br />
XVII. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS 36<br />
XVI I I. REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGER 36<br />
XIX. ACCESS TO SITE NOT OWNED BY RESPONDENTS 37<br />
XX. SITE ACCESS AND DATA/ DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY 39<br />
XXI. RECORD PRESERVATION 40<br />
XXII. DELAY IN PERFORMANCE 42<br />
24
XXIII. ASSURANCE OF ABILITY TO COMPLETE WORK 42<br />
XXIV. REIMBURSEMENT OF RESPONSE COSTS 43<br />
XXV. UNITED STATES NOT LIABLE 44<br />
XXVI. ENFORCEMENT AND RESERVATIONS 44<br />
XXVII,. ACCESS TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 46<br />
XXVIII,. EFFECTIVE DATE/TERMINATION 46<br />
XXIX. OPPORTUNITY TO CONFER 47
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY<br />
Region V<br />
In The Matter Of: )<br />
)<br />
<strong>Muskego</strong> San itary Landf :i. 11 )<br />
Source Control Operable Unit )<br />
<strong>Muskego</strong>, Wisconsin )<br />
)<br />
) U.S.. EPA<br />
Respondents listed in Attachment 4 ) Docket No.,<br />
)<br />
Proceeding Under Section 106(a) of the )<br />
Comprehensive Environmenta1 Response, )<br />
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1.980,, )<br />
as amended (4 2 U. S,. C. 9 6 06 (a}) )<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER<br />
FOR REMEDIAL DESIGN AND REMEDIAL ACTION<br />
I,. INTRODUCTION AND JURISDICTION<br />
1. This <strong>Order</strong> directs Respondents to perform, a remedial, design<br />
for the remedy described in the Record of Decision dated June :i.2,<br />
1992, and Scope of Work for the <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong>, site,<br />
Source Control Operable Unit, and to implement the design by<br />
performing a remedial action,. This <strong>Order</strong> is issued t.o<br />
"'•
State Highway 24 (
Galvanizing, Inc. were present at the Site,.<br />
d., Respondent Aldrich Chemical Company! Inc. arranged,, by<br />
contract, or agreement„ or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment,, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substance::; owned or possessed<br />
by Aldrich Chemical. Company, Inc. at the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included flammable liquids and other chemicals.,<br />
Hazardous substances of the sane kind as those owned one: possessed<br />
by Respondent Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. were present at the<br />
Site. e. Respondent All en- Bradley Company,, Inc. arranged, by<br />
com tract or agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Alien-Bradley Company, Inc., at the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included grinding compounds,, liquid waste and slag.<br />
v ; Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed<br />
by Respondent Alien •"Bradley Company, Inc. were present at the<br />
Site. f'. Respondent Allied Signal Corporation is a successor in<br />
interest to Bostrom Seating Inc.. Bostrom Seating Inc. arranged,,<br />
by contract or agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal, or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Bostram Seating Company at the Site,. Those hazardous<br />
substances included industrial liquid wastes., Hazardous<br />
substances of the sane kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Bostrom Seating Inc., were present at the Site.<br />
g., Respondent American Motors Corporation arranged ., by<br />
contract or agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment,, one: arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by American Motors Corporation at the site. Those hazardous<br />
v..,.-' substances included waste oils,, paint sludge and other sludges,<br />
and waste liquids-;„ Hazardous substances of the same kind as<br />
those owned or possessed by Respondent American Motors<br />
Corporation were present at. the Site,.<br />
h. Respondent American Can Company is the successor in<br />
interest of Amer icology. Ameri.oology arranged,, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by<br />
Americology at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
liquid industrial wastes. Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Airier icology were present at the<br />
Site. i,. Respondent Ampco Metal Inc., arranged! by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or
treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed toy Ampco<br />
Metal Company at the Site.. Those hazardous substances included<br />
liquid industrial wastes. Hazardous substances of the sane kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Respondent Ampco Metal Company<br />
were present at the Site.<br />
j. Respondent. Amron Corporation arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment., or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Amron<br />
Corporation at. the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
waste oils, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, zinc stripper,, spent<br />
chemicals and other liquid wastes., Hazardous substances of the<br />
same kind as those owned or possessed by Respondent Anron<br />
Corporation were present at the Site.,<br />
k. Respondent Beatrice Company is a successor in interest<br />
to Pfister and Vogel. Tanning Company., Pfister and V'ogel Tanning<br />
vk \ Company arranged, by contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the<br />
disposal or treatment, or arranged with a. transporter for<br />
transport for disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances<br />
owned or possessed toy Pfister and Vogel Tanning Company at the<br />
Site, Those hazardous substances included sludges and flammable<br />
solvents, Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned<br />
or possessed by Pfister and Vogel Tanning Company were present at<br />
the Site„<br />
1. Respondent Beazer East,, Inc.. is a successor in interest<br />
to Theim Corporation. Theim Corporation arranged, toy contract, or<br />
agreement, or otherwise,, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Theim<br />
Corporation at the Site.. Those hazardous substances included<br />
waste chemicals,, powder and glue., Hazardous substances of the<br />
same kind as those owned or possessed by Theim Corporation were<br />
present at the Site.,<br />
V..X in. Respondent Browning Ferris Industries of Wisconsin is a<br />
successor in interest to Town and Country Disposal Service,, Inc.<br />
Town and Country Disposal Service,, Inc. accepted hazardous<br />
substances for transport to, and disposal or treatment, at the.<br />
Site,, and selected the Site for disposal or treatment:. Those<br />
hazardous substances included various industrial wastes.<br />
Hazardous substances of the same kind as tltose disposed of by<br />
Town and Country Disposal Service,, Inc. were present at the Site.,<br />
n. Respondent Brunswick Corporation is a successor in<br />
interest to Ozite Carpet. Ozite Carpet arranged,, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise,, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Ozite<br />
Carpet at the Site, Those hazardous substances included sludges.<br />
Hazardous sutostanoes of the same kind as those owned or possessed<br />
by Ozite Carpet were present at the Site.
,. Respondent Caterpillar, Inc. arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise,, for the disposal, or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport: for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substance!-; owned or possessed by<br />
Caterpillar, Inc.. at the Site. Those hazardous substances<br />
included corrosive liquids, including paint strippers and other<br />
hazardous wastes., Hazardous substances of the sane kind as those<br />
owned ox possessed by Respondent Caterpillar,, Inc., Mere present<br />
at the site.<br />
p. Respondent Cudahy Tanning Co., Inc., arranged,, by<br />
contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal ox:<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Cudahy Tanning Co., Inc. at the Site. Those hazardous-!<br />
substances included leather scraps contain ing chromium,, and<br />
sludges., Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned or<br />
possessed by Respondent Cudahy Tanning Co.,, Inc.. were present at<br />
the site.<br />
q,, Respondent: Dings Company,, Magnetic Group arranged,, by<br />
contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment , or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Dings Company, Magnetic Group at the Site., Those hazardo>us<br />
substances included waste cutting oils,. Hazardous substances of<br />
the same kind as those owned or possessed by Dings Company,<br />
Magnetic Group were present at the Site.,<br />
r., Respondent E,. Z. Paintr Company arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement, ot otherwise, for the disposal or treatment:,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal, or<br />
treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by E.,Z.<br />
Paintr Company at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
acetone, alcohol, waste oil,, polyviny 1 acetate and polyviny 1<br />
alcohol. Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned or<br />
\, .' possessed by Respondent E,.Z., Paintr Company were present at the<br />
Site. s. Respondent Envirex Inc. arranged,, by contract or<br />
agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment,, o>f hazardous substances owned or possessed by Envirex<br />
Inc. at the Site. Those hazardous substances included liquid<br />
wastes and paint wastes., Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Respondent Envirex Inc., were<br />
present at the Site.<br />
t., Respondent. General Electric Company arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement., or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment,, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances owned our possessed<br />
by General Electric Company at the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included acids,, liquid waste and powder, Hazardous
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Respondent General Electric Company were present at the Site,.<br />
u., Respondent Harn isohfeger arranged,, by contract or<br />
agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment„ or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by<br />
Harnischfeger at the Site., Those hazardous substances included<br />
industrial liquid wastes., Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Respondent HarniscltiLfeger were<br />
present at the Site,.<br />
v,. Respondent Hydrite Chemical Company arranged,, by<br />
contract or agreement.,, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment., or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Hydri te Chemical Company at the Site.. Those hazardous<br />
substances included sodi.urn carbonate,, sodium chloride, sodium<br />
v i metasilcate, phosphates and other chemicals., Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Respondent Hydri te Chemical Company were present at the Site,.<br />
w. Respondent Inryco Corporation arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Inryco<br />
Corporation at. the Site, Those hazardous substances included<br />
sludges„ waste paint and lacquer thinners., Hazardous substances<br />
of the same kind as those owned or possessed by Respondent Inryco<br />
Corporation were, present at the Site.,<br />
x,. Respondent Laidlaw Waste Systems,, Inc.. is the successor<br />
in interest to <strong>Sanitary</strong> Disposal Service., <strong>Sanitary</strong> Disposal<br />
Service accepted hazardous substances for transport to, and<br />
disposal or treatment at the Site,, and selected the Site for<br />
disposal or treatment.. Those hazardous substances included<br />
various industrial wastes,. Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
V...x as those disposed of by <strong>Sanitary</strong> Disposal Service were present at<br />
the site.<br />
y, Respondent Law Tanning Co. arranged,, by contract, or<br />
agreement, or otherwise,, for the disposal or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Law<br />
Tanning Co. at the Site,. Those hazardous substances included<br />
leather scraps containing chromium. Hazardous substances of the<br />
same kind as those owned or possessed by Respondent. Law Tanning<br />
Co,, were present at the Site.,<br />
;>;,. Respondent Louis Alien Division of Magnetix, Inc..<br />
arranged, by contract or agreement, or otherwise,, for the<br />
disposal or treatment,, or arranged with a transporter for<br />
transport for disposal 1 or treatment,, of hazardous substances<br />
owned or possessed by the Louis Alien Division of Magnetix, Inc.<br />
at the Site. Those hazardous substances included industrial
liquid wastes. Hazardous substances of. the same kind as those<br />
owned or possessed by Respondent Louis Alien Division of<br />
Magnetix, Inc. were present at the Site,.<br />
aa» Respondent Master Lock. Company arranged,, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport, for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Master<br />
Lock Company at the Site., Those hazardous substances included<br />
industrial liquid wastes., Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned ox possessed by Respondent Master Lock Company<br />
were present, at the Site.,<br />
bb., Respondent Metals Transport Company,- Inc, accepted<br />
hazardous substances for transport to, and disposal or treatment<br />
at the Site, and selected the Site for disposal or treatment.<br />
Those hazardous substances included metal--bearing slag.,<br />
Hazardous substances of the same, kind as those disposed of by<br />
Metal Transport Company, Inc. were present at the Site.<br />
cc. Respondent Midwest Tanning Company arranged, by<br />
contract, or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport, for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Midwest Tanning Company at the Site,. Those hazardous<br />
substances included waste liquids and sludges. Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Respondent Midwest Tanning Company were present at the Site.<br />
dd. Respondent PPG Industries arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, o>f hazardous substances owned or possessed by PPG<br />
Industries at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
paint wastes and. sludges. Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Respondent PPG Indlustries were<br />
present at the Site.<br />
ee. Respondent Pressed Steel Tank Co.., Inc., arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal, or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Pressed Steel Tank Co.., Inc.. at the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included sludges and liquid wastes,. Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Respondent Pressed Steel Tank Co.., Inc., were present at the Site,<br />
ff. Respondent PVL Partnership is a successor in interest<br />
to Pfister and Vogel Tanning Company,. Pfister and Vogel Tanning<br />
Company arranged,, by contract or agreement,, or otherwise,, for the<br />
disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for<br />
transport for disposal or t.reatment, of hazardous substances<br />
owned or possessed by Pfister and Vogel Tanning Company at the<br />
Site, Those hazardous substances included sludges and flaiunable<br />
solvents, Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned
or possessed by Pfister and Vogel Tanning Company were present at<br />
the Site,<br />
gg. Respondent RAPCO Leather Company arranged, by contract<br />
or agreement.,, or otherwise, for the. disposal, or treatment,, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment,, of, hazardous substances owned or possessed by RiHPCO<br />
Leather Company at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
waste liquids and sludges. Hazardous substances of the sarnie kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Respondent RAPCO Leather Company<br />
were present at the Site,.<br />
hh, Respondent Rexnord Incorporated arranged,, by contract<br />
or agreement., or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Rexnord<br />
Incorporated at the Site„ Those hazardous substances included<br />
various industrial wastes., Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
v j as thO'se owned or possessed by Respondent Rexnord Incorporated<br />
were present at the Site.<br />
i:i.„ Respondent St.. Luke's Hospital arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by St.,<br />
Luke's Hospital at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
medical waste. Hazardous substances of the same kind as those<br />
owned or possessed by Respondent St.. Luke's Hospital were present<br />
at the Site.,<br />
j j., Respondent Star Line Trucking Company accepted<br />
hazardous substances for transport to, and disposal or treatment<br />
at the Site,, and selected the Site for disposal or treatment,.<br />
Those hazardous substances included fly ash., Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those disposed of by Star Line<br />
Trucking Company were present at the Site,. Respondent Star Line<br />
Trucking also arranged, by contract or agreement, or otherwise,,<br />
^.....-' for the disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for<br />
transport for dlsposal o>r treatment, of hazardous substances<br />
owned or possessed by Star Line Trucking Company at the Site..<br />
Those hazardous substances included various industrial wastes.,<br />
Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed<br />
by Respondent Star Line Trucking Company were present at the<br />
Site. kk:, Respondent Teledyne Wisconsin Motors arranged, by<br />
contract or aipMiienent, or otherwise,, for the disposal or<br />
treatment,, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or 'fcxeatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Teledyne Wisconsin Motors at the Site.. Those hazardous<br />
substances included liquid wastes and waste oil. Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Teledyne Wisconsin Motors were present at the Site.,<br />
11. Respondent Trinity Hospital arranged, by contract or
agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Trinity<br />
Hospital at the Site, Those hazardous substances included<br />
medical waste. Hazardous; substances of. the same kind as those<br />
owned or possessed by Respondent Trinity Hospital were present at<br />
the Site.<br />
inm., Respondent Vulcan Materials Company arranged,, by<br />
contract or agreement,, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport, for<br />
disposal or treatment,, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Vulcan Materials Company at the Site., Those hazardous<br />
substances included metal-bearing slag. Hazardous substances of<br />
the same kind as those owned or possessed by Respondent Vulcan<br />
Materials Company were present at the Site.<br />
nn. Respondent W.A. Krueger Company arranged,, by contract<br />
or agreement, or otherwise!, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by W.A.<br />
Krueger Company at the Site. Those hazardous substances included<br />
waste ink and glue. Hazardous substances of the same kind as<br />
those owned or possessed by Respondent W.A. Krueger Company were<br />
present at. the Site,<br />
oo., Respondent Wayne Chemical Corporation arranged, by<br />
contract our agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Wayne Chemical. Corporation at the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included waste chemicals„ Hazardous substances oof: the<br />
sane kind as those owned or possessed by Respondent Wayne<br />
Chemical Corporation were present, at the Site.<br />
pp., Respondent Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company arranged,<br />
by contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company at the Site., Those hazardous<br />
substances included various industria 1 wastes,. Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Respondent Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company were present at the<br />
Site,. qq. Respondent Wisconsin Electric Power Company arranged,,<br />
by contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Wisconsin Electric Power Company at. the Site. Those hazardous<br />
substances included transformers and fly ash.. Hazardous<br />
substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed by<br />
Wisconsin Electric Power Company were present at the Site.<br />
rr,. Respondent Zununach-Peerless Chemical. Coating Co,.
v<br />
arranged,, by contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the<br />
disposal or treatment,, or arranged with a transporter for<br />
transport for disposal or treatment„ of harcardoius substances<br />
owned or possessed; by Zummach- Peer 'less Chemical Coating Co., at<br />
the. Site.. Those hazardous substances included paint dust and<br />
powders. Hazardous substances of the sane kind as those owned or<br />
possessed by Respondent Zi-uniiiach-Peerles-is Chemical Coating Co.<br />
were present at the Site.<br />
ss., Respondent Jack Quigley operated the Site prior to<br />
1970. During the time that the Site was operated by Jack<br />
Quigley, hazardous substances, including some or all of those<br />
described in this Section, were disposed of at the Site.<br />
tt. Respondent Prestige Foods is a successor in interest to<br />
Patrick Cudahy Company., Patrick Cudahy Company arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement, or otherwise, for the disposal, or<br />
treatiient,, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Patrick Cudahy Company at the Site. Those hazardous;;<br />
substances included industrial wastes.. Hazardous substances of<br />
the same kind as those owned or possessed by Patrick Cudahy<br />
Company were present at the Site.<br />
4. The Respondents identified in paragraph 3 are collectively<br />
referred to as "'Respondents „"<br />
5. On September 15, 1985, (50 Fed. Reg.. 37956),, pursuant to<br />
section 105 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9605, EPA placed the Huskego<br />
<strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> Site on the National Priorities List, set forth<br />
at 40 C.F.R. Part 300,, Appendix B.<br />
6. To study and undertake response activities in phases,, EPA<br />
divided the Site into operable units. The operable units tor the<br />
Site are the Source Control Operable Unit and. the Groundwater<br />
V J Operable Unit. This <strong>Order</strong> addresses the Source Control Operable<br />
Unit,,<br />
7. From August 14, 1937 through November 4, 1992,, Waste<br />
Management: of Wisconsin (WMHI) , under EPA's oversight,, has<br />
undertaken a Remedial Investigation of the Site. WMWI has also<br />
undertaken separate Feasibility Studies for each Operable Unit of<br />
the Site., These activities have been perfooned pursuant to<br />
CERCLA and. the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300.<br />
WMWI has perfonned this work under an <strong>Administrative</strong>: Consent<br />
<strong>Order</strong> (AGO) signed, on August 14, 1967.<br />
8. Pursuant, to section 117 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9617, EPA<br />
published; notice of the completion of the FS and of the proposed<br />
plan for remedial action on November 12,, 1991, and provided<br />
opportunity for public comment on the proposed remedial action.
Similarly, Respoiikllents were given an opportunity to comment on<br />
the proposed remedial action and supplenient, the <strong>Administrative</strong><br />
Record.<br />
9. The decision by EPA on the remedial action to be implemented<br />
for the Source: Control Operable Unit is embodied in an Interim<br />
Action Record of Decision ('"ROD" 1 }, exeouted on June 12,, 199;;!, on<br />
which WDNR had a reasonable opportunity to review and comment, on<br />
and which WDNR has given its concurrence,, The ROD is attached, to<br />
this <strong>Order</strong> as Attachment 1 and is incorporated by reference., The<br />
ROD is supported by the <strong>Administrative</strong> Record which contains the<br />
documents and information upon which EPA based the selection of<br />
the response action. The U.S. EPA's selected response action set<br />
out in the ROD has been determined to provide adequate protection<br />
of public health,, welfare and the environment; meet, all Federal<br />
and State environmental laws;: and be cost effective. The Source<br />
Control Operable Unit is the first of two phases for the project.<br />
This SCOU is consistent with the Final Remedy in that it. prevents<br />
contaminant movement into the ground water from the source areas,<br />
10.. Contaminants were detected in soil, groun.dwat.er and<br />
sediments at. the Site,. Groups of contaminants included. BETXs<br />
(Benzene, EthyIbenzene,, Xylene,, and Toluene) , chlorinated ethenes<br />
and ethanes, inorganics,- Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)„ and<br />
pesticides., Specific chemicals are listed in the ROD,, under<br />
Section V (Site Characteristics) and the Remedial Investigation,<br />
Section 4 (Nature and Extent, of Contamination) ,.<br />
11. The Remedial Investigation results indicate that there has<br />
been a release of. hazardous substances into the groundwater and<br />
in the soils at the Site,. There are multiple source areas and<br />
groundwater pathways at the Site in which contaminants are<br />
located. Section 4, Nature and Extent of Contamination, of the<br />
Remedial Investigation report specifically indicates<br />
contaminants,, location of contaminants,, and concentrations of<br />
contaminants at. the Site,. Several, contaminants were found in<br />
exceedance of Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and WDNR<br />
Enforcement Standards (ESs} including; benzene, 1,2••••<br />
dichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, and vinyl<br />
chloride. A more comprehensive: list can be found in Section 4 of<br />
the RI.<br />
1.2.. Groundwater is the primary migration pathway for<br />
contaminants at the Site. Groundwater flow away from the Site is<br />
predominantly along the Southern and Southeastern flow paths.,<br />
Along the Southern flow path groundwater is potentially affected<br />
by the Old Fill Area, Non-Contiguous Fill Area, and the former<br />
rendering plant lagoons, The Southeastern flow path is<br />
potentially affected by the Non-Contiguous Fill Area, the
Southeast Fill Area, and the former rendering plant lagoons,,<br />
Private wells are located downgradient from these source areas<br />
and could potentially be affected by contaminants., A majority of<br />
these private wells have been converted to public drinking water<br />
supply,, Exposure to landfill gas, through either methane<br />
migration in the soils or Volatile Organic Contaminant (VOC)<br />
iinigration in the air, is also a concern at the Site,. Inhalation<br />
of landfill gas is of concern due to the potential presence of<br />
unacceptable levels of VOCs that may cause a health risk,, Direct<br />
exposure to contaminated soil or waste is currently not a concern<br />
at. the Site, Future exposure nay be a concern if the cover is<br />
not adequately improved and Maintained.<br />
13. There are approximately 130 homes within one-ha HE' mile of<br />
the Site., This converts to a population of 325, assuming there<br />
are 2.5 persons living in each home,. There are approximately a<br />
dozen homes downgradient that potentially could be affected by<br />
groundwater contamination. All of these homes have been or will<br />
be connected to public water for consumptive purposes.. Therefore<br />
these homes do not draw water from the groundwater potentially<br />
affected by contamination, The land surrounding the Site is<br />
currently a mixture of private homes, smal 1 ••••scale agriculture,,<br />
medium-sized farming, and industrial use, Residential<br />
development is progressing westward along Janesville Road toward<br />
the Site,. This is an indicator that future land use of property<br />
nearby the Site could be primarily residential,, Public Health<br />
concerns are expressed in greater detail in the Public Health<br />
Assessment for the Site, in addition the Baseline Risk<br />
Assessment in the El presents current and potential risks to<br />
human health, welfare and the environment.,<br />
14.. There have been two drum removal actions at the Site, The<br />
first was the excavation and removal of free liquid, drums and<br />
contaminated soils in an area east of the Won-Contiguous Fill<br />
Area. The solid materials were transported to the Adams Center<br />
<strong>Landfill</strong> in Ft,, Wayne, Indiana while the liquids were transported<br />
to the SCA Incinerator in Chicago, Illinois., This action took<br />
place under the supervision of WDNR officials. The second<br />
removal was in a drum, trench area discovered during the EX in the<br />
Non-Contiguous Fill Area, Through a <strong>Unilateral</strong> <strong>Administrative</strong><br />
<strong>Order</strong> issued on January 4,, 1991, U.S. EPA ordered. WMHI to remove<br />
the drums and surrounding contaminated soils. Excavation of the<br />
drum trench, began in April 1991 and. was completed in May 1991, A<br />
total of 989 drums were excavated along with approximately 2,500<br />
cubic yards of surrounding contaminated soil, The soils were<br />
excavated to a depth of approximately 25 feet below the original<br />
surface grade until ground water was encountered,<br />
15.. The selected remedy for the source control operable unit is
primarily designed to prevent percolation through wastes and into<br />
the groundwater. Included in this remedy is a multi-layer cap<br />
over the source areas, leachate control systems in the Old and<br />
Southeast Fill areas,, landfill gas control in the Old, Non-<br />
Contiguous and Southeast Fill areas, and In-situ Vapor Extraction<br />
(ISVE) in portions of the Non-Contiguous Fill Area,, A more<br />
detailed description, of the remedy can be found under the<br />
Selected Remedy section (IX.) of the ROD,.<br />
1.6. The main component of the source control remedy is the<br />
multi-layer cap over the source areas., The clay component of the<br />
cap is designed to minimize percolation into and through the<br />
waste masses and carry contamination into the groundwater. The<br />
multi-layer cap will ibe designed to direct rainwater and snowmelt<br />
away from the waste masses and protect the clay layer from frost<br />
penetration. The leachate control component of the remedy will<br />
iy i reduce the buildup of contaminated liquids within the waste<br />
masses and minimise seeping of these liquids into the<br />
groundwater.. The landfill gas control and ISVE systems will<br />
remove contaminants within wastes and so 1.1 s respect ive ly.<br />
Ill,. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DETERMINATIONS<br />
17. The <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> Site is a "'facility 111 as<br />
defined in section 101(9) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9601(9).<br />
IB., Respondents are "'persons 111 as defined as in section 101 (21)<br />
Of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9601(21).<br />
19., Each Respondent is a ""liable party" 1 as defined in section<br />
107 (a) of CERCLA, 42 U.,S,.C., 9607 (a), and is subject to this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> under section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606(a).<br />
20. '"Hazardous substances 1 " as defined in section 101(14) of<br />
V...-'' CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9601 (14), have been disposed at the Facility,<br />
21. These hazardous substances have been and continue to be<br />
released from the Site into the soil, groundwater, sediment and<br />
air,.<br />
22. The past disposal and current migration of hazardous<br />
substances from the Site are a. '"release" 1 as defined in section<br />
101(22) Of CERCLA,, 42 U.S.C. 9601(22).<br />
23.. The potential for future migration of hazardous substances<br />
from the Site poses a threat of a '"release 11 " as defined in section<br />
101(22) Of CERCLA, 4 2 U.S.C. 9 601(22).<br />
24.. The release and threat of release of one or more hazardous<br />
substances from the facility may present an imminent and
V..,/'<br />
substantial endangerment to the public health or welfare or the<br />
environment.<br />
25. The actions required by this <strong>Order</strong> are necessary to protect<br />
the public health, welfare, and the environment and are<br />
consistent with the National Contingency Plan (NCP) ,, 40 CFR Part<br />
300,, as amended, and CERCLA.,.<br />
IV. NOTICE TO THE STATE<br />
26. Prior to issuing this <strong>Order</strong>, EPA notified the State of<br />
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (""WDNR 1 ") , that EPA<br />
intended to issue this <strong>Order</strong>,<br />
31. EPA will consult with the WDNR and the WDNR will have the<br />
opportunity to review and comment to EPA regarding all work, to be<br />
performed, deliverables, and any other issues which arise while<br />
the <strong>Order</strong> remains in effect.<br />
V. ORDER<br />
27. Based on the foregoing, Respondents are hereby ordered to<br />
comply with the following provisions, including but not limited<br />
to all attachments to this <strong>Order</strong>, all documents incorporated by<br />
reference into this <strong>Order</strong>, and all schedules and deadlines in<br />
this <strong>Order</strong>, attached to this <strong>Order</strong>, or incorporated by reference<br />
into this <strong>Order</strong>:<br />
VI., DEFINITIONS<br />
28.. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein., terns used in<br />
this <strong>Order</strong> which are defined in CERCLA or in regulations<br />
promulgated under CERCLA shall have the meaning assigned to them<br />
in the statute or its implementing regulations. Whenever terras<br />
listed below are used in this <strong>Order</strong> or in the documents attached<br />
to this <strong>Order</strong> or incorporated by reference into this <strong>Order</strong>, the<br />
following definitions shal1 apply:<br />
a,. '"CERCLA" shal.1 mean the Comprehensive Environmental<br />
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1.930, as amended, 42<br />
U, S. C. 9 6 01 e t ....sec|b»<br />
b,. '"Day" 1 shall mean a calendar day unless expressly stated<br />
to be a working day,. ""Working day"" shall mean a day other than a<br />
Saturday, Sunday, Federal, or State holiday. In computing any<br />
period of tine under this <strong>Order</strong>, where the last day would fall on<br />
a Saturday, Sunday, Federal or State holiday, the period shall<br />
run until the end of the next working day,<br />
c. '"EPA" 1 shall mean the United States Environmental<br />
Protect ion Agency.<br />
d. '"WDNR"* shall mean the Wisconsin Department of Natural<br />
Resources.,<br />
e. "National Contingency Plan"" or "NCP 1 " shall mean the<br />
National Contingency Plan promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9605, codified at 40 C.P.R. Part 300,<br />
including any amendments thereto.<br />
f. '"Operation and Maintenance 1 ' 11 or "O&M" shall mean all<br />
activities required under the. Operation and Maintenance Plan<br />
developed by Respondents pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong> and Task II,. B. of<br />
the Scope of Work, and approved by EPA.<br />
g, '"Paragraph 1 " shall mean a portion of this <strong>Order</strong><br />
identified by an arabic numeral,.<br />
h. '"Performance Standards'" shall mean those cleanup<br />
standards,, standards of control f and other substantive<br />
requirements, criteria or limitat .ions, identified in the Record<br />
of Decision and Scope of Work:, that the Remedial Action and Work<br />
required by this <strong>Order</strong> must attain and maintain,.<br />
:L. '"Record of Decision 1 " or ""ROD 11 " shall mean the EPA Record<br />
of Decision relating to the Site, Source Control Operable Unit,,<br />
signed on June 1.2, 1.992 by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region<br />
^ , V, and all attachments thereto.<br />
j« "Remedial Action" 1 or "RA" shall, mean those activities,,<br />
except for Operation and Maintenance, to be undertaken by<br />
Respondents to implement the final plans and specifications<br />
submitted by Respondents pursuant to the Remedial Design Work<br />
Plan approved by EPA, including any additional activities<br />
required under Sections X, XI, XII, XIII, and XIV of this <strong>Order</strong>,.<br />
k. "Remedial Design 1 " or "ED 1 " shall mean those activities to<br />
be undertaken by Respondents to develop the final plans and<br />
specifications for the Remedial Action pursuant to the Remedial<br />
Design Work Plan,,<br />
1. "'Response Costs" shall mean all costs, including direct<br />
costs, indirect costs, and accrued interest incurred by the<br />
United States and the WDNR to perform or support response actions<br />
at the Site,. Response costs include but are not limited to the<br />
costs of overseeing the Work, such as the costs of reviewing or<br />
developing plans, reports and other items pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong><br />
V.../ and costs associated with verifying the Work.<br />
m,. ""Scope of Work" 1 or '"SOW" 1 shall mean the statement of<br />
work for implementation of the Remedial Design, Remedial Action,<br />
and Operation and Maintenance: at the Site, as set forth in<br />
Attachment 2 to this <strong>Order</strong>, The Scope of Work is incorporated<br />
into this <strong>Order</strong> and is an enforceable part of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
n. ''" Sect ion"" shall, mean a portion of this <strong>Order</strong> identified<br />
by a roman numeral and includes one or more paragraphs.<br />
o., '"Section 106 <strong>Administrative</strong> Record'" shall mean the<br />
<strong>Administrative</strong> Record which includes all documents considered or<br />
relied upon by EPA in preparation of this <strong>Order</strong>.. The Section 106<br />
<strong>Administrative</strong> Record Index is a listing of all documents<br />
included in the Section 106 <strong>Administrative</strong> Record in addition to<br />
those already included in the administrative record attached to<br />
the ROD, and is attached hereto as Attachment 3.,<br />
p., '"Site" shall mean the <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> Superfund
encompass ingf approximately 56 acres,, located in the city of<br />
<strong>Muskego</strong>, Waukesha County,, Wisconsin, as described in the Record<br />
of Decision,.<br />
q. '"State 11 " shall mean the State of Wisconsin,.<br />
r. "United States 1111 shall mean the United States of AinLerioa,.<br />
s. '"Work 1 " shall mean all activities Respondents<br />
are required to perform under this <strong>Order</strong> t.o implement the ROD for<br />
the Source Control Operable Unit, including Remedial Design.,<br />
Remedial Action and Operation and Maintenance for the Source<br />
Control Operable Unit and any activities required to foe<br />
undertaken pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
VII,. NOTICE GIF INTENT TO COMPLY<br />
29,. On or before January 15, 1993, EPA must receive written<br />
notice from Respondents stating their unequivocal intention to<br />
comply with the terms of this <strong>Order</strong>, In the event any Respondent<br />
v , fails to provide such notice, that Respondent shall be deemed to<br />
have failed to comply with the terms of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
Respondent" s written notice shall, describe, using facts that<br />
exist, on or prior to the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong>, any<br />
111 sufficient cause 1 " defenses asserted by Respondents under<br />
sections 106(b) and 1.07(c) (3) of CERCLA, The absence of a<br />
response by EPA. t.a the notice required by this paragraph shall<br />
not be deemed to be acceptance of Respondent's assertions.<br />
VIII. PARTIES BOUND<br />
30.. This <strong>Order</strong> shall apply to and be binding upon each<br />
Respondent identified in Section I, their successors, and<br />
assigns., Respondents are jointly and severally responsible for<br />
carrying out all activities required by this <strong>Order</strong>., Failure of<br />
one or more Respondents to comply with all or any part of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> shall not in any way excuse or justify noncompliance by any<br />
other Respondent., No change in the ownership, corporate status,<br />
V...y or other control of any Respondents shall alter any of the<br />
