01.01.2013 Views

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

736 <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong>: <strong>The</strong> <strong>Seeds</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Fruits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Infamy</strong><br />

gun, the “[m]inimum requirements to establish identity as U.S.<br />

men-<strong>of</strong>-war.” Th ey were to be stationed in the paths <strong>of</strong> known<br />

Japanese ship movements: (1) between Hainan Isl<strong>and</strong> (China)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hue on the east coast <strong>of</strong> Indochina, now Vietnam; (2) east <strong>of</strong><br />

the Indochina coast between Camranh Bay <strong>and</strong> Cape St. Jacques;<br />

<strong>and</strong> (3) <strong>of</strong>f Pointe de Camau on the southern tip <strong>of</strong> Indochina.<br />

All three vessels were “to observe <strong>and</strong> report by radio Japanese<br />

movements in west China Sea <strong>and</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong> Siam.”<br />

Ferguson wanted to know why Stark had ordered three small<br />

vessels to watch for Japanese movements on British possessions.<br />

Ingersoll replied simply the dispatch had said,<br />

“president directs.” . . . Th at was our reason for doing it. Admiral<br />

Stark was told by the president to do it. . . . Admiral Hart was<br />

already conducting reconnaissance <strong>of</strong>f that coast by planes<br />

from Manila. . . . I am sure Admiral Stark would not have done<br />

this unless he had been told. . . . We did not initiate this movement,<br />

sir, <strong>and</strong> we were getting . . . suffi cient information from<br />

Admiral Hart by the searches which his planes were making. 11<br />

11 Ibid., part 9, pp. 4252–53. Of these three small vessels, only one got to sea<br />

before the Japanese attack. Th e Isabel left Manila on December 3, with orders<br />

to proceed to Camranh Bay on the Indochina coast, ostensibly to search for a<br />

lost Navy PBY plane. On the 5th, about 22 miles from the Indochina coast,<br />

she was sighted by a Japanese Navy plane, <strong>and</strong> ordered to return to Manila,<br />

where she arrived on December 8 (Kent Tolley, Cruise <strong>of</strong> the Lanikai [Annapolis,<br />

Md.: Naval Institute, 1973], pp. 269–70). Th e second ship, the Lanikai,<br />

skippered by then Lieutenant Kent Tolley, was preparing to leave Manila when<br />

the attack came. She patrolled the coast <strong>of</strong> the Philippines for a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

weeks, fi nally departing Manila on December 26, <strong>and</strong> after some adventures<br />

reached Australia (ibid., p.120). Th e third small ship selected, the Molly Moore,<br />

was never commissioned; when the attack came, her mission became “superfl<br />

uous” (ibid., p. 272). Author’s note: Apparently Hart looked on the mission <strong>of</strong><br />

these three small vessels as “mission impossible.” When ordering the Lanikai<br />

to the coast <strong>of</strong> Indochina (ibid., p. 19), Hart said he had felt he was sending<br />

its skipper “on what looked like a one way mission.” Tolley thought FDR may<br />

have been <strong>of</strong>f ering these small ships <strong>and</strong> the men aboard “to bait an incident,<br />

a casus belli” (ibid., p. 279). Hart wanted to know why the president had sent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!