Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ... Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy - Ludwig von Mises ...

01.01.2013 Views

Joint Congressional Committee, Pearl Harbor Attack: Part 2 695 British and Dutch, for the defense of the Philippines and the British and Dutch East Indies. Th e Philippines are now being reinforced. Marshall and Stark reaffi rmed that the “basic military policies and strategy agreed to in the United States-British Staff Conversations remain sound. Th e primary objective of the two nations is the defeat of Germany.” In this memorandum Marshall and Stark urged that war between the United States and Japan “should be avoided while building up defensive forces in the Far East, until such time as Japan attacks or directly threatens territories whose security to the United States is of very great importance.” Stark and Marshall closed with a clear and unmistakable joint recommendation: “Th at no ultimatum be delivered to Japan.” 64 On November 18 Kimmel was advised that “[u]ntil international conditions on and subsequent to 25 Nov. become defi ned and clarifi ed . . . any further direct or great circle routing between Hawaii and Philippines should not repeat not be used.” And he was authorized to place a Dutch ship, Bloemfontein, in a convoy with American-fl ag vessels. 65 Ferguson: Do you know why they used the date there “subsequent to November 25”? . . . Did you ever know that we had a message that we intercepted from the Japs showing that the dead line [sic] date [for the Japanese ambassadors to complete their negotiations with the United States] was the 25th of November? 64 Ibid., part 16, pp. 2222–23, Marshall/Stark November 5, 1941, memorandum to FDR. Copy sent Kimmel with Stark’s letter of November 14, 1941 (Ibid., part 16, pp. 2220–21; see also pp. 2222–23). 65 Ibid., part 14, p. 1404, OPNAV November 18, 1941 Message #181705.

696 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy Kimmel: No, sir, I never had anything like that. . . . I do not know what November 25 meant, but I was concerned . . . with the orders I received to put the Bloemfontein in the convoy with American-fl ag vessels. . . . Ferguson: Do you think the fact that we put that ship into our convoy would indicate that we were taking parallel action? Did you take it as such? Kimmel: My memory is not entirely clear, but I think we had some matériel, or personnel, or something on this ship that we wanted to get through, on the Bloemfontein. . . . I do not recall . . . just what it was. On one of these Dutch ships that we used, we had some fl iers that were going out to China. 66 Ferguson: Well, now, what kind of an order do you interpret that [to put a Dutch ship in an American convoy] to be? Kimmel: Th e way I interpret that order is that you would go in betwixt an attacking force and a Netherlands ship and if they shot at you. . . . Why, I would probably shoot back. Ferguson: Well, then, that would create at least an incident, would it not, an international incident? Kimmel: Yes, sir, it probably would. Ferguson: And there would be little use then of talking about the fi rst overt act, wouldn’t there? Kimmel: Well, the Japs would have shot fi rst. Ferguson: I see. Even though you would have run between the mark that [they were] shooting at and that wasn’t our mark, that did not belong to this country, you would consider under those circumstances that the Jap shot fi rst? 66 Ibid., part 6, p. 2878.

Joint Congressional Committee, <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Harbor</strong> Attack: Part 2 695<br />

British <strong>and</strong> Dutch, for the defense <strong>of</strong> the Philippines <strong>and</strong> the<br />

British <strong>and</strong> Dutch East Indies. Th e Philippines are now being<br />

reinforced.<br />

Marshall <strong>and</strong> Stark reaffi rmed that the “basic military policies<br />

<strong>and</strong> strategy agreed to in the United States-British Staff<br />

Conversations remain sound. Th e primary objective <strong>of</strong> the two<br />

nations is the defeat <strong>of</strong> Germany.”<br />

In this memor<strong>and</strong>um Marshall <strong>and</strong> Stark urged that war<br />

between the United States <strong>and</strong> Japan “should be avoided while<br />

building up defensive forces in the Far East, until such time as<br />

Japan attacks or directly threatens territories whose security to<br />

the United States is <strong>of</strong> very great importance.” Stark <strong>and</strong> Marshall<br />

closed with a clear <strong>and</strong> unmistakable joint recommendation:<br />

“Th at no ultimatum be delivered to Japan.” 64<br />

On November 18 Kimmel was advised that “[u]ntil international<br />

conditions on <strong>and</strong> subsequent to 25 Nov. become defi ned<br />

<strong>and</strong> clarifi ed . . . any further direct or great circle routing between<br />

Hawaii <strong>and</strong> Philippines should not repeat not be used.” And he<br />

was authorized to place a Dutch ship, Bloemfontein, in a convoy<br />

with American-fl ag vessels. 65<br />

Ferguson: Do you know why they used the date there “subsequent<br />

to November 25”? . . . Did you ever know that we had<br />

a message that we intercepted from the Japs showing that the<br />

dead line [sic] date [for the Japanese ambassadors to complete<br />

their negotiations with the United States] was the 25th <strong>of</strong><br />

November?<br />

64 Ibid., part 16, pp. 2222–23, Marshall/Stark November 5, 1941, memor<strong>and</strong>um<br />

to FDR. Copy sent Kimmel with Stark’s letter <strong>of</strong> November 14, 1941 (Ibid.,<br />

part 16, pp. 2220–21; see also pp. 2222–23).<br />

65 Ibid., part 14, p. 1404, OPNAV November 18, 1941 Message #181705.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!