Respondents" responsibi1 i.ties under this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
31.. Respondents shall provide a copy of this <strong>Order</strong> to any<br />
prospective owners or successors before a controlling interest in<br />
Respondent's assets, property rights, or stock: are transferred to<br />
the prospective owner or successor,. Respondents shall provide a<br />
copy of this <strong>Order</strong> to each contractor, sub-contractor,<br />
laboratory, or consultant, retained to perform any Work under this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, on the date such services are retained., Respondents shall<br />
also provide a copy of this <strong>Order</strong> to each person representing any<br />
Respondent with respect t.o the Site or the Work and shall<br />
condition all contracts and subcontracts entered into hereunder<br />
upon performance of the Work in conformity with the terms of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, With regard t.o> the activities undertaken pursuant to this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, each contractor and subcontractor shall be deemed to be
elated by contract to the Respondents within the meaning of<br />
section 107 (b) (3) Of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607 (b) (3).<br />
Notwithi-itanding the terms of any contract , each Respondent is<br />
responsible^ for compliance with this <strong>Order</strong> and for ensuring that<br />
its contractor s , subcontractors and agents comply with this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, and perform any Work, in accordance with this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
32.. Within five (5) days after the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong><br />
each Respondent that owns real property comprising all or part of<br />
the Site shall record a copy or copies of this <strong>Order</strong> in the<br />
appropriate governmental office where land ownership and transfer<br />
records are filed or recorded, and shall ensure that the<br />
recording of this <strong>Order</strong> is indexed to> the titles of each and<br />
every property at the Site so* as to provide notice to third<br />
parties of the issuance and terms of this <strong>Order</strong> with respect to<br />
those properties. All such Respondents shall, within 15 days<br />
v i after the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong>,, send notice of such<br />
recording and indexing to EPA.<br />
33. Not later than sixty (60) days prior to any transfer of any<br />
property interest in any real property included within the Site,<br />
Respondents shall submit a true and correct copy of the transfer<br />
document (s) to EPA,, and shall identify the transferee by name,,<br />
principal business address and effective date of the transfer.<br />
IX. WORK TO BE PERFORMED<br />
34.. All aspects of the Work to be performed by Respondents<br />
pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong> shall be under the direction and<br />
supervision of a Project Coordinator qualified to undertake and<br />
complete the requirements of this <strong>Order</strong>.. EPA. retains the right<br />
to disapprove the Project. Coordinator and any,, or all, of the<br />
contractors and/ or subcontractors retained by the Respondents .<br />
Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong>,<br />
Respondents shall notify EPA. in writing of the name and<br />
^...../ qualifications of the Project Coordinator, including primary<br />
support entities and staff, proposed to be used in carrying out<br />
Work under this <strong>Order</strong>,. In the event EPA disapproves a Project<br />
Coordinator ,, selected contractor , or selected sub- contractor ,<br />
Respondents shal .1 ret a in an alternative pro j eat coordi nator ,<br />
contractor,, or sub-contractor to perform the work:, and such.<br />
selection shall be made within fifteen (15) days following the<br />
date of EPA's disapproval,. If at any time Respondents propose to<br />
use a different: Project Coordinator, contractor or subcontractor,<br />
Respondents shall notify EPA before the new Project<br />
Coordinator performs any Work under this <strong>Order</strong>.,<br />
_ _ Action<br />
3 5 . Within f orty~~fTve~~(45)~ "days' lii!te¥"THe~""sIgnature Date of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall submit a Work Plan for the Remedial.<br />
Design/Remedial Action at the Site ("Remedial Design/Remedial
Action Work Plan" 1 or "RD/RA Work Plan") to EPA for review and<br />
approval.. The. RD/RA Work Plan shall include a step-by-step plan<br />
for completing the. remedial design for the remedy described in<br />
the ROD and for attaining and maintaining all requirements,<br />
including Performance standards,, identified in the ROD. The<br />
RD/RA Work: Plan must describe in detail the tasks and<br />
deliverables Respondents will, complete during the remedial design<br />
phase, and. a schedule for completing the tasks and deliverables<br />
in the RD/RA Work Plan, The ED/ISA Work Plan shall be consistent<br />
with, and shall provide for implementing the Scope of Work,, and<br />
shall comport with EPA's '"Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial.<br />
Action Guidance, OSWER Directive 9355.0-4A.'" The'RD/RA Work: Plan<br />
shall include a Sampling and Analysis Plan, Quality Assurance<br />
Project Plan (QAPP) (in conformance with Section XVI of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>),, and Health and Safety Plan for all pre-design sampling<br />
effortsi including treatability studies, and shall, be consistent<br />
is j with the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) . The major<br />
tasks and deliverables described in the RD/RA Work: Plan shall<br />
include, but not be limited to,, the following: (1) a preliminary<br />
design; and (2) a final design,. The design phases shall include<br />
final plans and specifications,, operation and maintenance (O&M)<br />
plan,, construction field sampling plan,, construction quality<br />
assurance plan (CQAP) „ and a. contingency plan; and (3) a design<br />
schedule..<br />
36. Upon approval, of the RD/RA Work Plan by EPA, Respondents<br />
shall implement the RD/RA Work Plan and submit all design<br />
deliverables according to the schedule in the approved RD/RA Work<br />
Plan,. Any noncompliance with the approved RD/RA Work: Plan shall<br />
be a violation of this <strong>Order</strong>,. Unless otherwise directed by EPA,<br />
Respondents shall not perform further Work at the Site prior to<br />
EPA's written approval, of the RD/RA Work Plan.<br />
V...y 37, Upon EPA approval,, the Final Design is incorporated into<br />
this <strong>Order</strong> as a requirement of this <strong>Order</strong> and shall be an<br />
enforceable part of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
38. The RD/RA Work Plan shall be developed in accordance with<br />
the ROD,, and the attached Scope of Work,, and shall be consistent<br />
with the Final Design as approved by EPA,, The RD/RA Work Plan<br />
shall, include methodologies , plans and schedules for completion<br />
of at. least the following: (1) selection of the remedial action<br />
contractor,; (2) implementation of the CQAP; and. (3)<br />
identification of and satisfactory compliance with applicable<br />
permitting requirements. The RD/RA Work Plan shall also include<br />
a schedule for implementing all remedial action tasks identified<br />
in the Scope of Work, a work plan for soil vapor extraction, and<br />
a quality assurance project plan (QAPP). The RD/RA Work Plan<br />
shall also identify the initial formulation of Respondent"s
Remedial Action Project Team (including the Supervising<br />
Contractor) and identify potential borrow sources for cap<br />
construction. Respondents shall also submit to EPA for review,,<br />
as part of the RD/RA Work: Plan,, a Health and Safety Plan for<br />
field activities required by the RD/RA Work Plan.,<br />
39.. EPA, in consultation with WDNR will review and either<br />
approve, disapprovef or conditionally approve, the ED/FA Work<br />
Plan. If the Work Plan is disapproved or conditionally approved,<br />
EPA will provide, in writing, comments or modifications required<br />
for approval. Respondents shall, then, within thirty (30) days of<br />
the date of ERA'S written notification of disapproval or<br />
conditional approval, submit an Amended Work Flan which<br />
incorporates only the requ.ired comments or rnodificat ions,. EFA<br />
shall review the Amended Work: Plan and either approve our<br />
disapprove it, Failure to submit an approvable (Amended) Work<br />
is> /( Flan shall constitute noncompliance with this <strong>Order</strong>,. Upon<br />
approval by EPA, the RD/RA Work Plan is incorporated into this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> as a requirement of this <strong>Order</strong> and shall be an enforceable<br />
part of this <strong>Order</strong>,.<br />
40.. U]pO'i'i approval of the RD/RA Work Flan by EPA,, Respondents<br />
shall implement the RD/RA Work Plan according to the schedules in<br />
the RD/RA Work Plan., Unless otherwise directed by EPA,,<br />
Respondents shall not commence remedial action at the Site prior<br />
to approval of the RD/RA Work Plan. Respondents will be<br />
responsible for obtaining all State and local permits required<br />
for implementati on of this remedy,.<br />
41... 1:1: Respondents seek: to retain a construction contractor to<br />
assist in the performance of the Remedial Action, then<br />
Respondents shall submit a copy of the contractor solicitation<br />
documents to EPA not later than five (5) days after publishing<br />
'--...-'' the solicitation documents..<br />
42.. Selection of the construction contractor shall be subject to<br />
review and approval by EPA,, in consultation with WDNR., Within<br />
ten (10) days after EFA approves the RD/RA Work Plan, Respondents<br />
shall notify EPA in writing of the name, title, and<br />
qua1ifications of any construction contractor proposed to be used<br />
in carrying out work: under this <strong>Order</strong>, If EPA disapproves of the<br />
select iO'ii of any contractor as the construct ion coin tractor,,<br />
Respondents shall submit the name, title and qualifications of a<br />
new contractor to EPA within thirty (30) days after receipt, of<br />
EPA' s disapproval of the contractor previously selected,.<br />
43. The Work performed by Respondents pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong><br />
shall, at a minimum, achieve the Performance Standards specified<br />
in the Record of Decision and in Section II.I. of the Scope of
Work.<br />
44. Notwithstanding any action by EPA, Respondents remain fully<br />
responsible for achievement of the Performance Standards in the.<br />
Record of Decision and Scope of Work. Nothing in this <strong>Order</strong>,, or<br />
in EPA's approval of the Scope of Work,, or in the Remedial Design<br />
or Remedial. Action Work Plans, or approval of any other<br />
submission, shall be deemed to constitute a warranty or<br />
representation of any kind by EPA. that full performance of the<br />
Remedial Design or Remedial Action will achieve the Performanee<br />
Standards set forth in the ROD and in Section II.I. of the Scope<br />
of Work:. Respondent' s conpllance with such approved documents<br />
does not foreclose EPA from seeking additional work to achieve<br />
the appl icable performance s tandards..<br />
45. Respondents shall, prior to any off-site shipment of<br />
v , hazardous substances from the Site to an out-of-state waste<br />
management facility, provide written notification to the<br />
appropriate state environmental official in the receiving state<br />
and to EPA's RPM of such shipment of hazardous substances.<br />
However, the notification of shipments to the State shall not<br />
apply to any off-Site shipments when the total volume of all<br />
shipments from the Site to the State will not exceed ten (10)<br />
cubic yards..<br />
a. The notification shall be in writing, and shall include<br />
the following information! where available: (i) the name and<br />
location of the facility to which the hazardous substances are to<br />
be shipped; (2) the type and quantity of the hazardous substances<br />
to be shipped; (3) the expected schedule for the shipment of the<br />
hazardous substances; and (4) the method of transportation.,<br />
Respondents shall notify the receiving state of major changes in<br />
the shipment plan, such as a decision to ship the hazardous<br />
V...y substances to another facility within the same state, or to a<br />
facility in another state,.<br />
b., All hazardous substances removed from the Facility or<br />
vicinity shall be disposed of or treated at a Facility approved<br />
by EPA's RPM, and in conpl lance with the Resource Conservation<br />
and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et se
46. Respondents shall cooperate with EPA in providing<br />
information regarding the Work to the public., As requested by<br />
EPA, Respondents shall participate in the preparation of such<br />
infonnation for distribution to the public: and in public meetings<br />
which nay be held or sponsored by EPA to explain activities at or<br />
relating to the Site.<br />
47.. Within thirty (30) days after Respondents conclude that the<br />
Remedial Act ion construct ion has been fully perf orniedl,,<br />
Respondents shall so notify EPA and shall schedule and condluct a<br />
pre-certification inspection to be attended by Respondents and<br />
EPA. The pre-certification inspection shall be followed by a<br />
written report submitted within thirty (30) days of the<br />
inspection by a registered professional engineer and Respondents"<br />
Project Coordinator certifying that the Remedial Action has been<br />
\ ) completed in full satisfaction of the requirements of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
If, after completion of the pre-certification inspection and<br />
receipt and review of the written report, EPA determines that the<br />
Remedial Action or any portion thereof has not been completed in<br />
accordance with this <strong>Order</strong>, EPA shall notify Respondents in<br />
writing of the activities that must be undertaken to complete the<br />
Remedial Action and shall set forth in the notice a schedule for<br />
performance of such activities. Respondents shall perform all<br />
activities described in the notice in accordance with the<br />
specificat ions and schedules establ ished therein.. If EPA<br />
concludes, following the i initial or any subsequent certification<br />
of completion by Respondents that the Remedial Action has been<br />
fully performed in accordance with this <strong>Order</strong>, EPA may notify<br />
Respondents that the Remedial Action has been fully performed,<br />
EPA's notification shall be based on present knowledge and<br />
Respondent's certification to EPA, and shall not limit EPA's<br />
right to perform periodic reviews pursuant to section 12l(c) of<br />
V...../ CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9621(c), or to take or require any action<br />
that in the judgment of EPA is appropriate at the Site,, in<br />
accordance with 42 U.S.C. 9604,, 9606, or 9607.<br />
48. Within thirty (30) days after Respondents conclude that all<br />
phases of the Work have been fully performed, that the relevant<br />
Performance Standards have been attained, and that all Operation<br />
and Maintenance activities have been operated for at least one<br />
year, Respondents shall submit to EPA a written report by a<br />
registered professiona1 engineer certifying that the Work has<br />
been completed in full satisfaction of the reguirenents of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>,. EPA shall reguire such additional activities as may be<br />
necessary to complete the Work or EPA may,, based upon present<br />
knowledge and Respondent' s certif icat ion to EPA,, issue written<br />
notification to Respondents that the Work has been completed,, as<br />
appropriate. EPA's notification shall not limit EPA"s right to
perform periodic reviews pursuant to section 121 (c) of CERCLA,, 42<br />
U.S.C. 9621(c), or to take or require any action that in the<br />
•jludqment of EPA is appropriate at the Site, in accordance with 42<br />
U.slc. 9604, 9606, or 9607.<br />
X. FAILURE TO ATTAIN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS<br />
49. In the event that EPA determine® that additional response<br />
activities are necessary to meet applicable Performance<br />
Standards , EPA nay notify Respondents that add it 1 onal. response<br />
actions are necessary,.<br />
50. Unless otherwise stated by EPA, within thirty (30) days of<br />
receipt of notice from EPA that additional response activities<br />
are necessary to meet any applicafole Performance Standards,<br />
Respondents shall submit for approval by EPA a Work Plan for the<br />
additional response activities., The work plan shall conform to<br />
the applicable requirements of sections IX„ XVI, and XVII of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>. Upon EPA's approval, of the work plan pursuant to Section<br />
XIV, Respondents shall implement the work plan for additional<br />
response activities in accordance with the provisions and<br />
schedule contained therein.,<br />
XI., EPA PERIODIC REVIEW<br />
51. Under section 121(c) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9621 (c),, and any<br />
applicable regulations,, EPA may review the Site to assure that<br />
the Work performed pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong> adequately protects<br />
human health and the environment,. Until such time as EPA<br />
certifies completion of the Work, Respondents shall conduct the<br />
requisite studies „ invest igat ions„ or other response act ions as<br />
determined necessary by EPA in order to permit EPA to conduct the<br />
review under section 121(c) of CERCLA. As a result of any review<br />
performed under this paragraph,, Respondents may be required to<br />
perform additional Work or to modify Work previously performed.<br />
XII. MODIFICATIONS TO WORK<br />
52. EPA nay determine that modifications to the Work: identified<br />
in this <strong>Order</strong> and attachments to this <strong>Order</strong>, may be necessary to<br />
achieve the performance goals in the ROD or to maintain<br />
consistency with the final, remedy., If EPA determines that<br />
modifications to work are necessary, EPA nay require Respondents<br />
to submit for approval RD/RA Work Plan(s) to include the<br />
additional response activities. EPA nay also require Respondents<br />
to modify any plan, design, or other deliverable required by this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>,, including any approved modifications,<br />
53. Not later than thirty (30) days after receiving EPA' r s notice<br />
that modifications to work are required pursuant to this Section,,<br />
Respondents shall submit a work plan for the response activities<br />
to EPA for review and approval. Upon approval by EPA, the work
plan is incorporated into this <strong>Order</strong> as a requirenient of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> and shall be an enforceable part of this <strong>Order</strong>. Upon<br />
approval of the work plan by EPA, Respondents shall implement the<br />
work: plan according to the standards, specifications, and<br />
schedule in the approved work: plan. Respondents shall notify EP.A<br />
of their intent to perform such modifications, to work within<br />
seven (7) days after receipt of EPA's request for Modifications<br />
to work.,<br />
XI11. ENDANGERMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE<br />
54. In the event of any action or occurrence during the<br />
performance of the Work which causes or threatens to cause a<br />
release of a hazardous substance or which may present an<br />
immediate threat, to public health or welfare or the environment,<br />
Respondents shall immediately take all appropriate action to<br />
prevent, abate, or minimize the threat, and shall immediately<br />
v i notify EPA's Remedial Project Manager (RPM). If neither of these<br />
persons is available Respondents shall notify the EPA Emergency<br />
Response Branch, Region 5. Respondents shall take such action in<br />
consultation with EPA's RPM and in accordance with all. applicable<br />
provisions of this <strong>Order</strong>, including but not limited to the Health<br />
and Safety Plan and the Contingency Plan.. In the event, that.<br />
Respondents fail to take appropriate response action as required<br />
by this Section, and EPA takes that action instead, Respondents<br />
shall reimburse EPA for all costs of the response action not<br />
inconsistent with the NCP. Respondents shall pay the response<br />
costs in the manner described in Section XXIV of this <strong>Order</strong>,<br />
within thirty (30) days of Respondent's receipt of demand for<br />
payment and a Itemized Cost Summary of the costs incurred.<br />
55.. Nothing in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to limit<br />
any authority of the United States to take,, direct, or order all<br />
appropriate action to protect human health and the environment or<br />
v....y to prevent, abate, ox: minimise an actual, or threatened release of<br />
hazardous substances on, at,, or from the Site.<br />
XIV. EPA REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS<br />
56.. After review of any deliverable, plan (other than the RD/RA<br />
Work: Plan(s)), report, or other item which is required to be<br />
submitted for review and approval pursuant, to this <strong>Order</strong>,, EPA.<br />
may: (a) approve the submission; (b) approve the submission with<br />
modifications; (c) disapprove the submission and direct<br />
Respondents to re-submit the document after incorporating EPA"s<br />
comments; or (d) disapprove the submission and assume<br />
responsibility for performing all or any part of the response<br />
action. As used in this <strong>Order</strong>, the terms "'approval by EPA/" "'EPA<br />
approval, 111 or a similar term means the action described in<br />
subparagraphs (a) or (b) of this paragraph,. The WDNR shall, have<br />
the opportunity to review and comment on any deliverable, plan,
eport or other item which is required to be submitted for review<br />
and approval pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>.,<br />
57.. In the event of approval or approval with mod if ications by<br />
EPA, Respondents shall proceed to take any action required by the<br />
plan, report, or other item, as approved or modified by EPA.<br />
58. Upon receipt of a notice of disapproval or a request for a<br />
modification, Respondents shall, within thirty (30) days or such<br />
longer tine as specified by EPA in its notice of disapproval or<br />
request, for Modification, correct the deficiencies and resubrait<br />
the plan, report, or other item for approval. Notwithstanding<br />
the notice of disapproval,, or approval with modifications,<br />
Respondents shall proceed„ at the direction of EPA, to take any<br />
action required by any non-deficient portion of the submission.<br />
v , 59. If any submission is not approved by 'EPA, Respondents shall<br />
be deemed to be in violation of this <strong>Order</strong>.,<br />
XV,. PROGRESS REPORTS<br />
60. In addition to the other deliverables set forth in this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall provide monthly progress reports to EPA<br />
with respect to actions and activities undertaken pursuant to<br />
this <strong>Order</strong>. The progress reports shall be submitted on or before<br />
the fifteenth day of each month fedlowing the effective date of<br />
this <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents" obligation to submit progress reports<br />
continues, until EPA gives Respondents written notice under<br />
paragraph 47., At a minimum, these progress reports shall: (1.)<br />
describe the actions which have been taken to comply with this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> during the prior month; (2) include all results of sampling<br />
and tests and all other data received by Respondents and. not<br />
previously submitted to EPA; (3) describe all work planned for<br />
the next month with schedules relating sw::h work to the overall<br />
^...../ project schedule for RD/RA completion; and (4) describe all<br />
problems encountered and any anticipated problems,, any actual or<br />
anticipated delay s, and solutions developed and implemented to<br />
address any actual or anticipated problem!-; or delays,<br />
XVI. QUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLING AMD DATA ANALYSIS<br />
61.. Respondents shall use the quality assurance, quality<br />
control,, and chain of custody procedures described in the "'EPA<br />
NEIC Policies and Procedures Manual,, 1 " May 1978, revised. May 1986,<br />
EPA-330/9-78-001-R, EPA's "Guidelines and Specifications for<br />
Preparing Quality Assurance Program Documentation," June 1, 1987,<br />
EPA's "Data Quality Objective Guidance/" (EPA/540/687/003 and<br />
004), and any aniendnoients to these documents,, while conducting all<br />
sample collection and analysis activities required herein by any<br />
plan.. To provide quality assurance and maintain quality control,<br />
Respondents sha 11::
a. As part of the RD/EA Work Plan, Respondents shall submit<br />
a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) to the U.S. EPA that is<br />
cons 1stent with the SOW,, the Amended Work Plan and EPA's '"Interim<br />
Guidelines and Specifications For Preparing Quality Assurance<br />
Project Plans 1 " (QAM-O05/80) and any subsequent amendments. The<br />
QAPP must: be approved by EPA prior to the comnencement of any<br />
sampling and analysis under this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
b. Prior to the development, and submittal of a QAPP,<br />
Respondents shall attend a pre-QAPP meeting, if determined<br />
necessary,, sponsored by EPA to identify all monitoring and data<br />
quality objectives. U.S.. EPA, after review of the submitted QAPP,<br />
wi 11 either approve, conditionally approve , or disapprove the<br />
QAPP. Upon notification of conditiona 1 or disapproval,,<br />
Respondents shall make all required modifications to the QAPP<br />
within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notification.<br />
v / c., Use only laboratories which have a documented Quality<br />
Assurance Program that complies with EPA guidance document QAMS-<br />
005/80 and subsequent amendments.<br />
d., Ensure that the laboratory used by the Respondents for<br />
analyses, performs according to a method or methods deemed<br />
satisfactory to EPA and submits all protocols to be used for<br />
analyses to EPA at least 15 days before beginning analysis.<br />
e. Ensure that EPA personnel and EPA's authorized<br />
representatives are allowed access to the laboratory and<br />
personnel utilized by the Respondents for analyses,,<br />
f. Ensure provision of analytical tracking Information<br />
consistent, with OSWER Directive Number 9240. 0-2B, '"Extending the<br />
Tracking of Analytical Services to PRP-Lead Superfund Sites."<br />
62. Respondents shall notify EPA not less than fourteen (14)<br />
days in advance of any sample collection activity. At the<br />
request of EPA, Respondents shall allow split or duplicate<br />
k...,/ samples to be taken by EPA or its authorized representatives, of<br />
any samples collected by Respondents with regard to the Site or<br />
pursuant to the implementation of this <strong>Order</strong>.. In addition, EPA<br />
shall have the right to take any additional sample!-; that EPA<br />
deems necessary.<br />
XVII,. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS<br />
63.. All activities by Respondents pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong> shall,<br />
be performed in accordance with the requirements of all Federal<br />
and state laws and regulations. EPA has determined that the<br />
activities contemplated by this <strong>Order</strong> are consistent with the<br />
National Contingency Plan (NCP).<br />
64.. Except as provided in section 121 (e) of CERCLA and the NCP,<br />
no permit shall be required £or any portion of the Work conducted<br />
entirely on-Site. Where any portion of the Work requires a
Federal or State permit or approval, Respondent):) shall submit<br />
timely application!-: and take all other actions necessary to<br />
obtain and to comply with all such permits or approvals.,<br />
65.. This <strong>Order</strong> is not, and shall not be construed to foe, a<br />
permit issued pursuant, to any Federal, or State statute or<br />
regulation.<br />
66. All materials removed from the Site shall, be disposed of or<br />
treated at a facility approved by EPA's RPM and in accordance<br />
with section 121 (d) (3) of CERCLA, 42 u.S.C. 9621 (d) (3); with<br />
the U.S. EPA "Revised Off-Site policy/" 1 OSWER Directive 9834.11,<br />
November 13, 1987; and with all other applicable Federal, State,<br />
and local requirements,<br />
XVIII. REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGER<br />
^ , 67,. All. coMmuni.cati.ons, whether written or oral, from<br />
Respondents to EPA. shall be directed to EPA's Remedial Project<br />
Manager., Respondents shall submit to EPA four copies, and to<br />
WDNR two copies, of all documents,, including plans, reports,, and<br />
other correspondence, which are developed pursuant, to this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
At a Minimum, Respondents shall send one copy of all such<br />
documents to EPA and 'WDNR by overnight or certified mail,<br />
EPA's Remedial Project Manager is:<br />
William J., Haubold<br />
U.S. EPA, Region 5 (HSRW-6J)<br />
77 West. Jackson Boulevard<br />
Chicago,, 11.1 inois 60 604<br />
(312)"353-6261<br />
68. EPA has the unreviewable right to change its Remedial.<br />
Project Manager or Alternate Remedial Project Manager., If EPA<br />
V....X changes its Remedial Project. Manager or Alternate Remedial.<br />
Project Manager, EPA will inform Respondents in writing of the<br />
name, address, and telephone number of the new Remedial Project<br />
Manager or Alternate Remedial Proj ect Manager.<br />
69. EPA's RPM and Alternate RPM shall have the authority<br />
lawfully vested in a Remedial Project Manager (RPM:) and On-Scene<br />
Coordinator (OSC) by the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R.<br />
Part 300,. EPA's RPM or Alternate RPM shall have authority,<br />
consistent with the National Contingency Plan, to halt any work.<br />
required by this <strong>Order</strong>,, and to take any necessary response<br />
action.<br />
70. Within twenty (20) days after the effective date of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>,, Respondents shall designate a Project Coordinator and<br />
shall submit thus name, address, and telephone number of the
Project Coordinator to EPA for review and approval. Respondents"<br />
Pro ject Coordinator shall be responsible for overseeing<br />
Respondenti-i" implementation of this <strong>Order</strong>., If Respondent.!-! wish<br />
to change their Pro;} ect Coordinator ,F Respondent s shal 1 pr ovide<br />
written notice to EPA, five (5) days prior to changing the<br />
Project Coordinator, of the name and qualifications of the new<br />
Project Coordinator,, Respondents selection of a Project<br />
Coordinator shall be subject to EPA approval,<br />
XIX, ACCESS TO SITE NOT OWNED BY RESPONDENTS<br />
71, If the Site,, the off-Site area that is to be used for<br />
access,, property where documents required to be prepared or<br />
maintained by this <strong>Order</strong> are located! or other property subject<br />
to or affected by the clean up,, is owned in whole or in part by<br />
parties other than those bound by this <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents will<br />
obtain, or use their best efforts to obtain, site access<br />
,s ; agreements from the present owner (s) within 60 days of the<br />
effective date of this <strong>Order</strong>. Such agreements shall provide<br />
access for EPA,, its contractors and oversight officials, the<br />
state and its contractors „ and Respondents or Respondents''<br />
authorized representatives and contractors,, and such agreements<br />
shall specify that Respondents are not EPA's representative with<br />
respect to liability associated with Site activities.<br />
Respondents shall save and hold harmless the United States and<br />
its off id a Is,, agents,, employees , contractors , subco>ntractors, or<br />
representatives for or from any and all claims one: causes of<br />
action or other costs incurred by the United States on behalf of<br />
EPA including but not limited to attorneys fees and other<br />
expenses of litigation and settlement arising from or on account<br />
of acts or omissions of Respondents, their officers, directors,<br />
employees, agents, contractors,, subcontractors, and any persons<br />
acting on their behalf or under their control,, in carrying out<br />
activities pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>, including any claims arising<br />
V...y front any designation of Respondents as EPA's authorized<br />
representative(s) under section 104(e) of CERCLA. Copies of such<br />
agreements shall be provided to EPA prior to Respondent's<br />
initial:;ion of field activities„ Respondents'' best efforts shall<br />
include providing reasonable compensation to any off-Site<br />
property owner. If access agreements are not obtained within the<br />
time referenced above,, Respondents shall immediately not if y EPA<br />
of their failure to obtain access.. Subject to the United States"<br />
non-reviewable discretion,, EPA may use its legal, authoriti.es to<br />
obtain access four the Respondents, may perform those response<br />
actions with EPA contractors at the property in question, or nay<br />
terminate the <strong>Order</strong> if Respondents cannot obtain access<br />
agreements.. If EPA performs those tasks or activities with<br />
contractors and does not terminate the <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall<br />
perform all other activities not repairing access to that<br />
property, and shall reimburse EPA,, pursuant, to Section XXIV of
v<br />
this <strong>Order</strong>, for all costs incurred in performing such activities.,<br />
Respondents shall integrate the results of any such tasks<br />
undertaken by EPA into its reports and deliverables.<br />
Respondents shall, reimburse EPA, pursuant to Section XXIV of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>., for all. response costs (including attorney fees) incurred<br />
by the United States to obtain access for Respondents,<br />
XX,. SITE ACCESS AND DATA/DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY<br />
72!, Respondents shall allow EPA and its authorized<br />
representatives and contractors to enter and freely move about<br />
all property at the Site and off-Site areas subject to or<br />
affected by the work under this <strong>Order</strong> or where documents required<br />
to be prepared or maintained by this <strong>Order</strong> are located, for the<br />
purposes of inspecting conditions,. activities,, the results of<br />
activities, records,, operating logs, and contracts related to the<br />
Site or Respondents and its representatives or contractors<br />
pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>; reviewing the progress of the Respondents<br />
v '"' in carrying out the terras of this <strong>Order</strong>; conducting tests or<br />
sampling as EPA or its authorized representatives or contractors<br />
deem necessary; using a camera, sound recording device or other<br />
documentary type equipment; and verifying the data submitted to<br />
EPA by Respondents. Respondents shall allow EPA and its<br />
authorized representatives to enter the Site, to inspect: and copy<br />
al 1 records , files, photographs ,r documents, sampling and<br />
monitoring data,, and other writings related to work undertaken in<br />
carrying out this <strong>Order</strong>,. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as<br />
limiting or affecting EPA's right of entry or inspection<br />
authority under Federal law,.<br />
73. Respondents may assert a claim of business confidentiality<br />
covering part or all of the information submitted to EPA pursuant:<br />
to the terms of this <strong>Order</strong> under 40 C.F.R. 2.203, provided such<br />
claim is not inconsistent with section 104(e)(7) of CERCLA, 42<br />
V.../ U.S.C. 9604(e) (7) or other provisions of law. This claim shall<br />
be asserted in the manner described by 40 C.F.R. 2.203(b) and<br />
substantiated by Respondents at the time the claim is made,<br />
Information determined to be confidential by EPA will be given<br />
the protection specified in 40 C.,F.R,, Part 2,. If no such claim<br />
accompanies the information when it is submitted to EPA,, it may<br />
be made available to the public by EPA or the State without<br />
further notice to the Respondents. Respondents shall not assert<br />
confidentiality claims with respect to any data related to Site<br />
conditions., sampling, or moini.tori.ng,.<br />
74. Respondents shall maintain for the period during which this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> is in effect, an index of documents that Respondents claim<br />
contain confidential business information., The index shal 1<br />
contain,, for each document, the date, author, addressee,, and<br />
subject of the document. Upon written request from EPA,,
Respondents shall submit a copy of the index to EPA.<br />
XXI,. RECORD PRESERVATION<br />
75.. Respondents shall provide to EPA upon request, copies of all<br />
documents and information within their possession and/or control<br />
or that of their contractors or agents relating to activities at<br />
the Site or to the implementation of this <strong>Order</strong>„ including, but<br />
not 1 inited to sampling,, analysis, chain of custody records,<br />
manifests f trucking logs, receipts, reports, sample traffic<br />
routing, correspondence, or other documents or information<br />
related to the. Work. Respondents shall also make available to<br />
EPA for purposes of invest igation, information gathering, or<br />
testimony, their employees,, agents,, or representatives with<br />
knowledge of relevant facts concerning the performance of the<br />
Work,<br />
it , 76. Until, ten (10) years after EPA provides notice pursuant to<br />
v '" paragraph 47, each Respondent shall preserve and retain all<br />
records and documents in its possession or control, including the<br />
documents in the possession or control, of their contractors and<br />
agents on and after the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong> that relate<br />
in any manner to the Site., At the conclusion of this document<br />
retention period,, Respondents shall notify the United States at<br />
least ninety (90) calendar days prior to the destruction of any<br />
such records or documents,, and upon request by the United States,,<br />
Respondents shall, deliver any such records or documents to EPA...<br />
77. Until ten (1.0) years after EPA provides notice pursuant to<br />
paragraph 47 of this <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall preserve, and shall<br />
instruct their contractors and agents to preserve,, all documents,<br />
records, and information of whatever kind, nature or description<br />
relating to the performance of the Work. Upon the conclusion of<br />
this document retention period,, Respondents shall notify the<br />
V...y United States at least ninety (90) days prior to the destruction<br />
of any such records, documents or information, and,, upon request.<br />
of the United States, Respondent!-; shall deliver all such<br />
documents, records and information to EPA..<br />
78.. Within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall submit a written certification to EPA's<br />
RFM that they have not altered, mutilated., discarded, destroyed.<br />
or otherwise disposed of any records, documents or other<br />
information relating to their potential, liability with regard to<br />
the Site since notification of potential liability by the United<br />
States or the State or the filing of suit against it regarding<br />
the Site. Respondents shall not dispose of any such documents<br />
without prior approval by EPA.. Respondents shall, upon EPA's<br />
request and at no cost to EPA, deliver the documents or copies of<br />
the documents to EPA,.
