02.01.2013 Views

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

Spike Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Spike</strong> | 15 YEARS OF BOOKS, MUSIC, ART, IDEAS | www.spikemagazine.com<br />

Review [published June 2000]<br />

Mark Danielewski: House Of Leaves<br />

Gary Marshall<br />

House Of Leaves is one of the strangest books we’ve<br />

seen for some time. With multiple narrators, a mass of<br />

footnotes and direct transcripts of video tapes, the novel<br />

has been described as a “literary Blair Witch Project’ –<br />

a description we’d wholeheartedly agree with.<br />

The novel is narrated by Johnny Truant, a barhopping<br />

low-life who is losing his grip on reality.<br />

When an old man – Zampano – dies, Truant grabs a<br />

manuscript from his apartment and takes it home to<br />

read it. This manuscript is an analysis of The Navidson<br />

Record, a collection of videotapes that record some<br />

spooky goings on in a suburban house. As Truant<br />

reads the manuscript, he reproduces it in full, sharing<br />

his observations with us and describing his own<br />

increasingly fragile mental state.<br />

There are three main stories in House Of Leaves:<br />

Truant’s reactions to the manuscript, Zampano’s analysis<br />

of The Navidson Record, and the contents of the<br />

videotapes themselves. As the novel continues, each<br />

story overlaps. Zampano adds extensive footnotes to<br />

his work and attempts to contact the famous people<br />

(Stanley Kubrick, Steven Spielberg, Camille Paglia)<br />

mentioned in the tapes; Truant attempts to explain<br />

the more tortuous footnotes, adding explanations and<br />

analysis of his own, and unnamed ‘editors’ in turn comment<br />

on both Zampano’s and Truant’s comments. The<br />

Navidson Record would have made an excellent spinechiller<br />

in its own right, but the analysis and footnotes<br />

rack the creepiness up by a notch. In the early stages of<br />

the transcripts, we know that something scary’s going<br />

to happen: the footnotes tell us so.<br />

As if the layers of comment weren’t complicated<br />

enough, after a few dozen pages things go completely<br />

mental. The word house is printed throughout in blue,<br />

without explanation; footnotes become longer than the<br />

sections they’re commenting on, print is reversed or<br />

rotated<br />

BUY Mark Danielewski books online from and<br />

, entire sections are crossed out; some pages con-<br />

tain a single word or letter, while others are filled with<br />

lists of buildings or household amenities. All of these<br />

things are reproduced faithfully, resulting in pages where<br />

the only text is “XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX”,<br />

other pages with letters and words missing due to “fire<br />

damage” (the gaps are replaced by spaces and square<br />

brackets), still others with text at crazy angles or tiny<br />

190<br />

More<br />

<strong>Spike</strong><br />

email<br />

RSS<br />

Facebook<br />

Twitter<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

J<br />

K<br />

L<br />

M<br />

N<br />

O<br />

P<br />

Q<br />

R<br />

S<br />

T<br />

U<br />

V<br />

W<br />

X<br />

Y<br />

Z

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!