Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 3 787 described the 13 parts “in guarded terms” and added that the 14th and most important part had not yet been received. Miles said he had seen the 13 parts where he had been a dinner guest. Bratton also told Miles that he, Miles, had delivered the fi rst 13 parts to Hull. 195 Kaufman asked Bratton if Miles had told him it wasn’t necessary to deliver the 13 parts to Marshall that night. Bratton remembered no such instructions. Kaufman then read into the record Miles’s JCC testimony, in which he took full responsibility for that . . . message not going to the Chief of Staff that night. . . . I knew its substance. I did not consider that it was necessary to arouse the Chief of Staff at that time of night for that message. 196 After having this testimony called to his attention, Bratton added: “I would like to say further at this point that if there was any error of omission or commission with respect to the delivery of the 13 parts of that message Saturday night of the 6th of December 1941 to Army personnel the error was mine, and I accept full responsibility for it.” 197 In this way, both Miles and Bratton added their names to the list of those willing to take the responsibility for a possible failure on the part of Marshall. Denials by Top Officials Lead Bratton to Doubt His Earlier Testimony Th e persons in the Army who “customarily” received MAGIC, Bratton said, were Marshall, Gerow, and Miles. “And do we have it now,” Kaufman asked, “that no delivery was made to any of those persons other than to the Secretary of State and excepting 195Ibid., p. 4514. 196Ibid., part 3, p. 1554. 197Ibid., part 9, p. 4515.

788 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy General Miles who had already seen it at Admiral Wilkinson’s house?” “Th is is the point” Bratton said at which his “memory begins to go bad”; he could “not state positively whether there was any delivery made that night or not at this time.” He had testifi ed before the APHB that he “had made delivery to the Secretary of the General Staff , to the night duty offi cer, or to General Gerow and to General Miles.” Th at, Bratton said, was his “normal procedure.” He “tried to make simultaneous delivery to all these people.” However, when he made that statement to the APHB he “had not remembered . . . that Colonel Dusenbury was working with me in the offi ce that night.” 198 Also Clausen had shown him a number of sworn affi davits collected from various offi cers: Bedell Smith, General Ralph Smith, Gerow, Gailey, and others to the eff ect that they did not receive the 13 parts of this message from me or from anyone else Saturday night. Now, I know all these men. I do not doubt the honesty and integrity of any one of them, and if they say that I did not deliver these pouches to them that night, then my memory must have been at fault. 199 Asked by Ferguson why he had changed his testimony, Bratton replied: It was a combination of facts, sir. . . . My subsequent recollection that Colonel Dusenbury was at work with me in the offi ce that evening . . . and the affi davits of various offi cers stating that I did not make deliveries to them on Saturday evening, and my recollection of the telephone conversation with General Miles at about half-past eleven Saturday night, my subsequent conversations with Colonel Dusenbury, with whom I have talked here in Washington, my conversations with General Gerow, 198 Ibid., p. 4515. 199 Ibid.

788 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

General Miles who had already seen it at Admiral Wilkinson’s<br />

house?”<br />

“Th is is the point” Bratton said at which his “memory begins<br />

to go bad”; he could “not state positively whether there was any<br />

delivery made that night or not at this time.” He had testifi ed<br />

before the APHB that he “had made delivery to the Secretary <strong>of</strong><br />

the General Staff , to the night duty <strong>of</strong>fi cer, or to General Gerow<br />

<strong>and</strong> to General Miles.” Th at, Bratton said, was his “normal procedure.”<br />

He “tried to make simultaneous delivery to all these<br />

people.” However, when he made that statement to the APHB<br />

he “had not remembered . . . that Colonel Dusenbury was working<br />

with me in the <strong>of</strong>fi ce that night.” 198 Also Clausen had shown<br />

him a number <strong>of</strong> sworn affi davits collected from various <strong>of</strong>fi cers:<br />

Bedell Smith, General Ralph Smith, Gerow, Gailey, <strong>and</strong> others<br />

to the eff ect that they did not receive the 13 parts <strong>of</strong> this message<br />

from me or from anyone else Saturday night. Now, I<br />

know all these men. I do not doubt the honesty <strong>and</strong> integrity<br />

<strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> them, <strong>and</strong> if they say that I did not deliver these<br />

pouches to them that night, then my memory must have been<br />

at fault. 199<br />

Asked by Ferguson why he had changed his testimony,<br />

Bratton replied:<br />

It was a combination <strong>of</strong> facts, sir. . . . My subsequent recollection<br />

that Colonel Dusenbury was at work with me in the <strong>of</strong>fi ce<br />

that evening . . . <strong>and</strong> the affi davits <strong>of</strong> various <strong>of</strong>fi cers stating that<br />

I did not make deliveries to them on Saturday evening, <strong>and</strong> my<br />

recollection <strong>of</strong> the telephone conversation with General Miles<br />

at about half-past eleven Saturday night, my subsequent conversations<br />

with Colonel Dusenbury, with whom I have talked<br />

here in Washington, my conversations with General Gerow,<br />

198 Ibid., p. 4515.<br />

199 Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!