XXII. DELAY IN PERFORMANCE<br />
79. Any delay in performance of this <strong>Order</strong> that;, in EPA's<br />
judgment., is not properly justified by Respondents under the<br />
terms of this paragraph shall be considered a violation of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>. Any delay in performance of this <strong>Order</strong> shall not affect<br />
Respondents obligations to fully perform all obligations under<br />
the tenns and conditions of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
80. Respondents shall, notify EPA of any delay or anticipated<br />
delay in performing any requirement of this <strong>Order</strong>, Such<br />
notification shall be made by telephone to EPA's RPM or Alternate<br />
RFM within forty eight (48) hours after Respondents first knew or<br />
should have known that a delay might occur. Respondents shall<br />
adopt, all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize any such<br />
delay. Within five (5) business days after notifying EPA by<br />
,s< , telephone, Respondents shall provide written notification fully<br />
describing the nature of the delay, any justification for delay,<br />
any reason why Respondents should not be held strictly<br />
accountable for failing to comply with any relevant, requirements<br />
of this <strong>Order</strong>, the measures planned and taken to minimize the<br />
delay, and a schedule for implementing the measures that will be<br />
taken to mitigate the effect of the delay. Increased costs or<br />
expenses associated with implementation of the activities called<br />
for in this <strong>Order</strong> is not a justification for any delay in<br />
performance.<br />
XXIII. ASSURANCE OF ABILITY TO COMPLETE WORK<br />
81. Respondents shall demonstrate their ability to complete the<br />
Work required by this <strong>Order</strong> and to pay all claims that; arise from<br />
the performance of the Work by obtaining and presenting to EPA<br />
within thirty (30) days after approval of the RO/RA Work Plan,,<br />
one of the following: (1) a perfornance bond; (2) a letter of<br />
V...,/ credit; (3) a guarantee by a third party; or (4) internal<br />
financial information to allow EPA to determine that Respondents<br />
have sufficient assets available to perform the Work.<br />
Respondents shall demonstrate financial assurance in an amount no<br />
less than the estimate of cost for the remedial design and<br />
remedial action contained in the Record of Decision for the Site.<br />
If Respondents seek to demonstrate ability to complete the<br />
remedial action by means of internal financial information, or by<br />
guarantee of a third party, they shall re-submit such information<br />
annually, on the anniversary of the effective date of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
If EPA determines that such financial information is inadequate.<br />
Respondents shall,, within thirty (30) days after receipt of EPA's<br />
notice of determination, obtain and present to EPA for approval<br />
one of the other three forms of financial assurance listed above.,<br />
82. At least seven (7) days prior to commencing any work at the
Site pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents shall submit to EPA a<br />
certification that Respondents or their contractors and<br />
subcontractors have adequate insurance coverage or have<br />
indemnification for liabilities for injuries or damages to<br />
persons or property which may result from the activities to be<br />
conducted by or on behalf of Respondents pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>,<br />
Respondents shall ensure that such insurance or indemnification<br />
is maintained for the duration of the. Work required by this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>.<br />
XXIV. REIMBURSEMENT OF RESPONSE COSTS<br />
83. Respondents shall reimburse EPA,, upon written demand, for<br />
all response costs incurred by the United States in overseeing<br />
Respondents' implenientation of the requirements of this <strong>Order</strong>.<br />
EPA. nay submit to Respondents on a periodic basis an accounting<br />
of all response costs incurred by the United States with respect<br />
, . to this <strong>Order</strong>. EPA's certified Agency Financial Management<br />
System summary data (Itemized Cost Summary), or such other<br />
summary as certified by EPA, shall serve as basis for payment<br />
demands.<br />
84. Respondents shall,, within thirty (30) days of receipt, of<br />
each EPA accounting, remit a certified or cashier's check for the<br />
amount of those costs,. Interest shall accrue from the later of<br />
the date that payment of a specified amount is demanded in<br />
writing or the date of the expenditure., The interest rate is the<br />
rate established by the Department of the Treasury pursuant to 31<br />
U.S.C. 371.7 and 4* C.F.R. 102.13.<br />
65, Checks shall be made payable to the Hazardous Substances<br />
Superfund and shall, include the name of the Site, the Site<br />
identification number, the account number and the title of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>. Checks shall be forwarded to:<br />
V.y U. S,. Environmental Protection Agency<br />
Superfund Accounting<br />
"P.O. Box: 70753<br />
Chicago,, 111inois 60604<br />
86. Respondents shall send copies of each transmittal letter and<br />
check to'the EPA's RPM.<br />
XXV,. UNITED STATES MOT LIABLE<br />
87.. The United States, by issuance of this <strong>Order</strong>, assumes no<br />
liability for any injuries or damages to persons or property<br />
resulting from acts or omissions by Respondents, or their<br />
directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives,,<br />
successors, assigns, contractors, or consultants in carrying out<br />
any action or activity pursuant to this <strong>Order</strong>. Neither EPA nor<br />
the United States may be deemed to be a party to any contract<br />
entered into by Respondents or their directors, officers,
employees, agents, successors, assigns, contractors, or<br />
consultants in carrying out any action or activity pursuant to<br />
this <strong>Order</strong>..<br />
XXVI. ENFORCEMENT AMD RESERVATIONS<br />
138. EPA reserves the right to bring an action against<br />
Respondents under section 107 of CERCL&, 42 U.S.C. 9607, for<br />
recovery of any response costs incurred by the United States<br />
related to this <strong>Order</strong> and not. reimbursed by Respondents. This<br />
reservation shall include, but not be limited to past costs,,<br />
direct costs, indirect costs,, the costs of oversight, the costs<br />
of compiling the. cost documentation to support oversight cost<br />
demand,, as well as accrued interest as provided in section 107(a)<br />
of CER.CIA,<br />
89.. Notwithstanding any other provision of this <strong>Order</strong>, at any<br />
is , time during the response action,, EPA may perform its own studies,<br />
complete the response action (or any portion of. the response<br />
action) as provided in CERCIA and the NCP,, and seek reimbursement<br />
from Respondents for its costs,, or seek any other appropriate<br />
relief. -<br />
90.. Nothing in this <strong>Order</strong> shall, preclude EPA from taking any<br />
additional enforcement actions,, including modification of this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> or issuance of additional. <strong>Order</strong>s,, and/or additional<br />
remedial or removal, actions as EPA may deem necessary, or from<br />
requiring Respondents in the future to perform; additional<br />
activities pursuant to CERCIA,, 42 U.S.C. 9606(a),, et_..se«3[«x or<br />
any other applicable law. Respondents shall be liable under<br />
CEJEtCLA section 107 (a), 42 U.S.C. 9607 (a) , for the costs of any<br />
such additional actions.<br />
91. Notwithstanding any provision of this <strong>Order</strong>, the United<br />
V..-'' States hereby retains all of its information gathering,<br />
inspection and enforcement authorities and rights under CERCLA,<br />
RCRA and any other applicable statutes or regulations.<br />
92. Respondents shall, be subject to civil penalties under<br />
section 10is(b) of CERCLA.,, 42 U.S.C. 9606(bj , of not more than<br />
$25,, 000 for each day in which Respondents willfully violates,, or<br />
fails or refuses to comply with this <strong>Order</strong> without sufficient<br />
cause., In addition, failure to properly provide response action<br />
under this <strong>Order</strong>,, or any portion hereof, without sufficient<br />
cause, may result in liability under section 107(c) (3) of CERCLA,,<br />
42 U.,S.C,. 9607(c) (3), for punitive damages in an amount at<br />
least equal to, and not more than three times the amount of any<br />
costs incurred by the Hazardous Substance Superfund as a result<br />
of such failure to take proper action.,
93. Nothing in this <strong>Order</strong> shall, constitute or be construed as a<br />
release from any claim, cause of action or demand in law or<br />
equity against any person for any liability it nay have arising<br />
out of or relating in any way to the Site.<br />
94. If a court issues an order that invalidates any provision of<br />
this <strong>Order</strong> or finds that Respondents has sufficient cause not to<br />
comply with one or more provisions of this <strong>Order</strong>, Respondents<br />
shall remain bound to comply with all provisions of this <strong>Order</strong><br />
not invalidated by the court's order.<br />
XXVII. ACCESS TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD<br />
95. The Section 1O6 <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong> supporting the above<br />
Findings of Fact and Detenni.nati.ons is available for review on<br />
normal business days between the hours of 9:OO a.,n, and 5:OO p.m.<br />
at the U.S. EPA,, Region V,, 77 West Jackson Boulevard., Chicago,,<br />
v , Illinois. Please contact Janet Pfundheller, <strong>Administrative</strong><br />
Record Specialist, at (312) 353-7626 to review the <strong>Administrative</strong><br />
Record at this location. An Index of the <strong>Administrative</strong> Record<br />
is attached within the ROD hereto as Attachment 1..<br />
XXVIII. EFFECTIVE DATE/TERMINATION<br />
9(5.. This <strong>Order</strong> shall be effective 20 days after the <strong>Order</strong> is<br />
signed by the Regional Administrator. All times for performance<br />
of ordered activities shall be calculated from this effective<br />
date.<br />
97. The provisions of this <strong>Order</strong> shall be deemed to be satisfied<br />
when EPA notifies Respondents in writing that Respondents have<br />
demonstrated, to U.S. EPA's satisfaction, that all tennis of the<br />
<strong>Order</strong> have been completed,. This notice shall not, however,<br />
" terminate Respondents obligation to comply with Article XXI of<br />
this <strong>Order</strong> (relating to record preservation),.<br />
XXIX. OPPORTUNITY TO CONFER<br />
98. Respondents nay, within ten (10) days after the date this<br />
<strong>Order</strong> is signed, request a conference with EPA to discuss this<br />
<strong>Order</strong>. If requested, the conference shall occur at U.S. EPA<br />
Region 5 offices,, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois or<br />
a location to be determined at a later date,. This conference is<br />
not an evidentiary hearing, and does not constitute a proceeding<br />
to challenge this <strong>Order</strong>. It does not give Respondents a right to<br />
seek: review of this <strong>Order</strong>, or to seek resolution of potential<br />
liability, and no official stenographic record of the conference<br />
will be made, At any conference held pursuant to Respondent,'s<br />
request, Respondents may appear in person or by an attorney or<br />
other representative,. Requests for a conference must be by<br />
telephone followed by written confirmation mailed that day to<br />
William J. Haubold, Remedial Project Manager, 77 West Jackson<br />
Blvd.,, Chicago, II, 60604, (312) 353-6261.'
So <strong>Order</strong>ed, this<br />
day of December, 1992.,<br />
BY:<br />
William E,, Mono<br />
Acting Director, 'lilaistM-s^.WfiSin.-ij^jiiaiiiSStinit: Division<br />
1.1,.S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />
Region V
v.,/<br />
ATT^CBMINT 4<br />
INDEX OF LIABILITY
INDEX 0F LIABILITY DOCUMENTS<br />
09 / 2 5 / 8 6 Waste Managaaient, U,. S. ZPA<br />
Inc.<br />
0212 4 / a 7 waste Management, U, S., EPA<br />
Inc.,<br />
o ::i / 2 4 / al waste Management, u. S. EPA<br />
Inc..<br />
10/30/92 waste Management, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc.<br />
11/13/92 Waste Management,, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc..<br />
09/09/136 Carl Wauer U.S.<br />
0 € / 01 / 8 7 Acme Gal. van i z ing ,<br />
Inc..<br />
11/02/92 Aciniai Gtlvanizing, U.S. Elf'A<br />
Inc.,<br />
:.,:;:/!'[!'/i-i(ii Aldrich chemical U.S. EPA<br />
Cnipany<br />
:LO/io/f:i! Aldrich chaiical U.S. EFA<br />
C0inpa:nY<br />
12/1IEI/B6 Allintini lilradley Co. U..S. EPA<br />
11/03/92 Alien Bradley Co. U.S., EPA<br />
Rasponsie t:::: EPA<br />
I nf o rmar i o n Reque s t<br />
SuppIiitiiKiincai<br />
Riiitsponsa co EPA<br />
Information Raquaat<br />
( including 12 drivar<br />
affidavits)<br />
Supiplenental<br />
Riniiiponsdi: to EPA<br />
I nf orniat i o n Re quest<br />
SuppIiitiDnaiintal<br />
Rmisponse to EPJfi,<br />
Information Raquast<br />
(attaching siiteriiitlated<br />
records)<br />
Suppleaantal<br />
Rin HI i;ion!!ii€ to EP'A<br />
I nf oriiat i on RiiMpies t<br />
(attaching liquid<br />
wasta report<br />
summaries)<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Reqruamt<br />
Riiiisponainit to EPA<br />
Information Requamt<br />
Riiiiinponsiit to E;PA<br />
Infoniation Raqminst<br />
Riiiiiiiiponsiiit to EPA<br />
Infoinnation Raqiuast<br />
sniippiaiineinitai<br />
Riasponaiii to EPA<br />
Informiiiition Riiiquaiiit<br />
RAsponsa to EPA<br />
Information Raqwmst<br />
Si.ippl«Biiaiiirital<br />
Rdiifliponse to EPA<br />
Information Regjumtst
Author<br />
12/22/86 American Motors U.S. SPA<br />
Corp.<br />
11/12/92 Ampco Metal Co. U.S. EPA<br />
04/24/87 Aniron Corporation U.S. SPA<br />
11/06/92 Amron Corporation U.S. EPA<br />
11/04/92 Beatrice Company U.S. EPA<br />
11/251B2 aeatrloe company U.S. EPA<br />
07/06/87 Elostrom Seating U.S. EPA<br />
Inc.,<br />
11./12 / 92 Bos tron Seat ing U, S.. EPA<br />
Inc.<br />
11/24/92 Browning Ferris U.S. EPA<br />
Indus tries<br />
06/04/87 Caterpillar Tractor u.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
11./12 / 9 2 Catintrpil Lar Tractor U.. S. l-IFA<br />
Connpany<br />
12/04/ill€ Cudahy Tanning Co., U.S. EPA<br />
11/12/92 cudahy Tanning Co. U..S, EPA<br />
11/20/92 GudaJhy Tanning Co,. u,.s,, EPA<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I n f o r:ix a t i c n R e qu e s t<br />
Res pains; e to EPA<br />
Informat i a n Request<br />
Response t::i EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Rasponiiie to EPA<br />
I nf orma t, i o n Requein t<br />
Response to EPA<br />
In^oncnation Requeet<br />
Suppleinnnintal<br />
Rioiinponse to EPA<br />
Infooiacion Request<br />
Reimponse to EPA<br />
Infonnation Reqiunitst<br />
Suppleiniental<br />
Ruiijiiponse to EPA<br />
Infonnation Riiiqunimit<br />
Raiisponsiiii to EPA<br />
Infonnation Request<br />
Responsnii to EPA<br />
Infonnation<br />
Suppliiinantai<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infooution Request<br />
Suppleiniental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Suppliraiental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
IniElornation Request
V.,./<br />
06/30/87 Dings e-^-in Response ~::: £?<br />
r.e ernes'<br />
10/26/92 Dings company U.S. EPA<br />
06/15/87 E.Z. Paintr Co. U.S. EPA<br />
11/06/92 S.Z. Paintr Co. U.S. EPA<br />
10/29/92 Envirax, Inc. U.S. EPA<br />
11/18/92 Envirisx, Inc. U.S. EPA<br />
05/05/87 Gditniiiral Electric U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
12 /1.2 / S 6 Hw:-n i. in ch I! diigiii r<br />
10 / :i! 0 / 92 Haoiiischf eger<br />
u.s.<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
11/02/92 Hydritai Chwnical U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
09/24/86 LmidlW !'laili-l:.iii: U.S.. EPA<br />
syintmis, Inc.<br />
11/12/92 Law Tanning Co, U.S. EPA<br />
12/2:3I/S6 Loiliill Alliiil U.S.. EPA<br />
oa/0!!!/B7 Hastiiitr Lock: Co.<br />
11/05/92 IttJllltillir Lock CO.<br />
U.S.,<br />
U.S. EFA<br />
Supplemental.<br />
Response t::: EPA<br />
I n IE: o rma t i o n iR e q u e s T:<br />
Rmsponse to EPA<br />
Information Requesr<br />
Supplemental<br />
Rin mponi!!! in to EPA<br />
Information Requmtst<br />
Raiiiiponse to EPA<br />
Infornation Request<br />
Supplemental.<br />
Reniponse to EPA<br />
I nf croat i o n Reqwiis t<br />
RiiiiinpoiniiiNiit to EPA<br />
Infonnation iRiiiiq[M,iniii.t<br />
Riiiiinponsiiit to<br />
Information Rwqiieint<br />
Suppieiniiiitntal<br />
Riiitfliponsnii to EPA<br />
Information Rinquaint<br />
Riiiuiiiponsiiit to EPA<br />
Infonnation Riitqueiiit<br />
to EPA<br />
Information. Ruitqiiaint<br />
Riiiisponsnit to EPA<br />
Information Rinquiiniit<br />
Riiiispon!!i
11/12/92 Master Lock Co, U. S. EPA<br />
12113 / 8 6 MetaIs Transport U.S. EPA<br />
Co., Inc.<br />
11/01/92 Metals Transport U.S. £?A<br />
Co., Inc.<br />
12 /10 / 86 Midwiast Tanning Co. U. S,. EPA<br />
10/28/92 Midwest Tanning Co. U.S. EPA<br />
11/ 0::i /92 Patrick Cudahy<br />
Company<br />
12/17/86 PPG 1ndustri es<br />
11 /04/92 PPG Industries<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. HPA<br />
11/11/92 Pressed Steel Tank: U.S. EPA<br />
coapany<br />
06/30/87 PVL Limiti!td<br />
Partnership<br />
07/17/87 Rexnordl Inc.<br />
11 /1 a / 9 2 RMcnord,, :i: nc.<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
11/09/92 St. Luke's Hospital U.S. EPA<br />
0:31/27/137 Star Line<br />
Trucking Co.<br />
.10/14/92 Star Line<br />
Trucking Co.<br />
U.S.<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response '::::: EPA<br />
I n f oma t i ;:: r. Requ (•> s t<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I nf ornat i c n Request<br />
Suppleniental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I n f o r an a c i o n Requ e s t<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Inf conation Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Reiiiponse to EPA<br />
Infonnation Request<br />
I<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I n :l: o rma t i o n Reques t<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
SuppJiemental.<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to<br />
Infonnation Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infbnnation Request<br />
Response to EPA \..,''<br />
Infonniation Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information R.equest<br />
Reimponse to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
»<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Rinquest<br />
Supplementel<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information R«ic[uest
V.../<br />
...„.,/ „ . y
. .<br />
lb"/27/92 Wisconsin Electric '.<br />
Power Co.,<br />
11/05/92 Wisconsin Electric U.S. 1PA<br />
Power Co.<br />
v<br />
U.S. :i.r-M -(=...,<br />
OFFICE OF REGIONAL CO...*-<br />
Suppieiciencai<br />
Response to i-iPA<br />
Infcraaticn Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to 'EPA<br />
Informat i on ReqrueiEit
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY<br />
REGION V<br />
In the Natter Of : )<br />
<strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> )<br />
aiir Operable Unit }<br />
WlincoBinin ) U.S., HI PA<br />
) Docket No. V-W-' 95-C-295<br />
Proceeding Under Section 106 (a) of )<br />
the Comprehensive Environmental )<br />
Response „ Compensat ion , and )<br />
Liability Act of 191:10, as amended )<br />
IKIOJIOIUIIT 'TO MliliXltnSTEATrWE GffitDEE<br />
FOB li!fij[llJT)JAL JHIIiJ'ji'n'jM MIT) 1 FDIEIIED1E Mi ATTTO!!!!<br />
'"•"'' On June 6, 1995, the Acting Director of the Waste Management<br />
Division , Reg ion V, Uni t ed States Environmental Protection Agency<br />
(U.S. EPA) issued an <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong> (the "<strong>Order</strong>") in this<br />
matter to 56 named Respondents., Since the time of issuance, U.S.<br />
EPA has identified minor factual errors in the <strong>Order</strong>,, and has<br />
decided to amend the above -referenced <strong>Order</strong> to correct those<br />
errors. The <strong>Order</strong>, and this Amendment to the <strong>Order</strong>,, are issued<br />
to Respondents by the U,,S. EPA under the authority vested in the<br />
President of the United States by Section 106 (a) of the<br />
Comprehensive Environmental. Response, Compensation and Liability<br />
Act 'of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA") , 42 U.S.C. § 9606 (a). This<br />
authority was delegated to the Administrator of the U.S. EPA on<br />
January 23, 1987, by Executive <strong>Order</strong> 12580 (52 Federal Register<br />
2 9 2 6) ,. and was further delegated to the Regional Administrator on<br />
September 13, 1987 by EPA Delegation NOB. 14-14 and 1.4 - 14 -A, and<br />
to the Director,, Waste Management Division, Region V, by Regional<br />
\,..y Delegation. Nos. 14-14 and 14 -14 -A.<br />
The <strong>Order</strong> issued in this matter on June 6, 1995, is hereby<br />
amended as follows :<br />
I,, Paragraph 4, on pages 2 and 3 of the <strong>Order</strong>,, is amended to<br />
read :<br />
4. Within ten (10) dlays after the issuance of this<br />
Amendment to the <strong>Order</strong>,, each Respondent that owns real property<br />
comprising any part of the Site shall record a copy of the <strong>Order</strong><br />
and the Amendment thereto in the appropriate governmental office<br />
where land ownership and transfer records are filed or recorded,<br />
and shall ensure that the recording of this <strong>Order</strong> and Amendment<br />
is indexed to the title of each and every property owned by said<br />
Respondent at the Site, so as to provide notice to third parties<br />
of the issuance and tennis of this <strong>Order</strong> and Amendment with
V..y<br />
respect to those properties. All such Respondents shall,, within<br />
20 days after the issuance of the Amendment to this <strong>Order</strong>, send<br />
notice of such recording and indexing to U.S. EPA.,<br />
II. Paragraph 8.a., on page 6 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to read:<br />
a. Respondent. Waste Management of Wisconsin,, Inc.<br />
("WMWi"), formerly known as Acme Disposal Company, is now, and<br />
has been since approximately 1970, the operator of the Site,.<br />
Since 1991, WMWI has also been the owner of the Anamax Plant<br />
property that is part of the Site. Daring the time that the Site<br />
has been operated by NMWI, by its corporate affiliates and by<br />
Acme Disposal. Company, hazardous substances, including some or<br />
all. of those described in this flection, were disposed of at the<br />
Site. HMHI is also a successor in interest to Best Disposal<br />
Service Company and United Waste Systems. Best Disposal Service<br />
Company, Acme Disposal Company and United Waste Systems accepted<br />
hazardous substances for transport to, and disposal or treatment<br />
at the Site, and selected the Site for disposal or treatment.<br />
III. Paragraph 8.b., on page 6 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to read:<br />
b. Respondent Carl Wauer is now, and has been from about<br />
1965, the owner of the Site. Mr. Wauer operated the Site from<br />
approximately 1965 until approximately 1,970, when Acme Disposal<br />
succeeded Mr.. Wauer as operator of the Site., During the period<br />
in which Mr, Wauer operated the Site,, and during the time in<br />
which he has owned the Site, hazardous substances„ including some<br />
or all of those described in this section, were, disposed of at<br />
the Site.<br />
IV.. Paragraph 8.o., on page 10 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to read:<br />
o. Respondent 1-1 lack-hawk Leather, Ltd. arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
I , treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
'"••"' disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Blackhawk Leather, Ltd.,, at the Site,. Those hazardous<br />
substances included various process-related liquid wastes.<br />
Hazardous substances of the same kind as those owned or possessed<br />
by Blackhawk Leather, Ltd, are contained at the Site.<br />
V. Paragraph 8.ff., on page 14 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to<br />
read:<br />
ff., Respondent Babcock & Wilcox Company arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or"arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Babcock & Wilcox Company•, at the Site„ Those hazardous<br />
substances included cutting oils, and drums containing other<br />
liquid industrial wastes., Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Babcock: & Wilcox Company are<br />
contained at the Site.
VI., Paragraph 8.pp., on page '16 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to<br />
read:<br />
pp. Respondent Envirex, Inc.. arranged, by contract or<br />
agreement or otherwise, for the disposal or treatment, or<br />
arranged with a transporter for transport for disposal or<br />
treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed by Envirex:,,<br />
Inc. /'at the Site,, Those hazardous substances included liquid<br />
wastes and paint wastes. Hazardous substances of the same kind<br />
as those owned or possessed by Envirex, Inc., are contained at the<br />
Site „<br />
¥i:i:,. Attachment 1 to the <strong>Order</strong> is amended to substitute Babcock &<br />
Wilcox: Company for McDermott, Inc., (as Respondent number 32) and<br />
to substitute Envirex, Inc. for Rexnord Corporation fas<br />
Respondent number 42} .,<br />
VIII. Paragraph S.zz., on page 19 of the <strong>Order</strong>, is amended to<br />
read:;<br />
zz,. Respondent Vulcan Materials Company arranged, by<br />
contract or agreement or otherwise, for the disposal or<br />
treatment, or arranged with a transporter for transport for<br />
disposal or treatment, of hazardous substances owned or possessed<br />
by Vulcan Materials Company„ at the Site., Those hazardous<br />
substances included aluminum slag and other waste by-products of<br />
the aluminum recycling process. l-Iazardous substances of the same<br />
kind as those owned or possessed by Vulcan Materials Company are<br />
contained at the Site.<br />
The June 6, 1995, <strong>Order</strong> is otherwise unchanged in all respects.<br />
Unless expressly stated herein,, none of the requirements or<br />
deadlines in that <strong>Order</strong> are in any way affected by the issuance<br />
of this Amendment.<br />
\^' SO ORDERED this __(..___ day of July,, 1995.<br />
BY: £ /h~<br />
William E, Muno<br />
Acting Director, Waste Management Division<br />
United States Environmental. Protection. Agency,, Region V
v../<br />
ATTACHMENT 2<br />
SCOPBOFWM
December 1, 199:!!<br />
soon OF won: rat<br />
rate somes COMIBOL iii::!!;!!!;!!!:!:!:]::;!!,]!, iCiiiwioi i;ini EEinxiiM;. ACROV<br />
acfXTOKH ;I!.T THE<br />
HUSXBGQ ..SfttttTUff LMIDF1LL SITE<br />
M08KEGO, WISCONSIN'<br />
I • EEffiKiiiili!<br />
The purpose of this Remedial Design/ltaMdial Action at the<br />
Nuskego <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> National Priorities List (NFL) site<br />
(Site) „ referred to in Figure 1, is to fully implement the<br />
Record of Decision (BOD) for the Source Control Operable Unit<br />
remedy which was signed 'by the Regional Administrator on June<br />
\ y 12, 19 92. The iRespondeiriits shall follow the U.,8, EPA superfund<br />
Remedial Design and Rmedial Jkstion Guidance „ the RODIP the<br />
approved Remedial ]:>esi
Contiguous Fill Ax: mas .. The length ,<br />
location,, and sdhieduls for coiuitruction of<br />
tha fenca will be determined during the<br />
design of the landfill cap, Additional<br />
pay be ,jr«quir«d by U.S. EPA to<br />
the nioititpce annas from the stone<br />
Ridge Recycling ejwil Disposal Center, if open<br />
to th* : public. Sates shsill ba installed to<br />
provide access for expected vehicular<br />
traffic. Waning signs shall be posted at<br />
2 00- foot intervals along the fence and<br />
points of entry (gates) to that site. The<br />
warning aigna ailull advise that the area is<br />
a Supiicrfttnd Sitnit or that tha area is<br />
hazardous duw to irastae buried within the<br />
soil which pomie a ritiik to people through<br />
diract contiuit. tha signs shall also<br />
provide a local contact " a telephone nuiggllMir<br />
to call for further information,.<br />
B.. :i;:iutitntio:uil icointtrols<br />
€.,.<br />
Within 60 da,ys af t«r tha affective date of the<br />
Adiiini«trat iv» <strong>Order</strong> , the RaapondainUit shall<br />
:jjiiiliinent hibit fuittinre<br />
dewelopneBt ( iiiKSluding,, o]iii->site excawatiotniii ,<br />
building co:nsil±n:ictioin ,, drilling, installaLtioint of<br />
drinking water walls ,, or other use* of tha Site<br />
would ba iiuioitwistent with LmiiKljisiiiiiiiiinl^iiLtiiciini<br />
long tann inuntinteiniance of the renedial action]!<br />
fov all of the Site proparty which any of thin<br />
cixiereinitly owirt. Tha iftaspoindenta , also vrithin 60<br />
day s aftwr tha af:i!!(iitetiva date of the <strong>Order</strong>, shall<br />
u in in their best efforts to iiiplaiment thoae suie<br />
dated restrictioinia on thoee portions of the Site<br />
property which are owned by persons other thnin<br />
tha Reapondants . Tha deed r estr ictions regarding<br />
future developniieinit of the site shall be<br />
oaiciiigtidared paniianent.<br />
upon receipt of that order r the<br />
RetiiipondantB ahall pxtnrida acceaa to thoae<br />
pojirtions of tlw Site controlled by the<br />
Respondents . :i::n addition r tha Reapondants shai 1<br />
use their baniit; effort!!! to obtain access for the<br />
piuirpome of iBiplenenting Wo>r]lc required by the<br />
Ordatr and this SOI on thoae portions of tha Site<br />
not presantiy oinmed or controlled by the<br />
Resppndeitnte „ ttiis Hqrk inoiludea without<br />
1 limit: at ion tlu installatidn and maintenance of a<br />
cap over the Fill Areas, coinBtruction of a fence<br />
to limit access to the source areas,
sstahlishBient of a leach ate control system in the<br />
old Fill Area and inprdvittMnt of the existing<br />
leecihate control system in the Southeast Fill<br />
Area, inpl«Mntation of an active landfill, gas<br />
control systsis. within these waste masses and<br />
those of the Non-contiguous Fill Area, and<br />
construct ion of an In-situ ( in- place ) vapor<br />
extraction (XSVE) system in soils of the Non-<br />
Contiguous Fill Area., Access , when obtained ,,<br />
shall be provided for representatives of the<br />
Respondents , as well as for the U.S. EPA and the<br />
Wisconsin Department of Natural. Resources (WDNR)<br />
and their contractors or authorized<br />
representatives ,<br />
D. LmBdfill Clip<br />
\v / The Respondents shall design and reconstruct a<br />
landfill cap covering the Old, Southeast,, and<br />
Non-Contiguous Fill areas that will meet or<br />
exceed the ic^e^uirfiments of Section MR S 04.07 ( l)-<br />
(7) „ Wisconsin <strong>Administrative</strong> Code (WAG) . The<br />
Respondents shall , during the remedial des ign<br />
phase, propose a cap design that will include<br />
construct ing the cap either as separate noncontiguous<br />
units or as one continuous cover., The<br />
proposed design shall also designate the source<br />
of materials to be used for the new cap., The new<br />
cap design may include reusing (i.e. ,- picking up<br />
and replacing) existing cover materials that mieet<br />
the standards specified in Chapter NR 504,, tote,<br />
presently covering the Old and Southeast. Fill<br />
Areas. If existing material is not to be reused<br />
in oonstraction of the clay layer, then new<br />
material shall be utilized in construction of the<br />
final clay layer on the existing fill areas,, The<br />
II. S.. EPA, in consultation with the HONE, will<br />
approve the final configuration of the cap and<br />
the materials ussd in its construction,, The cap<br />
shall be constructed to meet the mininuini slope<br />
rec|uirain.ent specified in s,, NR 506, 08(3 ) (C)(, MAC,.<br />
The Respondents shall iniaintain the cap for 30<br />
years following construct ion of the cap „<br />
The landfill cap shall be constructs^ to minimi:t:e<br />
leachate generation by limiting percolation of<br />
rainwater and snowmelt through the cap system,,<br />
waste naterial,, and into the groundwater. This<br />
ci!i.|;j shall inciude,, at a iiinimum (from top to<br />
bottom) :
A i-ioil. layer consisting o£ at least six<br />
inches of topsail that vill sustain plant growth.,<br />
Seed and fertilizer shall be applied to this<br />
layer to establish a vegetative cover. The<br />
vegetation shall be a persistent species with<br />
roots that will not pensitrate into lower lay are;<br />
An IB to 30-inch thick frost protect ion and<br />
rooting zone layer. This layer shall bin of<br />
sufficient diinpth to protect the underlying<br />
c:o:ni]i;>acl;:ii!i.08 (6) „ WM!« The nraiibai:!!:Ir spacing and location<br />
of gas extraction wells within each fill aniita,<br />
and the nrathod of gas condinnsate nanageiient shall<br />
be detsniinsd in the reiniedial design and shall be<br />
approved by the U.S. EWi., in consultation with<br />
the WDNR., Construetion p lans a nd docmentation<br />
for a landfill gas extraction system shall be<br />
prepared in accordance with ch, NR 516, His. Adm.<br />
Code. Debris or refuse generated by the<br />
4
installation of the extraction system may be<br />
cimsolidated within the fill areas.,<br />
The extracted landfill cjfaiil shall be mana.ged in<br />
a manner consistent with ch. MR 445 r MAC<br />
requirements..<br />
F - Luidf ill
each fill area, and thsi method of leechate<br />
management shall Iba determined in the nnsdial<br />
deimigitii and shin 11 bun approved by the U.S., EPA, in<br />
conwltfttion with the mm. U.S.. EPA, in<br />
consultation with WDI1 „ may raquire addit ional or<br />
sapplsiffiental laachatsi axtraction measures,, if<br />
needed to n»ixi«gd:i:e the amount of leschate<br />
withdrawn! ancll minimfz*, to the extent<br />
practicable, the amount of leachate collected on<br />
thin base of the Old Fill and Southeast Fill<br />
annas „<br />
LniAChate 'Mill be traatund and dispoi-iad of in<br />
cooinpliuiciih with all applicable d ischarga and / or<br />
printraatniiiinit staBdinrds ,. If any laachate<br />
ibraatinient or pontraatiinainit is necessary „ any<br />
slwilga or residualni frann that traatinent vill be<br />
iianaEtraction<br />
Spiiteii „ to rsainaitdiate the contaiminatad s-i ul:i- isioiliii<br />
IB the vicinity the HonEtraction<br />
wells ,r and a sysitea for trmtating of f -gas from the<br />
extraction wells ,, Raicspointdents shall per f one a<br />
Pilot-scale Test: prior- to full-scale<br />
iBplasantatioiiri to iggiininidiBe the potential for air<br />
intrusion into the waste masses,<br />
li, Pilot-Scale Test Work Plan<br />
After cu:>nstri;|,ction of the landfill cower<br />
{pnrsuaintt to Section II,,Dir above, of the SOW),<br />
tout prior to full- scale Implemiiintat.lan of the<br />
:[:E¥1 systeiii, the Rsspondfliints shall design and<br />
iiniplsciment a pilot-scale test of IS VI:; in the Mon-<br />
Conticruous Pill Area (the "'Pilot-Scale Test" 1 ) .<br />
Tbe Raspondsnts , puriiruiant to the tiiietable<br />
eetablished in Section Pi',, below,, of the SOW,,<br />
shall siil:nit« to .U.S. El'A and WDMR,, a work: plain<br />
for design and iBplnientation of the Pilot->Scale<br />
Test for ISVEt which is subject to approval by
U.S. EPA, in consultation with WDNR. The Work<br />
Plan shall incltuta, at a minimua, the location<br />
within the 'Non-Contiguous Fill Area where the<br />
Pilot-Scale Test is to be conducted,, the<br />
operation parsanieteoi, IjiJiiu.,, number and location<br />
of extract ion vslls, pumping rate,, etc,,, to be<br />
used during than Pilot -Scale Teat, and the time<br />
necessary to conduct and, complete the Pilot-Scale<br />
Test. At the conclusion of the Pilot-Scale Test,,<br />
the Respondents shall present the results<br />
developed during ths Pilot-scale Test to the U.S.<br />
EPA, and WDNR. The underlying data developed<br />
during the Pilot-Scale Test shall be made<br />
available to the U.S., EPA and. WDHR within 30 days<br />
of the request of the II,!:!,. EPA or WDNR.<br />
The Respondents shall conduct sampling to<br />
characterize the physical parameters of tlfta sub-<br />
; . soils in the iNton-Contiguous Fill Area, including,,<br />
but not limited to,, moisture content, grain siii:e<br />
distribution,, and total organic carbon. As part<br />
of the Pilot-Scale Test Work Plan,, Respondents:<br />
shall include the saiipling plan necessary to<br />
conduct this sampling,<br />
2 „ Full-scale I!:!¥E jjiiplenentation<br />
After, the coiipletion of the Pilot-Scale Test,, the<br />
IMinrpondents lEibnill iiiKplemwnt the full-scale IS¥E<br />
of the sub-moils in the Mpn
•Feasibility Twit" 1 ) „ The Feasibility Test shall<br />
bin subject to tha supervision and review of thin<br />
U, .S., EPA, in consultation with WDNR. The<br />
objective o>f tha Feasibility Test is to determine<br />
the optimum uuwmtm of putrients to be added to<br />
tlcMii siuilbr soils in order to promote than natural<br />
microbial activities ,, without deer eas ing the<br />
effiiiictiviniiwiiiiii of tte reiio'ptl of the VOCs by XSVE.<br />
At tlui. concluinioini of the Feasibility Test period.,,<br />
tte Baspondeiriits shall present the results of this<br />
study to thin U.S., EPA' and WDNR in a written<br />
report. Tte data danvslopad during the<br />
HMiiiiMiiiLbilJ, (::•!!' Tiiwt slb|all te :iu
the Respondent* shall notify the U.S. EPA and<br />
HOUR of such Interruption or cessation of<br />
of Miiration after learning thereof., Such<br />
notification may initially be given orally, but<br />
mast be confirmed in writing within five days<br />
after the data on which tha oral notification iisi<br />
given,, The Respondents shall notify the U.S.. EPA<br />
and wan, of the nature and causa of the<br />
interruption or cassation of operation,, as wall<br />
as tha estiaated length of time before the<br />
operation of tha ISVB system will, be resumed.<br />
Recipients shall propose an operation and<br />
Maintananca (Oil) schadule, aa dcitscribed in Tanilc<br />
lI.Bo r to liiinit syiiitaiin interruptions. Any<br />
deviations froiin tha ischdidule which result in<br />
syatam internxptions lallwll. ba raportad aa<br />
describad above., In all eamas where there is an<br />
v f intarruption or cassation in tha oparation of the<br />
ISYE systemi!, whether dua to nechanical failure,<br />
huiian error, or to parfornii routine laiaintananoe,,<br />
as wall aa any other reason, tha Respondents<br />
shall repair„ complete maintenance, or take any<br />
other etspa iMicaemary to expaditiously rasiaia the<br />
oparation of the IBM'E system.<br />
5 „ femination of Operation<br />
The Riiitspondants shall opare.te the IS¥E systai<br />
until rsceipt of written approval tram E'PA for<br />
shutdoirn,, aftar dtuionstration that tha soil^gas<br />
Cleanup Standards deterinLined under Section I „ I.E.,<br />
are mat, Upon adhiaving the soil-gas Cleanup<br />
Standards,, Reepondants shall submit to U.S. EPA<br />
and HDilt for review and approval by U..S, EFA, in<br />
conaultation with WD:RIP a Draft Rinadial Action<br />
Report containing the data establishing that tha<br />
Boil-gas Cleanup Standards have been achieved and<br />
will ba maintained, Mtspondents shall take<br />
iEimplas of t:;i:uiii si;iJI:i-»sdils to d.ocu»Biant the<br />
concentrations of cicmtaiiniiniants. The Respondents<br />
nay taniinata the operation of the :i:s¥E systeii<br />
only upon the exprass written approval of the<br />
U.S., EPAIP in oonsultation with MOPE,, Upon<br />
complete tannination of tha ISVE syatem,<br />
Raspondents shall ramove all equipMiimt usiiitd at<br />
the Site in connaction with the XSV'E systeii,, and<br />
shall fill and grade all eiictraction points,,<br />
tranches,, ate,.,, cdnstructed in connection with<br />
the operation of the I.SVE systan.
