Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 3 751 the fi rst time that I did not know that I was standing alone against the world in my testimony.” 72 Seeking Corroboration of His Memory Safford Writes Kramer on Duty in the Pacific Saff ord knew that Kramer was familiar with the “Winds Execute.” After all, it was Kramer who had translated the crucial passages and handed the teletyped intercept to Saff ord on the morning of December 4. Th en a week or so later Kramer and Saff ord together had gone over “a special folder of messages leading up to Pearl Harbor” that Kramer was assembling for Acting Navy Secretary Forrestal, in Secretary Knox’s absence from the country—in Hawaii, then a territory, not yet a state—to investigate the attack. Saff ord believed a copy of the “Winds Execute” was included in that special folder. 73 Saff ord had discussed the “Winds” intercept with Kramer in the spring of 1943, before Kramer left for Pearl Harbor and active duty in the Pacifi c. At that time Kramer’s memory, Saff ord said, coincided with his own. Th ey had not then looked for it, for they had both expected to “fi nd everything pertaining to that winds message in the fi les.” 74 In any event, the “Winds Execute” was not then in controversy. 75 Ferguson also quoted from NCI Top Secret testimony by Admiral Turner to the eff ect that he had learned on December 6 that “Th e Winds message came in” and that it meant “at least a break in diplomatic relations and probably war.” Also a Lt. Col. Kendall J. Fielder who had testifi ed before the Roberts Commission to “three signal words . . . as an indication that the code had been followed and that the attack was planned” (ibid., part 8, pp. 3792–94). 72Ibid., p. 3793. 73Ibid., p. 3689. 74Ibid., pp. 3693, 3697. 75Ibid., pp. 3731, 3774–76.

752 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy After that, Saff ord had had no occasion to talk to anyone about the “Winds Execute” until late 1943, when he had been “ordered by the Director of Naval Communications to prepare a history of radio intelligence up to and including the attack on Pearl Harbor.” 76 He then began researching the pre-Pearl Harbor record, including of course the “Winds Code” setup and the “Winds Execute.” At that point Saff ord started asking anyone he encountered “who had been on duty in the War and Navy Departments, prior to Pearl Harbor, and might have been expected to have fi rst hand knowledge of the winds message,” what they could remember about events of that period. Th at was when Saff ord learned from Commander Wesley A. Wright, 77 who had had it from McCollum, that McCollum’s long warning message of December 4 had not been sent. 78 He also discovered then that many intercept fi les were missing. 79 In his research of pre-Pearl Harbor radio intelligence, Saff ord testifi ed, he wanted the benefi t of Kramer’s recollections. So on December 22, 1943, he wrote Kramer, then in the Pacifi c. 80 He asked Kramer primarily about his December 6–7, 1941, deliveries of the Japanese 14-part reply to Washington’s top offi cials. Th e war was still in progress, so Saff ord phrased his questions “very carefully, in the event that my letter might fall into unauthorized hands.” He wrote: “We can’t fi nd the original ‘Weather Report’ . . . and its translation. What became of it?” 81 When Kramer 76Ibid., pp. 3602, 3693. 77Commander Wesley A. Wright. As of December 7, 1941, Wright was Assistant Communications Offi cer, in Pearl Harbor on the Staff of C-in-C. See Hewitt Inquiry, Joint Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack, part 36, p. 261. 78 Ibid., part 8, p. 3701, Saff ord January 22, 1944, letter to Kramer. 79 Ibid., p. 3706. 80 Ibid., p. 3691. 81 Ibid., p. 3698.

Joint Congressional Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack: Part 3 751<br />

the fi rst time that I did not know that I was st<strong>and</strong>ing alone against<br />

the world in my testimony.” 72<br />

Seeking Corroboration <strong>of</strong> His Memory<br />

Safford Writes Kramer on Duty in the Pacific<br />

Saff ord knew that Kramer was familiar with the “Winds<br />

Execute.” After all, it was Kramer who had translated the crucial<br />

passages <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>ed the teletyped intercept to Saff ord on the<br />

morning <strong>of</strong> December 4. Th en a week or so later Kramer <strong>and</strong><br />

Saff ord together had gone over “a special folder <strong>of</strong> messages leading<br />

up to <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>” that Kramer was assembling for Acting<br />

Navy Secretary Forrestal, in Secretary Knox’s absence from the<br />

country—in Hawaii, then a territory, not yet a state—to investigate<br />

the attack. Saff ord believed a copy <strong>of</strong> the “Winds Execute”<br />

was included in that special folder. 73<br />

Saff ord had discussed the “Winds” intercept with Kramer in<br />

the spring <strong>of</strong> 1943, before Kramer left for <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> <strong>and</strong> active<br />

duty in the Pacifi c. At that time Kramer’s memory, Saff ord said,<br />

coincided with his own. Th ey had not then looked for it, for they<br />

had both expected to “fi nd everything pertaining to that winds<br />

message in the fi les.” 74 In any event, the “Winds Execute” was not<br />

then in controversy. 75<br />

Ferguson also quoted from NCI Top Secret testimony by Admiral Turner to<br />

the eff ect that he had learned on December 6 that “Th e Winds message came<br />

in” <strong>and</strong> that it meant “at least a break in diplomatic relations <strong>and</strong> probably<br />

war.” Also a Lt. Col. Kendall J. Fielder who had testifi ed before the Roberts<br />

Commission to “three signal words . . . as an indication that the code had been<br />

followed <strong>and</strong> that the attack was planned” (ibid., part 8, pp. 3792–94).<br />

72Ibid., p. 3793.<br />

73Ibid., p. 3689.<br />

74Ibid., pp. 3693, 3697.<br />

75Ibid., pp. 3731, 3774–76.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!