02.01.2013 Views

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Spike</strong> | 15 YEARS OF BOOKS, MUSIC, ART, IDEAS | www.spikemagazine.com<br />

Review [published June 2001]<br />

David Markson: This Is Not A Novel<br />

Stephen Mitchelmore<br />

There’s always someone telling us that the novel is<br />

dead. And that is how it should be. As well as offering<br />

us the chance to laugh at the fools who parrot this<br />

announcement, it makes us ask, for the umpteenth<br />

time: what is the novel for, exactly? The question<br />

should not be answered without referring to a novel in<br />

particular. Each novel is unique. Or should be. We’ll<br />

come to that later.<br />

One of the reasons why cultural commentators,<br />

such as the BBC’s Andrew Marr, proclaim the death<br />

of the novel is because novels have become irredeemably<br />

classifiable. Novels that break the rules seem to<br />

be so mannered, so distant from the world we call<br />

real, that they demand to be classified as frivolous<br />

and elitist. Most of them are. And they seem all the<br />

more mannered and distant because the classifiable<br />

novel has become so refined, so intimate with the<br />

deceit of language, that we do not see them for the<br />

very odd objects they really are. Instead, by effacing<br />

themselves in a whole raft of technique, they enable<br />

the reader-as-consumer to bypass any doubts and leap<br />

straight into what is desired: distraction.<br />

BUY David Markson books online from and<br />

The literary novel, on the other hand, is definitively<br />

unclassifiable. Or should be. Hence the regular asking<br />

of the question: “Why are detective stories/thrillers/<br />

horror novels/science fictions ignored when it comes to<br />

literary prizes?” The accusation that always follows is<br />

that these prizes are for highbrow snobs. In a recent radio<br />

interview, the question and accusation was repeated<br />

by horror novel writer (and TV presenter) Muriel Gray.<br />

As I listened in a departure lounge filled with airportnovel<br />

clutching passengers, I wanted to shout: THERE<br />

IS GOOD REASON! But I kept my dignity. Until now.<br />

The reason is because the novel has to reinvent itself,<br />

each and every time. When a reinvention is achieved,<br />

it deserves recognition. One cannot use the crutch of<br />

a genre, the alibi of a genre, and expect to receive an<br />

award specifically intended for a unique achievement.<br />

Muriel Gray’s horror novels have received critical acclaim<br />

by those who know about such things; Stephen<br />

King no less. Worth checking out then. But you can’t<br />

have it both ways Muriel.<br />

In the same interview Gray says she hates writing but<br />

loves having written. I suggest this maybe due to her<br />

333<br />

More<br />

<strong>Spike</strong><br />

email<br />

RSS<br />

Facebook<br />

Twitter<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

J<br />

K<br />

L<br />

M<br />

N<br />

O<br />

P<br />

Q<br />

R<br />

S<br />

T<br />

U<br />

V<br />

W<br />

X<br />

Y<br />

Z

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!