I, cleanup<br />
1 . Establishing Cleanup S tandards for soil-»gas<br />
A,, AM set forth, in Section H above, Una<br />
]R(iiiiii;|;>oii]id,i!UTl::in: aha 11 design „ construct ,, operate ,.<br />
implement and! maintain aim I]i:::jiEi:l»i Vapor<br />
Extraction cleanup action in the contaminated<br />
sali-soils of the Non-Contiguous Fill Area,<br />
Except as provided above in Section H.5., the<br />
Respondents shall opinrate the ISVE system until<br />
tlui soil -gas Cleairop Standards specified pursuant<br />
to paragraph I.,1,,1I!L ,, bnilowr! are mat in tbm<br />
co«l::aiiiLinatind fflULb-Miioilm „ The iftespondants snail<br />
use tlla iiiioil-gas anlyiiiiis to nodal grouxndwihtaKr<br />
leivels and determine how the groundwater ciaaiiraip<br />
Standards can be achieved ,.<br />
I:) , 'Ilhiiin Riiitiii:|;Ki:rii:![iiml:::ii! slball f-ally opsrats,,<br />
maiBtaln, and iiniplttiiieimt tbe :i:S¥E systm for at<br />
isaiiiit two (2) years based on the design<br />
paraLmeteriii: approved Iby U,.j9:, EP1. after the Pilotiiicale<br />
Test.. Witbiini nixnstty (90) days after the<br />
two year aitm:hrarsa:nr of tlte coaencament of fullscale<br />
opNsratioink of the ISYE system,, the<br />
:R«inipoi:i4ents sluill siLiilbnniit to U.S., EPA a state-oftbe-art<br />
G:i^E>untemt.er/Sdil RI wl ) or thiiininailltiiir, to provide u .,:;;, EEli vitb<br />
the data on ipihlcb to base soil-gas Cleanup<br />
Standards „ TlEyiunxa soil-gajS Cleanup Standards will<br />
provide aim iriMpator of the level of sub-soil<br />
cleanup „ The |i:dtel. shall be ussd to dsteonina<br />
the soil-gas eleanujp standards for vocs in the<br />
soil-gas necessary to achieve and inaintain<br />
protective levels of yiOpm in the igro>und«rater,,<br />
The Groundnrater Cleanup Standards will be set in<br />
the qround Watejr opiiirabla Unit ROD,, The<br />
]ResipHi»n«tante shall utiliii:e all of the data<br />
produced during the Pilot-Scale Test,, the twoyear<br />
period of full-scale IS¥E operation,, as well<br />
as all previous! sampling and. nnonitoring<br />
acctivities to d»veloip tha Model.. The soil-gas<br />
Cleanup Standards dasignihtad by the U,. S., EP.ht, to<br />
be dsiteniiined Ibnuined upi;m the Model „ and the<br />
underlying data dsvelopad in connection with the<br />
fornnation of the Model IF and the cleanup level<br />
dsitarninad in the Record of Decision for the<br />
Groundvater Control Operable Unit must be<br />
achieved in order to elininate source area<br />
10
contaninant loading to tha aquifer,, and ±B<br />
intended, to assure that than cleanup Standards for<br />
tha greundvatur ara met,,<br />
In tile iisivant that the Respondents can. establish<br />
to tha satisfaction of the U.S.. EPA, iin.<br />
consultation with WDMR, that it would ba<br />
acceptable for Respondents to develop and submit<br />
the Model to U.S., EPA before the two-year<br />
anniversary deadline spine if led above, then the<br />
ReiKpondeinLtisi shall salagiiiit the Model upon receipt<br />
of written approval from U.S. EPA. At tha time<br />
the Respondents request approval to submit the<br />
Model prior to tha tiro-year anniversary deadline„<br />
Respondents shall submit to U.S.. EPA and WD1NIR all<br />
data relied upon by tha Respondents to support<br />
their belief that such early submission is<br />
acceptable,, as well as any othar data requested<br />
\ , thereafter by U.S.. EPlfL, in consultation with<br />
WDNR.<br />
C,. Upon reoeipt of the state-of-the-art Model,<br />
the aiEisuinptioniEi used for tha Model,, tha data<br />
utilised to develop the Model,, and the resulting<br />
propdeed soil-gas concentration for each VOC<br />
or the, aiMitioina 1 saiipling or<br />
monitoring data arm dioafepirovftd by the U.S. '<br />
in consultation vitb WGllllR,, then. the U.S. EPA, in<br />
consultation with ipn,, may provide the type of<br />
Modmtl , Una ni.adliiii!.- ipiiiiMUiinii iMiiurni ,, and the r Militant<br />
soil
temporary shutdown pursuant to Sect ion ]•][. 4..<br />
lniadia.tel:ir upon completion of such sampling,, the<br />
Respondents shall reaotivate the XSVE system,<br />
Upon, approval, oil! the Field Sampling Plan and QAPP<br />
by U.S., EPA, in consultation vith WDNR, the<br />
:Reiiiipat<br />
of U.S.. KNL or WMr, RaapoHnLdents shall sultadt to<br />
U.S.. EP'l. and mil tba test results and undarlying<br />
data compiled in connection vith the saitpllng and<br />
tainting perfonned pura'uant t.o the Field Saniipling<br />
Plan,. The Final Soil-nts shall sultnmdt for<br />
approval by U,,S» m, in consultation vith WMRt,<br />
a nnonitoring prograB inclwllingi; numiaer of veils,<br />
well locatioinir samtpling parniaters,, sampling<br />
frequency,, and duration of samp ling,<br />
The RD/RA for the Soiurce Control Operable Unit to be implananted<br />
by the Reapondants at the Hiukego <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> shall<br />
consist of four tamtam., The Eeaipondents shall perform, the<br />
folloving tasks and eiacaents as described more fully herein:<br />
Task I:: KD/Ra Worlc Plan<br />
A, Site Access<br />
B,, Monitoring and Sampling Plans<br />
C, Health lit Safety Plan<br />
D, Pilot Scale Test Work Plan<br />
E, Quality Assurance Proj ect Plan<br />
F, Potential Hateria I Borrow Sources Riaiport<br />
13
Task: II: Remedial Design Project Plans<br />
A., Design Plans and SpecifIcations<br />
B., operation and Maintenance Plan<br />
c., construction schedule<br />
D,. Borrow Source Report::<br />
E. construction Quality Assurance Plan<br />
Task III: Rsinundial Action Preparation and Construction<br />
A., Precoiistruction Inspection and Meeting<br />
l-i „ Pre-final Inspection<br />
c.. Final Inspect ion<br />
Task IV:: Reports and<br />
A .<br />
B,<br />
C.<br />
Progress Reports<br />
Notification of<br />
Action Report<br />
Final Report<br />
completion of Remedial<br />
The ResipHondents shall prspare and submit to the U.S. EPA, and thin<br />
liiniR,, for approval by if. .S. EP1IL, in eociuiiuiltation with the Win,<br />
an RD/RA Work Plan vndch sleiAll, docunnant the overall inianagnent<br />
isi tratagy for per f oraing tha design ,, cone tract ion , operation ,<br />
luintnmance and mtmitoring of th,e Raiwndial Action. The plan<br />
shall docmnint tbe riiiniiponiiilbilJ.ty and authority of all<br />
o)]i:ganiii:ations aiihd k:ay personnel iiwolvad with tha<br />
liiiEplaiiMntation. The Work Plan shall also inolude a description<br />
of gualificatione of key 1 personnel directing the RO/EA,<br />
including contractor psrsomnel „ The Respondents shall siuiJbstit a<br />
Draft RD/RA Work Plan accoizding to the schedule identified under<br />
Section IV of this iSiOW, The Respondents shall submit a Final<br />
RD/RA Work: Plan ijcK:orporating U.S.. EPA's comments on the Draft<br />
Work Plan according to the schedule identified in Section IV,,<br />
Site access agrstsasents rwpired to iinplement the Eeisedial<br />
Action shall be obtained by the Resipo>ndents as required in<br />
the <strong>Order</strong> prior to initiation of the Resvsdial. Action or<br />
additional studies. Site acciuis shall e:»±end for the<br />
duration of the cleanup and include allowances for all<br />
operation and »aaintenance considerations in accordance with<br />
the <strong>Order</strong>. The RD/RA Work Plan shall include a plan for<br />
gaining access to those portions of the site which the<br />
Respondents do not currently own,<br />
14
B • Hon ii 1*ifiir 'JiiliiStL jUliilL jILiiiHliiLiLDiiiL<br />
Respondents shall submit detailed monitoring and sampling<br />
plants describing the type, frequency, amid schedule' for<br />
suipling and monitoring of th§ remedial action for the site.,<br />
The Bonitoring and iii uipiing plans shall address groundvater<br />
and landfill gain monitoring, and how tyrannical requirements<br />
of. applicable permits , ami compliance with. vmstavatsr<br />
(leacnate) , gam and air eiiimsion iiiiitm will b« itisit for tltut<br />
site.. At a pixiLimuiki, tlw itoBitoriBg and isuipling prDiprami<br />
plans shall addrass saiaplia collectioim and analyssiii miathiads ,,<br />
analytical paraiunttars , f:riaq[iia!:ricyr ducration, and typia of<br />
nonitoring amid aaiapling nai:pir(Eitd to dnioBstratdii that thim<br />
Rmedial, Action maiata and :nia:JL;ntaina tllut Claaintup Standards and<br />
othar recpireigiiants for oparation of the ramadial actions at<br />
,( . tha site as specified in Section n of this SOW.,<br />
The Respondents shall subinit to U..S, EIA and WDil for comaent<br />
a Health, and Safaty Plan to address the activities to ba<br />
piarf ormad at tha facility to conduct tha Raiaiadial Dwnigri and<br />
iimplamant the Rawitdial Action(s)i „ Thm lealth and Safaty Plan<br />
shall, ha designed to pr0tact oiiMiiita pamionnel and area<br />
inasMants fron physical , clttmical and all oth.ar haieards posa«d<br />
by this Ranadial Action. The Raspoindents may modify tna<br />
Health and Safety Plan daweloped for tile KI/FS to addrass tha<br />
activities to be perforniiad at th
described in Sect ion XX. R.I of this SOW,, the Respondents<br />
shall submit a draft Mark plaint for the ISVE pilot test to<br />
U.S.. EPA for reyiaw and approval, lint consultation with ram.<br />
Upon receipt of coniiiMiiniliili omt the X8VB' work, plan, the<br />
RMipointiiaats shall iaoorpprat* tha coiiiinaants and raaubait tha<br />
doowant for approval to f, !!i , EFA, in eonraltation with, TOME.<br />
Following approval of tba work plaint for tha pilot test, tha<br />
Ea«pondents shall conduct thai pilot phase of the ISVE.<br />
within sixty days after completion of that pilot tuist, tha<br />
Ratapondoitintta shall sulHiiiiiit a drift tiif]|!hia«eBta.tion plan for foil<br />
scale opaitratioint of tha liilPEIi; syriittaia,, am discussoitd in. S«i)tetioint<br />
II. H.l of this SOW,, to U.S. m for raviaw and approval, in<br />
cointsultation with WSMR« Fallowing approval of thia liiiVi<br />
inplaaentiiition plan, tha Reapondants shall incorporate tha<br />
contents into the de«idgn plans for approval to U..S, EPJIli,, in ,, |<br />
consultation with WDNR. '"'"<br />
h QM'P shall ba smtadttad as part: of tha ED/IEIA Work Plann to<br />
cover saiiplimtf a:nd analpii:La prbceduras amtd tadtoiqaes for<br />
saiplaits collatatad unter the iESiniipling ailudl Analysiiii Flan abiwa,<br />
The Qiiun* 1 shall ba oomts:L|»tatinit with thw rauciiuirinaants of the<br />
U.S., EPill Contract Lab Frograia (CLI=']i for laboratories proposaid<br />
outsida the CLP,. At a iiininm ., the QAFP shall includdit the<br />
following:<br />
o Statamnuant of Purpose<br />
o Pro j (Eiict Dascr ipt ion<br />
o Project Organization and IRasponsibility<br />
o Sunpling Procedures and Objectives<br />
o Sample custody and Doonient Control x /<br />
o Calibration Procaduraa amid Freguency<br />
o iyriAlytical Prooad'uinnts , Data Raduotion „ Validation ,<br />
Asaessnan t ,, and Rairarting<br />
o Internal Quality Control Chacics and Frequency<br />
o Perf onotanca Systmt Charles and Frequency<br />
o Preventive Maintenance Procedures and Frequency<br />
o Datta Pr acision „ Accuracy and Coiinplet eness Assasmtant<br />
Procaduitrea<br />
o Corractiva Action<br />
o Quality Assurance Raporting<br />
:rhe Respondents shall prapare and subintit to the U.S. Q'A and the<br />
HOUR,, for approval Iby U.S.. EPilW in consultation with WOIR,, a<br />
Haterial Borriw Source Report which will identify potential soil<br />
material sources for cap construction. This report will<br />
identify any physical testing that has been performed on tha<br />
soils as veil as any potentiai problems associated with the use
o£ the borrow<br />
The Respondents shall prepare and submit to the U.S. EPA, and the<br />
WDNR, for approval by U.S. En,, in consultation with the m.,F<br />
draft and final construction pianist and specifications to<br />
implement the Remedial Actions for this Source Control Operable<br />
Unit at the Facility as required toy the 1OD aind SOW,,<br />
A.<br />
The BAspondant B isihall dinvelop clamr and coiiprehans ive dnuii ign<br />
plans and spacif Icationa vliidtn include but arm not linidteii to<br />
the £olloving:<br />
1 .. Discussion o:l! the desi«pn stratagY and tha design basis „<br />
iBcluding;<br />
a. Coiwpliance with, all applicable or relevant and<br />
appropriate r '•quirownts as inotind her sin ;; airid<br />
b ., H iniai .zation of envi ronmental and public h IIMII Jl.tJ:i<br />
impacts,,<br />
2,. Discussion of the tachnical factors of iniportanca including:<br />
a, Uss of cinrantlY aocaptsd, «iirir:ILroimental control<br />
neasures and<br />
b,, The iinpliEuinentation of the design ; and<br />
c „ Usa of current ly acceptable coma truct ion pract icas<br />
and tachnlques,.<br />
3 ,. Description of assuMiEitions »Dtad.s and detailed justification of<br />
tlEitssa assuiiEtptions;<br />
4 ,, Discussion of tlui pitwsibla smitrcas of arror and ref arancss to<br />
possible oparat ion and ilnaiiciitananca probliEimn ;:<br />
5, Dstailad drawings of tlis pnafiosed design;<br />
6 ,, Tables listing eqniiipiiant and specif icat ions ,;<br />
7 „ Tables giving iiaterial balances ;;<br />
8 „ Appendices including ;<br />
a. Sample calculations (one encniiple presentaid and<br />
explained clearly for aignificinnt or unii:|[ue design<br />
17
calculations);<br />
b, Derivation of equations essential to understanding<br />
the design plans and specificatioiM? and<br />
c. Results of laboratory or field tests<br />
The Respondents shall maait :|regularly with U.S. EVA to discuss<br />
design issues,, The design and •pacifications shall be submitted<br />
to the U.S., EPA and the WDHR in phases as described below.<br />
I,. Preliminary Design<br />
The Respondents shall submit the Preliminary Design when<br />
the design effort is approximately 95% complete<br />
according to the schedule set forth in Sedation IV,, At |(l |,<br />
this stage,, the Respondents shall have field verified<br />
the existing conditions of the Site, The Preliiiinary<br />
Design sihali reflect a level of effort: sucn that tJInint<br />
technical x^Eiicpiremsnts iiiLnd spmcif:!.cation 1-1 of than project<br />
have been adUiressed and out lined so that they nay be<br />
reviewed to deteriiine if the IPlnal Design will pravide<br />
an operable and usable Einwitdial Action,. supporting data<br />
and dconiinentation sball be prcnridmtd vith the daitsign<br />
documintnts defining the functional aspects of tine<br />
piragraiiBi. The pipiniiainaxy construct ion drmdngs<br />
siibnniitted by the Respondsnts shall r«ftflect organixation<br />
and: clarity. The Respondents shall include with their<br />
preliBinaxy suibnission, design calculations refleorting<br />
the suiiue percentage of coiipletioin as the designs they<br />
support.,<br />
After review of the preliminary submission by U.S. EFilL, *-•''<br />
the Respondents shall swiicute the reguired revisions and<br />
submit the final design (100% completion) with<br />
reproducible dnnwings and specif ications.,<br />
The Prelimdnary Design subiniittal, shall, also consist of<br />
the Design Plans and Specifications„ operation and<br />
liaintenance Planr Capital alnd Operation and Maintenance<br />
cost Estimate,, Pro j eet Schedule, and Construct loin<br />
Quality AssniLraiice Flan. The guality of the dsasign<br />
documents should be much tha.t the iRAiiiipondents would be<br />
able to incJUnde theis in a bid package and invite<br />
contractors to submit bids for the construction project.<br />
:n:,. Final Design<br />
The Respondents shall submit the Final Design according<br />
to the scted'uile< under jSioiction :i:¥. The Final Dttsign<br />
submittal coniiiiists of the final Design Plans and<br />
Specifications (:i.00% ccnplets),, the Respondents' Final
construction Cost Estimate , the Final, operation and<br />
Maintenance Flan , Construction Quality Assurance Plan „<br />
and Final Pro j act Sdtadule ,<br />
Ill . Additional studies<br />
The Remedial. Action may require additional studies to<br />
supplement the liLvailabliii technical data. U.S. EPA Hay*<br />
at its discretion,, require any Bach additional studies.<br />
Included in these additional studies would .be a d.es:k|ra<br />
tor the "Feasibility Test 1 " 1 described in Section II .ill<br />
of this SOW, For any such stadias required,, the<br />
Easpondants shall :l! tinndab all saitrvicmts ,, including field<br />
work as required,, matusirials ,, supplies! plant,, later,<br />
equipment,, invastigations , studies and suparintandenee,<br />
\s ,/ If additicmal studiein ara raquirad,, there shall bait an<br />
initial maeting of all principal personnel involved in<br />
the devalopimant of the i-itudias to discuss objectives,,<br />
resources „ coMui:inicatio:n channels „ role of personnel<br />
involved and orientation of the site,, etc., 'ins :l!inal<br />
report generated toy tbe Respondents shall Include all<br />
data coileoted during the studies and a seminary of tbe<br />
results of the studies.,<br />
Respondents shall prepare an Operation and llCoiinteiniance<br />
Plan to cover both i.mpleitanti!i.tion and long term inaintenance<br />
of the Raiiedial Action. An Initial Draft Operation and<br />
lintintenance Plan shall be sulbiiitted sinultaneouslY with the<br />
Preliminary Design Docuiment submission and the Final<br />
Operation and Haintenance Plan with the Final design<br />
docunients. The plan shall be composed of the following<br />
elements ::<br />
Description of normal operation and maintenance (OCIi) ;<br />
a. Description of tasks for opera t ion ;r<br />
b,, Description of tasks for maintenance;<br />
c ., Description of prescritosd treatment or operation<br />
conditions ; and<br />
d. Schedule shoving frequency of each OiScII task.<br />
Description of potential oparating problems;<br />
a. Description and analysis of potential, oparation<br />
problns j;<br />
to. Sources of information regarding problems; and<br />
19
c . ComoB and/or anticipat md raniindieiii ..<br />
d, Useful life analysis of sign 1:1! leant components and<br />
replaceniant costs,<br />
Description of routine monitoring and laboratory testing^<br />
a,, Description of Boiriiitoring tasks;;<br />
b., Description of required laboratory taints and their<br />
int erpr e ta t ion ;<br />
c „ Required Data Collection, Quality Aeeurance Project Plan<br />
d. Sdtodule of moiniitoring fra>qiutamcY and date, if<br />
appropriat ,e, vrhan nomiitoring may cease j and<br />
Description of alternate OUIE;<br />
a. Sltould aystais fall,, alternate procedluxes to pratvsnt<br />
undue hazard and reLaaiiiies or threate of raleaaw of<br />
hazard.ous i-iubstancea ; amid<br />
corrective Action ,;<br />
a,. Oiascription of any potantial corractive action to be<br />
sltouldL any nym taint fail, ; and<br />
b, Sdbadule for implementing these conrectiva actions j<br />
Saf
8 ., Records and reporting mechanisms required;<br />
a,, Daily operating logs;<br />
lb „ Laboratory records ;<br />
c« Records for operating costs;<br />
d „ Mechanism for report Ing emergencies ?<br />
e. Personnel arid niaintraainice records; and<br />
f , Monthly '/annual reports to State agencies<br />
The Respondents shall develop for approval by U.S. EPA a<br />
Project Schedule for construction and. implementation o:l! the<br />
Remedial Actions., Respondents shall specif ically identify<br />
dates for conpletion of the project and major interim<br />
milestones .. An Initial Project Schedule shall be suiJtaitted<br />
simultaneously with, the Preliminary Design Docraisnt<br />
submission and the approved Project Schedule with, the Final<br />
Des ign Documents .,<br />
D «• ifiiffiuQiEM. .JiiL!i!i!iM!^it!EiL..l;!>!i!][i!!ill][[ Jii.<br />
Tbe Respondents shall sukHii.it the final reconnieindations of soil<br />
borrow sources to the U.S. E'PA and the NDNR, fox apiproval by<br />
U.S. EPA,, in consultation wltn the MDNR.<br />
Tbe Respondents shall. suLbmit as part of the preliminary design<br />
d(E9icuiient a draft Construction Quality Asiirarance Plan ., The<br />
Respondents shall finalize the Construortion Quality Assurance<br />
Flan (CQ]!|. Plan)i incorporaiting comtents r
officer and the necessary supporting i.napection staff.<br />
2. Construction Quality Insurance Personnel Qualifications<br />
The Respoirklsnts shall set forth the quail.:!!ications of<br />
the CQA Officer arid supporting inspection persomnel<br />
shall be presented in the CQ& Flam to deiiioiuiBtrate that<br />
they posses in the training and axparienca necessary to<br />
fulfill their identified racponaibllitiaa.<br />
3„ Inspection Activities<br />
Respondents shall suainouriise in the CQA Plan the<br />
observations and teints that will be used to monitor the<br />
construction and iristallation of the coiwponeinitiii of the<br />
Remedial Actions, The plan shall include the scope and \ .<br />
f requency of each type of iniU|iieii;:tioin. Inspeations shall<br />
verify compliance with all health axid safety procedures,,<br />
and the e:iTu r iroraiiental reiEpiLireigiuiiints „<br />
4„ Sampling BequireiiBtents<br />
Tbe Respondents shall present in the CQJl Plaitu the<br />
sampling activities, saiinple s izB t sinineple locations,,<br />
siiuinple collect ion, methods „ f requeinoy of testing ir<br />
criteria for acceptance and rejectionrn, and plaints for<br />
correcting problems as addressed in the project<br />
specifications,.<br />
5,, Dociiuientation<br />
The Respondents shall descxibs in detail in the CQill> Flan<br />
the reporting reqairiiKiiiNiints for CQi, activities. This ...../<br />
shall include such iteiins as daily summary reports,,<br />
inspection data shststsr problem identification and<br />
corrective raisiasures reports „ design acceptance reports,,<br />
and final docuiuEintation. All construction docimentation<br />
shAll netnitt the :!:iin!j|iiii;ILi!:i!i;[ii(iiinil:::i!; of ch. Ml't !51€ WJIC,,<br />
Firavisions for the final iiiitorage of all records shall be<br />
presented in the CQJk Plan..<br />
The. Respondents shall construct and implement the Eennsdial<br />
Actions in accordance with the approved Work; Flan, design,,<br />
schedule and the CQA Plaiit. The EeApondents shall also implecinent<br />
the elements of the approved Gpsratiotn and itfointenance Flan and<br />
conduct the following' meetings and inspections::<br />
22
A. EU!Cj!;tlQi^<br />
The Respondents shal 1 conduct a precons traction inspect Ion end<br />
meeting to bin attended by U.S. EPA, the WDNR,, co ntr actor ( HI )„<br />
subcontractor (s) , and other identified parties. The purpose of<br />
the meeting shall be to;:<br />
:i. „ Review methods for documenting and reporting inspection<br />
data y<br />
2 ,, Review methods for distributing and staring doemwntin<br />
and reports;<br />
:•) , Rev lew work area security and saf ety protocol ?<br />
^ , 4 „ Discuss any appropriate modif icatione of the CQ& Plan to<br />
ensure that sits-"specific considerations are addresntedir<br />
and<br />
5. Conduot a site walk-around to verify that the design<br />
criteria ,, plans , and speoiif icat Ions are understood and<br />
to review material and ecpipiiient storage loeat ions „<br />
The preconiBttruoition inspection and meeting shall, be doomented<br />
by a designated person and minutes shall be tranenitted to all<br />
par ties present as well, as all Riespomdents .,<br />
Opon prelininary constiraction caiipletion,, the Eespondents shall<br />
notify U.S, EFA for the purposes of conducting a prefinal<br />
inspactioa. The prefinal inspection shall consist of a waU:through<br />
inspection of the entire project site. The inspection<br />
is to determine whether the construoition is complete and<br />
consistent with the oontraot: docunents and the U.S.. EPh approved<br />
Reimedi a ,1 Act ion .. Any outstanding , incoioiiple te ,, or 1 ncorrsict<br />
construction items discovered during the inspection shall be<br />
identified , noted and rectified by tltw Respc»nd,ents .<br />
Additionally, treatment equipment shall be operationally tested<br />
by the Respondents ,. The Respondents shall certify that the<br />
equipment has performed , and will function as designed, to meet<br />
the specif icat ions . The :Restpondents shall, correct any<br />
deficiencies and initiate retesting. The Respondents shall<br />
submit a Prefinal Inspection Reiport which shall document all<br />
outst and! ng „ incompleite (, or inoiorrect cons truction it ens ,<br />
actions retguired to resolve iteinis, completion date for these<br />
items, and which shall set a date for final inspection.<br />
c.<br />
Upon completion of any outstanding construction i teniis , the<br />
Respondents shall notify EFA for the purposes of conducting a<br />
23
final inspect ion,. 'Tha f trail iiniiiifiNinction shall consist. of a walkthrough<br />
inspection o£ the project sit®.. Tha Prefinal inspection<br />
Report shall ba usiiid am a chl[MiL..iSitlilLl!iSlllJiilSitl!Liii'[i!l[]li!l'<br />
Tha Raspondants shall prapara plums „ spacif icatione (, and raports<br />
as sat forth in Tannks I through Tamk IV to docuiiant tha daaigitiir<br />
construct ion ,, oparation IP Biiiintiimance „ and iniooitoring of tJ:i,a<br />
Ranadial Action,. Other doHCUiientation liihall include,, but not ba<br />
limited to tha following : { ,<br />
Tha Raspondapts shntll, at a ninirah, provlda tha U.S., EPA and<br />
the HD1HFR with signed, , monthly pn;»n|rass raports dunring tha<br />
dea ign and cons tract ion phasea amid sand -annual ]pri>ip:asa<br />
retpNCirts for operation and Biaintaraince activities containing:<br />
1 „ A description and astiinata of tha parcen taga of the<br />
RD / HA coimipiatad ;<br />
2.. Siiuinariaa of ijL|Lil,. findings;<br />
3. iiiiumnarias of jiiJLI changea made in tha RD/Wi, during the<br />
raporting period;<br />
i-iunnniarias of jyjL contacts with rapreaantat ivas of the<br />
local coiiwmity, public interast groupei or state<br />
goivarnmiant during the rapcnrting period ;:<br />
5 „ Suiimari ea of iJUL proiblamiii or potential problainuii<br />
encounterad diuiring the raporting period;<br />
4,<br />
6 , Actions baing taken to rectify problans ;<br />
7, Changas in personnel duiring the raporting period;<br />
til. Projected work; for the next raporting period;; and<br />
9. Copies of daily retports,, inspection raports,,<br />
laboratory /monitoring data,, etc.<br />
1 ., Within 60 days of the Final Inspact ion tha<br />
shall submiit a Draft Rantadial Action Iinplaiientation<br />
24
Ifleport to tha U.S. EPA and WD1R,, The Report shall<br />
document that the project is consistent with the design<br />
specifications ,, and that the Remedial. Action is<br />
perf orning adequately » The Report shall include , but<br />
not be limited to the following eLraents;:<br />
a., Synopsis of the Ranadial Action and<br />
certif ication of the design and constructioB ;<br />
b. Explanation of any nodificationiii to the plan<br />
and why thesa were neeaasaxy for the project;<br />
c, Listing of tJhe teclemical, raicpireniiEmts and<br />
apeci f icationa for j udging the functioning of<br />
the Remedial Action and also explaining any<br />
v , modification to thase technical :i:vEsquirietwmts<br />
and specif icatioiu ;<br />
d» Raaults of all site monitor ing ; and<br />
a.. Eacplanation of tha operation and :uintuanoe<br />
(inclwIiiiLg •onitoring) to l>i;i undertaltan at tha<br />
Site,<br />
Tha Respondent!;! shall suhoinit a Final Raiiniedial Action Report<br />
30 days aftar receiving U,S,, Eli'A and WDVR comments on the<br />
Draft Reiinadial Action :i::in|il«rai:iTl::ation Report,. The Fiinal<br />
R,enadial Action RapHiart jsball include a sttiiiomary of all<br />
constriuction activities , rapcirts IP nodif icat ions , and<br />
operation specifications neoesaary for 0 i M as deaoribaid<br />
v..y abova under the Notification of CoiiKpletion section,,<br />
IV.<br />
A suiiiDiiiary of the infonnaticn raporting requixwinents and<br />
deadlines for subniittals of plans and other docuiiants contained<br />
in the RD/RA SOW is presented below. Fo>r. each, reicpnired document<br />
or submission listed below,, the Rainpondenta stall subnidt 4<br />
copies t.o U .,!•!,. Eli'A,, and 2 copies to wraiR,. Additional<br />
requirements for document siibiniisaicns uy be identified by U .,!•!,.<br />
during the life of the project..<br />
1. Draft KD/1E1A Work Plan — » 45 days after the date of the<br />
Adiniinistrative <strong>Order</strong> shall, include::<br />
A.. Draft I :;;',']•! Pilot Test Work Plan<br />
B. Draft Health JSi Safety Plan<br />
C.. Draft Quality Assurance Project Plan<br />
i:> ,, Potent ial i:atar ial Borrow Sources Report
2,. Final Remedial Design work Flan — • 30 days after receipt of<br />
U,,s,. EPA'a comuimts on Draft RD/RA Work Plum<br />
A,, Final XSVE Pilot Test Work Plan<br />
B. Final Health i;Miiction —— 15 days after notification of<br />
construction cospletion<br />
7 .. Priii -final Inspection Rsport —— 1.5 days after Prm-f inal<br />
Inspection<br />
8 . Final. Inspection —— 15 days after Pre-f inal Inspectt ion<br />
Report:<br />
9 ,. Construction Compilation. Report —— 15 days after Final.<br />
I inspection<br />
10,, ISVE Pilot Scale Test<br />
a. Draft Pilot Scale Test Report for ISYE —— 45 days<br />
after completion of pilot scale test activities<br />
26
. Final Pilot Scale Test Report for ISVE —— 30 days<br />
after receipt of U.S.. EPA comments on Draft Pilot<br />
Scale Test Report<br />
:i.:i.,, ISVE Design Phase<br />
a. ISVE Draft Implementation Plan —— 60 days after<br />
U.S. EPA approval, of Final Pilot Scale Test Report<br />
