02.01.2013 Views

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Spike</strong> | 15 YEARS OF BOOKS, MUSIC, ART, IDEAS | www.spikemagazine.com<br />

TV. But now I’m back.”<br />

And with an increased workload, most significantly<br />

the Neuromancer film. After countless rumours, director<br />

Chris Cunningham has finally been announced to<br />

helm the feature. Cunningham is a 20-something prodigy,<br />

best known for his dark, off-beat music videos for<br />

Bjork, Aphex Twin and Madonna. He’s also a student<br />

of the late Stanley Kubrick … but he’s never directed a<br />

Hollywood feature. So how on earth did he get this job?<br />

“He was brought to my attention by someone else.<br />

We were told, third-hand, that he was extremely chary<br />

of the Hollywood process, and wouldn’t return calls.<br />

But someone else told us that Neuromancer had been<br />

his Wind In The Willows, that he’d read it when he was<br />

12. I went to London and we met.”<br />

After the debacle that was Johnny Mnemonic, Gibson<br />

is understandably coy about the whole process. Johnny<br />

Mnemonic was also directed by a Hollywood novice,<br />

avant-garde artist Robert Longo. Gibson once told me<br />

that the film they made was “More like Blue Velvet.”<br />

Clearly not the same film that ended up on the silver<br />

screen, then. What makes him so sure this one will turn<br />

out right?<br />

“Chris is my own 100 per cent personal choice,”<br />

he says firmly. “My only choice. The only person<br />

I’ve met who I thought might have a hope in hell of<br />

doing it right.<br />

“I went back to see him in London just after he’d<br />

BUY William Gibson books online from and<br />

finished the Bjork video, and I sat on a couch beside<br />

this dead sex little Bjork robot, except it was wearing<br />

Aphex Twin’s head. We talked. And we’re still talking.”<br />

Unfortunately, that’s all he’ll say: “I’ve learned<br />

that discussing these projects doesn’t really help<br />

them to happen.”<br />

So let’s talk about technology. Despite the impact<br />

his work has had on real-world science, most of<br />

Gibson’s fiction is clearly about people and humanity<br />

rather than technology itself. Why does he write science<br />

fiction at all?<br />

“Because I believe that most social change is now<br />

technologically-driven, and that new technologies<br />

are very seldom – almost never, really – legislated<br />

into existence.”<br />

Interesting, because Gibson has also admitted many<br />

times that he simply “makes the technology up”. That<br />

was certainly the case with Neuromancer, where the<br />

worldwide virtual network was actually inspired by<br />

watching children become absorbed in arcade games.<br />

Does he still do that?<br />

“I do make it up, to a certain extent. But it isn’t the<br />

toys themselves, the specific tech bits, that I’m genuinely<br />

concerned with – rather the way in which new<br />

technologies impact the social animal in ways that the<br />

developers of these technologies never thought of.”<br />

Is the Gibson household swamped with subscriptions<br />

to New Scientist and Astrophysics Today, then?<br />

238<br />

More<br />

<strong>Spike</strong><br />

email<br />

RSS<br />

Facebook<br />

Twitter<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

J<br />

K<br />

L<br />

M<br />

N<br />

O<br />

P<br />

Q<br />

R<br />

S<br />

T<br />

U<br />

V<br />

W<br />

X<br />

Y<br />

Z

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!