Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 3 821 * * * * * On April 11, 1946, after introducing additional material on the record, the committee stood “adjourned subject to the call of the Chair.” 297 However, on May 23, it reopened to accept a few more documents. Among other materials, Ferguson introduced for the record written statements from former Secretary of State Hull 298 and former Secretary of War Stimson. 299 Stimson’s notes for December 7 described a meeting with Hull and Knox that morning and told of his position that “the main thing is to hold the main people who are interested in the Far East together—the British, ourselves, the Dutch, the Australians, the Chinese.” For the record, Stimson attached copies of the statements expressing similar sentiments he had solicited that morning from Hull and Knox. 300 With the introduction of these documents, the hearings were “offi cially closed” and the committee stood “adjourned, subject to call by the Chair.” 301 JCC Hearings Reopened Again to Hear an Account of Stark’s December 6 Evening Although offi cially closed, the committee reopened once more on May 31, 1946, at the special call of Barkley. Stark had written Barkley a letter advising that he had fi nally been reminded of his 297 Ibid., part 11, p. 5364. 298Ibid., pp. 5367–416, “Replies to Interrogatories Propounded by the Honorable Homer Ferguson.” 299Ibid., pp. 5416–40, 5441–63, “Secretary of War Stimson’s Statement of Facts as Shown by My Current Notes and My Recollection as Refreshed Th ereby.” 300 Ibid., pp. 5439–41. 301 Ibid., p. 5542.

822 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy whereabouts on the evening of December 6. 302 Barkley did not feel he should sit on Stark’s letter. Nor did he think he should simply put it in the record where it would in eff ect be lost and buried. Th e matter could not be delayed as Stark was leaving for London that afternoon. 303 Barkley hurriedly reopened the hearings just to hear from Stark and his informant. Some of the ten committee members were out of town and unable to attend on such short notice. Only four Democrats appeared, and one Republican—Keefe—who, having had only a few minutes notice by phone, arrived late. Stark had written Barkley that Navy Captain Harold D. Krick, a personal friend and Stark’s former fl ag captain, had reminded Stark that the two men and their wives had spent that evening together. Th ey had attended a performance of Th e Student Prince at the National Th eater in Washington. When they returned from the theater to Stark’s quarters, one of Stark’s servants told him that the White House had called. Stark went immediately upstairs to phone FDR from his study, where a direct line to the White House was located. According to Krick, when Stark came back downstairs, he told him “in substance that the situation with Japan was very serious.” 304 When the two couples again met socially on Saturday, May 25, 1946, Krick happened to relate these events to Stark. Stark did not remember the occasion, but he realized that this meant that his testimony that he had not talked to FDR that evening was incorrect. Th e more Stark thought about this, “the more disturbed” he became. He thought “the committee should have this, the record should have it straight.” He got up around 2 or 3 in 302Ibid., pp. 5543–44. 303Ibid., pp. 5544, 5555. 304Ibid., p. 5544, quoting Stark’s letter to Barkley.

Joint Congressional Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack: Part 3 821<br />

* * * * *<br />

On April 11, 1946, after introducing additional material on<br />

the record, the committee stood “adjourned subject to the call <strong>of</strong><br />

the Chair.” 297 However, on May 23, it reopened to accept a few<br />

more documents. Among other materials, Ferguson introduced<br />

for the record written statements from former Secretary <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Hull 298 <strong>and</strong> former Secretary <strong>of</strong> War Stimson. 299 Stimson’s notes<br />

for December 7 described a meeting with Hull <strong>and</strong> Knox that<br />

morning <strong>and</strong> told <strong>of</strong> his position that “the main thing is to hold<br />

the main people who are interested in the Far East together—the<br />

British, ourselves, the Dutch, the Australians, the Chinese.” For<br />

the record, Stimson attached copies <strong>of</strong> the statements expressing<br />

similar sentiments he had solicited that morning from Hull <strong>and</strong><br />

Knox. 300<br />

With the introduction <strong>of</strong> these documents, the hearings were<br />

“<strong>of</strong>fi cially closed” <strong>and</strong> the committee stood “adjourned, subject to<br />

call by the Chair.” 301<br />

JCC Hearings Reopened Again to Hear an<br />

Account <strong>of</strong> Stark’s December 6 Evening<br />

Although <strong>of</strong>fi cially closed, the committee reopened once more<br />

on May 31, 1946, at the special call <strong>of</strong> Barkley. Stark had written<br />

Barkley a letter advising that he had fi nally been reminded <strong>of</strong> his<br />

297 Ibid., part 11, p. 5364.<br />

298Ibid., pp. 5367–416, “Replies to Interrogatories Propounded by the Honorable<br />

Homer Ferguson.”<br />

299Ibid., pp. 5416–40, 5441–63, “Secretary <strong>of</strong> War Stimson’s Statement <strong>of</strong> Facts<br />

as Shown by My Current Notes <strong>and</strong> My Recollection as Refreshed Th ereby.”<br />

300 Ibid., pp. 5439–41.<br />

301 Ibid., p. 5542.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!