for ISVE<br />
fo. ISVE Final Iiipileikentation Plan —— 30 days after<br />
U.S.. EPA contents on ISVE Preliminary Design<br />
1.2. Notification of completion of Remedial Action —— Upon<br />
achievement of Cleanup Standards for any of the components<br />
of the remedial action as specified in Section. II of this<br />
SOW<br />
13. Draft Remedial Action Report —— 60 days after Final<br />
Inspection<br />
1.4.. Final Remedial Act ion Report —•••• 30 days after receipt of<br />
U.S., EPA CQiimients on the Draft Remedial Action Report<br />
15.. I!:i¥E Feasibility Test Tecluiical Meinorandmn —— 6 months<br />
after initiating the fall-scale ISVE system<br />
1.6. Progress Reports for Tasks I through IV —— Monthly<br />
17.. Progress Reports During 0 % M —- Semi •••Annually<br />
27
ATTACHMENTS<br />
RECORD OF DECISION
Eiia MIIUIIMII lud L0«»tio«n:i:<br />
ID cnr<br />
iiiiunenio INIPIIIHIXIL JkBffHai!tx*B fen<br />
icfiom nimiiei ceiiinoL 'oraiaiu man<br />
mm :ni:i:iiiii]ii:intiiH:i aattaox<br />
Mttinkditgo <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong><br />
lltaiiiilcago ,, Wisconsin<br />
-„...„ liitmtniMiLt of Bin nils and varposss<br />
Ttols decision docuaant presents thai selected roaedial action for<br />
the <strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> locatad in lAwka^o , wiaconsin. "ha<br />
dacision has bsinn da'wlopind in aceardanoa with tha-<br />
EnviroaMntal Rsiiipointsini! coppwwation, and Liability Act<br />
as HHiiBiiind by tllui Siiipncfiuunud jyiiMivdiiMiiinitiii and :R i;i!i!it::i(:)i:i:i Act<br />
(SARA), and 'in aceerdanea with tha National Oil and Bafcardoaa<br />
Stiitbiiitaiiiica contingmey Plan (MCI?) . Tlllmi daoiaion is baiiiad on tha<br />
Ad^niatrativa Racord for tills iiiltniu Tha attaehad indax idantlfia*<br />
tbint itmii that coiinpriiiiKiii tha AdainUtratiya Racord, upon whieh tha<br />
iiMiilniictiori of th.a raiMiidial action la Ibainad,,<br />
.lyiiaiiitsiininaint of ilMii eitaii . .<br />
Actual or thraatanad ralaaaaa of hacardoiw aubatancas fro* this<br />
sit a, if not addraaaad by iaplaMnting tha raaponsa action aalactad<br />
in thia Racord of Dacision (ROD) , nay pras
s t -in t in<br />
f«nc«»;<br />
cap installation ovinr the portions of the site damad<br />
naeasHiry in the EDO according to W iscons in Admini strativa<br />
Coda m 504 stuidardin j<br />
Installation or upgrada of landfill laacaata control syurbwiui<br />
a (:: the mite;<br />
Acrtivs iinmyilll, giiinii control anEil Boiiiitoring for the site;<br />
:i:n-Sltu,i;:i::n-p;i,iiiC(in| liioil V-mipour tuitraotion at portions of thin<br />
H'OTi-"[::i::»i[|[t.:l.'!i|ii]i(:!»i;Mii Fill ttwn o:l! ttnm sitia;<br />
Cirircrancll wintiikr iiM»itin:i!ntg of iiNiilincttiiiiil iniidLiniting monitoring and<br />
prlvatint vinils to te diiitinmndxMiuEil (Etariung thm rmadial dasigmi; amd<br />
amid ]lCnti]n±.«nainioa of all synitmiii ..<br />
Than staitin of WiiKconiniint comiouirnii with thm sialactad rmsdy, Tba<br />
latter of coaouiinrwnioai is attaohad to tJte Raoord of Decision (ROD)<br />
packagin..<br />
isialtactind rmin«dY is p:rat
1:1:11- UIIOIIL uniiiraxriri iiii:iiiuo!io:]i<br />
jiiiuniii Linn'XLL nixn:<br />
OF<br />
i, SITE warn Mm LOCATION.. „...,,....,,,..................... i<br />
:i:x,, SITE HISTORY Km ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES. „.,,. „,,.,..,,,, 3<br />
XXI,, COMMUNITY PARTI dPATION, „ „ „ .. „.,... , ., . .. , , .,.,.., ,..... .... 5<br />
IV, SCOPE OF INTERIM ACTION SOURCE CONTROL<br />
•OFERMILE TOUT,.,.,. „ ,,,, „ „ , .., . „ , . „,. ,... . „,. . . ,. „ . . ..,. „ , - „ 6<br />
V, JEiiXTE CmRACTERISTIC!!!,.., „ , „ „ „ „. „ ,,, ,.. „ „,,,, ,,...,.,. „ „ . , , ,. 7<br />
VI,. !!ii:i]!«MI,Y OF SITE RISKS,, „ . ,. „ „ „,, „ „ „. ., „ „ , . ,,,, „.,, „ , . , , 15<br />
VII,, DEBCRXFTIOM OF ALTERNATIVES. . ,. ., . ,., . .. ,. -.. ,.... ••., . • . 17<br />
VXXI. SlimiAY OF €€iHEiy%J!kJTX¥E jyUJJYSXS OF ALTERNATIVES.,,. 25<br />
\,..J IX. TEE SELECTED REMEDY,,. .. . .. . .. . . ., . , ,, . . . . . , . . . . . . . ., . . ,. 31<br />
X. STM'UTORY DlilTniJ'IIMATICWS . ,,,, „ . ,, „ „ „ „. „ ,, „ „ . , „ „.., „ „ , „ , 33<br />
xx „ RESirararraiifESiSi IEIIIWPAY,. ., „ „.,. „ „,,.,,.,,.. „. „ „,..,., (Attached.;!<br />
XXX. MlilllXIEiTRM'X^l!! RECORD.. „.,, „,..,,. . .. „ , ,. ,.,,..,.,.,.,.,., Appendix A
FIGURE o<br />
FIGURE I<br />
FIGURE 2<br />
FIGURE 3<br />
FIGURE 4<br />
FIGURE 5<br />
FIGURE 6<br />
FIGURE 7<br />
FIGURE B<br />
FIGURE 9<br />
TMILE 1<br />
'IMBLE 2<br />
3<br />
TilkBLE 4<br />
IIKPIII11IEW i,;iuii;i:i:ii p :]i:]LLi mim<br />
SITE LOCATION Xiy»<br />
SITE HIP<br />
WASTE KMMiOilER OF WISCONSIN, INC, PROPERTY<br />
WATER TABLE MM' 1<br />
sj^raiiK LIXATIOHS<br />
JiiJklFLIlG LDCM'IOlJSt<br />
LOCM'IOHS<br />
LOCM'IOMS<br />
JUIPLIMG LOCATIONS (FlPtrATE WELLS)<br />
SEIIIIHEER SMIPLE LOClikTIONS<br />
''<br />
:i(i'i]U!!i]ii:i!!i;K:i iiiinii uynonu, IKTE<br />
GROUP RESULTS. ROCI1DS 1 MID 2<br />
1IR 140 MID E1E"A KL EXCEEOMICES FOE<br />
4,:: CAPPING-, LANDFILL Gi'i.lii i LEIIiCI-llTE<br />
, AMD IM--IEIITU ntEMKeiMT OF THE NOil-<br />
CO1TIGUOUS FILL .MEM!<br />
COST SUIffittHY M,TERMM':i:¥E 4 FASIBILITY STCIDY
OF KUEDXIII juwnnnkTXVB BIUBCTXOH<br />
:i:inn:oii jtcrxav eointa!! covntoL opittBLE TOUT<br />
utmtXLL sxa<br />
lira sn i;io,<br />
:i:« BITE KIIJIOE xsm LOCXTXOV<br />
The Jlfuskego <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> Superfund site occupies approxiiialbiEily<br />
56 acres north; of State Highway 24 (Janesvilla Road), and east of<br />
Crowbar Road in tha City of <strong>Muskego</strong>, Waukesha County, Wisconsin,.<br />
The site is located in Southeastern Hiscdnsin approximately fifteen<br />
miles southwest of the City of Milwaukee (see Figure 0) , More<br />
specifically tha isite isi southweiiit of the urbanized portions of<br />
the City of Huskeqro by rouqhly three miles., 'Ilium Site includes<br />
three areas known as th'a '"Old Fill Area 11 ",; the "'Southeast Fill Anna"<br />
and the in Hon-">Co;iiitiguous Fill Arma 1 " (see Figure 1) „ The site also<br />
includes wastewater ponds associated with a former rendering plant<br />
complex: (the IM i!Urii«iina:iiE: plant 1 " 1 ), Those ponds are located east of the<br />
Nan -Con tiguous Fill. Area, Portions of the property associated with<br />
the jyiiamaiic plant are also included in the Old and Southeast Fill<br />
Area boundaries. Directly north of the site is the stoneridge<br />
<strong>Landfill</strong>,, a closed and covered solid waste lanidfill, that is not<br />
part of the Superfund site., Land use to the waet of the site is<br />
for aand and gravel excavation. To the south, east and north of<br />
the site, the land use is a combination of residential and<br />
agricultural,. The area surrounding the Site is mend.-rural, but is<br />
zoned to permit further development in the future, Sefveral hcnes<br />
and businesses are in the vicinity of the property, and many ware<br />
once served by individual private water supply wells.. In the later<br />
19 i-i cis,, city water mains Were extended into the araa anEll several<br />
homes and businesses were connected,. currently, two residences<br />
southeast of the site are not connected to public water, These<br />
residences are indicated in Figure 1.<br />
The Musilcego <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> 'Site is situated on unconsolidated<br />
deposits that are up to 300 feet thick and are generally conprised<br />
of glacial till, outwash|p and lacustrine deposits,. Site<br />
invastigative infonnation and private well boring logs shew layers
FIGURE 0<br />
SITE "iftr<br />
LOCATION ' *<br />
SITE LOCATION MAP<br />
SCALE IN MILES;;<br />
WhitiBfish Bay..-''<br />
Shorewood<br />
SilTE .LOCATION<br />
8 16 north
Not Connected<br />
To Puibliic Walter<br />
Potential<br />
Expansion<br />
Fill Area<br />
OLD FILL<br />
AREA<br />
SOUTH<br />
EAST<br />
FILL<br />
AREA<br />
Figure 1<br />
l..oQ»lkm of former<br />
Plisurili<br />
t.a«ora<br />
INIon«Contiguous<br />
Fill Area<br />
Former<br />
Rendering Pliant [""]<br />
SiteMap<br />
Mluiskego> <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong><br />
IU1 ILII s Ike qo/Wise an si n
of fine-grained material (till and lacustrine deposits) south a:nd<br />
east of the site to depths of about 70 to 200 feet and coarse<br />
grained material (outwash) below the till to depths of about 200 to<br />
30Q feet below land surface.<br />
There are three principal sources of ground water in Waukesha<br />
County, In order of depth below the land surface they are; sand<br />
and gravel within the glacial drift,, Niagara dolomite, and an<br />
underlying sandstone. In the <strong>Muskego</strong> area,, a majority of the<br />
private wells are finished in the thick: sand and gravel deposits..<br />
The water table for this shallow aquifer is approximately 20 to 40<br />
feet deep and has produced yields as high as 2,, 000 gal/min. The<br />
depth of the upper glacial drift is about 300 feet which<br />
corresponds to the aquifer thickness. The ground water<br />
classification for this aquifer is Class IIA (i.e. , is used for<br />
human consumption purposes and is not restricted).<br />
In the Huskego area, ground water flow in the water table shallow<br />
aquifer is generally in an easterly to southeasterly direction.,<br />
This is similar to the ground water flow at the site,, which has two<br />
flow paths. The first is in a north to south direction under the<br />
eastern portion of the Old Fill Area where the basal clay unit<br />
separates the sand and gravel unit from the landfill.., The second<br />
flow path is generally to the southeast under the Southeast and<br />
Non-Contiguous Fill Areas.,<br />
The site is located within the Fox River watershed,, just south of<br />
a local surface divide.. There are numerous wetlands in the area<br />
and the closest off site inteniittent stream is located about<br />
three-quarters of a mile to the southeast., None of the wetlands<br />
are located within the site boundaries, Surface drainage at the<br />
site is divided between flow to the wetlands and the interiiittent<br />
strewn to the southeast,, Surface water runoff from the Old Fill<br />
Area is to the ditch along Crowbar Road or to the southeast through<br />
a small swale., The western half of the Southeast Fill Area also<br />
drains to this swale which eventually discharges to a small, wetland<br />
north of an abandoned railroad right-of-way. Runoff from the<br />
neighboring Anaiiax property,, the Non-Contiguous Fill Area,,<br />
Stoneridge <strong>Landfill</strong>, and the eastern half of the Southeast Fill<br />
Area is toward the ditch along the service road to a small wetland<br />
southeast of the site and then through a culvert under Highway 24<br />
to a larger wetland. The site is located within the 100 year<br />
floodplain.
:i::x. isixn: HXMORY MID i!::i(i:i!'i:)i;!i:!:i!:iii:]!!:isi']i' ACCXVXTXES<br />
A. SifcftJlilfcfiQC<br />
The 3 8 -acre Old Fill Area accepted material from the<br />
niid-19!:iOs until. 1977., An unknown amount of waste oils,<br />
paint products!, and other wastes were deposited into the Old<br />
Fill Area during this time,, The Southeast Fill Area which<br />
covers about 16 acres ,, accepted only municipal wastes during<br />
its operation from 1977 to :i.98l, The Non-Contiguous Fill<br />
Area includes a drum trench, north and south reJE'use<br />
trenches,, and an L-shaped fill area, This Non-Contiguous<br />
Fill Area occupies approximately 4.2 acres northeast of the<br />
Old Fill Area,, Eased on information from workers employed<br />
during operation of the landfill! the L-shaped Fill Area is<br />
expected to contain waste similar to that in the Old Fill<br />
Area.<br />
In response to deteriorating water quality at on-site ground<br />
water monitoring wells,, sampling of off site private water<br />
supply wells was conducted in 191:12 and 191:14 by the site<br />
operator, Waste Management of Wisconsin,, Inc. (WMWI) , and<br />
Wisconsin Department of Matural Resources (TONE) ,. The<br />
results of these analyses indicated that several of the<br />
private wells may have been impacted by a source of<br />
contamination, which could have been the landfill and /or the<br />
Ansiiiax wastewater lagoons , The resu Its were based on<br />
elevated indicator parameters , The tea t f or indicator<br />
parameters is a preliminary test completed to show signs of<br />
ground water contamination. In 1986 public water was<br />
extended to this area and private wells in the area were<br />
connected to this supply,, The site was evaluated and ranked<br />
by the United States Eiwironmental. Protection Agency (U „ s .<br />
EPA) and placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on<br />
S epteiiiiiiber 1 8 „ 1 Si 8 5 .<br />
In 1985,, a partial methane extraction system was installed<br />
by WMWI along the western portion of the Old Fill Area to<br />
alleviate methane gas migration that was noted at the site,,<br />
The extracted gas is destroyed through flaring.<br />
B * JEitJELISEJEUEitKlLiSbiiL<br />
During preparation of a portion of the Phase I Stoneridge<br />
<strong>Landfill</strong> area called Module III, which is due east of the<br />
]>l'o>n-
During the Remedial Investigation (HI) , a trench was<br />
discovered in a portion of the Non-Contiguous Fill .Area that<br />
contained, a large concentration of 55•••gallon drains., The<br />
boiundary of this Drum Trench area was furthsx' defined using<br />
a nagnetameter met el detector. Through a <strong>Unilateral</strong><br />
<strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong> issued on January 4, 1991, U.S. EPA<br />
ordered! Wl«l to rscimovsi the drums and su:i:xoi;inding<br />
contamiiiiated s oils, WlfWIT proceeded to conduct .this removal<br />
under U.S. EPA's supervision., Eiraavation of the drum trench<br />
began in April 1991 and was completed in May 1991. A total<br />
of 989 drams were excavated along with approximately 2,, 500<br />
cubic yards of surrounding contaminated soil. The Is oils<br />
were excavated down to a depth of approximately 25 feet<br />
below tile original surf ace elevation until ground water was<br />
encountered.<br />
The drum trench wain re-filled to a grade that allowed<br />
drainage away fron the area,. No final soil cleanup levels<br />
were established for this removal action since the<br />
excavation reached ground water.. Soil samples were taken in<br />
areas above the water table at the base of the trench, and<br />
contULination was found to be remaining,, This remaining<br />
contamination will be addressed in this Interim Action<br />
Source control Operable Unit (SCOU) Record of Decision<br />
(ROD),<br />
Below is a list of contaminants that were found from a<br />
representative sample of liquid collected from excavated<br />
drums on the staging pad on April 17,, 1991. The list below<br />
shows contaminants that were above detection limits., The<br />
detection limits for all contaminants were elevated due to<br />
sample concentrations.<br />
Benzene Chloroform Ethyl Benzene<br />
Toluene Trichloroethene Methylene Chloride<br />
Some of the other contaminants that were sampled for and<br />
found but not quantified because of elsrvatsd detection<br />
limits include;r vinyl chloride„ tettrachloroethene„ l,, 2dichloroethaner<br />
and 1IP1-dichloroethene. Contaninants found<br />
within the d:ranm trench are contaminants that are present in<br />
monitoring wells at the Site.,<br />
The liquids; from the excavated druiui were separated, bulked,,<br />
and disposed of through either a fuels blending program or<br />
incineration, The soils were disposed of in a hazardous<br />
waste cell unit at the Calumet Indlustrial Design <strong>Landfill</strong><br />
(CID) in Calumet City, XL, Solldiii; remaining in the drums<br />
were tested! bulked and accepted at a fuels blending<br />
facility in April of 1992 for repackaging., The solids<br />
totaled approximately 15 cubic yards and were then sent to a
£ ac'il ity in Texas for incineration ,. The disposal procedures<br />
occurred from October 1991 through April 1992.<br />
C. Baffillili^^<br />
On September I?/ 1987 , wiiwi "signed an <strong>Administrative</strong> <strong>Order</strong><br />
on Consent with U.S., EPA to conduct a Remedial<br />
Investigation/Peas Ibility Study (RX/FS ) £ or the site , The<br />
purposst of the RI is to idientif y sources of contamination<br />
and to characterize the contamination at the site. The RI<br />
is currently not finalized but ongoing results have been<br />
periodically suamarized in Technical Memoranda. The Final<br />
RI and Baseline Risk Assessment for the site have not been<br />
completed „ although site investigation work was completed in<br />
September 19!iil, Since the Baseline Risk Assessment has not<br />
been finalized, this Operable Unit will be considered an<br />
Interim Action Source Control Operable Unit. .A final remedy<br />
will be prepared for this Site that will include a Baseline<br />
Risk As sessment ..<br />
A Source Control Operable Unit FS was prepared in September<br />
1.991. The FS provides a detailed analysis of alternatives<br />
evaluated for this inter in action operable unit.. The<br />
alternatives developed in this FS are presented in the<br />
Description of Alternatives , Section VII »<br />
xxx. oaMMnmn vaaTxcxp*TX
equired until the final ground water operable unit ROD is<br />
completed. A response to all coinients received during the<br />
public comment period, in contained in the Responi-iivismess<br />
Summary,, which is attached to this the ROD,<br />
Other community relations activities were oionducted prior to<br />
thois a associated with the Proposed Plan and FS., A, comment<br />
period was held from August 2lit to* September 27,, 1987<br />
concerning the signing of the Rl/FS comment order, Press<br />
releases announcing this comment period were sent to local<br />
media., A couninity relations plan was finalized in early<br />
191:18, A "kidcoff" mam I:: log to discuss the initiation o£ the<br />
]R1 was held at the liuskego City Hall on Aug. 25,, 19BB.<br />
Advertisements and press releases were sent to local media,<br />
A fact sheet was developed and sent to everyone on the U.S.<br />
EFA"s niiailing list. In June 1991, a press release<br />
concerning tils,, EPA's drum removal project was issued and a<br />
fact sheet was developed and sent to everyone on the nailing \nj<br />
list, • ..<br />
IT,, BCOFB OF IimiltXM ACTIOM BOCIECE CO1RRO3L OPBOIJEtLE ItWXT<br />
As with many Super fund sites,, the problems at the Husk:ego<br />
<strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> are complex., Early site characterization<br />
activities conducted as part oil! the ]RI identified souroes of<br />
oontasiiiimtion that could be addressed before full<br />
oharacteriiKation activities were consplete,, Therefore, to<br />
acoelerate the rmediation of the sources of contamination,,<br />
U.S.. EII'A,, in consultation with WIDHRir organiiiied the work into<br />
two oiperable units (Oils). These are as follows::<br />
Interim Action Source Control 00 (SCOU): Control<br />
and remediation of the soiurces of oontaimination,,<br />
including landfill waste,, contuninated soils, leachate<br />
and landfill gas.<br />
Ground Water Oil (GilOU):: Control and reinediation of the<br />
contasdnation in the ground water aguifer„<br />
The Interia A,ctioin SCOU F addresses contaiinination no>vene:nt<br />
into the groiund water aquifer and soils fron sown::es within<br />
the Old, Southeast, and M(Em-»Cointiguous Fill Areas, These<br />
areas pose a threat to human health and the environment<br />
lt»ecause of the risks froii possible ingestion of or dermal<br />
contaort with contamiinated soils looated there or possible<br />
ingestion of or denial contact with contaminated ground<br />
water at private residences domigredisnt of the Site., Based<br />
on. sascpiing by the II.S, EFA in August 19!iilir there are no<br />
current iioupaots o:l! Volatile Organic Compounds (¥OCs]i at<br />
private wells downgradient of the Site. Howefver,, the threat<br />
o»f future private well iimpacts exists since downgradient<br />
momItoring wells have shown contani natiom,. The first
purpose of this response is to prevent current or future<br />
exposure to the. cointaiiiinated soils and to reduce contaminant<br />
migration into the ground water that is a current source of<br />
drinking water for local residents ,. The second purpose of<br />
this response is to prevent current or future exposure to<br />
landfill gas containing explosive and potentially toxic<br />
contaminants and to reduce the migration of landfill gasses<br />
to adjacent soils and structures .<br />
The Ground Water Operable Unit (GWOtl) is at the FS stage<br />
with a ROD expected in 1993.. It is anticipated that the<br />
GWOU will be the final response action for this site and<br />
that it will, address on -site as well as off-site ground<br />
water cointamination concerns. The combination of these two<br />
OU« is intended to address the entire site with respect to<br />
the threats to human health identified,, and to be identified<br />
in the RI, FS, and site Baseline Risk Assessment..<br />
¥„ SITE<br />
A. Geology and HydrogeolGigy<br />
The site is located in an area of thick: glacial drift<br />
overlying N iagara dolomite ., The drift thickness varies from<br />
approximately 300 feet on the east edge of the site to 50<br />
feet at a location about 2,, 000 feet south of the site, The<br />
site overlies a deep valley in the bedrock that is part of<br />
the Troy Valley which trends to the east with a steep<br />
bedrock slope rising to the south.<br />
The valley in the bedrock beneath the site is filled with<br />
sediments consisting of sand and gravel with a cover of<br />
glacial till. In general, fine-grained material (till and<br />
lacustrine deposits) south and east of the site extend to<br />
depths of approximately 70 to 200 feet. Below the till is<br />
coarse material (outwash) which extends to depths of about<br />
200 to 300 feet below land surface.<br />
At the northern portion of the site is the Upper New Berlin<br />
Formation which is a till deposit forming an east-west<br />
trending moraine.. The .New Berlin, Formation contains two<br />
pr incipal members , a lower sand and gravel unit and an upper<br />
till unit. The western portion of the site consists of the<br />
lower outwash sand and gravel unit that extends southwest<br />
from the site toward the Fox River, The upper unit is<br />
typically gravel, sand,, loam till that averages about 58<br />
percent sand,, 29 percent silt, and 13 percent clay,<br />
The sand and gravel deposits are present east of Crowbar<br />
Road and south of the land fill access road, beneath the<br />
western edge of the site, and extend east to the boundary of<br />
the basal clay under the Old Fill Area (Figure 2),
I:!: iiiilHlfll!!:)!:::«<br />
B0jiv iiy<br />
iji<br />
Lpuaii, iiuruiQ |<br />
1O !iilt|1LIJI| I •••! "<br />
--V-',-, i<br />
;\ ill :<br />
HWMd-|jyf<br />
|C/>
Above the Mew Berlin fooution is the Oak: Creek Formation<br />
which, consists of a much finer textured composition of finegrained<br />
till,, lacustrine clay,, silt, and sand,. This<br />
i:'o:nial::l.oni on an average consists of appropriately an 85<br />
percent clay-silt composition,. The western limit of the Oak<br />
Creek; Formation is the Valparaiso Moraine and ends within<br />
the Old Fill Area,, The western extent of the clay till and<br />
other low perBeability material is vertically and<br />
horizontally irregular,, AM a result,, its extent cannot be<br />
accurately defined., nor can an edge of low permeability<br />
material of constant thickness be mapped with an acceptable<br />
degree of certainty., The approximate Basal Layer Boundary<br />
is outlined in Figure 2,.<br />
The glacial sediments in the area are underlain by the<br />
Silurian-aged Niagara dolomite, at depths between 250 to 350<br />
feet below land surface. The Niagara dolomite is<br />
sequentially •underlain by Maguoketa shale, dolomites,<br />
sandstones t and i gneous and metamorphic rocks„ The<br />
Haquoilceta shale in the Site area is documented by private<br />
well logs which indicate there is about 200 feet of shale<br />
below the Niagara Dolomite,.<br />
The ground water flow in the site area varies in direction<br />
due to the complex geological, features. The general, ground<br />
water flow for the region is from the northeast to the<br />
southeast. Within unconsolidated areas located at the<br />
northern and western edges of the site,, the ground water<br />
moves in a southerly direction. However the geology by the<br />
Southeast and Old Fill Areas consists of consolidated clay<br />
layers. Therefore perched ground water conditions exist in<br />
these areas,, Ground water flows radially in all. directions<br />
from these areas as would be expected,. (Figure 3) Ground<br />
water from the northern portion of the site near the old<br />
rendering plant lagoons is split by a low ground water<br />
divide in the sand and gravel deposits., One flow path moves<br />
generally along a Southeast route that is directed beneath<br />
the Non-Contiguous Fill Area,, the Southeast Fill Area and<br />
the Anaimax plant.. The other flow path moves generally along<br />
a southern route that is directed under the Old Fill Area.<br />
The water table in the site area varies due to consolidated<br />
areas,, but in general is 20 to 40 feet deep., In areas where<br />
ground water is perched or leachats is held within the basal<br />
layer the water table is 20 to 3D feet deep.,<br />
Presently, the main aquifer in the sand and gravel unit is<br />
currently used for private water supply downgradient of the<br />
site in only two private residences,, Public water was<br />
provided to the Site area in 19136 along Janes villa Road to<br />
the South and Hillendale Avenue to the east,, in 1986., The<br />
§
ifa: K<br />
NEHEOUU. »«eilia»IOUIFE^!IEILIIV SlUDr<br />
UUStLIEQD 5
municipal veil system is located -a few miles east of the<br />
site and is not near,, or is it affected, by the site.<br />
Hydraulic conductivity varies throughout the site dependincjf<br />
on the soil type.. Within the clay till,, the hydraulic<br />
conductivity ranges from 1.6 :»: 10"* centimeter is per second<br />
(cm/ ei) to 5.1 x 10~ 9 cm/ is., However,, the hydraulic<br />
conductivity of the sand and gravel deposits is much higher ,,<br />
ranging from 3.9 x l,0* i! cm/s to 1.2 x 10' 3 cm/s.<br />
The El sampling of ground water,, soil, sediment and leachate<br />
was predoiiinantly conducted at on- site locations , with the<br />
exception of ground water suipling at monitoring wells and<br />
pr ivate wells loca ted of f - s ite . Sampling was conducted for<br />
organ! c:s,, semi -volatile organics,, poiychlorinated biphenyls<br />
(PCBs) , and metals,<br />
1. Ground water<br />
Ground water is the main pathway of concern for contaminant<br />
migration at the site. As mentioned above , there are two<br />
iiiiai.il groiund water flow paths. The first one,, known as the<br />
Southern flow path,, runs from the northern section of the<br />
site under the Old Fill Area and continues to the south.,<br />
The second or Southeast flow path., also nowes from the<br />
northern portion of the Site,, hut is diverted to the<br />
southeast and flows beneath the Southeast Fill Area,, the<br />
Non -Contiguous Fill Area and Ananoiax property .. In addition „<br />
conditions exist where leachate accumulates in areas above<br />
these flow paths in perched or eleivated conditions,. (Figure<br />
3)<br />
^L!;!i!ilJ;;Jt]l!Sii][;]i:i...J!!JiL!;!ii!i:..J;!jS!«:l;J;ii •- The Southern Flow Path is potentially<br />
affected by the f ooier rendering plant lagoons „ and the Old<br />
and Non-Contiguous Fill. Areas., Two rounds of ground water<br />
sampling occurred at 12 downgradient wells at seven<br />
different locations, The results of the samples collected<br />
from these monitoring wells are summarized in Table l;<br />
locations of the monitoring wells are shown in Figure 4.<br />
Organic contanination located in the Southern Flow Path<br />
includes BETX (benzene „ ethylben;i:ene ,, toluene ,, xy lene ) ,,<br />
chlorinated ethene „ and chlorinated ethane groups „<br />
Individual cheiiical concentrations and well locations are<br />
listed below.<br />
Benzene 1 ug/L :i.:i5A<br />
Toluene 3 ug/L 121B
i<br />
I, ,<br />
o<br />
Q<br />
! I J ! S II ! I ! ! ! ! : i i ! s :<br />
: i i : : : : : i : i i : : : ! ! :;::::!<br />
::: ! " ::: !: : ::: iii :!: ?<br />
mi iii in tii mi t!i tn<br />
S , jS ? 9 9 9 9 9 i? ;:;<br />
i iiyi iiii iji tii MI ii<br />
i b o o !:i 1:1 !:S<br />
SE<br />
... i... (.., i<br />
X X X<br />
I '«'» «•• ! ! r» 'M « «"' ! ! i ! f •• t : I ! ! i ! ! i : m I !<br />
i : ••• ;»> — ; : : : t : : i i i : : : : : i i t ••• l<br />
S t<br />
i o o o o 9 9 9<br />
1 W W W W <<br />
iii iii iii *<br />
I •••) I<br />
?<br />
i :
SAMPLE ID<br />
SRWRC::: Flow p<br />
=~~i 2 -Cjg"^j><br />
ML-GWE93P-32<br />
MLGWE94-02<br />
MLGWE94P-C2<br />
ML G WE 134 02<br />
ML-GWEI14A-02<br />
MLGWF64C-02<br />
ML-GWTW62-02<br />
Nca^iSi^oa^FisiA^<br />
Round :<br />
ML-GWE97F-3S<br />
ML GVrE-GGA -0:<br />
MLGWE:02AO:<br />
ML-GWEI04-€:<br />
ML G\£E-35 0-<br />
ML-GWTW74R-OI<br />
Roustd 2<br />
HL-OWE97P-02<br />
MLGWE!ODA-€2<br />
MLGWEI02A02<br />
MLGWEI04-02<br />
MLGWE-M02<br />
MLGWTW74R-02<br />
ML-OWEI7R4!<br />
MLGWE4I4I<br />
MLOWESS^I<br />
ML-dWEi7-Oi<br />
MLOWE90^i<br />
Round 2<br />
ML-GWEI7R-02<br />
MLGWE4I-02<br />
MLGWESf-02<br />
ML-GWEi7'02<br />
MLGWE50-D2<br />
Bscisro-ind Well:<br />
ML-GWEIO-S2<br />
ML-UW3W75-02<br />
MONITORING<br />
WELL<br />
E93P<br />
EN<br />
E94P<br />
EI34<br />
EI34A<br />
PMC<br />
r«?«<br />
s/Ar.s.T.ii Fsciiay<br />
E97F<br />
E-GSA<br />
EED2A ,<br />
EIG4<br />
EL35<br />
TW74R<br />
E97?<br />
EI03A<br />
E:02A<br />
BI04<br />
EI36<br />
TW74R<br />
E17R<br />
E4I<br />
ESS<br />
ES7<br />
E90<br />
EI7R<br />
E4=<br />
ESS<br />
Ei?<br />
E90<br />
Eio<br />
TW73<br />
34<br />
3<br />
3:600<br />
503<br />
J<br />
36300<br />
TASLE I<br />
CHLORINATED CIUX)RINATED CHLORINATED<br />
ETHANES KETONES BENZENES PMENOI5<br />
13<br />
3<br />
7<br />
•9<br />
S<br />
7<br />
10<br />
3<br />
I?<br />
3<br />
10<br />
•o 3<br />
2403<br />
9<br />
2970<br />
i!<br />
2<br />
I2SO<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
Psgs 2 os 3<br />
PAIIs PIITHALATES It'll.<br />
360<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT<br />
NT
NOTES.<br />
1 , CGncen..s-io~! SR In sg/L.<br />
Table i (C<br />
2 Dallied rynAoU (-) indlcas es=paa»» »:» as scieaed in :Ke «mpk. Thg .ynsbsl (*)<br />
no- aaayasa is; Sa Shssa sa.TJJ.-i.<br />
3. NT i-!Jic=.« cc-spcund: wire nss sasiyzsd :cr i= :hi: unsple.<br />
4. This Tsble —5 origmsily T^fe 4-2 ffom ihs Sappkissem so Uchnka! tAi-i:-^.-.~ss No. 2.<br />
TIK/vu/ILV<br />
13527,33<br />
Psge 3 of 3
,Bcr,..<br />
is!!<br />
!!..,. iilll<br />
i.. 11<br />
in i
EtJ:i.ylben;i:ene<br />
Xylene<br />
Tetrachloroethene<br />
Trichloroethene<br />
lr'2-Dichloroethene<br />
Clil.oroet.hane<br />
1,- 2 •••Dichlor oethane<br />
1.,, 1 -Dichloroethane<br />
3 uq/L<br />
1-13 ug/L<br />
1 uq/L<br />
1-3 uq/L<br />
1-8 uq/L<br />
2 ug/L<br />
2 uq/L<br />
1-5 ug/L<br />
123B<br />
123B, 96P<br />
12 3B<br />
123B, 135B, 138A<br />
135A-B, 137A-B, 96<br />
13 5A<br />
135A, 137A<br />
135A-B, 137A-B, 95Pr 96<br />
Semi •••volatile compounds and pesticides/PCBs were not<br />
detected in the Round I ground water samples collected from<br />
the Southern Flow Path., Therefore,, Round 2 samples were not<br />
analyzed for these parameter!!!,<br />
Ground water monitoring wells were also sampled for Target<br />
Analyte List (TAL) metals and cyanide, and general ground<br />
water quality indicators.. These analyses were used to<br />
assess chemical concentration, trends within the aquifer to<br />
aid in the determination of' ground water flow patterns, and<br />
contaminant fate and mi.gration..<br />
There are seven TAL constituents that were detected in one<br />
or more monitoring well sample (s) along the Southern, or<br />
Southeastern Flow Paths at levels higher than those detected<br />
in the background wells E80 and TW75. All of these seven<br />
were detected along the Southern Flow Path at various wells..<br />
The constituents were as follows:<br />
.Arsenic<br />
Barium<br />
Chromium<br />
"• Lead<br />
* Manganese<br />
* Nickel<br />
* Sine<br />
J;!js;!13i:!;Jl!iL!!ij!ii:!;;!iL][;;i:i...Ji;],.:S!LJI:li!!J;;l3i ••• The Southeastern Flow Path which<br />
diverts from the Southern Flow Path in the northern area of<br />
the site,, was character ized using 11 monitor ing wells at six<br />
locations. The sampling from these wells are summarised in<br />
Table 1; locations of the monitoring wells are shown in<br />
Figure 5.,<br />
There are four organic contaminant groups that were detected<br />
on-site along the Southeastern Flow Path. These groups are<br />
BETXs , chlorinated ethenes,, chlor inated ethanes,, and<br />
phthalates. Individual concentrations and well locations<br />
are listed below, One organic contaminant„ vinyl, chloride,,<br />
was fouridl off-site,, at levels in exceedance of Federal<br />
Max! munii Contaminant Levels (HCLs) and WDNR Bnf or cement<br />
Standards (ESs) shown in Table 2. The vinyl chloride<br />
contamination was found during ground water monitoring<br />
southeast of the Site at Well'p64C..<br />
Benzene 1 ug/L<br />
10
J ' '~'fl i ilr!' •• ii '' " I?<br />
'• 1 ,-'N 1,1 1!- 1 tt ': H " «<br />
:r /- X f | it ? » i ' i|<br />
! Ix'-i ___ ..r'- 1 "I 1 5<br />
! 1, || •'<br />
north • ' • s i|<br />
o<br />
«l.<br />
1<br />
Iji 1 I j[ i! !| || 11| j; 11 i 11 |i 3<br />
mnil> i jwn ilium ii uuiiLiniuMunnil yUAIVTV'iy "^~* »...«, 31. '—..«. -f(l-<br />
———————— ...- —————————————— ... ——— .. BI wf ifj (.UC|j_|| p wM _ 1N( |N | M (i „ .„ jr.p , j . ,,,.<br />
MllSKII CUl SAMUMT 1 AM 11 III<br />
WWSlt UWWMG*WtN1l 0* : WISCONSIN MC . ' ——— """ ——————————— ----.<br />
mnt OF s£Cio« us i w.«»« . „.. . ....... „„......._......._„...._....„—-——.—<br />
CHY l> MUSKI'V) WMML-SIIA CCXffllV. IMSCCI4SM - «•" ««,.,, r...,,« «.^.....-.,
Xylene 1 ug/L 92P<br />
Trichloroethene 2-3 ug/L 92A<br />
1,2-Dichloroethene 2-3 ug/L 92A<br />
Vinyl Chloride 5-7 ug/L 64C<br />
1,2-Dichloroethane 2! ug/L 92A<br />
1.1-Dichloroethane 6-7 ug/L 92A<br />
Additional organic compounds detected in this area include<br />
1.2-dichloropropane from monitor ing well E92A at a<br />
concentration of 2 ug/L (Rounds :i. and 2) ; and methylene<br />
chloride (a common/probable laboratory contaminant) , TW62 at<br />
a concentration of 2 ug/L (Round 1 only) .,<br />
Phthalates were detected, in one ground water sample from<br />
this area during Round 1 (E92-3 ug/L) , and two samples from<br />
Round 2 (E94-4 ug/L, and TW62•••:•) ug/L) . Constituent<br />
compounds detected were di-n-octyl phthalate and bis; (2ethy<br />
Ihexy 1) phthalate,.<br />
As with the Southern Flow Path, pi-isticides/PCBi-i were not<br />
detected in Round 1 ground water samples collected from this<br />
area. Therefore,, Round 2 sample!:! were not analyzed for<br />
these parameters.,<br />
There are five TA'L constituents that were detected in one or<br />
more monitoring well sample (a) along the Southeastern Flow<br />
Path at levels higher than those detected in the background<br />
wells ElitO and TW7S.. These constituent!:! are as follows::<br />
* Arsenic * Zinc<br />
* Barium * Manganese<br />
* Nickel<br />
£>:>;J:Mis;i::....i;LJ[;.!i!.i!i;!i> - The Southern and Southeastern Flow Paths<br />
described above affect well locations primarily downgradient<br />
froun the site as) shown in Figures 4 and 5.,<br />
Monitoring wells are also located in the Non-Contiguoui-i Fill<br />
and Ananiax plant areas as well as along the northern extent<br />
of the Old Fill Area (Figures 6 and 7) '. The highest<br />
concentration of organic contamination for the site was<br />
found at wells in the Non-Contiguous Fill Area.<br />
Specifically, monitoring well Ei::h:i, located in the Noncontiguous<br />
Fill Area, was contaminated with several VOCs at<br />
levels in exceedance of HCLs and WDNR Enforcement Standards<br />
(ESs),<br />
Contaminant groups that were detected within the Non-<br />
Contiguous Fill, Ananiax plant and northern boundary areas<br />
include BETXs,, chlorinated ethenes, chlorinated ethanes,<br />
ketones,, phenols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />
(PAHs)., Some of the individual concentrations and well<br />
locations are listed below,<br />
11
.Mil I-J..L.I..I I l.l J I.I.I JJ.J_i.J I. I I I I l I l. I I l<br />
I<br />
<br />
ilil I<br />
"I J<br />
%<br />
14 ~1-<br />
-\v H<br />
IMldllli 1l IUNII IIBIIIIi II IULIIKLINII UD4U11MII<br />
I'.MU or iiitciot n iw FI;IH<br />
cut a ujSKiiVi WIMKLSIIA caviiv wiscnNsri<br />
r<br />
g i.i ~:<br />
"ii ,<br />
i |«<br />
1<br />
LJI•••**"<br />
" o<br />
,•'••""' "<br />
.....«.»» .» .......*.. » I. J........I .• ».!.....<br />
......,.-.-.. ---- | - ,,; .__<br />
.' ^X<br />
' « ' ,<br />
\<br />
/"'""'<br />
1 f'<br />
I .,<br />
i >!<br />
t \ J<<br />
• \ l<br />
\ Ii<br />
•>>i<br />
. •<br />
!: I<br />
I<br />
..\;<br />
\ '*' *'•<br />
'-!<br />
'n<br />
I i*<br />
^0,1<br />
^<br />
i<br />
i!<br />
I<br />
1<br />
i,»<br />
\><br />
Ni ;;l'ii i i' ;; II .! IE ..<br />
! : ;i| ill<br />
» •' IE - -< 11*<br />
E i i! ' i!<br />
i 1 ' i i 1! «<br />
" = !<br />
ii !!<br />
;;<br />
i!<br />
It! . .<br />
linijmmi<br />
i- •'"I" i<br />
........... >AMRZYN ""'""•" •"""'• :rt<br />
-S' ::::::L:::::;::..:"::::I:::: . ..<br />
....,„., .1]|r;<br />
if.., /.in -111<br />
""*•"• •
K'LtO'.l INIViSIIOWlCWUHHiSUlllv Slum<br />
l> UMllll<br />
Hi OF mscowSK IM:<br />
mm m iiiiCiion nil l »n n:?ec<br />
CUT 01 lullJEIIJI-lUD. 'MMId.laX.h COIJ^lt<br />
=! tl<br />
if I i i I i I i 11 i i I I!<br />
l<br />
..,.....,. VtMRZYN<br />
S I '• * I! IS ii * * i<br />
III ' *<br />
I!
Benzene 1-21 Ug/L 10 OA, 102A, 104<br />
97P, TW74R, 87<br />
Toluene 8-12,000 ug/L la;;:A,, :.::i6<br />
Ethylbenzene 270-7,300 ug/L 102A, 136<br />
Xylene 5-39,000 ug/L 102A, 136<br />
TetrachloroetJ:i ene 3 uq'/ L 17R<br />
Trichloroethene 1-7 ug/L 87, 100A, 104, TW74R<br />
1,2-Dichloroethene 1-12 ug/L 100A, 102A, 1.04<br />
TW74R, 87<br />
1,2-Oichloroethane 3-9 ug/L 102A, 87<br />
-1,1-Dichloroethane 3-8 ug/L 100A, 102A, 1.04<br />
87, 971?<br />
Chloroethane B ug/L 97P<br />
2 -Butanona 9 ••••;
2. Soil/Sediment<br />
Soil samples were conducted at locations in the Old Fill<br />
.Area,, Southeast Fill Area, North and South Refuse Trenches<br />
and the Drum Trench of the Non-Contiguous Fill Area (Figure<br />
9) .. These samples were taken at the apparent base of fill<br />
material in these areas to determine the effect of<br />
contaminant movement in the soils under the waste., The soil<br />
samples varied in depth from 20 to 40 feet below surface<br />
level, The saiiples in the Old and Southeast Fill Areas were<br />
collected at leachate head well locations LII14 , LHlifi , LH12 ,,<br />
and LH17. The six Refuse and three Drum Trench samples were<br />
completed after excavation to the soil beneath the waste in<br />
these areas ,<br />
BETX and ketones were the predominant organic compound<br />
groups detected in the basal soil samples from the leachate<br />
head well borings. The primary constituents and their<br />
concentration!-! are listed below,.<br />
Benzene 160-13 , 000 ug/kg<br />
Toluene 12 0-13 0,000 ug/kg<br />
Ethylbeneze 40-24 ,, 000 ug/kg<br />
Xylenei 2-100, 000 ug/kg<br />
Acetone 13 -7 , 1.00 ug/kg<br />
;;!-butanone 3-13 , 000 ug/kg<br />
4-methyl-2-pentanone 180-29 , 000 ug/kg<br />
Jsophorone 59-3 , 600 ug/kg<br />
Other volatile organics found in soil samples included:<br />
trichloroethene (790 ug/kg) in the Drum Trench,<br />
tetrahydrofuran (1,900 ug/kg) in the Drum Trench and (2:1.<br />
ug/kg ) in the Refuse Trench, and chloroform (520 ug/kg and<br />
1.50,000 ug/kg) in the Dnum Trench.<br />
Total phenols and PAEls were the precllominant semi -volatile<br />
organics in the Drum and Refuse Trench Areas., In addition,,<br />
phthalates were also detected in these areas. The primary<br />
coinsti.tu.ents and their respective concentrations are listed<br />
below,<br />
50-3,2oug/kg<br />
2 -Hethy Iphenol 4 3 0 ug/kg<br />
4«ethylphenol 210-550 ug/kg<br />
Eenisoic acid 170 ug/kg'<br />
Napihthalene 100-5 ,, 6C)6 ug/kg<br />
2-Methylnaphthalene 72-1,300 ug/kg<br />
Phenanthrene :i.:i.o ug/kg<br />
Pyrene 82 ug/kg<br />
Chrysene 81 ug/kg<br />
31.3
Ben::: o (a) pyrene<br />
Indeno (1,, 2,3 -cd) pyrene<br />
D ibeniKO (a, h) anthracene<br />
Benw o (g , h,, i) perylene<br />
Butylbenzyl phthalate<br />
0lathyIphthalate<br />
Di-n-butYl phthalate<br />
Bis (2 eth;y Ihexy 1} phtJhal ate<br />
110-140 ug/kq<br />
210 ug/kq<br />
230 ug/kg<br />
190 ug/kg<br />
42-1,000'uq/kg<br />
98-150 ug/kq<br />
86-310 ug/kq<br />
300-440 ug/kg<br />
PCBs were detected In one sail sample each from the Drum<br />
Trench and North and South Refuse Trenches,. Pegiticides were<br />
also detected in one or more samples from the North and<br />
South Refuse Trenches. The constituents and their<br />
conceiTtxat ions are 1isted below.<br />
Arochlor 1242<br />
Arochlor 1248<br />
Arochlor 1260<br />
4„4'-DOT<br />
4,4"-DDE<br />
4,4•-DDE<br />
42-170 ug/kg<br />
200 ug/kg<br />
62 ug/kg<br />
22 ug/kg<br />
9.2-30 ug/kq<br />
8.2-33 ug/kg<br />
The only trace elements that were not within the common<br />
regional range for natural, soils based on U.S., EPA<br />
other publications were, magnesium and cadmium.<br />
Magnesium was found in exceedance of the conion range in the<br />
Southeast, Drum,, and Refuse Trench areas. Cadmium was found<br />
in exceedance of the .common range in the Old,, Drum,, and<br />
Refuse Trench areas. Nine TAL metals; aluminum, arsenic,<br />
cobalt,, copper, iron, lead, mercury, sodium ,, and zinc<br />
exceeded the regional background soil levels at one or more<br />
basal soil sample locations .<br />
In addition ,, a sediment investigation was conducted to<br />
assess the effects of surface water runoff from the fill<br />
areas and the Ananoiax property., Sampling was conducted at<br />
various locations on and off the site. However,<br />
concentrated efforts were conducted along a drainage swale<br />
on the east side of the Old Fill and Southeast Fill Areas<br />
(Figure 9) . Below is a list of the constituents identified<br />
along wi .th concentrations and locations .<br />
CiSllEM! 1 !Ee ililrliLiiiJllr<br />
Acetone<br />
1„1-0 ichloroethane<br />
2-Butanone<br />
Toluene<br />
Phenol<br />
4-MethyIphenol<br />
- 1BO ug/kg<br />
11 ug/kg<br />
53 ug/kg<br />
2-190 ug/kg<br />
790 ug/kq<br />
570-960 ug/kg<br />
141<br />
SD4<br />
SD4<br />
SD4<br />
SDI , SDS<br />
SD4<br />
SOI , SD4
O •4<br />
in<br />
i<br />
nimii ii nan IIBIII<br />
UfSMGOSMiUi rr ii hM» ii 1<br />
Nl OF ^i«J.Orr5«- ll»:<br />
i'»fn ni wtcuiM 111 TMI W?H.<br />
en v ri' IMUSWI 'ir w»i 1*1 Si i* CCWIJlt WfiiljiCdMSI*<br />
,....,,., MMRZYN '"-"•:: .. ":';! L<br />
..,„..,«,........»< „„.....•. ,nu><br />
. ..i. ....... „....,,_ ,.„....,....,<br />
...,..„ .,j,C<br />
'"*' '-"••*<br />
'"""• '<br />
w
SJ<br />
'I<br />
o ••1<br />
..I.I..LI I I.I I I.I.I I..I.J..I..I I I I I I I I ! I I I 11 I I. I J..1.J<br />
m<br />
i-t |dk<br />
!b III<br />
Cl III<br />
•I 19<br />
iff f I<br />
() til<br />
Benzole Acid 230 ug/kg 804<br />
Naphthalene 210 ug/kg SD4<br />
2Hiethyl.naphthalene 96- 200 ug/kg SDl, SD4<br />
Fyrene 110 ug/kg SD3<br />
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 600-680 ug/kg SDl, SDiil<br />
Di-u-butyl-phthalate 170 ug/kg SD8<br />
3. Air<br />
Ambient air, leadhate head well,, and gas vent vapor sample®<br />
were taken, at the site during the El,, However, the result!;!<br />
were found to be invalid due to the exceedance of<br />
recoimended sample holding times.. S inc.®, the investigation<br />
of the site began,, the operator„ WMNI, has agreed to<br />
implement the Nisconsin raquirsment, NR 506., 08<br />
J!k
assessment determines whether contamination at the land fill<br />
could pose an unacceptable health risk or environmenta1 risk<br />
in the absence of any remedial action. Potential threats to<br />
public health are estimated by making assumption!-! about the<br />
manner,, frequency and length of tine a per son could be<br />
exposed to site-related contaminants., However, for this<br />
interim action operable unit the baseline risk assessment<br />
has not been completed since the EX has not been finalized,.<br />
For the proposed SCOII, a qualitative risk assessment was<br />
prepared consistent with U.S. EPA. policy, '"Hole of the<br />
Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy Selection<br />
Decisions/ 1 " dated April 22,, 1991. The qualitative risk<br />
assessment examined contaminants detected in ground water,<br />
leachate, and soils during the field investigation phase of<br />
the RI, These contaminants were evaluated, with respect to<br />
their carcinogenIcity, toxicity, and possible exposure<br />
pathways from and at the site..<br />
The following is a representative list of contaminants<br />
detected, in ground water, leachate,, sediment,, and soil at<br />
and near the site::<br />
Bern: ene Acetone Mercury<br />
Ethylbenzene 2-Butanone Butylbenzylphthalate<br />
Toluene 2-Hexanone Diethylphthalate<br />
Xylenes Tetrahydrofuran dl-n-octylphthaiate<br />
Chl oroethane :i.,, 4 ••• D ich lore benz ene PCBs<br />
1,, 1-Dichloroethane 2-Methylphenol Arsenic<br />
1,2-Dichloroethene 4-Methylphenol Barium<br />
Stvrene Pentachlorophenol Cadmium<br />
Dichloropropane Phenol Chromium<br />
Trlchloroethene Benzole Acid Copper<br />
Vinyl Chloride Cyanide<br />
Bis (2 - e thylhexy 1) phthala :te Lead<br />
Nickel<br />
Zinc<br />
The sand and gravel aquifer in the immediate area of the<br />
landfill is contaminated, The potential exists for this<br />
contamination to move with ground water flow toward private<br />
residences.<br />
Exposure to landfill gas,, through either methane migration<br />
in the soils or VQC migration in the air,, is a concern at<br />
the Site., Inhalation of landfill gas is of concern due to<br />
the potential presence of unacceptable levels of VOCs that<br />
may cause a health risk,. A potential health risk: would<br />
exist until landfill gas controls are installed and<br />
operating to adequately manage potential exposure. wmi has<br />
14!
comitted to managing landfill gas at the site in accordance<br />
with Wisconsin Administrativa Coda NR 506,08(6) ,.<br />
Direct exposure to contaiiinated soil or waste is currently<br />
not a concern at the site,, All fill areas are covered by at<br />
least one foot of soil to limit the exposure potential,.<br />
However, future exposure nay be a concern if the cover is<br />
not adequately improved and maintained,<br />
Continued Isachate generation and the resulting additional<br />
ground water contamination is another potential concern at<br />
the site, Private wells to the Southeast and South of the<br />
Site ware sampled, by U.S. EPA for VOCs in August 1991, but<br />
no contaminat ion was detected.. Although most potential<br />
receptors of contaminated ground water are now on public<br />
drinking water supp 1 ies, some downgr ad lent res ident s are<br />
still using private wells that may become impacted by siterelated<br />
ground water com taminat i on.. E leva ted 1 eacha te<br />
levels in the Old, Southeast and Non-Contiguous Fill Area®<br />
will result in continued ground water contamination until<br />
leachate generation is adequately controlled or most of the<br />
contaminants have been leached from the waste.,<br />
Of the chemicals in ground water, those with exceedances of<br />
Safe Drinking Hater Act or WDNR NR 140 WAG ground water<br />
drinking standards are shown in Table 2„ This Table<br />
compares the maximum ground water concentrations in the<br />
immediate landfill area with the MCLs, ESs and WDNR ME 1.40<br />
Frevsntative Action Limits (FALs) ,,<br />
Based on toxi c:ological studies „ benzene and viny 1 chloride<br />
are classified as U.S., EPA Group A •••• human carcinogens;<br />
while trichloroethene, tetraohloroethene and<br />
pentachlorophenol are classified as Group B2 - probable<br />
human carcinogens. Pending completion of the complete<br />
baseline risk: assessment, exiceeduices of drinking water<br />
standards alone justify the interim action operable unit<br />
remedial action. Actual or threatened releases of hazardous<br />
substances from this site,, if not addressed by implementing<br />
the respomse action selected in this ROD, may present an<br />
imminent and substantia.! endianganiiient to public health,,<br />
welfare,, or the env ironnient.,<br />
« DEeotiPTioi OF<br />
A,, Remedial Action Obj ectives<br />
Upon completion of the first phases of investigation work at,<br />
the site, remedial action objectives were developed that<br />
address the source areas while considering the long-term<br />
goals of protecting human health and the environment and.<br />
17
Chemical<br />
Compounds<br />
VOCs<br />
vinyl<br />
1,2 DichlGroethane<br />
Trichloroethene<br />
Benzene<br />
Tetraehleroetnene<br />
Toluene<br />
Ethylbensene<br />
(total)<br />
Tetrahydrofuran<br />
Chloroform<br />
Table 2<br />
!<br />
KR 140 and EPA MCL FOR GROUND<br />
UG/L (unless otherwise noted)<br />
Maximum i<br />
Concentration<br />
7, 00 |<br />
9,00<br />
7,00<br />
21*00<br />
1,00<br />
12000,00<br />
7300»00<br />
39000.00<br />
41 = 00<br />
1,00<br />
NR 140<br />
Enforcement<br />
Standard<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
1<br />
343<br />
136Q<br />
620<br />
50<br />
6<br />
.2<br />
NR 140<br />
Preventive<br />
Action<br />
Limit<br />
2720<br />
,0015<br />
,05<br />
,18<br />
,067<br />
= 1<br />
68,6 !<br />
124<br />
10<br />
.6<br />
t<br />
40 CFR<br />
Part 141<br />
MCL<br />
1000<br />
2<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
5<br />
700<br />
10000<br />
!<br />
= = =
Chemical<br />
Compounds<br />
SVOCs<br />
Arsenic<br />
Barium<br />
Cadmium<br />
Chromimum , tots 1<br />
Iron<br />
Lead<br />
Manganese<br />
Selenium<br />
Silver<br />
1<br />
Table 2<br />
NR 140 and EPA MCL FOR<br />
UG/L (unless<br />
Maximum<br />
Concentr at ion<br />
4 = 00<br />
25,90<br />
11*70<br />
133,00<br />
,7 os mg/1<br />
50300,00 sg/1<br />
5 = 20<br />
4560.00<br />
34 = 00<br />
SMCL - Contaminant Level<br />
41<br />
NR 140<br />
Enforcement<br />
Standard<br />
300<br />
50<br />
1,0 mg/1<br />
10<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
10<br />
50<br />
,30 sg/1<br />
NR 140<br />
Preventive<br />
Action<br />
Limit<br />
30<br />
5<br />
,2 mg/1<br />
1,0<br />
5<br />
25<br />
1<br />
10<br />
,15 sg/1<br />
5<br />
40 CFR<br />
Part 141<br />
MCL<br />
50<br />
1<br />
2,0 mg/1<br />
5<br />
100<br />
.3 sg/1 aCL<br />
15 SMCL<br />
50<br />
50<br />
100
meeting applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement!-;<br />
(MtARi-iji, Site-specific goals of limit ing the potential for<br />
the release of contaminants to the ambient air,, sub-waste<br />
soils, and ground water include the following:;<br />
«> Minimize the migration of chemical constituents from<br />
soil/refuse transported by leachate to ground water<br />
that would contribute to ground water concentrations in<br />
excess of MCLs, ESs; and PALs beyond the waste boundary;<br />
«> Control the seepage, migration and concentration of<br />
landfill, gas generated by the refuse in the Old,<br />
Southeast, and Non-Contiguous Fill Areas, and in the<br />
soils or air at or beyond the property boundary;<br />
«> Minimize hazardous air contaminants that may be emitted<br />
from the Old,, Southeast and Non-Contiguous, Fill Areas,,<br />
and comply with applicable air pollution control<br />
standards; and<br />
w Minimize the potential, for human exposure to waste and<br />
contaminated soils and for release of contamination to<br />
the environment,<br />
Since this interim action operable unit addresses source<br />
control., site-specif ic cleanup standards for soils and<br />
ground water Mill not be necessary for the Old and Southeast<br />
Fill Areas,, where containment provides the primary source<br />
control.. However,- a per f ormiance-based cleanup standard,,<br />
which account!!! for and incorporates ground water standards<br />
will be established for soils in a portion of the Non<br />
Contiguous Fill Area,, where the source area will be treated<br />
as wail as contained,. A cleanup standard would be<br />
established because of the more concentrated nature of the<br />
hazardous materials located in this specific area..<br />
The performance-based cleanup standard would be applied to<br />
the area, covered by the in-situ vapor extraction (ISVE)<br />
system., The cleanup standard Mill, be based on residual<br />
soil-gas concentrations that are low enough to assure<br />
compliance with ground water cleanup standards, which will<br />
be specified in more detail (including compound specific<br />
standards) in the ROD for the GWOU for the Site. The<br />
relationship between soil-gas VOC concentrations and ground<br />
water VOC concentrations would be modeled to determine the<br />
concentration of VOCs in the waste/subsoil that must be<br />
achieved, in order to assure that,, even if the remaining VOCs<br />
leach into ground water, the level, of VOCs in the ground<br />
water will not exceed levels that are protective o:i: human<br />
health and the environment. The model will incorporate data<br />
collected during a pilot-scale test, and the first two-year<br />
period of full-scale ISVE operation, as well as previous<br />
US
sampling and monitoring data coll acted at the Site., In<br />
accordance with the national. Contingency Plan (NCP)<br />
§300.430(f) (5)i(iii)i (A), if waste is left in place at the<br />
conclusion of a response action,, the (specified ground water<br />
clean-up standards should be attained at the points of<br />
compliance identified in the GNOU HOD.<br />
The XSVE system will operate until the concentration of VOCs<br />
in the waste/subsoil calculated by the model is achieved.<br />
This methodology would be superior to setting numerical<br />
reduction rates,, based upon the percentage of VOC removal<br />
from thak soil, because it directly corresponds to achieving<br />
groujid water cleanup lev els.<br />
B. Developniiient of Alternativeiii<br />
Alternatives developed in the FS for the SCOU considered the<br />
Old,, Southeast, and Non-Contiguous fill areas.. As stated<br />
above,, the remedial action objectives involve controlling<br />
landfill leachate and gas,, limiting the potential for<br />
exposure to contaminants via inhalation, ingestion, and<br />
denial absorption pathways, and nininizing impacts to ground<br />
water.<br />
In developing alternatives, the FS takes into consideration<br />
previous removal work: that has occurred, The remedial<br />
alternatives were assembled from applicable remedial<br />
technology options., The alternatives surviving the initial<br />
screening were evaluated and compared with respect to the<br />
nine criteria required by the NCP., In addition to the<br />
remedial action alternatives,, the NCP requires that a noaction<br />
alternative also be considered for the site. The noaction<br />
alternative serves primarily as a point of comparison<br />
for other alternatives„<br />
Two general strategies have been utilized, to accomplish the<br />
remedial action objectives four the source control portion of<br />
this site. The first strategy is to control the production<br />
of gas and leachate while minimizing potential exposure to<br />
waste or conta,ininated soil. 'Ilium second is to manage gam and<br />
leaoihate after production,. These strategies are evident<br />
within the forthcoming alternative descriptions.<br />
€., Alternatives<br />
Under Alternative 1 no additional corrective action would be<br />
taken at the site to address sources or potential sources of<br />
ground water contamination or direct contact threats. The<br />
limited removal of leachate by WMWFI from the Southeast Fill<br />
If
Area would! continue utilizing the current method of pumping<br />
from a portion of the existing collection system directly to<br />
the sanitary sewer.<br />
Under a no-action scenario,, contannination from the source<br />
areas in leachate or soils would not be prevented from<br />
reaching the ground water aquifer, This would result in<br />
continued off •••site migration of contaniiinants in the ground<br />
water.. Also,, gas and air con .tarni nation would continue to<br />
migrate through soils off-site and/or into the atmosphere .,<br />
Finally, the current cover over the source areas would<br />
degrade due to freezing and thawing, This would result in.<br />
greater percolation of rainwater and more likelihood of<br />
contaminant transfer into the ground water „<br />
A no-action remedy would allow the site to remain as it<br />
exists today with an incomplete fencing structure around the<br />
site., Therefore, direct contact to soils would be a greater<br />
likelihood for workers at the Stoneridge Recycling facility<br />
and trespassers.. There would be no capital or operational<br />
costs assoc dated with this alternative ..<br />
The LiBitiiid-Action Alternative involves jjinplsmenting<br />
measures to restrict access to the site and monitor gas<br />
migration, Site controls include a fence extension and deed<br />
restrictions for the site. Fencing would be extended across<br />
into the Anamax property to complete the enclosure of all<br />
fill areas and the wairotewater ponds. <strong>Landfill</strong> gas<br />
monitoring would also be a component of this alternative to<br />
deteonine compliance with solid waste regulations.,<br />
As in the No-Action Alternative, this remedy would not<br />
prevent contamination currently in leachate or soils from,<br />
reaching the ground water eguifer through percolation or<br />
direct leaking,. This alternative also does not address the<br />
prevention of gas migration through soils nor does it<br />
prstvent the current cover degradation through freeze-thaw<br />
cycles.,<br />
The limited-action scenario would deter direct contact to<br />
contaainated soils with the installation of a fence., In<br />
addition this action would hinder premature destruction or<br />
disturbance of the current cover., The current cover does<br />
not contain any freeze-thaw protection layer of soil on top<br />
of the clay. This allows the clay layer to expand and<br />
contract from freezing conditions,<br />
Capital cost for this alternatvie would be seventeen<br />
thousand four hundred dollars ($17,400),, There would be no<br />
operational or maintenance costs.
AlteouLtiva 3 consists of sswan major coiniponants . Thin first<br />
threa : deaidi restrictions (, f mem s:u:tans ion , and landf 1 .1 .1 gas<br />
nitonitoriinig and control ara thin mum am Alternative 2. Tha<br />
add! tional four components arm ::<br />
«> Cup installation over tha Old and Sirathaast Fill Araas<br />
in accordamica with NE 5041 MAC;<br />
«> landfill leachata control in the Old Fill Araa;<br />
«> XaprovoiMnt of thin unxisting leachatin control system In<br />
thm Southeast Fill Arsaj: and<br />
Alternative 3 would increase the effactivariess of laachate<br />
extraction by increased or naxiDixed use of the current<br />
system and installation of additional extraction vails<br />
using the sane procedure as in the Old Fill Area,<br />
Collection walls would ba installed to the base of the<br />
refuse and spaced appropriately to influence and collect<br />
leachata from all areas where laachate can collect or build<br />
up (:i.,,e. , create a head of leachate} , The exact design and<br />
spacing will be detainined in the remedial design. The.<br />
datannlniation of the final configuration of walls would ba<br />
madia by U.S. EPA, in consultation with WD1NIR,, during the<br />
remedial design activities..<br />
The leadbiate extraction systems would be operated to<br />
maximize the amount of leachata withdrawn and Minimize to<br />
the extent practicable,- the a»no>unt of leachat e accunulated<br />
on the base of both fill areas,<br />
Laachate and gas systemi condensate will likely ba discharged<br />
to .the sanitary sewer,, provided pre treatment standards are<br />
mat, It may be necessary to pretreat leachate bafora sewer<br />
discharge to meet pretxeatiment standards „ Leachata may be<br />
treated along with, groundvater as part of the subsequent<br />
GWOU. Effluent limits for possible discharge of treated<br />
ground water/leachate to surface and/or ground water will be<br />
deteoiinetd for that action, if necessary•'. Sludlge/'residual<br />
from tixMiiai^iiiJiiUTt/ipiiiel:::!: 1 *!^!!!:::!!!!!!!]:!!!:: may have to ba managed as a<br />
hazardous waste if sltown to be a Toxicity ctiaracteristic<br />
Leaching Procedlure (TCLP) characteristic hazardous waste,<br />
Wastes excavated or generated by the installation of<br />
airtxaction systems (i.e.,, drill spoils) „ may have to be<br />
managed as a haiBardous waste if shown to be a TCLP<br />
characteristic hazardous waste. Sludge/residuals and/or<br />
other excavatad/genarated wastes, if shown to be a nonhazardous<br />
waste, may be managed at a solid waste landfill.<br />
The Land Disposal Restrictions (LDKs) would apply to any<br />
TCLP hazardous wasta that is to be disposed of'(i.e.„<br />
placement of the waste occurs) on or off site, Certain nonliquid<br />
ax:ca¥ated/generated wastes nay ba re-buried at the<br />
site, in an appropriate location selected during the RD<br />
(likely at the Southeast. Fill Area), under the new cover<br />
system whan it is constructed. This would include some of<br />
the :ij[rineiiirl:;igation--deri¥ed wastes now being stored in<br />
containers at the Site. U.,!•!,. Elf'A has detariiined that such<br />
re-burial would not. constitute placement„ and would not<br />
trigger the LDEs., U.S., EPA has also dateriiDiined that the<br />
substantive analysis required under the Wisconsin policy<br />
"Interim Policy (Guidelines) For Promoting :i:n-State and On-<br />
Site Nanaganient of Hazardous Wasta in the' State of<br />
Wisconsin" 1 should be performed for the management of any<br />
hazardous wastes from the Site, It may be possible to treat
TCLP liazardowii waste so it no longer shows the<br />
characteriatic and maiuge it as a non-"hazardous waste,<br />
The final, additional segment of Alternative 3 is an active<br />
landfill gam control system in the Old and Southeast Fill<br />
Areas. This system would, work in con j unction with the<br />
leaehate collection system to extract landfill gases in the<br />
Fill Areas. The e:dtxactad landfill gam would be destroyed<br />
by a ground flare consistent with Wisconsin NR 445 WAC<br />
requireiiiuiintiii.<br />
-Alternative 3 is composed of several sagments that address<br />
actual or potential contaminant migration from the Old and<br />
Southeast Fill Arses . Alt ernat iv« 3 aiddrnitsees (, tbroiuigh<br />
contairunwnt and trditatnant, tha rn of contamination<br />
and the prevention of huinian (raposure to coimtaninants,,<br />
The NR 504 MAC cap will raduca tltnuit percolation of rain water<br />
through conitaminatnitd waste iiatarial and into the ground<br />
water by providing an iigtipennaitabla layer above the waste<br />
material ,, This decreasmtd periinabilitY w ill- contain<br />
contaminatioin within tha Fill Ireae and help prevant .<br />
migration off •••site. Thun cap will also provide added<br />
protection from direct oaintact by adding additional cover<br />
material., ifiddsd cover will alao be installed to protect the<br />
cap integrity from freeze- thaw cycles comsietent with the<br />
reg ion " a weathar .<br />
The installation of a gas extraction system would directly<br />
reduce and treat, through thenal destruction ir landfill gas<br />
contaminants., The gas extraction synitsiin will also reduce<br />
the chance of cap cracking caused by internal presaura front<br />
gas formation,<br />
Alternativs 3 addresses contamination probleitm in t:he old<br />
and Southeast Fill Areae but iloiiuii not addrass contamination<br />
in the Non-Contiguous Fill Iraa excatpt to the extent that<br />
area is included in the fencing and dead rastrictions..<br />
Tha capital coat for this altarnativa is estimated to be<br />
seven itillion dollars (!ii7jrOOOir00D]| „ The operation and<br />
maintenance costs for Altarnativa 3 are one million seven<br />
hundred thousand dollars ( $1 „ 700 „ 000) ,.<br />
:JSU^<br />
J!l^^<br />
Alternative 4 consists of ail of the components contained in<br />
Alternative 3 with the addition of the following::<br />
23
•» iBStallation of a Wisconsin MR 504 cap over the Noncontiguous<br />
Fill Area; and<br />
«> In-Situ Vapor Extraction (ISVIE!) in the Non-Contiguous<br />
Fill Area<br />
Modified Alternative 4 (the selected remedy) is the same as<br />
Alternative 4r with the addition of::<br />
•» A ground water monitoring program conducted at<br />
selected existing Monitoring and private well® approved<br />
by U.S., Ell'A,, In consultation with. WDNR, during Remedial<br />
Design (RD]| and after iMplementat ion.<br />
Alternative 4 is coiipoaed of several segments that address<br />
actual or potential contaminant migration from the Old,.<br />
Southeast„ and Non-Contiguous Fill source areas,<br />
Alternative 4 addresses„ through containment and treatment,,<br />
the reduction of contamination and the prevention of human<br />
exposure.<br />
The NR. 504 AC c
Tne selected reBedy includes ground water Boinltoring to be<br />
completed at locations spine if led during the KD by U.S. EPAr<br />
in coiwultation with the WDNR. Tills ground water Monitoring<br />
will bin performed to contribute to the def inition of the<br />
contamination plum and to Bsarare the •ffectivanass of the<br />
implementation of the inter in renedial measures .. The<br />
program will include ,, ait a iinininnm, seiii-uiLnual monitor ing<br />
f or Chapter MR 5013 WAC indicator paraBeters and VOCs at low<br />
detection limits in selected monitoring wells along the<br />
liioiuith and souitheanit port ions of tJnii Sita, in a salected<br />
baokgroiuind monitoring vell|p and in i»elanoted privata walls.<br />
The iionitoring and privata wiklls would ba sslaoted baa ad on<br />
veil location IP dapith ,, past Bonitoiring raiiiiiiiltisi „ construction IP<br />
ate,, This alternativa is tlte nnost connprahanaive cleanup<br />
of all of the alternatives,<br />
Coats for .iFk.lta:nniati¥a 4 or tha salaoted reiiniiidy would ba<br />
approxiBataily thai sanw with alight varianca in comparison to<br />
the capital and operational counts, Titus capital costs for<br />
jy.teniatiw 4 or the aalaoted reniMiidY ara eigbt nil lion<br />
dollars ($1:1 , i:iOO(lai:iCi)i „ Tltta opinratioin and Bainteiniance costs<br />
are one Billion nine hundred thouaand dollars .<br />
¥ixi ., einniiiuoE' ow conmuua-nm mLisie our<br />
1.1 ,,S., ElfMlL has estiiLbliiiiLhad nimis oritaria that balance haalth|p<br />
technical. ,, and cost considerat ions to determine the most<br />
appropriats alternative,, I'lfinn criteria analyiee the salectad<br />
reBady so that the rauiiedy is px^tactivs of human health and<br />
the eiwirominieiiiit ,, attains MtMLs IP is cost effactiva,, and<br />
utilises psnnanant solutions and treatiiiient tecltMmologies to<br />
the iniuclBun extant practicable,, The raiedial alternativas<br />
devaloped in the FS have heen evaluated amu:li coBpinriiitd using<br />
the nine criteria set forth in the MCP. The nine criteria<br />
are set fourth by i.LS. EFA under MCP 30i;i,,430(e) (9) (ill) .<br />
These nine criteria are syBnsrixed as follows ;i<br />
moncTioii OF<br />
addresses wihetber a rsBedy provides ade«pna1ba protection of<br />
bUBan health, and the enviromsnt and describes how risks are<br />
posed tnrough each exposure pathvay are eliminated ,, reduced ,<br />
or controlled througfh traatnunt ,, eng:iLneeri:ng controls ,, or<br />
institutiona .1 controls «<br />
eOMFLIllCE 1IT1 IJE'FLXOJIIIUI! Ol». ElUriOUR MSB<br />
:ni:i!!i;;ti[i:i::i;i:i!:ill[]!!;iim!i CUUlilsli addresses wlhethaMi: a rasedy will Beet<br />
all othiDtr Federal and State anvironBental statutes and/or<br />
provides grounds for invoking a waiver.<br />
2S
LOBO-Tim BFFlCTXVnnsa ili-lsm FinilOkJinCE refer::! to the ability<br />
of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of human health<br />
and the envir onnnent over time , once cleanup standards have<br />
been net.<br />
OF eoirruixiiiyiiT TQXXCXTY, MOBILITY, OR TOLDMB<br />
through treatment is the anticipated perforimance of the<br />
treatment technologieiii a remedy may employ.<br />
Jill-1 DJii'lI'-TIi:]!!.!!!; BVFBCTIYBBBM addresses the period of tine needed<br />
to achieve protection^ and any adverse impacts on human<br />
health and the eiwixonment that may be posed during the<br />
construction and implementation peri od „ unit: 11 cleanup<br />
standards are achieved.,<br />
IMnEMEmBILITY is the technical and adainistrative<br />
feasibility of a remedy, including the availability of<br />
materials and services needed to implement a particular<br />
option.<br />
COST' incl tides estimated initial capital. ,, operation and<br />
maintenance (OlilM) costs, and net present worth costs,<br />
MiOiX'TlKiE indicates whether, basetd on its review of<br />
the RI/F!:i and Proposed Plan,, the State concurs with,<br />
opposes, or has inio comniient on the preferred alternative at<br />
the present time .,<br />
COMICCIMIR JkCli^nnJIC]!: is based on cominents received from the<br />
public during the public conment period, These comments are<br />
assessed in the responsiveness sumnary attached to this ROD,<br />
B. EjE!i:n)i!ii!
pot Hint ia 1 exposure to waste and contuniiriants and continued<br />
ground vat mr contasdna t :i. on ,<br />
AltsniuEitive 3 is more protective of human health and the<br />
env:ixonsiant than Mternetives 1 III 2 .. The cainibination of<br />
ins t Itut ional controls , capping and leachate/ landf i 11 gam<br />
controls effectively protect potsntial receptors from<br />
landfill contaminants as long as these systems are<br />
Baintained. l-toweiver,, Alternative 3 is not vary effective in<br />
controlling the sources of contamination in the Won-<br />
Contiguous Fill Anna,, where high levels of soil and ground<br />
• water contamination are known to sadist ., Under alternative<br />
3 1 this Area would continue! to be a source oil! soils and<br />
groundwater contunination.,<br />
Alternative 4 provides additioiriial protection by u,pE3irai:lii:ng<br />
the cap and providing :ES¥E extractio:n for the INfon-'-Contiguoas<br />
Fill Areas.. These additional measures will reduce the<br />
future potential for further soil and ground water<br />
contanikiBation in, and arising fronn,, this area..<br />
The selected alternative adds a final elennent of<br />
protectiveitMss teyond what JlLltsirnative 4 provides by<br />
routinely supling residential and inoindtoring wells nioi-it<br />
likely to be affectmtd by contasiination at the Site..<br />
to,, cniPLUkKii iiTi lypFLXCiiiBu: OE liisumyra 1 mi .]'i:i; | :p]!i:i:!>]!':i;t;i:;ii, 1 i:i!!<br />
The Site was never an operating Resource Coiuiervation and<br />
RecovaMcy Act (RCIflA) facility., Site records do not<br />
conclusively desioostrate that the materials disposed of at<br />
the Site during its operation Mere listed RCRA hazardous<br />
wastes, Th«refOKrelp RGKIl closure rsquireiinents would not be<br />
applicable at this site. RC1A Land Disposal Restrictions<br />
(Ulls) are none the less applicable to the isanageniient of<br />
treatinisflt residues end/or any other wastes nnanaged as part<br />
of reimsdy iiniplesMiintation that are found to be charact eristic<br />
ltita»:ardous wastes and are disposed of through placement of<br />
the waste on or in the land,, on or off site,<br />
Alt ernative 1 and 2 do not meet current State and Federal<br />
landfill closure requirements ,- which are applicable to this<br />
site.<br />
Under NR 50(5, .08 (06) lM!r laBdfills containing over 500,000<br />
cubic yards of vasts that accepted nnunicipal solid waste<br />
must have an active landfill gas recovery system to<br />
effectively control, emissions of haiBardous air contaminants<br />
to the air. Alternatives 3 and 4 include active landfill<br />
gas control systems that comply with those xMMiuirensnts for<br />
ill?
controlling methane migration and controlling emission!:; of<br />
hazardous landfill gas constituent!:!,<br />
The improved cap and additional leachate collection system<br />
in Alternatives 3 and 4 comply vita Wisconsin solid waste<br />
closure (NR 506.08 WAC) t ground-water quality requirements<br />
(NR 140 WAC), and landfill cover system design criteria (NR<br />
504,.07 WAC) ., Under Section ME 506.08(03) MAC,, a site with<br />
chapter M!R 140 WAC ground water standard exceedances; is<br />
required to install a cover system meeting the standards in<br />
section MR 504,07, if such a system is necessary to abate<br />
such exceedances. The ISVE system in Alternative 4 will<br />
likewise be designed to meet AHAEs.. The ISVE cleanup<br />
standards vi.ll be developed in conjunction with the<br />
identification and compliance with ground water ARARs as<br />
part of the GWOU remedy „<br />
2. Primary Balancing Criteria<br />
Five primary balancing criteria are used to identify major<br />
trade-offs between the remedial alternatives which satisfy<br />
the two threshold criteria,. These trade-offs are ultimately<br />
balanced to identify the preferred alternative and to select<br />
the final remedy. JQiecause Alternatives 1 and 2 do not<br />
satisfy the threshold criteria,, they will not be evaluated<br />
by the primary balancing criteria.<br />
a, LOW-TEW EFFECTXVEHEM Mill FlEiUAMDCE<br />
Alternatives 3 and 4 and the selected remedy provide<br />
controls for a permanent and effective source control<br />
reimedy..<br />
Alternative 4 and the selected remedy provide good control,<br />
of potential, exposure to waste contaminants or continued<br />
leaching of waste contaminants by treating soils in the Non-<br />
Contiguous Fill Area, capping all identified source areas,,<br />
and providing leachate and landfill gas controls in the<br />
landfill areas., The selected remedy provides additional<br />
assurance of long-term effectiveness by monitoring nearby<br />
wells,. Capping and leachate/landfill, gas controls in.<br />
Alternative 3 provides adequate controls for the areas<br />
addressed„ but may provide less long-ti-srm effectiveness than<br />
Alternative 4 because it does not address the Non-Contiguous<br />
Fill Area.. Institutional Controls and O&M further reduce<br />
the risks from direct contact under all alternatives.<br />
!!!§
. UDUCTXOM XM TOXXCXTY, MOBILITY, OR VOLUME TRROUOE<br />
TRBATMBMT<br />
Due to moist conditions in a portion of the Old and<br />
Southeast Fill Areas,, the waste is being reduce:! in volume<br />
through biodegradation. However,, biodegradation would not<br />
significantly reduce contannination and the time frame and<br />
uncertainties for such reductions would be much greater than<br />
for implementing a remedy .<br />
Alternatives 3 and 4 and the selected remedy will reduce the<br />
toxicity, nobility! and volume of methane and other VOCs in<br />
the subsurface through actively extracting and treating<br />
landfill gas.<br />
Alternatives 3 and 4 will reduce the mobility and volume of<br />
Isachate in the Old and Southeast Fill Areas by extracting<br />
leachate through a series of wells and constructing a<br />
low-peinneability cap, The described cap option would allow<br />
some, infiltration to enter the landfill,, which will aid the<br />
natural biodegradation occurring within the landfill and<br />
reduce the time until the refuse is stabilized. The<br />
collected leachate Mill receive appropriate! treatment and be<br />
proper 1 y disposed«<br />
In addition, Alternative 4 and the selected remedy would<br />
also reduce the mobility and volume of VOCs at the<br />
Noncontiguous Fill Areas using ISVE. VOCs in the waste and<br />
surrounding soils would be extracted through wells screened<br />
in the unsaturated a:one and treated,, if necessary, above<br />
ground..<br />
C,, SHORT-TERM EmCTXVEHESS<br />
None of the alternatives would pose a substantial risk to<br />
the community t workersf and environment during remedial<br />
actions, Precautionary actions, through the ramadiaI action<br />
health and safety plan,, would address risks to on-i-iite<br />
workers and potential off-site risks„<br />
Capping, installation of a landfill leachate and gas<br />
extraction system,, and installation of an II-IVE system can be<br />
acconnplished in one construction season.. The risks of<br />
construction activities for Alternatives 3 and 4 and the<br />
seleeted remedy are adequately managed through dust<br />
suppression and the use of personal protective equipment for<br />
construction workers. The need for lea chat e extract ion nay<br />
decrease since the improved caps should result in reduced<br />
leachate generation.
d. ZMFLniEHTABXLXTY<br />
Iiiplementation for any of the alternatives should not be<br />
difficult,. Capping with an NR 504 WAG cap,, a component of<br />
Alternatives 3 and 4 , would be the most extent i ve remedial<br />
measure but still, not difficult to implement, because this<br />
type of cap is common at Super fund and landfill sites.,<br />
A leachats extraction system,, combined with an active<br />
landfill gas collection system! a component of Alternatives<br />
3 and 4, is common at landfills,. Implementation should not<br />
be difficult.<br />
ISVE is also becoming a common cleanup technology at various<br />
Superf und sites and implementation would be technically<br />
practical. Although ISVE is a relatively new technology<br />
when spec i. f i ca 1 ly be ing imp lenient sd in a non-homogene ous<br />
landfill mass,, this should not impede the implementation<br />
since a similar technology is being applied at the Hag en<br />
Farm Superf und site in Wisconsin.,<br />
Iniplementability of institutional, controls should not be<br />
difficult because no significant off -site controls should be<br />
necessary,<br />
HI,, COSTS<br />
The estimated costs of the four FS alternatives are listed<br />
below,, The first column list, the capital, or construction<br />
costs for the project. The second column are the costs to<br />
operate the remedial, system once it is constructed., The<br />
final column is the sum of the first two columns,.<br />
:i.,. o o o<br />
2. $17,400 0 $17,400<br />
31, $7,.0 mil $1. 7 -2 .6 Illlil $8.7-9.6 nil<br />
4. SGLO mil $1.9 -2, .8 nil $9. 9 -10. 8 mil<br />
The selected remedy adds monitoring costs of appropriately<br />
$20, 000 to Alternative 4, but is in every other way<br />
identical. A range is given in the Total Cost figures to<br />
account for a 51 and 10% discount rate, The higher cost<br />
figure corresponds to the lower discount rate. The<br />
operation and maintenance for these alternatives is :K)<br />
years., In addition, Capital Cost figures are based on<br />
construction beginning iiimed late ly . The vast ma j or ity of<br />
these cost will not actually be incurred until after<br />
Remedial Design is completed, A more detailed description<br />
of the costs for Alternative 4 is provided in Table 3 1
YEAR<br />
0<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
a<br />
s<br />
veil<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
IS<br />
IS<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
CAPITAL<br />
COSTS<br />
7.984.000<br />
!<br />
OSM<br />
COSTS<br />
309,500<br />
309,500<br />
309.500<br />
309,500<br />
309,500<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134J200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
1 34,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
MUSKEGO LANDFILL<br />
ALTERNATIVE 4: GAS & LEACHATE CONTROL,<br />
AND TREATMENT OF THE FILL<br />
TOTAL<br />
ANNUAL<br />
COSTS<br />
7,984,000<br />
309,500<br />
309,500<br />
309.500<br />
309,500<br />
309,500<br />
134.200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134,200<br />
134.200<br />
DISCOUNT<br />
RATE: NET<br />
10%<br />
P/W FACTOR<br />
7,934.000<br />
281,364<br />
0,751315<br />
0.683013<br />
192,175<br />
0.564474 75,752<br />
0,513158<br />
04S6507<br />
0.424098 56.914<br />
51,740<br />
0350494 47,036<br />
0.31B631<br />
0.280864<br />
0.217629<br />
0,197645<br />
24,137<br />
21,943<br />
0.148644 19,948<br />
0,135131 16,135<br />
0,122646<br />
0.111678 14,987<br />
0.101526<br />
11,260<br />
0.076278 10,236<br />
DISCOUNT<br />
*: NET<br />
5%<br />
p/W FACTOR WORTH<br />
1,000000 7,984,000<br />
0,952361<br />
0.863838<br />
0,783526<br />
0.746215 100,142<br />
0.710681 95.373<br />
0,644609<br />
0,613913<br />
0.584679 78,464<br />
74.728<br />
0.530321 71,169<br />
0,505068<br />
0,481017<br />
0.458112 61,479<br />
58.551<br />
0.415521<br />
0,395734 53.107<br />
0,376889<br />
0.358942 48,170<br />
0.341S50 45.876<br />
0,325571<br />
0,310068 41,611<br />
0.295303<br />
0.281241 37.743<br />
34,234<br />
Q.057309 7,8910.231377<br />
31,051<br />
TOTAL: $9,91 4,000 TOTAL*:<br />
VARIANCE; -8== VARIANCE: 0*<br />
NOTE: ' Suparfund program RI/FS racernmsnds iha! a discount rats of 5% before taxes and alter inflation tot<br />
assumed, as in the column, Ths PRPs ussd 10% In the FS Report, as she—- in the first €-of«mn.<br />
rotate are te the nearest $1 .000.<br />
Table 3<br />
DISCOUNT<br />
RATE: . NET<br />
3%<br />
«>/W WORTH<br />
7,984,000<br />
291,733<br />
0.915142<br />
0.888487 274.987<br />
112,390<br />
0,613092 109,117<br />
0,789409<br />
0.766417<br />
0.744094<br />
0.722421<br />
0.701380<br />
91.384<br />
0.661118<br />
0.623167<br />
0,605016 81,193<br />
74,303<br />
0,537549 72,139<br />
0,521893<br />
0.506692<br />
0.4S1934 86,018<br />
0.477606<br />
0,463695<br />
0.450189 80.415<br />
0.437077<br />
0,424346 56,947<br />
0.411987<br />
TOTAL: $11,417,000<br />
VARIANCE: 6%
3,. Modifying Criteria<br />
in,, STM'E ACCIFTMCB<br />
The WDNR has bean the support agency for the RI/FS and has<br />
reviewed this ROD. The WDNR concurs with the selected<br />
remedial action,. In addition!, the WDNE does not feel that<br />
Alternatives 1 through 3 are protective or would attain<br />
ARARs; therefore,, these alternatives are not acceptable to<br />
the State,.<br />
b „ CQMKOVXTY ACCEPTIVCE<br />
Comments have been submitted by the community,, local<br />
governnent officials, and potentially responsible parties<br />
(PRPs). In general, issues presented in the comments were<br />
directed toward the inclusion of ground water monitoring for<br />
the final remedy, and a delay in the capping of the<br />
Southeast Fill Area, Comments and responses to those<br />
comments are described in greater detail in the<br />
Respons iveness Summary attached to this :ROD,<br />
c. Summary<br />
Based on a comparison of the nine criteria, Alternatives 1<br />
and 2 do not provide protection from all of the potential<br />
risks at the site and do not comply with ARAEs. They<br />
therefore do not meet the threshold test for selection of a<br />
remedy alternative at the site. Alternative 3 would be<br />
protective for a portion of the source areas of the Site,<br />
but would not provide protection from all of the potential<br />
risks at the site either,, Alternati.ve 4 would be protective<br />
of human health and the environment with respect to all<br />
source areas and would attain ARARs. The selected remedy<br />
adds a final, element of protect.:!.veness by periodically<br />
monitoring those existing wells more likely to provide<br />
potential 1 representation of ground water cbnt.amination.<br />
Alternative 4 and the selected remedy provide the greatest<br />
degree of long-term effectiveness and permanence because<br />
they provide the greatest, degree of remediation and<br />
containment of the contaminants„ The selected remedy adds a<br />
monitoring program to help provide assurance of long-term<br />
effectiveness,. Alternatives 3, 4 and the selected remedy<br />
provide reduction of toxicity through destruction and<br />
treatment of contaminants „ but Alt ernat ive 4, and the<br />
selected remedy encompass all source areas and utilize ISVE.<br />
Implementation for any of the alternatives is not expected<br />
to pose any technical problems since similar remedies have<br />
been selected and constructed at other Superfund sites,<br />
31
Alternatives 3 and 4 are more costly due to the sco>pe of the<br />
work: perfoou-id under each. Alternative 4 and the selected<br />
remedy are the most costly because they enconiipass capping<br />
and ISVE at the Non-ContigiULous Fill Area. The incremental<br />
cost of this significant additional remedial activities(,<br />
however„ is rather small in comparison to the environmental<br />
benefit obtained.<br />
The WDNR concurs with the selected remedy for the site, and<br />
does not consider Alternatives l. through 3 to be protective<br />
or in compliance with ARARs,, and therefore would not accept<br />
any of these alternati ves. The community „ local government<br />
officials,, and PRPe that submitted public comments agree<br />
with capping the Fill Areas, although a question was raised<br />
as to the need for immediate capping of the Southeast Fill.<br />
Area,, These groups also concur that the leachate collection<br />
and ISVE portions of this interim action operable unit are<br />
necessary, valuable, and consistent with the final remedy.<br />
II,, TEE SELECTED EEMIEDT<br />
Based on the evaluations of the alternatives,, U.S., EPA and<br />
the State of Wisconsin believe that the selected remedy<br />
(Alternative 4 plus ground water monitoring of existing<br />
well!-!) will be protective of huiun health and the<br />
environmentt comply with AEiy;t.sr be cost effective,, and will,<br />
utilise permanent solutions to the maximum extent<br />
practicable..<br />
The selected remedy for the SCOU entails::<br />
4i Ground water monitoring of selected existing monitoring<br />
and private wells to be determined during remedial<br />
design; and<br />
ii Operation and Maintenance of all systems,.<br />
Site controls, including the extension of the fence to<br />
encompass the waste disposal portion of the Anamax property<br />
currently outside the fenced area,, will minimize<br />
non-authorized access to contaminated areas, and deed<br />
restrictions will ensure that the land is not used for<br />
residential purposes in the future., Installation of a new<br />
cover system over the Old Fill,, Southeast Fill and<br />
Non-Contiguous Fill Areas will remove the potential for<br />
people to come in contact with the landfill waste, through<br />
direct contact or inhalation of airborne particles,, and will<br />
reduce the amount of leachate produced in those areas..<br />
Implementing leachate controls in the Old Fill and Southeast<br />
Fill Areas will prevent further ground water contamination<br />
by removal and disposal of contaminants prior to reaching<br />
the ground water. <strong>Landfill</strong> gas controls in the Old Fill, and<br />
Southeast Fill Areas will minimize releases of hazardous<br />
landfill gas constituents to the air. The use of an ISVE<br />
system will provide additional, protection by removing vocs<br />
before they can be leached into soil or ground water or<br />
emitted to the air.<br />
The remedial action objectives and cleanup goals for this<br />
interim action, operable unit remedy are presented in Section<br />
VII of this ROD, The remedial action objectives include::<br />
«' Minimize the migration of chemical constituents from<br />
soil/refuse transported by leachate to ground water<br />
that would contribute to ground water concentrations in<br />
excess of MCLs, ESs and PALs;<br />
in Control, the seepage„ migration and concentration of<br />
landfill gas generated by the refuse in the Old,,<br />
Southeast, and Non-Contiguous Fill Areas, to the soils<br />
or air at or beyond the property boundary;<br />
«' Minimize hazardous air contaminants that may be emitted<br />
from the Old, Southeast and Non-Contiguous Fill Areas,<br />
and comply with applicable air pollution control.<br />
standards; and<br />
ii' Minimize the potential for human exposure to waste or<br />
contaminated soiIs,.<br />
Table 4 lists a detailed cost summary for the selected<br />
remedy, U.S. EPA and the HDNR believe that, the selected<br />
remedy will achieve the remedial action objectives for this<br />
operable unit remedy of the site.
.CAPrTALCOSTS<br />
SiteTenong<br />
Capping<br />
a. Old and Southeast Fill Areas<br />
b., Non-Contiguous Fill Areas<br />
Gas Control<br />
Leachate • Control<br />
In-Situ Vapor Extraction<br />
SUBTOTAL<br />
Adnunistration (5%)<br />
Engineering (20%)<br />
Contingency (20%)<br />
TOTAL<br />
ap vo nnng an V!:i:::::!<br />
<strong>Landfill</strong> . Gaa/Leachate Control<br />
Leachate Treatment<br />
(years 1992 to 1997)<br />
(years 1998 to 2022)<br />
In-Situ Vapor Extraction<br />
(years 1992 to 1997)<br />
SUBTOTAL<br />
(years 1992 to 1997)<br />
(years 1998 to 2022)<br />
Contingency (15%)<br />
fye'anl9$2to'l997)<br />
(years 1998 to 2022)<br />
TOTAL<br />
(yean 1992 to 1997)<br />
(years 1998 to 2022)<br />
PRESENT NET WORTH<br />
(IO%IRicounTKate)<br />
MAL/vlr/JEM/KEB<br />
[iriiiad«4(I)<br />
13,3:27.41<br />
Table 4<br />
FcMftfllly Study<br />
1 Luudlllll<br />
$ 12.000<br />
S 3,641,000<br />
S 426,000<br />
$ 300.000<br />
S 884.000<br />
$ 243Lggo<br />
S 5,506,000<br />
S 275,300<br />
S 1,101,200<br />
$ yoyoo<br />
S 7,984,000<br />
S<br />
$<br />
$<br />
S<br />
S<br />
S<br />
39,700<br />
29,000<br />
164,000<br />
48,000<br />
36.400<br />
269,100<br />
116,700<br />
401,400<br />
S 309^00<br />
$ 134*200<br />
S 9.914.000
I. STATUTORY DiraXXMATXOMS<br />
^^<br />
The selected remedy provides adequate protection of human<br />
health and the eiwixonment through ISVE to treat waste and<br />
contaminated soil in portions of the Non-Contiguous Fill<br />
Area; capping to contain wastes and contaminated soils,<br />
al levi at ing threats from direct contact and niniaiz ing<br />
leachats generation ; collection , control and appropr late<br />
treatmient of oontaniinants in landfill leachate ; cent inued<br />
extraction of landfill, gas to prevent migration,, buildup<br />
and/ or explosion ; ground water monitoring to ident If y<br />
potential impacts of contamination on existing wells; and<br />
land use restrictions and fencing to limit direct exposure<br />
to contamination.,<br />
Any short term risks associated with excavation of trenches<br />
for ISVE will be minimized through good construction<br />
practices..<br />
Wetlands are located southeast of the Site directly east of<br />
the Anamax facility entrance road, An intermittent creek<br />
flows over the Site and discharges into the wetlands area.,<br />
Sediment samples taken in the intermittent creek area,<br />
specifically 504 f show contamination in this area., The<br />
levels were below surface water criteria levels for the<br />
contaminants with listed values in U. S. EPA water quality<br />
criteria (QuAlity_$a^£ej^a__fjzt_Ha£sr_1222.) . In addition,,<br />
the cap portion of the SCOU will prevent contamination in<br />
soils from cont acting surface water runoff ,. Therefore<br />
wetland affects from the Site will be mitigated.<br />
The source control measures under the selected remedy „ in<br />
combination with the ground water operable unit,, will<br />
attempt to restore ground water to the State ESs and PALs<br />
and to Federal MCLs,.<br />
The selected remedy will be designed to meet all applicable,<br />
or relevant and appropriate requirements (AEARs) under<br />
federal ,, and more stringent state environnental. laws ., A<br />
list of MIARs for the site is contained in the alternative<br />
arrays section of the FS. The primary AKARs that will be<br />
achieved by the selected alternative are::
water *ot of 1977, aim amended [33 U.B.C. iii 1317]<br />
40 CFR 40 3 - Pretreatnent Standards . Require that waste<br />
waters to be discharged into a Publicly Owned Treatment<br />
Works ( POTH) satisfy both general and specif ic requirements<br />
to protect against damage to PO'IWisi. Any waste to be<br />
discharged to a POTW must, if necessary, be treated to<br />
satisfy these standards prior to discharge.. These<br />
pretreatnment requirenents are administered under NR 2 l :i. and<br />
IDS., The substantive requirements of these regulations will<br />
apply to collected leachate to be discharged.,<br />
Eesottiroe conservation and R«oov«ry l!i.ot(, am attended |[4ilt<br />
U.BoC.1 § if Ml et iiiaq. ]; WiiiioomniiiB Eiiiiwiroitmeiinta:!. FroteotioB<br />
lElaiKardous Waste Hanag«i,sBt lot [Wis« Btat,, § :i.44«(EiO'-74l]<br />
Host RCRA requirenents are administered under the State of<br />
Wisconsin " s i:niplenenting regulations ., U. S . EPi'i, does not<br />
have sufficient evidence to deinkonstrate that listed 'RCEA<br />
wastes were disposed of at the site. RCRA requirenments are<br />
therefore not applicable to One site,, except to the extent<br />
that new haiKardous wastes (such as treatBent residuals) are<br />
generated during the course of the remedy.. Several other<br />
RCRA regulations ,, al though no>t ap>pl icable „ address probl einis<br />
or circuiuitances very similar to those encountered at this<br />
site and are therefore relevant and appropriate., However,<br />
the reiiedy will coiiply with the following applicable<br />
requirements::<br />
Mis. Admin.. Code MR 60!:i; 40 CFR 261 - Identification of<br />
Haieardous Hastes.. Provide reguireiients for deteniining when<br />
a waste is hazardous ,. The substant i ,ve requirements of these<br />
regulations will apply to TCLP testing of treatment<br />
reeiiduals and waste excavated at the site which niiiiy be<br />
di sposed of of f -sit e „<br />
Wii-i. Admin,. Code NR 1:115; 40> CFR 262 - Standards Applicable<br />
to Generators of Haieardous Waste ,. Provides requirements foxthe<br />
ship>;iniexit of wastes to treaibment,, storage or disposal<br />
facilities .. These requirements may app ly to of f -site<br />
shipiment of treatment reeiiduals and other wastes.<br />
Mis., Admin. Code NR 620; Department of Transportation<br />
Hazardous llCeterials Transportation, Act. [49 U..S,C,, § :UIO:i.];<br />
40 CFR 263 ••• Standardei Applicable to Transporters of<br />
BaziiLrdous Waste ., Requires record keeping „ reporting and<br />
iwnif acting of waste shipments „ These requirements may<br />
apply to of f -site shipment o:l: treatment residuals and other<br />
wastes..
W IB,. Admin. Code MR 6:3 0. .10-17; 40 CFR 264,, Subpart B -<br />
General Faci 1 ity Requirements ., Est ablishes s utost ant i . ve<br />
requir einienti-i for s ecuri ,ty t inspection , personnel training ,<br />
and materials handling which are relevant and appropriate to<br />
on -sit e act! vities involving excavat ions and handl ing of<br />
hazardous soils and materials .<br />
Wis, Admin. Code ME 630.21-22; 40 CFR 26'!,, Subpart D -<br />
Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures., Establishes<br />
substantive reguirenents for emergency planning which are<br />
relevant and appropriate for on -site activities involving<br />
excava tion and handling of hazardous s ubst a rices .<br />
His., Admin. Code NR 675; 40 CFR 268 - Land Disposal<br />
Rest r ict ions ., Requires that hax ardous wastes cannot be land<br />
disposed unless they satisfy specified treatment standards<br />
and imposes record keeping requirements on such wastes .,<br />
These requirements apply to off -site disposal, of any<br />
treatment residues or other hazardous wastes ..<br />
Wii!ii::o:iii!!iln EiiririroBiiaiEtal ProtinctioB Law,, eubeltmptiiiir ril'HEloliiill<br />
Waste [Wis. Stint,, lii :I.44,43-
into the ambient air and procedures for measuring specific<br />
air pollutants . Landf 1 ,11 gas end ss ions , handling of<br />
contaminated soils during excavation,, and cap construction,<br />
could cause air emissions of VOCs, particulates, fugitive<br />
dust or other contaminants which could adversely effect<br />
human health and the environment ., The design of the remedy<br />
will reduce such emissions to acceptable levels or provide<br />
for treatment to satisfy these standards,<br />
Safe Drinking Water Lot [40 U.8.C. § ::iOO et nmiq; . ]<br />
40 CFR 141,, His. Adiuiin,. Code ME. 109 - Maximum Contaminant<br />
Levels (MCLi:!) ,. MCLs establish drinking water standard!;! for<br />
potential and actual, drinking water sources. MCLs have been<br />
exceeded at the site in the shallow aquifer, which is<br />
classified as a potential drinking water source., The ISVE<br />
component of the ntiLSidy,, in combination with the upcoming<br />
ground water operable unit, will achieve compliance with<br />
MCLs and non-zero Maximum Contaminant Level. Goals.<br />
Wis. Admin., Code NR 1.40 ••• Grouiindwater Quality Standards.<br />
Provides for groundwater quality standards including<br />
Preventive Action Limi , t .is ( PALs ) , Enforcement Standards<br />
(ESs) „ and (Wisconsin) Alternative Concentration Limits<br />
(WACLs) . The IS¥E coHponent of the remedy « in combination<br />
with the upcoming ground water operable unit, will, achieve<br />
compliance with any applicable substantive groundwater<br />
quality standards.<br />
WiscoBiiiiniL EiwixoniiiLemtal Froteotioin. :i:>in,imIP eubchaiiter XI -Water<br />
and Sewage [Wini, stint.. § :i.d 11 , oil -;i!7;|<br />
Wis. Admin, Code NR 102 and 105 - Surface water quality<br />
standards. NR 102 creates an antidegradation policy for all<br />
waters of the state and prohibits toxic substances in<br />
surface waters at concentrations which adversely affect<br />
public health or welfare, present or prospective water<br />
supply uses, or protection of aniital life. The ISVE<br />
component of the remedy «. in combination with the upcoming<br />
ground water operable unit, will achieve compliance any<br />
substantive requirements o£ these regulations that<br />
const it: u te iftEARs .<br />
Clean water l,ot of l!!i?T, am uneigideiili |[3:ii iL.iii.c., § Ui'il
coivtaminated runoff is channeled directly to .a surface water<br />
bodyt. however, that runoff must comply with any applicable<br />
concentration limits.<br />
3 •<br />
Claami Water Act of 1977, am emeBdeiil 133 u.B.C. iii IMU]<br />
Executive <strong>Order</strong> 11990 and 40 CFR 6 - Protection of Wetlands,.<br />
These requirements -provide for protection against loss or<br />
degradation of wetlands . Contanination in surface waiter<br />
runoff will be controlled so that it does not have an<br />
adverse impact on nearby wetlands .<br />
c.<br />
The selected remedy provides overall cost-effectiveness.,<br />
ISVE adds a significant degree of permanence,, as does the<br />
extraotioin of contaminants in leachate and landfill gasses ,.<br />
The substantial additional, protection and psoianence<br />
provided by the upgraded cap and ISVE under the selected<br />
alternative is achieved with only a minor (roughly 9%)<br />
increase in cost over the only other protective alternative.,<br />
Moreover , by ef f ect ively addressing sources of ground water<br />
contamination , the sel ected inter im action operabl e unit<br />
remedy may also reduce the cost of the ground water operable<br />
-unit.<br />
The selected alternative represents the best balance of<br />
alternatives with respect to the nine evaluation criteria<br />
described in Section VIII . An innovative treatment<br />
technology , :i:S¥E, is used to permanent ly address the most<br />
highly concentrated source area of contamination . The<br />
selected alternative treats the principal source of ongoing<br />
ground water contaiiination and direct contact threats. The<br />
cap further retards the movement of residual contaminants to<br />
ground water by reducing the generation of leachate. The<br />
upgraded leachate collection system captures for treatment<br />
the leachate that is produced,, Collected leachate will also<br />
be treated and disposed of., The land use restrictions will<br />
further assure protection to the public health and the<br />
environment .<br />
E, PoiU^EiTiiiJice for Treatfflsnt As A PrinclDal<br />
3191
By treating the BOS t highly concentrated conta:i»iinat ed so:i. 1<br />
and leadhata as reguired,, the selected remedy satisfies the<br />
statutory preference for remedial* that employ treatment of<br />
the principal threat to peinnanently and significantly reduce<br />
toxicity, mobility,, or volume of hazardous substance!-!,,<br />
The selected remedy reduces the likelihood that the i-iource<br />
areas will continue to be a significant source of ground<br />
water contaaination by use of XS¥Eir collection and<br />
appropriate treatment of leachateir and capping to reduce<br />
infi 1 tration„ The reiinaining existing contajiiination in<br />
ground water will be addreased thlrough the second operable<br />
unit at tlie site, The cap,, combined with institutional<br />
controls will also act to prevent exposure through direct<br />
contact..
This Eesponsiveness Summary has been prepared to meet the<br />
requirementiEi of Sections 113 (k) (2)i (B) (ivj and 117 (b) of the<br />
Conpreheinsive Environmental Response,, Compensation,, and Liability<br />
Act (CERCLA) of 19130,, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and<br />
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, which requires U.S.. EPA to<br />
respond ".. .to each of the written or oral presentations 111 on a<br />
Proposed Flan for remedial action.. This Responsiveness Summary<br />
summarizes comments and concerns expressed by the public and<br />
other interested parties in written and oral form received by<br />
U., S. EPA, on the recommended remedy.<br />
On November 18 1991,, U.S.. EPA made available to the public for<br />
review and content the FS and Proposed Plan for source areas at<br />
the Husksgoi <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong>.,<br />
U.,S. EPA received comments at the public meeting on December 12,<br />
1991, at the <strong>Muskego</strong> City Hall.. Additional written comments were<br />
also submitted during the comment period.<br />
Comments received during the public comment period are summarized<br />
in this section. The comment period was held from November 18 to<br />
December 18, 1991. Some of the comments have been paraphrased in<br />
order to effectively summarize them in this document. The reader<br />
is referred to the public meeting transcript and copies of<br />
written comments submitted during the comment period. All are<br />
contained in the <strong>Administrative</strong> Record and are available for<br />
review at the information repositories.,<br />
ComiitBt: One commenter believed that U.S, EP'A should add a<br />
gr oiund water monitor ing pr ogr am at s e lee ted mon it or i ng a nd<br />
private wells to the remedy. The suggestion was made to include<br />
semi-annual monitoring for MR 508 MAC indicator parameters and<br />
VOCs at low detection limits in monitoring wells along the south<br />
and southeast portions of the site, as well as in a selected<br />
background monitoring well and in selected private wells. These<br />
wells should be selected based on their location,, depth, past<br />
monitoring result s,, and construction. The comnienter suggested<br />
that this monitoring program begin in Spring 1992, if possible.<br />
U.S. :i;:il!'l, Response:! U.S.. EP'A agrees with, the commenter., Such, a<br />
monitoring program will be included in the selected remedy and<br />
outlined in the ROD, The implementation time frame for this work<br />
will be finalized in the Remedial Design phase of the project..<br />
U.S. EPA will plan to Implement all portions of the remedy in an<br />
expeditious and effective manner.<br />
Cc»:imiiiBt;c In the first of four separate comments,, one commenter<br />
pointed out a cost discrepancy between the Proposed Plan and FS.
i:i,,B« EPA, Eeinponssx U.S.. EPA agrees that, different present net<br />
worth costs for Alternative!:! 3 and 4 appeared in the two<br />
documents., The lower costs of $8,. 7 million and $9.9 million,,<br />
respectively,, have been noted as the most recent figures for<br />
Alternatives 3 and 4 and will be reflected in the ROD,.<br />
The second comment pertained to the effectiveness of<br />
U.S.. EFA"s list of source control remedial alternatives., The<br />
coiuonenter stated that while capping,, landfill gas, ISVE, and<br />
leachate extraction should have a substantial effect on limit ing<br />
ground water contamination and the release of site contaminant si,<br />
natural processes ( sorpt ion , dispersion ,, and biodegradat ion) can<br />
also reduce the observed concentrations in dowxigradient ground<br />
water to acceptable levels. The commenter viewed natural<br />
processes as being a major component to the final, remedy.<br />
U.S., EF1. liinspoBsiiiii While U.S.. EPA agrees that natural processes<br />
can reduce the observed concentra tions , concen tr at ions are high<br />
enough that the time and likelihood for these processes to be<br />
effective to protect human health, and the environment would be<br />
unknown. Additional information on this subject will be provided<br />
in the next operable unit which will focus on ground water, The<br />
source control remedy selected is not inconsistent with utilizing<br />
natural, degradation processes to reduce ground water<br />
contamination levels..<br />
Comment:: The third comment stated that cap construction of the<br />
southeast fill area could be postponed while the effects of the<br />
proposed upgraded leachate and landfill gas extraction system!:;<br />
are monitored.<br />
U.S. EPA lesponsiiiii: U.S. EPA disagrees,. First, leachate<br />
collection mechanisms ,, including new extraction wells ,, nay not<br />
effectively reduce leachate levels over the entire bottom area of<br />
fill, therefore allowing the possibility of leachate to leak: from<br />
this area during the evaluation period , Additional percolation<br />
through the old, weathered cover would add to the amount, of<br />
leachate that could leak: out „<br />
Second,, the current, cover ..allows the potential for air intrusion<br />
at a significantly greater rate than a new MR 504 cover. This<br />
condition reduces the effectiveness and efficiency of gas<br />
collection in this area..<br />
Third,, according to the intent, of NR 50 4.07(1.;) WAC and NR<br />
506., 08 (3) MAC,, the construction of a cap should be accomplished<br />
in the most effective and quickest manner possible (i.e. , it<br />
should be implemented as quickly as possible ) to minimize the<br />
amount of percolation into a fill area over time.,<br />
Conmiuiti: The commenter " s final comment pertained to the<br />
effectiveness of the ISVE system., The commenter offered a method<br />
for measuring that effectiveness., The method wold use a soil -gas
medium to determine the clean-up Etandards for .the system. The<br />
clean-up standard would be based on soil-gas concentrations that<br />
correspond to ground water cleanup levels,, which will be<br />
developed later during the Groundvatar Operable Unit Feasibi1ity<br />
Study. A model evaluating the relationship between soil-gas VOC<br />
concentrations and groundwater VOC concentrations would be used<br />
to determine the waste/subsoil concentrations necessary to<br />
achieve the protective level of VOC's in groundwater. This<br />
method would provide sufficient fli-sxibility to allow cleanup to<br />
occur without premature imposition of unrealistic clean up goals<br />
or performance standards.<br />
O.B» EF1 RiiHiipoMiin U.S. EPA generally agrees with this comment<br />
and has included language on clean up standards in the ROD that<br />
addresses this concern,<br />
Conoiment:: Two comments were received concern!ng ground water<br />
migration.<br />
U.S., EPA EaiiiipoiiiisiiM! Ground water migration will be addressed in<br />
the next operable unit for the Site! That operable unit will<br />
deal solely with ground water issues. Ground water monitoring<br />
will be required for this source control operable unit in order<br />
to measure the effect on ground water by the remedy., This<br />
monitoring will also provide additional information on the ground<br />
water contaminant migration to be used for the final remedy.<br />
Comment! Two commenters stressed that the most complete cleanup<br />
possible be done at the Site.<br />
U.B., EPA Response!: U.S. EPA agrees, The most complete cleanup<br />
considered for the source areas at the Site is being selected.,<br />
In addition to the original recommendation as outlined in the<br />
Proposed Plan,, the Agency is planning to add a ground water<br />
monitoring program to the source control operable unit action.,<br />
This is outlined in the ROD.<br />
Comment:: One commenter requested that all..private and monitoring<br />
well, results of all tests taken on her property be sent to her.<br />
U«e« EFA Essponsiiiii U.S. EPA sent all information on January 8,<br />
1992., Additional infornation regarding test results is available<br />
at the information repositories located at the Muskago City Hall<br />
and the IMtuskego Public Library.,<br />
Comment it One commenter provided U.S. EPA with sampling<br />
information provided to him by the WDNR. He also included his<br />
telephone number if the Agency needs more information.<br />
U.S., EPA Response)! u.8. EPA thanks the comment sir for this<br />
information. If more information is needed, the Agency will<br />
certainly contact him.,
Paoe MO.<br />
03/12/52<br />
niCttE'/IF MM! PAGES Oil 7 IE<br />
AONINIITMTIVE u-oara nn>«<br />
MUtKECO UNITARY LANDFILL SITE<br />
i, WltOMIN<br />
TITLE AUTHOR RECIPIENT DOOM-HIT TYPE OCOIIJK<br />
2 89/05/05 l.'iMt'MM- ri: InwiiriiiiKiK lEdflimtiriiri,)!,. •• Stitt G(fford,N.<br />
Unntw Mimiviunirii: Report »1F y
Pacio NO.. 2<br />
03n2/92<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE RI-OOIW INDEX<br />
HUSKEGO stimuli LANDFii.i. $ i re<br />
MUBKIEKI,, WI'iOCIMillM<br />
FICHE/FRAHE PACES DATE TITLE AUTMHI RECIPIENT DOCUMENT TYPE OOCNUMB'<br />
Prapwiiindi SiMiplirvgi iiinel<br />
AnmiliyiMiii OMiKMte tin IHI<br />
ueindl far rifiiiiripUnw at<br />
i:lni( iLiiiidninitiii HiniEl<br />
iiritl lEiiin Viiiitii mi:<br />
13 91/01/Oft Ultirich.!)., * U,!i, IEPA ,,/!,. •• wniitii<br />
lor iMuNtcnwBi Lwidtl 1,1<br />
kilhtlhi in Uittiir<br />
iliiriiitiiry l.iincll'lll<br />
Couiricy,<br />
UlMieirmiiri<br />
1)1 PILimri<br />
itinniitinry l.iwlif 11II<br />
yniAmilM Conn'ty,,<br />
Wliiicoiuiiiri Vail. 3 of !S<br />
ui/nr/oo ciunil.l!ty Aiiiiuirinriciii<br />
iPngiJnci: Plnni<br />
iliiiriliiiniry liinnHHIU<br />
206 68/00/00 Piriwiouii<br />
I. music (I HI<br />
Jtiimi tniry<br />
W, llmiiartn on<br />
llinrilhtinry<br />
llll'llHP 111. IK|lLMlli;i»n«i,<br />
V«>H.. 2<br />
Wiirir»iri IEi>»iiiiiihnr iir»o, line.. Miurmiiiiimimi: K!«|»B>rtt/itiEiLidil imi 1 i!<br />
Unr«>iri<br />
iB9/W>/00 Rinimalini InviuniinirtI»n Miirxyn<br />
/IF muni li 11 Ihcy Ittudy line..<br />
Hun>l(i»oa Itiiivitiiiry l.ii«HFIII.<br />
SHEW irnchnilicnll<br />
HO.. 1 V'CllUNIK i! (I1F Ji<br />
lEIruiirimif *ni|i iliMitn II ii1»rl !i/!l Mull hm<br />
Uimyni IEiri||iliPMMiir>ing,Inc. UiinlK 15<br />
Uutu<br />
EnglnMfing, lliiiirn Rl>|WtCII/!ilElJKlllllnll 17<br />
10<br />
11<br />
14
Pa Ha. 3<br />
0:5/12/92<br />
F1CHE/FSAME PAGES DATE<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE IHECCHJCl INDEX<br />
jiAiinriwv ILMIDIFII.I. SITE<br />
, WISCONSIN<br />
TITLE AUTHOR RECIPIENT DOCUMENT TYPE OOCNUH<br />
/Feasibility Study Inc.<br />
HuMiknwE) <strong>Sanitary</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong><br />
Site Siuppl,imnt To<br />
Teehnii en I Mnic.cluiii Ha.1l<br />
!!
Psen- Mo.. 4<br />
03/12/92<br />
FICHC/fRAHE IP'AGI-Si DATE TITLE<br />
() 90/06/00<br />
ion<br />
thill<br />
Rl/FS<br />
Altvrmtlvm Army<br />
DaffiiLiinnrttt ilmrein Control<br />
Opwratoln IJlirilMt IRomiKliiiil<br />
I iwinit i nii'l: I oiV NIIIII < l> 11II ty<br />
dim Kuiilcmgiti I.iiiri(i-Ml.ll<br />
IIII/F9<br />
ADMINISTRATIVE KOMI INDEX<br />
MKIUilifll SANI TART UIIOMI.I. Si I TIE:<br />
AUTHOR<br />
1!) l.«l:icnir cawiir'iirig tho fliicidnji:,<br />
KaiLirull ill SmiisiH mil lloirl:<br />
Plhnrn MitoKluiii Jab Mo.<br />
IMilT.1,1!,<br />
1l!i 911 /111 1/00 Attaint: <br />
Drum lliiMinwnl Iliiintciii<br />
if'l.nn<br />
HiiiniMriiiirHiljm<br />
), UlliSiOOinill<br />
1IIEC1IPII lEIIir<br />
DOCUMENT TYPE OQOIIW<br />
EngtnMrfng HOE:., llwitn NliHmwimnnit Kii«iM)>iri:«/!!ittiJiEl
PEitpl! INK). 5<br />
03 /"I2 in<br />
ADMINISTRAT tve IIIECOIUDI INDEX<br />
UNITARY LANDFILL sure<br />
HIJIICKIEQO,,<br />
nCHf/FRAHE PAGES 0ATIE TITLE AUTKHI ir'IPI: OOOIUHIr<br />
91/0()/«0 IMiinnBMiiil Uinrxyn, Ire..<br />
91/10/00 . U.K.<br />
ItninJ i:«nr<br />
I.1MWKFIIU, Sltll<br />
SLi|9|Eiiiimnm I: <br />
mull lirwlyiiiii<br />
of Iliihiiildiiirivliil Wnl.II<br />
liilinn<br />
1!S>6 91/11/00 iFniKitiibilllty JEtudy<br />
0|Miiinitolii UHrilht<br />
MunulMHiKi Smriiitiiiry<br />
LfllPlltfltl IKl/IFii<br />
Ijiiintiii Himmiwiwmcm Rcpcirtn/'StiLiiiiittn<br />
Jorws.V. • U.I. EWl KtU«y,J.,HMJbold,U. IMpcur i:n/«udl 1111<br />
trninyn I inc..<br />
ilnli in l'lnn
2 9 IW2<br />
Mir., Valdas ¥. Adamkus, Administrator<br />
U.S. EPA Region V<br />
BO S. Dearborn St.,<br />
Chicago, Fill 601504<br />
SItate of Wisconsin \ DEPARTMENT OF NATOIEAIL RESOURCES<br />
11011 iionitli Wrilmliiir JtaiElt<br />
|[|
Mr., Vail das V. Adii.mlo.i«;,, Acini nlstrator 2<br />
" Biased on 30 years of operation and narinteinaince (O&M)<br />
The Department concurs with the! selection of this remedy, as described above<br />
and in the Record of Decision for the situ,<br />
Me understand that if the potentially responsible parties; (PRP's) do not agree<br />
to fund the remedy, the State of Wisconsin will] contribute ILK of the remedial<br />
action costs; associated with the action and 10% of the GUI costs for the first<br />
year ami provide for all OJiiM after that. Me provide this assurance on the<br />
assumption that. ILL S. II PA will pursue all appropriate enforcement action!; with<br />
the PRP's prior to expending the Fund at the site.<br />
Me understand that if the Fund is expended to conduct the remedy and If<br />
hazardous waste meedlmg disposal Is required to be managed off-site as part of<br />
the remedy, that the State of Wisconsin Mi'11 be required to provide tlhe<br />
assurances for haziirdous wigiste managCTiismt in |40 CI : R 300., !ilO(d) amid (e) of the<br />
Haiti oiriall Continigeincy Plain. The assurances are that a compliant hai.iirdoi.is<br />
waste facilMity is a v a ill able,, and that facillity's use is coins; istent with our<br />
approved Capacity Assurance Plan., Haiardous waste residuails naiy be generated<br />
by the future pretreatineirit of leachate and liindfil'l gas coiridensiitte prior to<br />
discharge to the sanitary sewer., However, it Is expected that leachate nay be<br />
discharged to the sanitary sewer without pretreatnent In the near tern,<br />
tie also understand that our staff will continue to work in close consultation<br />
with your staff during the pre-desigin, design and construction phases of the<br />
remedy,.<br />
Thank you for your support and cooperation in addressing tlhe contairii nation<br />
problem at the I<strong>Muskego</strong> <strong>Landfill</strong> site., Should you have any questions regarding<br />
this matter, please contact Mr. Paul D1d1er, Director of the Bureau of Solid l!i<br />
Hazardous Vlasfe Manaicieneint , at 1608) I! l:>6 • 1327 ,<br />
Sincerely,,<br />
€, D.<br />
Secretary<br />
i::DB::GAI:<br />
cc: Lynan Hyble ••• AD/5<br />
Linda Heyer - LC/5<br />
Paul Didler - SH/3<br />
Frank Sclnultz/Jin Schmidt •• SEO<br />
Ul-ill Haubold - U.,S,. EPA Region. V, HSRU-6J<br />
Mark G1esfeldt/6ary Ede 1 stein - SW/3
ATTACHMENT 4<br />
LIST OF RESPONDENTS
ATTACHMENT 4<br />
LIST OF RESPONDENTS<br />
UNILATERAL ORDER FOR SOURCE CONTROL OPERABLE UNIT<br />
MUSKEGO SANITARY LANDFILL SITE<br />
1. Carl Wauer<br />
2.. Waste Management of Wisconsin,, Inc.<br />
3.. Acme Galvanizing, inc..<br />
4.. Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.<br />
5.. Alien-Bradley Company, Inc.<br />
6.. Allied Signal Corporation<br />
7.. American Motors Corporation<br />
8.. American Can Company<br />
9.. Ampco Metal Inc.<br />
10. Amron Corporation<br />
11.. Beatrice Company<br />
12. Beazer East, Inc.<br />
v_; 13. Browning Ferris Industries of Wisconsin, inc.<br />
14. Brunswick Corporation<br />
15.. Caterpi 1 lax, Inc,<br />
16. Cudahy Tanning Co., Inc.<br />
17. Dings Company, Magnetic Group<br />
18. E.Z. Paintr Company<br />
19. Envirex Inc.<br />
20. General Electric Company<br />
21. Harnischfeger<br />
22.. Hydrite Chemical Company<br />
23. Inryco Corporation<br />
24.. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.,<br />
25. Law Tanning Co. r<br />
26. Louis Alien Division of Magnetix, Inc.<br />
27. Master Lock. Company<br />
28.. Metals Transport Company, Inc..<br />
29.. Midwest Tanning Company<br />
W 30. PPG Industries<br />
31.. Pressed Steel Tank Co,,, Inc.<br />
32.. Prestige Foods<br />
33.. PVL Limited Partnership<br />
34.. Jack Quigley<br />
3 5., RAPCO Leather Company<br />
36.. Rexnord Incorporated<br />
37. St. Luke's Hospital<br />
38. Star Line Trucking Company<br />
39.. Teledyne Wisconsin Motors<br />
40.. Trinity Hospital<br />
41.. Vulcan Materials Company<br />
42. W.A. Krueger Company<br />
43. Wayne Chemical Corporation<br />
44. Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company<br />
45. Wisconsin Electric Power Company<br />
46. Zummach-Peerless Chemical Coating Co.
INDEX OF LIABILITY DOCUMENTS<br />
09 / 2 5 / B 6 Waste Hanagement,, U., S, EP'A<br />
Inc,<br />
02/24/87 Waste Management, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc,<br />
03/24/87 Waste Management, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc,.<br />
10/30/92 Waste Management, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc,<br />
:i. 1 /13 / 92 Was t e Management , U., S,. EPA<br />
Inc.<br />
09/09/86 Carl Wauer U.S. EPA<br />
06/01/87 Acne Galvanizing,, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc.<br />
11/02/92 Acme Galvanizing,, U.S. EPA<br />
Inc,<br />
12/19/86 Aldrich Chemical U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
10/10/92 Aldrich Chemical U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
12/18/86 Alien Bradley Co. U.S. EPA<br />
11/03/92 Alien Bradley Co. U.S. EPA<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
(including 12 driver<br />
affidavits)<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
(attaching site-related<br />
r 'ecor ds)<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
(attach ing 1iquid<br />
waste report<br />
summaries)<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplenoiental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Inforiiation Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request
12/22/86 American Motors U.S. EPA<br />
Corp.,<br />
11/12/92 Anpco Metal Co. U.S. EPA.<br />
04/24/87 Anron Corporation U.S. EPA<br />
11/06/92 Anron Corporation U.S. EPA<br />
11/04/92 Beatrice Company U.S. EPA<br />
11/2 5/92 Beatrice Company U.S. EPA<br />
07/06/87 Bostrom Seating U.S. EPA<br />
Inc..<br />
11 /1:2 / 9 2 Bostrom Seat ing U., S. EPA<br />
Inc.,<br />
11/24/92 Browning Ferris U.S. EPA<br />
Industries<br />
06/04/87 Caterpillar Tractor U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
11/12/92 Caterpillar Tractor U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
12 / 0 4 / 8 6 Cudahy Tanning Co. U. S,. EPA<br />
11/12/92 Cudahy Tanning Co. U.S. EPA<br />
11/20/92 Cudahy Tanning Co. U.S. EPA<br />
Title.<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infornation Reques t<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I nf o nna t i o n Reque s t<br />
Supplementa1<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infonnation Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infonnation Request<br />
Supplemental.<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Requemt<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Informati on Requemt<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infonnation Request
o (S / 3 o / 8 7 Dings company<br />
1 0 / 2 6 / 9 2 D ings Company<br />
06/15/87 E.Z. Paintr Co,<br />
10/29/92 Envirex, Inc.<br />
ll/l8/92 Envirex, Inc»<br />
12/12/86 Harnischfeger<br />
10/20/9:;! Harnischfeger<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
11/06/92 E.Z. Paintr Co, U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S.. EPA<br />
05/05/87 General Electric U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
U.S. EPA<br />
11 / o 2 / 9 2 Hydr it e Chenica 1 U,. S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
09/24/06 Laidlav Waste U.S., EPA<br />
Systems, I nc „<br />
11/12/921 Law Tanning Co. U.S., EPA<br />
12/23/86 Louis Allis U.S. EPA<br />
08/05/87 Master Lode Co. U.S, EPA<br />
11/05/92 Master Lode Co, U.S. EPA<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Rei-sponse to EP'A<br />
Information Request<br />
Reeponse to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
SuppleBiental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
][n:l!oniiation Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Infornation Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to ERA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
I nf o mat i on Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Respomse to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request
11/12/92 Master Lock Co,<br />
Ri-jg ;L]RJ;
v.../<br />
11/17/92 Star Line<br />
Tracking Co.<br />
u.s. EPA<br />
05/21/87 Teledyne Wisconsin U.S., EPA<br />
Motors<br />
11 / 06/92 Teledyne Wisconsin U,. S., EPA<br />
Motors<br />
0(5/29/87 Theiii Corporation/ U.S. EPA<br />
Koippers Company<br />
11/12/92 Bea:ser East., Inc. U.S., EPA<br />
11/05/92 Trinity Hospital U.S. EPA<br />
11/13/92 Vulcan Materials U.S. EPA<br />
Company<br />
11/25/9;;! Vulcan Materials U.S., EPA<br />
Company<br />
12/17/86 W.A. Krueger U.S. EPA.<br />
06/10/87 Wayne Chemical U.S. EPA<br />
Corp.<br />
10/26/92 Wayne Chemical U.S. EPA<br />
Corp.<br />
11 /10 / 9 2 Wayne Cheaica 1. U., S, EPA<br />
Corp.,<br />
06/13/87 Wisconsin Bell U.S. EPA<br />
1 Ci / 23192 Misconsin Bell. U.S. EPA<br />
12/17/86 Wisconsin Electric U.S. EPA<br />
Power Co,<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
In £ormat, ion Request.<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA.<br />
Inforiiation JRequest<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Informati on Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information JRequest<br />
Supplemental<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Inf orraat i on Request<br />
Response to EPA<br />
Information Request
Date<br />
Qr<br />
lb"/27 " /92 Wisconsin Electric U. S. EPA<br />
Power Co .,<br />
11/05/92 Wisconsin Electric U.S. EPA<br />
' ' pow(ar Co